Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Widening global variability in grassland biomass since the 1980s

An Author Correction to this article was published on 19 August 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Global change is associated with variable shifts in the annual production of aboveground plant biomass, suggesting localized sensitivities with unclear causal origins. Combining remotely sensed normalized difference vegetation index data since the 1980s with contemporary field data from 84 grasslands on 6 continents, we show a widening divergence in site-level biomass ranging from +51% to −34% globally. Biomass generally increased in warmer, wetter and species-rich sites with longer growing seasons and declined in species-poor arid areas. Phenological changes were widespread, revealing substantive transitions in grassland seasonal cycling. Grazing, nitrogen deposition and plant invasion were prevalent in some regions but did not predict overall trends. Grasslands are undergoing sizable changes in production, with implications for food security, biodiversity and carbon storage especially in arid regions where declines are accelerating.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Temporal change in mean peak NDVI.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Relationship between changes in major explanatory factors and maximum NDVI.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Global maps showing variation among sites in various conditions.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Relationship between annual remotely sensed maximum NDVI and annual live aboveground biomass.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are freely available via the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI) Data Portal (https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/advancedSearch.jsp).

Code availability

Code that supports the findings of this study is freely available via the Environmental Data Initiative (EDI) Data Portal (https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/advancedSearch.jsp).

Change history

References

  1. Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 1560–1563 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciais, P. et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, M. & Running, S. W. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329, 940–943 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 791–795 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333, 616–620 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tylianakis, J. M. et al. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1351–1363 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buitenwerf, R., Rose, L. & Higgins, S. I. Three decades of multi-dimensional change in global leaf phenology. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 364–368 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berner, L. T. et al. Summer warming explains widespread but not uniform greening in the Arctic tundra biome. Nat. Commun. 11, 4621 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, J. et al. Global semi-arid climate change over last 60 years. Clim. Dyn. 46, 1131–1150 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Antar, M. et al. Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: an overview of world biomass production and utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 139, 110691 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krausmann, F. et al. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10324–10329 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao, Q. et al. Climatic change controls productivity variation in global grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 26958 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Miles, V. V. & Esau, I. Spatial heterogeneity of greening and browning between and within bioclimatic zones in northern West Siberia. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 115002 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavender-Bares, J. et al. Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to advance biodiversity conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 506–519 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao, C. et al. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta‐analysis. New Phytol. 177, 706–714 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Turbelin, A. J., Malamud, B. D. & Francis, R. A. Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: patterns of invasion and policy responses. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 78–92 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borer, E. T. & Stevens, C. J. Nitrogen deposition and climate: an integrated synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 541–552 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knapp, A. K., Ciais, P. & Smith, M. D. Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–productivity relationships: implications for climate change. New Phytol. 214, 41–47 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Teng, M. et al. The impacts of climate changes and human activities on net primary productivity vary across an ecotone zone in Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 714, 136691 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zani, D. et al. Increased growing-season productivity drives earlier autumn leaf senescence in temperate trees. Science 370, 1066–1071 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, Y. et al. Nutrients and water availability constrain the seasonality of vegetation activity in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4379–4400 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker, M. D. et al. Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1342–1346 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Parmesan, C. & Hanley, M. E. Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises. Ann. Bot. 106, 849–864 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olofsson, J. et al. Herbivores inhibit climate‐driven shrub expansion on the tundra. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2681–2693 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maestre, F. T. et al. Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands. Science 378, 915–920 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yahdjian, L. et al. Why coordinated distributed experiments should go global. BioScience 71, 918–927 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borer, E. T. et al. Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 65–73 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. White, R. P., Murray, S., Rohweder, M., Prince, S. D. & Thompson, K. M. Grassland Ecosystems (World Resources Institute, 2000).

