Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Deep ocean control of global temperature after net-zero emissions

Abstract

We analyse outputs from both climate mitigation scenarios and an energy balance model to investigate how deep ocean processes shape centennial-scale trajectories of global mean surface temperature after net-zero emissions are achieved. While surface temperature decreases as carbon dioxide concentration declines, this cooling trend could eventually reverse when vertical heat diffusion warms the deep ocean sufficiently to reduce the vertical temperature gradient, thereby weakening the deep ocean heat uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Evolution of surface temperature anomaly and deep ocean temperature anomaly with two different pathways in low-emission scenarios in CMIP climate models.
Fig. 2: Evolution of surface temperature anomaly, deep ocean temperature anomaly, radiative forcing, net heat flux and heat diffusion in the energy balance model and CMIP climate models.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in this study are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18203190 (ref. 36).

Code availability

All the figures were prepared in NCAR Command Language (NCL) version 6.4.0, which is publicly available at https://www.ncl.ucar.edu/. The code for the analysis is available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18203190 (ref. 36).

References

  1. UNFCCC Adoption of the Paris Agreement (United Nations, 2015); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf

  2. IPCC: Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  3. Cassidy, L. J. et al. Regional temperature extremes and vulnerability under net zero CO2 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 014051 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MacDougall, A. H. et al. Is there warming in the pipeline? A multi-model analysis of the Zero Emissions Commitment from CO2. Biogeosciences 17, 2987–3016 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frölicher, T. L., Winton, M. & Sarmiento, J. L. Continued global warming after CO2 emissions stoppage. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 40–44 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borowiak, A. et al. Projected global temperature changes after net zero are small but significant. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL108654 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, Y. H. et al. Early or delayed Northern Hemisphere warming driven by the AMOC in a net-zero CO2 world. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 8, 291 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, R. G., Goodwin, P., Ceppi, P., Jones, C. D. & MacDougall, A. H. A normalised framework for the Zero Emissions Commitment. Biogeosciences 22, 7167–7186 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, R. G., Roussenov, V., Frölicher, T. L. & Goodwin, P. Drivers of continued surface warming after cessation of carbon emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10,633–10,642 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, L. et al. Past and future ocean warming. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 776–794 (2022).

  11. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P. & Von Schuckmann, K. Earth’s energy imbalance and implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 13421–13449 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huguenin, M. F., Holmes, R. M. & England, M. H. Drivers and distribution of global ocean heat uptake over the last half century. Nat. Commun. 13, 4921 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. von Schuckmann, K. et al. Heat stored in the Earth system: where does the energy go? Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2013–2041 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oh, J.-H. et al. Emergent climate change patterns originating from deep ocean warming in climate mitigation scenarios. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 260–266 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng, L. et al. Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601545 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyssignac, B. et al. Measuring global ocean heat content to estimate the Earth energy imbalance. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 432 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Held, I. M. et al. Probing the fast and slow components of global warming by returning abruptly to preindustrial forcing. J. Clim. 23, 2418–2427 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate response in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part I: analytical solution and parameter calibration using CMIP5 AOGCM experiments. J. Clim. 26, 1841–1857 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory, J. M. et al. A new conceptual model of global ocean heat uptake. Clim. Dyn. 62, 1669–1713 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, G. Il et al. Deep ocean warming-induced El Niño changes. Nat. Commun. 15, 50663 (2024).

  24. Li, S. et al. Mitigation-driven global heat imbalance in the late 21st century. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 651 (2024).

  25. Romanou, A., Marshall, J., Kelley, M. & Scott, J. Role of the ocean’s AMOC in setting the uptake efficiency of transient tracers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5590–5598 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zanna, L., Khatiwala, S., Gregory, J. M., Ison, J. & Heimbach, P. Global reconstruction of historical ocean heat storage and transport. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1126–1131 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gregory, J. M., Andrews, T. & Good, P. The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO2. Philos. Trans. A 373, 20140417 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lyman, J. M. et al. Robust warming of the global upper ocean. Nature 465, 334–337 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, C., von Storch, J.-S. & Marotzke, J. Deep-ocean heat uptake and equilibrium climate response. Clim. Dyn. 40, 1071–1086 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., Shine, K. P. & Stordal, F. New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2715–2718 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. IPCC Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).

  32. Cael, B. B. Ocean heat uptake efficiency increase since 1970. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100983 (2022).

  33. Liu, M., Soden, B. J., Vecchi, G. A. & Wang, C. The spread of ocean heat uptake efficiency traced to ocean salinity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL100171 (2023).

  34. Allan, R. P. et al. Physically consistent responses of the global atmospheric hydrological cycle in models and observations. Surv. Geophys. 35, 533–552 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Watanabe, M. et al. Strengthening of ocean heat uptake efficiency associated with the recent climate hiatus. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3175–3179 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, Y.-H. et al. Deep Ocean control of global temperature after net-zero emissions. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18203190 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) through Climate Change R&D Project for New Climate Regime funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2022003560001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.-W.Y. and Y.-H.L. conceived of the study, and Y.-H.L conducted analysis and wrote the manuscript with comments and input from S.-W.Y., G.W., S.-Y.S. and S.-I.A. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and the improvement of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang-Wook Yeh or Guojian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Richard Williams and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: Aliénor Lavergne, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 CO2 concentration in the low emission scenario of CMIP.

The timeseries of CO2 concentration in SSP1-2.6 scenario of CMIP6 (green solid line) and RCP2.6 scenario of CMIP5 (blue solid line).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Evolution of surface temperature anomaly and deep ocean temperature anomaly in the Energy Balance Model.

a, b Time series of surface temperature anomaly (red line), deep ocean temperature anomaly (blue line), and radiative forcing (gray line) under the enhanced γ (γ × 3) and the baseline γ experiments. Shaded regions represent the full range (minimum to maximum) of 41 simulations obtained by perturbing the exchange efficiency from −20% to +20% in 1% increments, and solid lines denote the ensemble means.

Extended Data Table 1 CMIP5 and CMIP6 models used in this study and the corresponding model centers. CMIP5 models are shown in bold and italics

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, YH., Yeh, SW., Wang, G. et al. Deep ocean control of global temperature after net-zero emissions. Nat. Geosci. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-01934-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-01934-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing