Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

An orally administered gene editing nanoparticle boosts chemo-immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Abstract

Chemoresistance and immunosuppression are common obstacles to the efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) and are regulated by mitochondrial chaperone proteins. Here we show that the disruption of the tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1) gene, which encodes a mitochondrial chaperone in tumour cells, causes the translocation of cyclophilin D in tumour cells. This process results in the continuous opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which enhances chemotherapy-induced cell necrosis and promotes immune responses. On the basis of this discovery we developed an oral CRISPR–Cas9 delivery system based on zwitterionic and polysaccharide polymer-coated nanocomplexes that disrupts the TRAP1 gene in CRC. This system penetrates the intestinal mucus layer and undergoes epithelial transcytosis, accumulating in CRC tissues. It enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy by overcoming chemoresistance and activating the tumour immune microenvironment in orthotopic, chemoresistant and spontaneous CRC models, with remarkable synergistic antitumour effects. This oral CRISPR–Cas9 delivery system represents a promising therapeutic strategy for the clinical management of CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Increased TRAP1 expression in CRC correlates with MPT.
Fig. 2: Construction and characterization of HTPBD.
Fig. 3: HTPBD exhibits tumour enrichment through mucus penetration and transporter-mediated transcytosis.
Fig. 4: HTPBDTRAP1 enhances chemotherapy-induced necrosis by MPT in vitro.
Fig. 5: HTPBDTRAP1 exhibits enhanced chemotherapeutic efficacy in CRC organoids and orthotopic models.
Fig. 6: Antitumour efficacy of HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU in combination with ICB in chemoresistant and spontaneous CRC.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets of tumour transcriptome sequencing have been deposited in the The National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with the accession number PRJNA1096614. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Ward, R. A. et al. Challenges and opportunities in cancer drug resistance. Chem. Rev. 121, 3297–3351 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galluzzi, L., Buqué, A., Kepp, O., Zitvogel, L. & Kroemer, G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 97–111 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thibaudin, M. et al. First-line durvalumab and tremelimumab with chemotherapy in RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 1b/2 trial. Nat. Med. 29, 2087–2098 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, C. et al. Outcomes and toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a real-world retrospective analysis. Cancer Commun. 41, 921–924 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitt, M. et al. Colon tumour cell death causes mTOR dependence by paracrine P2X4 stimulation. Nature 612, 347–353 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mariya, T. et al. Prognostic impact of human leukocyte antigen class I expression and association of platinum resistance with immunologic profiles in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 1220–1229 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giddings, E. L. et al. Mitochondrial ATP fuels ABC transporter-mediated drug efflux in cancer chemoresistance. Nat. Commun. 12, 2804 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, Z. et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress signalling protects the nuclear genome. Nat. Metab. 1, 1209–1218 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lao, L. et al. CD8+ T cell-dependent remodeling of the tumor microenvironment overcomes chemoresistance. Cancer Immunol. Res. 11, 320–338 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, B. H. et al. Regulation of tumor cell mitochondrial homeostasis by an organelle-specific Hsp90 chaperone network. Cell 131, 257–270 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, X. et al. Cyclophilin D deficiency attenuates mitochondrial perturbation and ameliorates hepatic steatosis. Hepatology 68, 62–77 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao, Q. et al. Targeting mitochondria-located circRNA SCAR alleviates NASH via reducing mROS output. Cell 183, 76–93.e22 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Denorme, F. et al. Platelet necrosis mediates ischemic stroke outcome in mice. Blood 135, 429–440 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, Y., Madungwe, N. B., Tombo, N., Li, L. & Bopassa, J. C. Abstract 420: RIP3 interacts with mitofilin in the inner membrane of mitochondria to induce cardiomyocytes necrosis after ischemia/reperfusion. Circ. Res. 123, A420 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Costantino, E. et al. TRAP1, a novel mitochondrial chaperone responsible for multi-drug resistance and protection from apoptotis in human colorectal carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 279, 39–46 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoon, N. G. et al. Mitoquinone inactivates mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 by blocking the client binding site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19684–19696 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gewirth, D. T. Paralog specific Hsp90 inhibitors—a brief history and a bright future. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 16, 2779–2791 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong, S., Moyo, B., Lee, C. M., Leong, K. & Bao, G. Engineered materials for in vivo delivery of genome-editing machinery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 726–737 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Abramson, A. et al. Oral mRNA delivery using capsule-mediated gastrointestinal tissue injections. Matter 5, 975–987 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoo, J., Nhean, S., Vogel, P., Rybkin, I. I. & Kostoff, D. Implementation of oral chemotherapy management program in the large integrated health care system and its impact on patient safety. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 279 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, T. D., Whitehead, K. A. & Mitragotri, S. Materials for oral delivery of proteins and peptides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 127–148 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, B. et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide-derived zwitterionic polymers: a new class of ultralow fouling bioinspired materials. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw9562 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shao, Q. & Jiang, S. Molecular understanding and design of zwitterionic materials. Adv. Mater. 27, 15–26 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bansil, R. & Turner, B. S. The biology of mucus: composition, synthesis and organization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 124, 3–15 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Duncan, G. A., Jung, J., Hanes, J. & Suk, J. S. The mucus barrier to inhaled gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 24, 2043–2053 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirji, G. et al. The microbiome-derived metabolite TMAO drives immune activation and boosts responses to immune checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabn0704 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Teft, W. A. et al. Identification and characterization of trimethylamine-N-oxide uptake and efflux transporters. Mol. Pharm. 14, 310–318 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kato, Y. et al. Synthetic zwitterions as efficient non-permeable cryoprotectants. Comm. Chem. 4, 151 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ganguly, P., Boserman, P., van der Vegt, N. F. A. & Shea, J.-E. Trimethylamine N-oxide counteracts urea denaturation by inhibiting protein–urea preferential interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 483–492 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie, W. J. et al. Large hydrogen-bond mismatch between TMAO and urea promotes their hydrophobic association. Chem 4, 2615–2627 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Landriscina, M. et al. TRAP1, a novel antiapoptotic gene responsible for multidrug resistance in human colorectal carcinoma cells. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2541 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chae, Y. C. et al. Control of tumor bioenergetics and survival stress signaling by mitochondrial HSP90s. Cancer Cell 22, 331–344 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ariës, I. M. et al. PRC2 loss induces chemoresistance by repressing apoptosis in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Exp. Med. 215, 3094–3114 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu, L. et al. Nanoparticle-based oral delivery systems for colon targeting: principles and design strategies. Sci. Bull. 61, 670–681 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hone Lopez, S. et al. The gut wall’s potential as a partner for precision oncology in immune checkpoint treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev. 107, 102406 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, Y., Kamada, N. & Moon, J. J. Oral nanomedicine for modulating immunity, intestinal barrier functions, and gut microbiome. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 179, 114021 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, Z. et al. Organoids. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2, 94 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Drost, J. & Clevers, H. Organoids in cancer research. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 407–418 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, X., Bechara, R., Zhao, J., McGeachy, M. J. & Gaffen, S. L. IL-17 receptor–based signaling and implications for disease. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1594–1602 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Overall, C. M. & Kleifeld, O. Validating matrix metalloproteinases as drug targets and anti-targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 227–239 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao, H. et al. Wnt signaling in colorectal cancer: pathogenic role and therapeutic target. Mol. Cancer 21, 144 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pan, K. & Xie, Y. LncRNA FOXC2-AS1 enhances FOXC2 mRNA stability to promote colorectal cancer progression via activation of Ca2+-FAK signal pathway. Cell Death Dis. 11, 434 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Baghdadi, M. et al. Chemotherapy-induced IL34 enhances immunosuppression by tumor-associated macrophages and mediates survival of chemoresistant lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 76, 6030–6042 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 52333004 to X.-Z.Z. and 22135005 to X.-Z.Z.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.Z. and X.-Z.Z. conceived the project and designed the experiments. K.Z. synthesized materials. K.Z. and Y.Y. performed in vitro cell experiments. K.Z., Y.Y. and X.-K.J. contributed to data collection and analysis. K.Z., Y.Y., X.K.J., T.P., S.-M.Z., C.-H.Y. and Z.-Y.R. performed in vivo experiments. K.Z., Y.Y. and X.-Z.Z. cowrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian-Zheng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks Rene Jackstadt and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Enhanced tumour uptake and penetration of HTPBD.

a, Representative CLSM 3D visualization images of CT26 cells in the lower chamber. Scale bar, 50 μm. b, Representative CLSM images showing colocalization of nanocomplexes and mucus in mouse colon after 15 min incubation. Scale bar, 200 μm. c,d, Representative CLSM images of nanocomplexes penetration into tumour cell clusters from apex to equator with 20 μm z-spacing (c); fluorescence intensity distribution of nanocomplexes at 60 μm depth (d). Scale bar, 50 μm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment significantly induced transcriptomic changes in genes associated with the immune system.

a, Venn analysis of CRC tissue transcription in control, HTPBDTRAP1, and HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment groups. b,c, Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes with p-value < 0.05 and fold change ≥ 2, comparing the control group to the HTPBDTRAP1 treatment group (b) and the control group to the HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment group (c). d,e, Stacked plots of KEGG pathway analysis comparing the control group to the HTPBDTRAP1 treatment group (d) and the control group to the TPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment group (e). Statistical significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (b).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Immune system pathways activated by HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment.

a, Heat map for identification of differentially expressed genes in CRC tissues after control, HTPBDTRAP1 and HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment. Three biological replicates are shown for each group. b,c, Bubble plots showing the major pathways associated with differentially expressed genes between the control and HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment groups, as determined by KEGG enrichment analysis (b) and GO enrichment analysis (c). d,e, Chord plot (d) showing the KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes between the control and HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment groups, and representative pathway diagram (e) of GSEA enrichment analysis. Statistical significance was determined by Fisher’s exact test with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for multiple comparisons (b,c) and permutation test (e).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 HTPBDTRAP1 + 5-FU treatment effectively modulates the tumour immune microenvironment.

a-e, Representative FCM plots and quantitative statistical analysis of DCs (CD80+CD86+ in CD11c+) in mesenteric lymph nodes (a), CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ in CD3+) (b), Tregs (CD4+Foxp3+ in CD3+) (c), MDSCs (CD11b+Gr-1+) (d) or CD4+ helper T cells (CD4+ in CD3+) (e) in CRC tumour tissues after different treatments. n = 4 independent samples. f,g, The levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α (f), IL-6 and IL-12p70 (g) in CRC tumour tissues of different treatment groups were determined by ELISA. n = 4 independent samples. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc corrections (a-g).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–50, Tables 1–5 and References.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Statistical source data of Supplementary Information.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots and statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, K., Yan, Y., Jin, XK. et al. An orally administered gene editing nanoparticle boosts chemo-immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 935–946 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-01904-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-01904-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research