  31. Axelrod, D. I. Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. Bot. Rev. 51, 163–201 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sala, O. E. et al. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69, 40–45 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knapp, A. K. & Smith, M. D. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291, 481–484 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gilbert, B. et al. Climate and local environment structure asynchrony and the stability of primary production in grasslands. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 7, 1177–1188 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P. & Lister, D. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7, 109 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ackerman, D., Millet, D. B. & Chen, X. Global estimates of inorganic nitrogen deposition across four decades. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 33, 100–107 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Plas, F. et al. Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1602–1611 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Heisler-White, J. L., Knapp, A. K. & Kelly, E. F. Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 158, 129–140 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xia, J. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and climate variables controlling of biomass carbon stock of global grassland ecosystems from 1982 to 2006. Remote Sens. 6, 1783–1802 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Orndahl, K. M., Macander, M. J., Berner, L. T. & Goetz, S. J. Plant functional type aboveground biomass change within Alaska and northwest Canada mapped using a 35-year satellite time series from 1985 to 2020. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 115010 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boone, R. B., Conant, R. T., Sircely, J., Thornton, P. K. & Herrero, M. Climate change impacts on selected global rangeland ecosystem services. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1382–1393 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Andresen, L. C. et al. Biomass responses in a temperate European grassland through 17 years of elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3875–3885 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. MacDougall, A. S. et al. Comparison of the distribution and phenology of Arctic mountain plants between the early 20th and 21st centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 5070–5083 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Möhl, P., von Büren, R. S. & Hiltbrunner, E. Growth of alpine grassland will start and stop earlier under climate warming. Nat. Commun. 13, 7398 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Friedman, A. R. et al. Interhemispheric temperature asymmetry over the twentieth century and in future projections. J. Clim. 26, 5419–5433 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MacDougall, A. S., Wilson, S. D. & Bakker, J. D. Climatic variability alters the outcome of long‐term community assembly. J. Ecol. 96, 346–354 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Grace, J. B. et al. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529, 390–393 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson, T. M. et al. Herbivory and eutrophication mediate grassland plant nutrient responses across a global climatic gradient. Ecology 99, 822–831 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dee, L. E. et al. Clarifying the effect of biodiversity on productivity in natural ecosystems with longitudinal data and methods for causal inference. Nat. Commun. 14, 2607 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Seabloom, E. W. et al. Plant species’ origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands. Nat. Commun. 6, 7710 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Borer, E. T. et al. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation. Nature 508, 517–520 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Borer, E. T. et al. Nutrients cause grassland biomass to outpace herbivory. Nat. Commun. 11, 6036 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Delegido, J. et al. A red-edge spectral index for remote sensing estimation of green LAI over agroecosystems. Eur. J. Agron. 46, 42–52 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Eisfelder, C. et al. Above-ground biomass estimation based on NPP time-series—a novel approach for biomass estimation in semi-arid Kazakhstan. Ecol. Indic. 72, 13–22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 508–513 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zeng, X. et al. The global decline in the sensitivity of vegetation productivity to precipitation from 2001 to 2018. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 6823–6833 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Clay, D. E. et al. Does the conversion of grasslands to row crop in semi-arid areas threaten global food supplies? Glob. Food Secur. 3, 22–30 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Godde, C. M. et al. Global rangeland production systems and livelihoods at threat under climate change and variability. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044021 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jackson, R. B., Banner, J. L., Jobbágy, E. G., Pockman, W. T. & Wall, D. H. Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418, 623–626 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cleland, E. E. et al. Belowground biomass response to nutrient enrichment depends on light limitation across globally distributed grasslands. Ecosystems 7, 1466–1477 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hungate, B. A. et al. The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 388, 576–579 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, M. et al. Assessing precipitation, evapotranspiration, and NDVI as controls of US Great Plains plant production. Ecosphere 10, e02889 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jiang, Z. et al. Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 101, 366–378 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rocchini, D., Ricotta, C. & Chiarucci, A. Using satellite imagery to assess plant species richness: the role of multispectral systems. Appl. Veg. Sci. 10, 325–331 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kong, L. et al. Natural capital investments in China undermined by reclamation for cropland. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1771–1777 (2023).

  66. Goldewijk, K. K. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: the HYDE database. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 417–433 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lehmann, C. E. et al. Savanna vegetation–fire–climate relationships differ among continents. Science 343, 548–552 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Firn, J. et al. Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. Ecol. Lett. 14, 274–281 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Potere, D. Horizontal positional accuracy of Google Earth’s high-resolution imagery archive. Sensors 8, 7973–7981 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Salinas-Castillo, W. E. & Paredes-Hernández, C. U. Horizontal and vertical accuracy of Google Earth®: comment on ‘Positional accuracy of the Google Earth terrain model derived from stratigraphic unconformities in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA’ by S.C. Benker, R.P. Langford and T.L. Pavlis. Geocarto Int. 29, 625–627 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Landsat Collection 1. United States Geological Survey (USGS) https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat-collection-1 (2023).

  72. Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Young, A. T. Rayleigh scattering. Appl. Opt. 20, 533–535 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing; https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).

  75. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Gelman, A. arm: Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models; http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arm (2011).

  77. Grueber, C. E., Nakagawa, S., Laws, R. J. & Jamieson, I. G. Multi-model inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 699–711 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Seabloom, E. W. et al. Species loss due to nutrient addition increases with spatial scale in global grasslands. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2100–2112 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank each of the researchers who have contributed data and ideas to the NutNet (http://www.nutnet.org). Grants to A.S.M., E.E., C.B. and O.C. came from the University of Guelph’s Canada First Research Excellence Fund project ‘Food from Thought’. Thank you to S. Rodrigues for technical support on data extraction from Google Earth and A. Bjorkman for comments on the paper. Fieldwork was funded at the site scale by individual researchers. Coordination and data management in the NutNet have been supported by funding to E.T.B. and E.W.S. from the National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network (NSF-DEB-1042132) and Long-Term Ecological Research (NSF-DEB-1234162 to Cedar Creek LTER) programmes, and the Institute on the Environment (DG-0001-13). We also thank the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute for hosting project data and the Institute on the Environment for hosting network meetings. This study was funded by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund—University of Guelph (‘Food From Thought’), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (A.S.M.), National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network (NSF-DEB-1042132) and Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-DEB-1234162 to Cedar Creek LTER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S.M., E.E. with M.S., C.B., K.L. and J.O. Methodology: E.E. with A.S.M., O.C., C.B., Q.C., E.W.S., T.O. and E.T.B. Investigation: E.E. and A.S.M. Visualization: A.S.M. and E.E. Analyses: A.S.M., with O.C., C.B., E.E., T.O., E.W.S. and Q.C. Funding acquisition: A.S.M., with E.T.B. and E.W.S. Project administration: A.S.M. Supervision: A.S.M. Writing—original draft: A.S.M. with E.E. Writing—review and editing: A.S.M., E.E. and all co-authors. Data collection and contribution: all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew S. MacDougall.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Eric Allan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacDougall, A.S., Esch, E., Chen, Q. et al. Widening global variability in grassland biomass since the 1980s. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 1877–1888 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02500-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02500-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing