Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The new frontier in understanding human and mammalian brain development

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders that cause cognitive, behavioural or motor impairments affect around 15% of children and adolescents worldwide1, with diagnoses of profound autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder increasing in the USA and contributing to a major economic burden2,3. Yet the origins and mechanisms of these conditions remain poorly understood, limiting progress in therapies. Comprehensive cell atlases of the developing human brain, alongside those of model organisms such as mice and non-human primates, are now providing high-resolution measures of gene expression, cell-type abundance and spatial distribution. In this Perspective, we highlight recent studies that have identified novel developmental cell populations, revealed conserved and divergent patterns of cell genesis, migration and maturation across species, and begun testing hypotheses that link them to processes ranging from transcriptional control of cell fate specification to the emergence of complex behaviours. We present remaining conceptual and technical challenges and provide an outlook on how further studies of human and mammalian brain development can empower a deeper understanding of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Future efforts expanding to additional developmental stages, including adolescence, as well as whole-brain, multimodal and cross-species integration, will yield new insights into how development shapes the brain. These atlases promise to serve as essential references for unravelling mechanisms of brain function and disease vulnerability, and for advancing precision medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Developmental timelines and comparative events across mammalian brains.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Multimodal single-cell approaches for building comprehensive developing brain cell atlases.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Broad impact of developing brain cell atlases on discovery and translation.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

References

  1. Gidziela, A. et al. A meta-analysis of genetic effects associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and co-occurring conditions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 642–656 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Buescher, A. V. S., Cidav, Z., Knapp, M. & Mandell, D. S. Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 168, 721–728 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leigh, J. P. & Du, J. Brief report: Forecasting the economic burden of autism in 2015 and 2025 in the United States. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 4135–4139 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molnár, Z. et al. New insights into the development of the human cerebral cortex. J. Anat. 235, 432–451 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace, J. L. & Pollen, A. A. Human neuronal maturation comes of age: cellular mechanisms and species differences. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 7–29 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Satterstrom, F. K. et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell 180, 568–584.e23 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Willsey, H. R., Willsey, A. J., Wang, B. & State, M. W. Genomics, convergent neuroscience and progress in understanding autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 323–341 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group. Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557–568 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng, H. & Sanes, J. R. Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 530–546 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colonna, M. et al. Implementation and validation of single-cell genomics experiments in neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 2310–2325 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng, H. What is a cell type and how to define it? Cell 185, 2739–2755 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao, Z. et al. A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain. Nature 624, 317–332 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, M. et al. Molecularly defined and spatially resolved cell atlas of the whole mouse brain. Nature 624, 343–354 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Langlieb, J. et al. The molecular cytoarchitecture of the adult mouse brain. Nature 624, 333–342 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, H. et al. Single-cell DNA methylome and 3D multi-omic atlas of the adult mouse brain. Nature 624, 366–377 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zu, S. et al. Single-cell analysis of chromatin accessibility in the adult mouse brain. Nature 624, 378–389 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Siletti, K. et al. Transcriptomic diversity of cell types across the adult human brain. Science 382, eadd7046 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhaduri, A. et al. Outer radial glia-like cancer stem cells contribute to heterogeneity of glioblastoma. Cell Stem Cell 26, 48–63.e6 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, K. S. et al. Unified rhombic lip origins of group 3 and group 4 medulloblastoma. Nature 609, 1012–1020 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, M. et al. Integrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks. Science 362, eaat7615 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic divergence across human and macaque brain development. Science 362, eaat8077 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Emani, P. S. et al. Single-cell genomics and regulatory networks for 388 human brains. Science 384, eadi5199 (2024).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhaduri, A. et al. An atlas of cortical arealization identifies dynamic molecular signatures. Nature 598, 200–204 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nowakowski, T. J. et al. Spatiotemporal gene expression trajectories reveal developmental hierarchies of the human cortex. Science 358, 1318–1323 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Heffel, M. G. et al. Temporally distinct 3D multi-omic dynamics in the developing human brain. Nature 635, 481–489 (2024).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Velmeshev, D. et al. Single-cell analysis of prenatal and postnatal human cortical development. Science 382, eadf0834 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, K. et al. Multi-omic profiling of the developing human cerebral cortex at the single-cell level. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg3754 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Capauto, D. et al. Characterization of enhancer activity in early human neurodevelopment using Massively Parallel Reporter Assay (MPRA) and forebrain organoids. Sci. Rep. 14, 3936 (2024).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Deng, C. et al. Massively parallel characterization of regulatory elements in the developing human cortex. Science 384, eadh0559 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ziffra, R. S. et al. Single-cell epigenomics reveals mechanisms of human cortical development. Nature 598, 205–213 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Trevino, A. E. et al. Chromatin and gene-regulatory dynamics of the developing human cerebral cortex at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 5053–5069.e23 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lister, R. et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341, 1237905 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49, 825–837 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gao, Y. et al. Continuous cell-type diversification in mouse visual cortex development. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09644-1 (2025). This study creates a comprehensive and high-resolution transcriptomic and epigenomic cell type atlas of the developing mouse visual cortex, revealing continuous cell-type diversification throughout the embryonic and postnatal periods.

  35. Tasic, B. et al. Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas. Nature 563, 72–78 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Bella, D. J. et al. Molecular logic of cellular diversification in the mouse cerebral cortex. Nature 595, 554–559 (2021).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, X. et al. Whole-cortex in situ sequencing reveals input-dependent area identity. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07221-6 (2024). This study utilizes high-throughput in situ sequencing to reveal broad cell-type compositional changes across the cortex caused by developmental perturbation of visual peripheral inputs.

  38. Hawrylycz, M. et al. SEA-AD is a multimodal cellular atlas and resource for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Aging 4, 1331–1334 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sohal, V. S. & Rubenstein, J. L. R. Excitation–inhibition balance as a framework for investigating mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 1248–1257 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bershteyn, M. et al. Human pallial MGE-type GABAergic interneuron cell therapy for chronic focal epilepsy. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1331–1350.e11 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. van Velthoven, C. T. J. et al. Transcriptomic and spatial organization of telencephalic GABAergic neurons. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09296-1 (2025). This study conducts comprehensive mapping of GABAergic neuron types in the adult and developing telencephalon of mice, revealing rules underlying their transcriptomic, spatial and developmental patterns.

  42. Krienen, F. M. et al. Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire. Nature 586, 262–269 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmitz, M. T. et al. The development and evolution of inhibitory neurons in primate cerebrum. Nature 603, 871–877 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Corrigan, E. K. et al. Conservation and alteration of mammalian striatal interneurons. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09592-w (2025). This study shows the conservation of TAC3 striatal interneurons with modified gene expression and distribution in evolution, suggesting that brain evolution among mammals occurs through fate refinement of initial classes during development rather than through the generation of entirely novel populations.

  45. Andrews, M. G. et al. LIF signaling regulates outer radial glial to interneuron fate during human cortical development. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1382–1391.e5 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Delgado, R. N. et al. Individual human cortical progenitors can produce excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Nature 601, 397–403 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, L. et al. Molecular and cellular dynamics of the developing human neocortex. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08351-7 (2025). This study identifies tri-potential intermediate progenitors that generate GABAergic neurons, oligodendrocyte precursors, and astrocytes in the human neocortex, and shows that glioblastoma cells share their transcriptomic features.

  48. Wang, R. et al. Adult human glioblastomas harbor radial glia-like cells. Stem Cell Rep. 14, 338–350 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Keefe, M. G., Steyert, M. R. & Nowakowsk, T. J. Lineage-resolved atlas of the developing human cortex. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09033-8 (2025). This study utilizes barcoded lineage tracing to reveal a developmental switch from glutamatergic to GABAergic neurogenesis in the human neocortex.

  50. Kostović, I., Judaš, M. & Sedmak, G. Developmental history of the subplate zone, subplate neurons and interstitial white matter neurons: relevance for schizophrenia. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 29, 193–205 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kubo, K.-I. Increased densities of white matter neurons as a cross-disease feature of neuropsychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 74, 166–175 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, D. et al. Spatial dynamics of brain development and neuroinflammation. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09663-y (2025). This study applies spatial tri-omics mapping to characterize cellular and regulatory dynamics in the developing mouse brain and in a neuroinflammatory mouse model, revealing a spatiotemporal relationship between axonogenesis and myelination, as well as distal microglia activation in focal demyelination.

  53. Mannens, C. C. A. et al. Chromatin accessibility during human first-trimester neurodevelopment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07234-1 (2024). This study details epigenomic characterization of human brain development during the first trimester, using epigenomic signatures to decipher transcriptional modules of regionalization and cell fate specification.

  54. Nano, P. R. et al. Integrated analysis of molecular atlases unveils modules driving developmental cell subtype specification in the human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 28, 949–963 (2025). This study defines a meta-atlas of human brain development using integrative computational analysis of multiple datasets and identifies TSHZ3 as a driver of cortical layer 5 specification.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kaplan, H. S. et al. Sensory input, sex and function shape hypothalamic cell type development. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08603-0 (2025). This study characterizes the development of cell types in the hypothalamic preoptic area that are involved in the regulation of sex-specific social behaviours, revealing that social experience can shape the development of these cell types.

  56. Kronman, F. N. et al. Developmental mouse brain common coordinate framework. Nat. Commun. 15, 9072 (2024). This study creates a comprehensive common coordinate framework for the mouse brain across developmental stages and maps the origin and redistribution of non-neuronal cells across development.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Jayakumar, J. et al. A three-dimensional histological cell atlas of the developing human brain. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.17.628811 (2024). This study reports the first comprehensive histological atlas of human brain development across key developmental stages, using complete intact tissue specimens.

  58. Sonthalia, S. et al. A curated compendium of transcriptomic data for the exploration of neocortical development. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.26.581612 (2024). This study curates public multi-omics data focused on neocortical development in an open data exploration environment and jointly decomposes these datasets to define the developmental emergence of primate-specific and conserved transcriptomic features, in addition to mapping which of these are recapitulated in organoid models.

  59. La Manno, G. et al. Molecular architecture of the developing mouse brain. Nature 596, 92–96 (2021).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Micali, N. et al. Molecular programs of regional specification and neural stem cell fate progression in macaque telencephalon. Science 382, eadf3786 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bakken, T. E. et al. Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. Nature 598, 111–119 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jorstad, N. L. et al. Transcriptomic cytoarchitecture reveals principles of human neocortex organization. Science 382, eadf6812 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Shibata, M. et al. Regulation of prefrontal patterning and connectivity by retinoic acid. Nature 598, 483–488 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Shibata, M. et al. Hominini-specific regulation of CBLN2 increases prefrontal spinogenesis. Nature 598, 489–494 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ma, S. et al. Molecular and cellular evolution of the primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Science 377, eabo7257 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Franjic, D. et al. Transcriptomic taxonomy and neurogenic trajectories of adult human, macaque, and pig hippocampal and entorhinal cells. Neuron 110, 452–469.e14 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, Y. et al. Comparative single-cell multiome identifies evolutionary changes in neural progenitor cells during primate brain development. Dev. Cell 60, 414–428.e8 (2025).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao, Z. et al. Evolutionarily conservative and non-conservative regulatory networks during primate interneuron development revealed by single-cell RNA and ATAC sequencing. Cell Res. 32, 425–436 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Adameyko, I. et al. Applying single-cell and single-nucleus genomics to studies of cellular heterogeneity and cell fate transitions in the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 2278–2291 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Schlegel, P. et al. Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila. Nature 634, 139–152 (2024).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Schneider-Mizell, C. M. et al. Inhibitory specificity from a connectomic census of mouse visual cortex. Nature 640, 448–458 (2025).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Gamlin, C. R. et al. Connectomics of predicted Sst transcriptomic types in mouse visual cortex. Nature 640, 497–505 (2025).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhou, J. et al. Brain-wide correspondence of neuronal epigenomics and distant projections. Nature 624, 355–365 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Peng, H. et al. Morphological diversity of single neurons in molecularly defined cell types. Nature 598, 174–181 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Foster, N. N. et al. The mouse cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic network. Nature 598, 188–194 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Nagy, C. et al. Single-nucleus transcriptomics of the prefrontal cortex in major depressive disorder implicates oligodendrocyte precursor cells and excitatory neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 771–781 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pfisterer, U. et al. Identification of epilepsy-associated neuronal subtypes and gene expression underlying epileptogenesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5038 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Gandal, M. J. et al. Broad transcriptomic dysregulation occurs across the cerebral cortex in ASD. Nature 611, 532–539 (2022).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Bhaduri, A. et al. Cell stress in cortical organoids impairs molecular subtype specification. Nature 578, 142–148 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Velasco, S. et al. Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex. Nature 570, 523–527 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. López-Tobón, A. et al. Human cortical organoids expose a differential function of GSK3 on cortical neurogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 13, 847–861 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Mansour, A. A. et al. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 432–441 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Giandomenico, S. L. et al. Cerebral organoids at the air-liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 669–679 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Cakir, B. et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 16, 1169–1175 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Pașca, S. P. et al. A framework for neural organoids, assembloids and transplantation studies. Nature 639, 315–320 (2025).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Werner, J. M. & Gillis, J. Meta-analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing co-expression in human neural organoids reveals their high variability in recapitulating primary tissue. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002912 (2024). This study presents a comprehensive data framework for evaluating the fidelity of in vitro-derived brain organoids benchmarked against the ground truth of primary developing brain tissue.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Ament, S. A. et al. A single-cell genomic atlas for maturation of the human cerebellum during early childhood. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eade1283 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Kamimoto, K. et al. Dissecting cell identity via network inference and in silico gene perturbation. Nature 614, 742–751 (2023).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Roohani, Y., Huang, K. & Leskovec, J. Predicting transcriptional outcomes of novel multigene perturbations with GEARS. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 927–935 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Bock, C. et al. High-content CRISPR screening. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 9 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866.e17 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Adamson, B. et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167, 1867–1882.e21 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Jaitin, D. A. et al. Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 167, 1883–1896.e15 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Fleck, J. S. et al. Resolving organoid brain region identities by mapping single-cell genomic data to reference atlases. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1148–1159.e8 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Jin, X. et al. In vivo Perturb-Seq reveals neuronal and glial abnormalities associated with autism risk genes. Science 370, eaaz6063 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Tasic, B. & Fishell, G. Exploring brain circuits, one cell type-or more- at a time. Neuron 113, 1469–1473 (2025).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Bashor, C. J., Hilton, I. B., Bandukwala, H., Smith, D. M. & Veiseh, O. Engineering the next generation of cell-based therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 655–675 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Bose, A., Petsko, G. A. & Studer, L. Induced pluripotent stem cells: a tool for modeling Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 45, 608–620 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Lin, H.-C. et al. Human neuron subtype programming via single-cell transcriptome-coupled patterning screens. Science 389, eadn6121 (2025).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rood, J. E. et al. The Human Cell Atlas from a cell census to a unified foundation model. Nature 637, 1065–1071 (2025).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Brust, V., Schindler, P. M. & Lewejohann, L. Lifetime development of behavioural phenotype in the house mouse (Mus musculus). Front. Zool. 12, S17 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. de Castro Leão, A., Duarte Dória Neto, A. & de Sousa, M. B. C. New developmental stages for common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) using mass and age variables obtained by K-means algorithm and self-organizing maps (SOM). Comput. Biol. Med. 39, 853–859 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Walker, M. L. & Herndon, J. G. Menopause in nonhuman primates? Biol. Reprod. 79, 398–406 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Clancy, B., Darlington, R. B. & Finlay, B. L. Translating developmental time across mammalian species. Neuroscience 105, 7–17 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Workman, A. D., Charvet, C. J., Clancy, B., Darlington, R. B. & Finlay, B. L. Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J. Neurosci. 33, 7368–7383 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant numbers U19MH114830 and U01MH130962 (to H.Z.); R01NS123263 and R01MH128364 (to T.J.N.); R00NS111731 and R01MH132689 (to A.B.); RF1MH124605 (to Y.K.); K99MH131832 (to L.W.); UM1MH130991 (to A.R.K., N.S. and A.B); R01MH134981 and DP2MH122400 (to A.A.P.); UM1HG011585, U19MH114821, R01HD082131 and R01NS112399 (to C.D.); UM1MH130981 and DP2MH140136 (to F.M.K.); RF1MH128876 (to R.F.); R01MH113005 and R01LM012736 (to J.G. and J.M.W.); and R24MH114788 and R24MH114815 (to S.A.A. and C.C.). H.Z., Z.Y., C.T.J.v.V., X.C. and Y.G. were also supported by the Allen Institute. This research was also supported by California Institute for Regenerative Medicine DISC0-14429, as well as gifts to T.J.N. from the Esther A. & Joseph Klingenstein Fund, the Shurl and Kay Curci Foundation, the Sontag Foundation, and the William K. Bowes Jr Foundation. T.J.N. is a New York Stem Cell Foundation Robertson Neuroscience Investigator, and A.A.P. is a New York Stem Cell Foundation Robertson Stem Cell Investigator. This research was also supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Rose Hills Foundation, a Klingenstein-Simons Fellowship and an Ablon Scholar Award to A.B.; W. M. Keck Foundation and Pershing Foundation awards to A.A.P.; and a Klingenstein-Simons Fellowship to F.M.K. This research was also supported by Jane Coffin Childs Medical Research Award grant 61-1749 to H.S.K., and a NOMIS Foundation Award and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to C.D. J.M.W. was supported by National Science Foundation award DGE-1938105, and E.K.C. was supported by National Science Foundation grant GRFP 2034836. S.V. and J.L.W. were Schmidt Science Fellows, and J.L.W. was also a Jane Coffin Childs Fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.J.N., P.R.N., A.B. and H.Z. led the writing with inputs and editing from all authors (T.J.N., P.R.N., K.S.M., X.C., E.K.C., W.D., Y.G., M.H., J.J., H.S.K., F.N.K., R.K., C.C.A.M., M.S., M.R.S., S.V., J.L.W., L.W., J.M.W., D.Z., G.Y., G.Z., S.A.A., C.C., C.D., R.F., J.G., A.R.K., F.M.K., Y.K., S.L., P.P.M., A.A.P., N.S., D.J.T., C.T.J.v.V., Z.Y., A.B. and H.Z.). C.T.J.v.V., J.L.W., T.J.N., A.A.P., N.S., A.B. and H.Z. prepared figures. K.S.M. coordinated the study. T.J.N., A.B. and H.Z. supervised the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tomasz J. Nowakowski, Aparna Bhaduri or Hongkui Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.Z. is on the scientific advisory board of MapLight Therapeutics. N.S. is a co-founder and board member of Bexorg. A.R.K. is a co-founder of and consultant to Neurona Therapeutics.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Eran Mukamel, Heng Xu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nowakowski, T.J., Nano, P.R., Matho, K.S. et al. The new frontier in understanding human and mammalian brain development. Nature 647, 51–59 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09652-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09652-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing