Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

AI, neurotechnology and society — a question of trust

Artificial intelligence and neurotechnology promise to transform neurological care, but their acceptance will depend on public trust. Such trust must be earned and maintained through responsible development, transparent reporting, public engagement and ethical oversight. Without these foundations, even highly beneficial technologies may fail to gain legitimacy or uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lucas, A., Revell, A. & Davis, K. A. Artificial intelligence in epilepsy — applications and pathways to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 20, 319–336 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandrabhatla, A. S., Pomeraniec, I. J., Horgan, T. M., Wat, E. K. & Ksendzovsky, A. Landscape and future directions of machine learning applications in closed loop brain stimulation. NPJ Digit. Med. 6, 79 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI https://doi.org/10.2759/177365 (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019).

  4. Pham, M. T. & Lázaro-Muñoz, G. Trust in neuroethics. AJOB Neurosci. 13, 3335 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Starke, G. et al. Finding consensus on trust in AI in health care: recommendations from a panel of international experts. J. Med. Internet Res. 27, e56306 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gille, F., Smith, S. & Mays, N. Evidence-based guiding principles to build public trust in personal data use in health systems. Digit. Health 8, 20552076221111947 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lavazza, A. et al. Neuralink’s brain-computer interfaces: medical innovations and ethical challenges. Frontiers Hum. Dyn. 7, 1553905 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Starke, G. & Ienca, M. Misplaced trust and distrust: how not to engage with medical artificial intelligence. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 33, 360369 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassil, K. The end of ‘mini-brains’! Responsible communication of brain organoid research. Mol. Psychol. Brain Behav. Soc. 2, 13 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baier, A. Trust, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Princeton University, 1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Starke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology: https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Starke, G., Ienca, M. AI, neurotechnology and society — a question of trust. Nat Rev Neurol 21, 407–408 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01114-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01114-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing