Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Lysosomal membrane homeostasis and its importance in physiology and disease

Abstract

Lysosomes are membranous organelles that are crucial for cell function and organ physiology. Serving as the terminal stations of the endocytic pathway, lysosomes have fundamental roles in the degradation of endogenous and exogenous macromolecules and particles as well as damaged or superfluous organelles. Moreover, the lysosomal membrane is a docking and activation platform for several signalling components, including mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), which orchestrates metabolic signalling in the cell. The integrity of their membrane is crucial for lysosomes to function as hubs for the regulation of cell metabolism. Various agents, including pathogens, nanoparticles and drugs, can compromise lysosomal membrane integrity. Membrane permeabilization causes leakage of proteases and cations into the cytosol, which can induce cell death pathways and innate immunity signalling. Multiple pathways repair damaged lysosomes, and severely damaged lysosomes are degraded by an autophagic process, lysophagy. Moreover, lysosome damage activates transcriptional programmes that orchestrate lysosome biogenesis to replenish the cellular lysosome pool. In this Review, we discuss recent insights into the mechanisms that ensure the maintenance of lysosomal membrane homeostasis, including novel mechanisms of lysosomal membrane repair and the interplay between lysosome damage, repair, lysophagy and lysosome biogenesis. We highlight the importance of lysosomal membrane homeostasis in cell function, physiology, disease and ageing, and discuss the potential for therapeutic exploitation of lysosomal membrane permeabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Composition and cellular functions of lysosomes.
Fig. 2: Lysosome repair pathways.
Fig. 3: Lysophagy.
Fig. 4: Lysosome biogenesis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Settembre, C. & Perera, R. M. Lysosomes as coordinators of cellular catabolism, metabolic signalling and organ physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 223–245 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luzio, J. P., Hackmann, Y., Dieckmann, N. M. & Griffiths, G. M. The biogenesis of lysosomes and lysosome-related organelles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016840 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellegaard, A. M. et al. Repurposing cationic amphiphilic antihistamines for cancer treatment. EBioMedicine 9, 130–139 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatterjee, S., Kon, E., Sharma, P. & Peer, D. Endosomal escape: a bottleneck for LNP-mediated therapeutics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2307800120 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Skowyra, M. L., Schlesinger, P. H., Naismith, T. V. & Hanson, P. I. Triggered recruitment of ESCRT machinery promotes endolysosomal repair. Science 360, eaar5078 (2018). Together with Radulovic et al. (2018), this work shows that damaged lysosomes can be repaired and identifies the ESCRT proteins as an important repair machinery.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Radulovic, M. et al. ESCRT-mediated lysosome repair precedes lysophagy and promotes cell survival. EMBO J. 37, e99753 (2018). 

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhen, Y., Radulovic, M., Vietri, M. & Stenmark, H. Sealing holes in cellular membranes. EMBO J., 40, e106922.

  8. Chen, W., Motsinger, M. M., Li, J., Bohannon, K. P. & Hanson, P. I. Ca2+-sensor ALG-2 engages ESCRTs to enhance lysosomal membrane resilience to osmotic stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2318412121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shukla, S., Larsen, K. P., Ou, C., Rose, K. & Hurley, J. H. In vitro reconstitution of calcium-dependent recruitment of the human ESCRT machinery in lysosomal membrane repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205590119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Herbst, S. et al. LRRK2 activation controls the repair of damaged endomembranes in macrophages. EMBO J. 39, e104494 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bussi, C. & Gutierrez, M. G. One size does not fit all: lysosomes exist in biochemically and functionally distinct states. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002576 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mercier, V. et al. Endosomal membrane tension regulates ESCRT-III-dependent intra-lumenal vesicle formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 947–959 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, J. X. & Finkel, T. A phosphoinositide signalling pathway mediates rapid lysosomal repair. Nature 609, 815–821 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Radulovic, M. et al. Cholesterol transfer via endoplasmic reticulum contacts mediates lysosome damage repair. EMBO J. 41, e112677 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hancock-Cerutti, W. et al. ER–lysosome lipid transfer protein VPS13C/PARK23 prevents aberrant mtDNA-dependent STING signaling. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202106046 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X. et al. The bridge-like lipid transport protein VPS13C/PARK23 mediates ER-lysosome contacts following lysosome damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 27, 776–789 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cai, S. et al. In situ architecture of the lipid transport protein VPS13C at ER–lysosome membrane contacts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203769119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Holthuis, J. C. & Menon, A. K. Lipid landscapes and pipelines in membrane homeostasis. Nature 510, 48–57 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barisch, C., Holthuis, J. C. M. & Cosentino, K. Membrane damage and repair: a thin line between life and death. Biol. Chem. 404, 467–490 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gault, C. R., Obeid, L. M. & Hannun, Y. A. An overview of sphingolipid metabolism: from synthesis to breakdown. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 688, 1–23 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellison, C. J., Kukulski, W., Boyle, K. B., Munro, S. & Randow, F. Transbilayer movement of sphingomyelin precedes catastrophic breakage of enterobacteria-containing vacuoles. Curr. Biol. 30, 2974–2983 e2976 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Niekamp, P. et al. Ca2+-activated sphingomyelin scrambling and turnover mediate ESCRT-independent lysosomal repair. Nat. Commun. 13, 1875 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Trajkovic, K. et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science 319, 1244–1247 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holopainen, J. M., Angelova, M. I. & Kinnunen, P. K. Vectorial budding of vesicles by asymmetrical enzymatic formation of ceramide in giant liposomes. Biophys. J. 78, 830–838 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nurminen, T. A., Holopainen, J. M., Zhao, H. & Kinnunen, P. K. Observation of topical catalysis by sphingomyelinase coupled to microspheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12129–12134 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deretic, V. & Lazarou, M. A guide to membrane atg8ylation and autophagy with reflections on immunity. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202203083 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Durgan, J. & Florey, O. Many roads lead to CASM: diverse stimuli of noncanonical autophagy share a unifying molecular mechanism. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo1274 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cross, J. et al. Lysosome damage triggers direct ATG8 conjugation and ATG2 engagement via non-canonical autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202303078 (2023). This study shows that lysosome damage triggers CASM.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, Y. et al. A bacterial effector reveals the V-ATPase–ATG16L1 axis that initiates xenophagy. Cell 178, 552–566.e20 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hooper, K. M. et al. V-ATPase is a universal regulator of LC3-associated phagocytosis and non-canonical autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202105112 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Boyle, K. B. et al. TECPR1 conjugates LC3 to damaged endomembranes upon detection of sphingomyelin exposure. EMBO J. 42, e113012 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaur, N. et al. TECPR1 is activated by damage-induced sphingomyelin exposure to mediate noncanonical autophagy. EMBO J. 42, e113105 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Corkery, D. P., Castro-Gonzalez, S., Knyazeva, A., Herzog, L. K. & Wu, Y. W. An ATG12–ATG5–TECPR1 E3-like complex regulates unconventional LC3 lipidation at damaged lysosomes. EMBO Rep. 24, e56841 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Corkery, D. P. et al. ESCRT recruitment to damaged lysosomes is dependent on the ATG8 E3-like ligases. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.30.591897 (2024).

  35. Koerdt, S. N., Ashraf, A. P. K. & Gerke, V. Annexins and plasma membrane repair. Curr. Top. Membr. 84, 43–65 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yim, W. W., Yamamoto, H. & Mizushima, N. Annexins A1 and A2 are recruited to larger lysosomal injuries independently of ESCRTs to promote repair. FEBS Lett. 596, 991–1003 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosengarth, A. & Luecke, H. A calcium-driven conformational switch of the N-terminal and core domains of annexin A1. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 1317–1325 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Evans, T. C. Jr. & Nelsestuen, G. L. Calcium and membrane-binding properties of monomeric and multimeric annexin II. Biochemistry 33, 13231–13238 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Blackwood, R. A. & Ernst, J. D. Characterization of Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding, vesicle aggregation and membrane fusion by annexins. Biochem. J. 266, 195–200 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bussi, C. et al. Stress granules plug and stabilize damaged endolysosomal membranes. Nature 623, 1062–1069 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Duran, J. et al. Calcium signaling from damaged lysosomes induces cytoprotective stress granules. EMBO J. 43, 6410–6443 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A. & Mittag, T. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid–liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates. Cell 176, 419–434 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ivanov, P., Kedersha, N. & Anderson, P. Stress granules and processing bodies in translational control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a032813 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Prentzell et al. G3BPs tether the TSC complex to lysosomes and suppress mTORC1 signaling. Cell 184, 655–674.e27 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jia, J. et al. Stress granules and mTOR are regulated by membrane atg8ylation during lysosomal damage. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202207091 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Guillen-Boixet, J. et al. RNA-induced conformational switching and clustering of G3BP drive stress granule assembly by condensation. Cell 181, 346–361.e17 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Garrity, A. G. et al. The endoplasmic reticulum, not the pH gradient, drives calcium refilling of lysosomes. eLife 5, 173–194 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakatogawa, H., Ichimura, Y. & Ohsumi, Y. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell 130, 165–178 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maejima, I. et al. Autophagy sequesters damaged lysosomes to control lysosomal biogenesis and kidney injury. EMBO J. 32, 2336–2347 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hung, Y. H., Chen, L. M., Yang, J. Y. & Yang, W. Y. Spatiotemporally controlled induction of autophagy-mediated lysosome turnover. Nat. Commun. 4, 2111 (2013). Together with Maejima et al. (2013), this study shows that damaged lysosomes are degraded by lysophagy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thurston, T. L., Wandel, M. P., von Muhlinen, N., Foeglein, A. & Randow, F. Galectin 8 targets damaged vesicles for autophagy to defend cells against bacterial invasion. Nature 482, 414–418 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chauhan, S. et al. TRIMs and galectins globally cooperate and TRIM16 and galectin-3 co-direct autophagy in endomembrane damage homeostasis. Dev. Cell 39, 13–27 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yoshida, Y. et al. Ubiquitination of exposed glycoproteins by SCF(FBXO27) directs damaged lysosomes for autophagy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8574–8579 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, E. A. et al. Fbxo2 mediates clearance of damaged lysosomes and modifies neurodegeneration in the Niemann–Pick C brain. JCI Insight 5, e136676 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Koerver, L. et al. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2QL1 coordinates lysophagy in response to endolysosomal damage. EMBO Rep. 20, e48014 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Teranishi, H. et al. Identification of CUL4A–DDB1–WDFY1 as an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex involved in initiation of lysophagy. Cell Rep. 40, 111349 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gahlot, P. et al. Lysosomal damage sensing and lysophagy initiation by SPG20–ITCH. Mol. Cell 84, 1556–1569.e10 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gallagher, E. R. et al. Lysosomal damage triggers a p38 MAPK-dependent phosphorylation cascade to promote lysophagy via the small heat shock protein HSP27. Curr. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.061 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Turco, E. et al. FIP200 claw domain binding to p62 promotes autophagosome formation at ubiquitin condensates. Mol. Cell 74, 330–346.e11 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Lin, M. G. & Hurley, J. H. Structure and function of the ULK1 complex in autophagy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 39, 61–68 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ghanbarpour, A., Valverde, D. P., Melia, T. J. & Reinisch, K. M. A model for a partnership of lipid transfer proteins and scramblases in membrane expansion and organelle biogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101562118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Olivas, T. J. et al. ATG9 vesicles comprise the seed membrane of mammalian autophagosomes. J. Cell Biol. 222, e2101562118 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Johansen, T. & Lamark, T. Selective autophagy: ATG8 family proteins, LIR motifs and cargo receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 80–103 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Melia, T. J., Lystad, A. H. & Simonsen, A. Autophagosome biogenesis: from membrane growth to closure. J. Cell Biol. 219, e202002085 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Braulke, T., Carette, J. E. & Palm, W. Lysosomal enzyme trafficking: from molecular mechanisms to human diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 198–210 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Pechincha, C. et al. Lysosomal enzyme trafficking factor LYSET enables nutritional usage of extracellular proteins. Science 378, eabn5637 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Richards, C. M. et al. The human disease gene LYSET is essential for lysosomal enzyme transport and viral infection. Science 378, eabn5648 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang, W. et al. GCAF(TMEM251) regulates lysosome biogenesis by activating the mannose-6-phosphate pathway. Nat. Commun. 13, 5351 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Langemeyer, L., Frohlich, F. & Ungermann, C. Rab GTPase function in endosome and lysosome biogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 957–970 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Saftig, P. & Klumperman, J. Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 623–635 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Braulke, T. & Bonifacino, J. S. Sorting of lysosomal proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 605–614 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Pols, M. S. et al. hVps41 and VAMP7 function in direct TGN to late endosome transport of lysosomal membrane proteins. Nat. Commun. 4, 1361 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Davis, L. J. et al. Organelle tethering, pore formation and SNARE compensation in the late endocytic pathway. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs255463 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Lie, P. P. Y. et al. Post-Golgi carriers, not lysosomes, confer lysosomal properties to pre-degradative organelles in normal and dystrophic axons. Cell Rep. 35, 109034 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Huotari, J. & Helenius, A. Endosome maturation. EMBO J. 30, 3481–3500 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Kummel, D. & Ungermann, C. Principles of membrane tethering and fusion in endosome and lysosome biogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 29, 61–66 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yang, C. & Wang, X. Lysosome biogenesis: regulation and functions. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202102001 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Stenmark, H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 513–525 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Gan, Q. et al. The amino acid transporter SLC-36.1 cooperates with PtdIns3P 5-kinase to control phagocytic lysosome reformation. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2619–2637 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Yu, L. et al. Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature 465, 942–946 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Li, X. et al. SNX8 enables lysosome reformation and reverses lysosomal storage disorder. Nat. Commun. 15, 2553 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Du, W. et al. Kinesin 1 drives autolysosome tubulation. Dev. Cell 37, 326–336 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rong, Y. et al. Clathrin and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate regulate autophagic lysosome reformation. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 924–934 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Li, X. et al. A molecular mechanism to regulate lysosome motility for lysosome positioning and tubulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 404–417 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Li, L. et al. The HEAT repeat protein HPO-27 is a lysosome fission factor. Nature 628, 630–638 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sardiello, M. et al. A gene network regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function. Science 325, 473–477 (2009). This study shows that most lysosomal genes are controlled by the transcription factor TFEB.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Settembre, C. et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science 332, 1429–1433 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Puertollano, R., Ferguson, S. M., Brugarolas, J. & Ballabio, A. The complex relationship between TFEB transcription factor phosphorylation and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 37, e98804 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Martina, J. A. & Puertollano, R. Rag GTPases mediate amino acid-dependent recruitment of TFEB and MITF to lysosomes. J. Cell Biol. 200, 475–491 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Cui, Z. et al. Structure of the lysosomal mTORC1–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator megacomplex. Nature 614, 572–579 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Lawrence, R. E. et al. Structural mechanism of a Rag GTPase activation checkpoint by the lysosomal folliculin complex. Science 366, 971–977 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Tsun, Z. Y. et al. The folliculin tumor suppressor is a GAP for the RagC/D GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1. Mol. Cell 52, 495–505 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Shen, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the human FLCN–FNIP2–Rag–Ragulator complex. Cell 179, 1319–1329.e8 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Napolitano, G. et al. A substrate-specific mTORC1 pathway underlies Birt–Hogg–Dube syndrome. Nature 585, 597–602 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Napolitano, G., Di Malta, C. & Ballabio, A. Non-canonical mTORC1 signaling at the lysosome. Trends Cell Biol. 32, 920–931 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Martina, J. A. et al. The nutrient-responsive transcription factor TFE3 promotes autophagy, lysosomal biogenesis, and clearance of cellular debris. Sci. Signal. 7, ra9 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Settembre, C. et al. A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J. 31, 1095–1108 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Roczniak-Ferguson, A. et al. The transcription factor TFEB links mTORC1 signaling to transcriptional control of lysosome homeostasis. Sci. Signal. 5, ra42 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Martina, J. A. & Puertollano, R. Protein phosphatase 2A stimulates activation of TFEB and TFE3 transcription factors in response to oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 12525–12534 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Medina, D. L. et al. Lysosomal calcium signalling regulates autophagy through calcineurin and TFEB. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 288–299 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Chen, D. et al. Inositol polyphosphate multikinase inhibits liquid–liquid phase separation of TFEB to negatively regulate autophagy activity. Dev. Cell 55, 588–602.e7 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Wang, Z. et al. Material properties of phase-separated TFEB condensates regulate the autophagy–lysosome pathway. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202112024 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Yin, Q. et al. CDK4/6 regulate lysosome biogenesis through TFEB/TFE3. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201911036 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Odle, R. I. et al. An mTORC1-to-CDK1 switch maintains autophagy suppression during mitosis. Mol. Cell 77, 228–240.e7 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Li, Y. et al. Protein kinase C controls lysosome biogenesis independently of mTORC1. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1065–1077 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Palmieri, M. et al. mTORC1-independent TFEB activation via Akt inhibition promotes cellular clearance in neurodegenerative storage diseases. Nat. Commun. 8, 14338 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Silvestrini, M. J. et al. Nuclear export inhibition enhances HLH-30/TFEB activity, autophagy, and lifespan. Cell Rep. 23, 1915–1921 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Li, L. et al. A TFEB nuclear export signal integrates amino acid supply and glucose availability. Nat. Commun. 9, 2685 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Napolitano, G. et al. mTOR-dependent phosphorylation controls TFEB nuclear export. Nat. Commun. 9, 3312 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Sha, Y., Rao, L., Settembre, C., Ballabio, A. & Eissa, N. T. STUB1 regulates TFEB-induced autophagy–lysosome pathway. EMBO J. 36, 2544–2552 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Wang, Y. et al. Acetyltransferase GCN5 regulates autophagy and lysosome biogenesis by targeting TFEB. EMBO Rep. 21, e48335 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Zhang, J. et al. Importance of TFEB acetylation in control of its transcriptional activity and lysosomal function in response to histone deacetylase inhibitors. Autophagy 14, 1043–1059 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Martina, J. A. et al. A conserved cysteine-based redox mechanism sustains TFEB/HLH-30 activity under persistent stress. EMBO J. 40, e105793 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Wang, H. et al. Oxidation of multiple MiT/TFE transcription factors links oxidative stress to transcriptional control of autophagy and lysosome biogenesis. Autophagy 16, 1683–1696 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Miller, A. J., Levy, C., Davis, I. J., Razin, E. & Fisher, D. E. Sumoylation of MITF and its related family members TFE3 and TFEB. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 146–155 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Martinez-Fabregas, J. et al. Lysosomal protease deficiency or substrate overload induces an oxidative-stress mediated STAT3-dependent pathway of lysosomal homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 9, 5343 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Kreuzaler, P. A. et al. Stat3 controls lysosomal-mediated cell death in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 303–309 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Miao, R., Li, M., Zhang, Q., Yang, C. & Wang, X. An ECM-to-nucleus signaling pathway activates lysosomes for C. elegans larval development. Dev. Cell 52, 21–37.e5 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Annunziata, I. et al. MYC competes with MiT/TFE in regulating lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy through an epigenetic rheostat. Nat. Commun. 10, 3623 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Chauhan, S. et al. ZKSCAN3 is a master transcriptional repressor of autophagy. Mol. Cell 50, 16–28 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Carey, K. L. et al. TFEB transcriptional responses reveal negative feedback by BHLHE40 and BHLHE41. Cell Rep. 33, 108371 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Kim, J. et al. USF2 and TFEB compete in regulating lysosomal and autophagy genes. Nat. Commun. 15, 8334 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Shin, H. J. et al. AMPK–SKP2–CARM1 signalling cascade in transcriptional regulation of autophagy. Nature 534, 553–557 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Li, X. et al. Nucleus-translocated ACSS2 promotes gene transcription for lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy. Mol. Cell 66, 684–697.e9 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Sakamaki, J. I. et al. Bromodomain protein BRD4 is a transcriptional repressor of autophagy and lysosomal function. Mol. Cell 66, 517–532.e9 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Nakamura, S. et al. LC3 lipidation is essential for TFEB activation during the lysosomal damage response to kidney injury. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 1252–1263 (2020). This study demonstrates that TFEB is activated by lysosome damage and that this requires LC3 lipidation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Goodwin, J. M. et al. GABARAP sequesters the FLCN–FNIP tumor suppressor complex to couple autophagy with lysosomal biogenesis. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj2485 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Jia, J. et al. Galectins control mTOR in response to endomembrane damage. Mol. Cell 70, 120–135.e8 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Kumar, S. et al. Mammalian Atg8 proteins and the autophagy factor IRGM control mTOR and TFEB at a regulatory node critical for responses to pathogens. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 973–985 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Bhattacharya, A. et al. A lysosome membrane regeneration pathway depends on TBC1D15 and autophagic lysosomal reformation proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 685–698 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Bonet-Ponce, L. et al. LRRK2 mediates tubulation and vesicle sorting from lysosomes. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb2454 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Parenti, G., Medina, D. L. & Ballabio, A. The rapidly evolving view of lysosomal storage diseases. EMBO Mol. Med. 13, e12836 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Gabande-Rodriguez, E., Boya, P., Labrador, V., Dotti, C. G. & Ledesma, M. D. High sphingomyelin levels induce lysosomal damage and autophagy dysfunction in Niemann–Pick disease type A. Cell Death Differ. 21, 864–875 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Guo, H., Callaway, J. B. & Ting, J. P. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat. Med. 21, 677–687 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Duewell, P. et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals. Nature 464, 1357–1361 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Valle Raleigh, J. et al. Reperfusion therapy with recombinant human relaxin-2 (serelaxin) attenuates myocardial infarct size and NLRP3 inflammasome following ischemia/reperfusion injury via eNOS-dependent mechanism. Cardiovasc. Res. 113, 609–619 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Halle, A. et al. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-β. Nat. Immunol. 9, 857–865 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Xiang, Y., Zhang, M., Jiang, D., Su, Q. & Shi, J. The role of inflammation in autoimmune disease: a therapeutic target. Front. Immunol. 14, 1267091 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Wagner, G. R. Asbestosis and silicosis. Lancet 349, 1311–1315 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Miller, K. & Harington, J. S. Some biochemical effects of asbestos on macrophages. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 53, 397–405 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Cox, L. A. T. Jr. Biological mechanisms of non-linear dose-response for respirable mineral fibers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 361, 137–144 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Holm, J. D. & Mansfield, E. Transmission electron imaging and diffraction of asbestos fibers in a scanning electron microscope. Anal. Methods 16, 4570–4581 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Nie, B. et al. The role of lysosomes in airborne particulate matter-induced pulmonary toxicity. Sci. Total. Env. 919, 170893 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Hornung, V. et al. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat. Immunol. 9, 847–856 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Kakuda, K. et al. Lysophagy protects against propagation of α-synuclein aggregation through ruptured lysosomal vesicles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2312306120 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Rose, K. et al. Tau fibrils induce nanoscale membrane damage and nucleate cytosolic tau at lysosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2315690121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Menzies, F. M., Fleming, A. & Rubinsztein, D. C. Compromised autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 345–357 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Bennett, M. K. et al. The syntaxin family of vesicular transport receptors. Cell 74, 863–873 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Lopez-Jimenez, A. T. et al. The ESCRT and autophagy machineries cooperate to repair ESX-1-dependent damage at the Mycobacterium-containing vacuole but have opposite impact on containing the infection. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007501 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Westman, J. & Grinstein, S. Determinants of phagosomal pH during host–pathogen interactions. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 624958 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Haraga, A., Ohlson, M. B. & Miller, S. I. Salmonellae interplay with host cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 53–66 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Rubinsztein, D. C., Marino, G. & Kroemer, G. Autophagy and aging. Cell 146, 682–695 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Terman, A. & Brunk, U. T. Oxidative stress, accumulation of biological ‘garbage’, and aging. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 8, 197–204 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Terman, A. & Brunk, U. T. Lipofuscin. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36, 1400–1404 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Settembre, C., Fraldi, A., Medina, D. L. & Ballabio, A. Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 283–296 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Sho, T., Li, Y., Jiao, H. & Yu, L. Migratory autolysosome disposal mitigates lysosome damage. J. Cell Biol. 223, e202403195 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Ballabio, A. & Bonifacino, J. S. Lysosomes as dynamic regulators of cell and organismal homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 101–118 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Hui, L., Chen, X. & Geiger, J. D. Endolysosome involvement in LDL cholesterol-induced Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in primary cultured neurons. Life Sci. 91, 1159–1168 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Weissmann, G., Zurier, R. B., Spieler, P. J. & Goldstein, I. M. Mechanisms of lysosomal enzyme release from leukocytes exposed to immune complexes and other particles. J. Exp. Med. 134, 149–165 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Pisonero-Vaquero, S. & Medina, D. L. Lysosomotropic drugs: pharmacological tools to study lysosomal function. Curr. Drug. Metab. 18, 1147–1158 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. de Duve, C. et al. Commentary. Lysosomotropic agents. Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 2495–2531 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Thiele, D. L. & Lipsky, P. E. Mechanism of l-leucyl-l-leucine methyl ester-mediated killing of cytotoxic lymphocytes: dependence on a lysosomal thiol protease, dipeptidyl peptidase I, that is enriched in these cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 83–87 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Shi, X. et al. Silica radical-induced DNA damage and lipid peroxidation. Env. Health Perspect. 102, 149–154 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Jacquin, E. et al. Pharmacological modulators of autophagy activate a parallel noncanonical pathway driving unconventional LC3 lipidation. Autophagy 13, 854–867 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Anand, A. et al. Cell death induced by cationic amphiphilic drugs depends on lysosomal Ca2+ release and cyclic AMP. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 1602–1614 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Selbo, P. K. et al. Photochemical internalisation, a minimally invasive strategy for light-controlled endosomal escape of cancer stem cell-targeting therapeutics. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 14, 1433–1450 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Weisheit, S. et al. Inhibiting autophagy increases the efficacy of low-dose photodynamic therapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 194, 114837 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Platt, F. M., d’Azzo, A., Davidson, B. L., Neufeld, E. F. & Tifft, C. J. Lysosomal storage diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 27 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Xu, Y. H. et al. Accumulation and distribution of alpha-synuclein and ubiquitin in the CNS of Gaucher disease mouse models. Mol. Genet. Metab. 102, 436–447 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Vanier, M. T. Niemann–Pick disease type C. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 5, 16 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Gravel, R. A., Triggs-Raine, B. L. & Mahuran, D. J. Biochemistry and genetics of Tay–Sachs disease. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 18, 419–423 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. van der Ploeg, A. T. & Reuser, A. J. Pompe’s disease. Lancet 372, 1342–1353 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Fukuda, T. et al. Dysfunction of endocytic and autophagic pathways in a lysosomal storage disease. Ann. Neurol. 59, 700–708 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Leal, A. F. et al. Mucopolysaccharidoses: cellular consequences of glycosaminoglycans accumulation and potential targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 477 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Maegawa, G. H. B. Lysosomal leukodystrophies lysosomal storage diseases associated with white matter abnormalities. J. Child. Neurol. 34, 339–358 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Shin, H. R. et al. Lysosomal GPCR-like protein LYCHOS signals cholesterol sufficiency to mTORC1. Science 377, 1290–1298 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Cui, Z., Joiner, A. M. N., Jansen, R. M. & Hurley, J. H. Amino acid sensing and lysosomal signaling complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 79, 102544 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Tian, X., Teng, J. & Chen, J. New insights regarding SNARE proteins in autophagosome–lysosome fusion. Autophagy 17, 2680–2688 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Marwaha, R. et al. The Rab7 effector PLEKHM1 binds Arl8b to promote cargo traffic to lysosomes. J. Cell Biol. 216, 1051–1070 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Raiborg, C. et al. Repeated ER–endosome contacts promote endosome translocation and neurite outgrowth. Nature 520, 234–238 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Pu, J. et al. BORC, a multisubunit complex that regulates lysosome positioning. Dev. Cell 33, 176–188 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.R. was supported by a Young Research Talents Grant from the Research Council of Norway (grant number 345137). Research in C.Y.’s laboratory is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32293201 and 92354303) and Program of Yunnan Province Leading Talents in Science and Technology (grant number 202105AB160003). H.S. was supported by Project Grants from the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (project number 2018081) and the Norwegian Cancer Society (project number 182698), and by an Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (project number 788954). M.R. and H.S. were also supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project number 262652).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Stenmark.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology thanks Spencer Freeman, Andrea Ballabio and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Ceramides

Bioactive sphingolipids composed of sphingosine and a fatty acid.

cis-Golgi

The entry face of the Golgi apparatus, which receives cargos from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).

Endolysosomes, autolysosomes and phagolysosomes

Hybrid organelles formed by fusion of lysosomes with late endosomes, autophagosomes or phagosomes, respectively.

Hemifusion

A transient state where outer layers of two membranes merge while the inner leaflets remain separate.

Intraluminal vesicles

(ILVs). Vesicles that form within endosomes via invagination and scission of the endosomal membrane.

LRRK2

(Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2). A large protein kinase whose mutations are the most common cause of familial Parkinson disease (5–6% of cases).

Membrane contact sites

Regions where two organelles come into proximity (<30 nm) to exchange lipids, ions, motor proteins or signalling molecules without fusing.

Multivesicular endosomes

A subset of late endosomes characterized by the presence of multiple intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by the inward budding of the limiting membrane.

NLRP3 inflammasome

A multiprotein complex that is activated in response to diverse cellular stress signals leading to caspase-1 activation and maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18.

Protolysosomes

Newly formed lysosomes (primary lysosomes) with inactive acid hydrolases.

Scramblase

A protein that mediates translocation of phospholipids between the two leaflets of a cellular membrane in an ATP-independent manner.

Selective autophagy

Autophagy of specific cargos such as damaged organelles, protein aggregates or pathogens, mediated by autophagy receptors that connect cargos with ATG8 (autophagy-related protein 8) family proteins.

SNARE

A group of proteins that mediate membrane fusion through energetically favourable tetrahelical bundles formed by SNAREs in the adjacent membranes.

Stress granules

Cytoplasmic, membraneless biomolecular condensates consisting of RNAs and proteins.

trans-Golgi network

(TGN). The exit face of the Golgi apparatus, composed of interconnected tubules and vesicles, which sends cargos to the plasma membrane and endosomes.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radulovic, M., Yang, C. & Stenmark, H. Lysosomal membrane homeostasis and its importance in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 27, 71–87 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-025-00873-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-025-00873-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing