Abstract
Diabetes has long-term, potentially severe implications for healthspan and lifespan and imposes an immense burden on global healthcare, the economy and society. Although a repertoire of medications is available to treat diabetes, these do not properly address the eventual lack of functional pancreatic beta cells that are needed to secrete insulin and maintain glucose homeostasis. Human islet cell transplantation from deceased donors is an established treatment for insulin-requiring type 1 diabetes, but demand outstrips supply. Substantial scientific and clinical progress has occurred in the last decade toward deriving pancreatic islet-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells, suggesting a potentially limitless solution to the supply issue and a new era in cell therapy for diabetes. Here, we critically review the scientific advances, the clinical trials and the various regulatory considerations that will need to be overcome for human stem cell-derived pancreatic islet-like cells to become the next cell therapy breakthrough for diabetes treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sun, H. et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 183, 109119 (2022).
Reusch, J. E. & Manson, J. E. Management of type 2 diabetes in 2017: getting to goal. JAMA 317, 1015–1016 (2017).
DiMeglio, L. A., Evans-Molina, C. & Oram, R. A. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 391, 2449–2462 (2018).
Douros, A. et al. Pharmacologic differences of sulfonylureas and the risk of adverse cardiovascular and hypoglycemic events. Diabetes Care 40, 1506–1513 (2017).
Vantyghem, M. C., de Koning, E. J. P., Pattou, F. & Rickels, M. R. Advances in β-cell replacement therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Lancet 394, 1274–1285 (2019).
US Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for allogeneic pancreatic islet cell products. https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/Guidance-for-Industry–Considerations-for-Allogeneic-Pancreatic-Islet-Cell-Products-PDF.pdf (2009).
Jayachandra, S. Summary basis for regulatory action. https://www.fda.gov/media/170457/download (2023).
Yamanaka, S. Pluripotent stem cell-based cell therapy-promise and challenges. Cell Stem Cell 27, 523–531 (2020).
Tan, L. S., Chen, J. T., Lim, L. Y. & Teo, A. K. K. Manufacturing clinical-grade human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beta cells for diabetes treatment. Cell Prolif. 55, e13232 (2022).
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).
Deinsberger, J., Reisinger, D. & Weber, B. Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis. NPJ Regen. Med. 5, 15 (2020).
Balboa, D. et al. Functional, metabolic and transcriptional maturation of human pancreatic islets derived from stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1042–1055 (2022).
Maxwell, K. G. et al. Gene-edited human stem cell-derived β cells from a patient with monogenic diabetes reverse preexisting diabetes in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaax9106 (2020).
Veres, A. et al. Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation. Nature 569, 368–373 (2019).
Velazco-Cruz, L. et al. Acquisition of dynamic function in human stem cell-derived β cells. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 351–365 (2019).
Du, Y. et al. Human pluripotent stem-cell-derived islets ameliorate diabetes in non-human primates. Nat. Med. 28, 272–282 (2022).
Hogrebe, N. J., Maxwell, K. G., Augsornworawat, P. & Millman, J. R. Generation of insulin-producing pancreatic β cells from multiple human stem cell lines. Nat. Protoc. 16, 4109–4143 (2021).
Ramzy, A. et al. Implanted pluripotent stem-cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells secrete glucose-responsive C-peptide in patients with type 1 diabetes. Cell Stem Cell 28, 2047–2061 (2021).
Shapiro, A. M. J. et al. Insulin expression and C-peptide in type 1 diabetes subjects implanted with stem cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells in an encapsulation device. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100466 (2021).
Business Wire. Vertex announces positive day 90 data for the first patient in the phase 1/2 clinical trial dosed with VX-880, a novel investigational stem cell-derived therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211018005226/en/ (2021).
Business Wire. Vertex presents positive VX-880 results from ongoing phase 1/2 study in type 1 diabetes at the American Diabetes Association 83rd Scientific Sessions. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230623446641/en/ (2023).
Nostro, M. C. et al. Efficient generation of NKX6-1+ pancreatic progenitors from multiple human pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 591–604 (2015).
Russ, H. A. et al. Controlled induction of human pancreatic progenitors produces functional beta-like cells in vitro. EMBO J. 34, 1759–1772 (2015).
Pagliuca, F. W. et al. Generation of functional human pancreatic β cells in vitro. Cell 159, 428–439 (2014).
Rezania, A. et al. Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1121–1133 (2014).
Loo, L. S. W., Lau, H. H., Jasmen, J. B., Lim, C. S. & Teo, A. K. K. An arduous journey from human pluripotent stem cells to functional pancreatic β cells. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20, 3–13 (2018).
Santosa, M. M., Low, B. S., Pek, N. M. & Teo, A. K. Knowledge gaps in rodent pancreas biology: taking human pluripotent stem cell-derived pancreatic beta cells into our own hands. Front. Endocrinol. 6, 194 (2015).
Toyoda, T. et al. Rho-associated kinases and non-muscle myosin IIs inhibit the differentiation of human iPSCs to pancreatic endoderm. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 419–428 (2017).
Toyoda, T. et al. Cell aggregation optimizes the differentiation of human ESCs and iPSCs into pancreatic bud-like progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. 14, 185–197 (2015).
Millman, J. R. et al. Generation of stem cell-derived β-cells from patients with type 1 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11463 (2016).
Hogrebe, N. J., Augsornworawat, P., Maxwell, K. G., Velazco-Cruz, L. & Millman, J. R. Targeting the cytoskeleton to direct pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 460–470 (2020).
Nair, G. G. et al. Recapitulating endocrine cell clustering in culture promotes maturation of human stem-cell-derived β cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 263–274 (2019).
Sharon, N. et al. A peninsular structure coordinates asynchronous differentiation with morphogenesis to generate pancreatic islets. Cell 176, 790–804 (2019).
Sharon, N. et al. Wnt signaling separates the progenitor and endocrine compartments during pancreas development. Cell Rep. 27, 2281–2291 (2019).
Maxwell, K. G., Kim, M. H., Gale, S. E. & Millman, J. R. Differential function and maturation of human stem cell-derived islets after transplantation. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 11, 322–331 (2022).
Wang, C. et al. Cell identity dynamics and insight into insulin secretagogues when employing stem cell-derived islets for disease modeling. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12, 1392575 (2024).
Zhou, Q. et al. A multipotent progenitor domain guides pancreatic organogenesis. Dev. Cell 13, 103–114 (2007).
Barsby, T. et al. Differentiating functional human islet-like aggregates from pluripotent stem cells. STAR Protoc. 3, 101711 (2022).
Ghazizadeh, Z. et al. ROCKII inhibition promotes the maturation of human pancreatic beta-like cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 298 (2017).
Gouzi, M., Kim, Y. H., Katsumoto, K., Johansson, K. & Grapin-Botton, A. Neurogenin3 initiates stepwise delamination of differentiating endocrine cells during pancreas development. Dev. Dyn. 240, 589–604 (2011).
Mamidi, A. et al. Mechanosignalling via integrins directs fate decisions of pancreatic progenitors. Nature 564, 114–118 (2018).
Gupta, S. K. et al. NKX6.1 induced pluripotent stem cell reporter lines for isolation and analysis of functionally relevant neuronal and pancreas populations. Stem Cell Res. 29, 220–231 (2018).
Nair, G. G., Tzanakakis, E. S. & Hebrok, M. Emerging routes to the generation of functional beta-cells for diabetes mellitus cell therapy. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 16, 506–518 (2020).
Melton, D. The promise of stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy. Diabetologia 64, 1030–1036 (2021).
Maxwell, K. G. & Millman, J. R. Applications of iPSC-derived beta cells from patients with diabetes. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100238 (2021).
Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Vertex announces FDA clearance of investigational new drug application for VX-264, a novel encapsulated cell therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. https://investors.vrtx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/vertex-announces-fda-clearance-investigational-new-drug (2023).
Enosawa, S. Clinical trials of stem cell therapy in japan: the decade of progress under the national program. J. Clin. Med. 11, 7030 (2022).
Wang, S. et al. Transplantation of chemically induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived islets under abdominal anterior rectus sheath in a type 1 diabetes patient. Cell 187, 6152–6164.e18 (2024).
Kroon, E. et al. Pancreatic endoderm derived from human embryonic stem cells generates glucose-responsive insulin-secreting cells in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 443–452 (2008).
Keymeulen, B. et al. Encapsulated stem cell-derived β cells exert glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1507–1514 (2023).
American Diabetes Association. Expanded FORWARD trial demonstrates continued potential for stem cell-derived islet cell therapy to eliminate need for insulin for people with T1D. https://diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/expanded-forward-trial-demonstrates-continued-potential-stem-cell-derived (2024).
Wu, J. et al. Treating a type 2 diabetic patient with impaired pancreatic islet function by personalized endoderm stem cell-derived islet tissue. Cell Discov. 10, 45 (2024).
Shapiro, A. M., Pokrywczynska, M. & Ricordi, C. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 268–277 (2017).
Naziruddin, B. et al. Evidence for instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in clinical autologous islet transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 14, 428–437 (2014).
Liang, Z. et al. Implantation underneath the abdominal anterior rectus sheath enables effective and functional engraftment of stem-cell-derived islets. Nat. Metab. 5, 29–40 (2023).
Gaba, R. C., Garcia-Roca, R. & Oberholzer, J. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation: an update for interventional radiologists. J. Vasc. Inter. Radio. 23, 583–594 (2012).
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Glucose-dependent insulin production and insulin-independence in type 1 diabetes from stem cell–derived, fully differentiated islet cells—updated data from the VX-880 clinical trial. https://diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/article/72/Supplement_1/836-P/149653/836-P-Glucose-Dependent-Insulin-Production-and (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. A rapid chemical reprogramming system to generate human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01799-8 (2025).
Abou-El-Enein, M., Bauer, G., Medcalf, N., Volk, H.-D. & Reinke, P. Putting a price tag on novel autologous cellular therapies. Cytotherapy 18, 1056–1061 (2016).
Lin, G. et al. HLA-matching potential of an established human embryonic stem cell bank in China. Cell Stem Cell 5, 461–465 (2009).
Yoshida, S. et al. A clinical-grade HLA haplobank of human induced pluripotent stem cells matching approximately 40% of the Japanese population. Med 4, 51–66 (2023).
Gourraud, P.-A., Gilson, L., Girard, M. & Peschanski, M. The role of human leukocyte antigen matching in the development of multiethnic “haplobank” of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem Cells 30, 180–186 (2012).
Taylor, C. J., Peacock, S., Chaudhry, A. N., Bradley, J. A. & Bolton, E. M. Generating an iPSC bank for HLA-matched tissue transplantation based on known donor and recipient HLA types. Cell Stem Cell 11, 147–152 (2012).
Vendrame, F. et al. Risk factors for type 1 diabetes recurrence in immunosuppressed recipients of simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplants. Am. J. Transplant. 16, 235–245 (2016).
Brooks, A. M. S. et al. De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with rapid loss of graft function following islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes. Am. J. Transplant. 15, 3239–3246 (2015).
Ballou, C. et al. Matching for HLA-DR excluding diabetogenic HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR4 predicts insulin independence after pancreatic islet transplantation. Front. Immunol. 14, 1110544 (2023).
Forbes, S. et al. Islet transplantation outcomes in type 1 diabetes and transplantation of HLA-DQ8/DR4: results of a single-centre retrospective cohort in Canada. EClinicalMedicine 67, 102333 (2024).
Erlich, H. et al. HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and genotypes and type 1 diabetes risk: analysis of the type 1 diabetes genetics consortium families. Diabetes 57, 1084–1092 (2008).
Tran, M. T. et al. T cell receptor recognition of hybrid insulin peptides bound to HLA-DQ8. Nat. Commun. 12, 5110 (2021).
Pathiraja, V. et al. Proinsulin-specific, HLA-DQ8, and HLA-DQ8-transdimer-restricted CD4+ T cells infiltrate islets in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 64, 172–182 (2015).
Nejentsev, S. et al. Localization of type 1 diabetes susceptibility to the MHC class I genes HLA-B and HLA-A. Nature 450, 887–892 (2007).
Noble, J. A. Fifty years of HLA-associated type 1 diabetes risk: history, current knowledge, and future directions. Front. Immunol. 15, 1457213 (2024).
Henry, R. R. et al. Initial clinical evaluation of VC-01 combination product—a stem cell–derived islet replacement for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-138-OR (2018).
Odorico, J. et al. Report of the key opinion leaders meeting on stem cell-derived beta cells. Transplantation 102, 1223–1229 (2018).
Vertex. Vertex announces FDA clearance of investigational new drug application for VX-264, a novel encapsulated cell therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. https://investors.vrtx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/vertex-announces-fda-clearance-investigational-new-drug (2023).
Taylor, N. P. Vertex cuts ties to CRISPR Therapeutics’ type 1 diabetes stem cell therapy (2024).
Sana Biotechnology. Uppsala University hospital and sana biotechnology announce authorization of the first-in-human clinical trial application for a primary islet cell treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes. https://ir.sana.com/news-releases/news-release-details/uppsala-university-hospital-and-sana-biotechnology-announce (2023).
Philpott, J. Vertex halts development of diabetes cell therapy after trial failure. https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/vertex-halts-development-of-diabetes-cell-therapy-after-trial-failure/?cf-view (2025).
van der Torren, C. R. et al. Immunogenicity of human embryonic stem cell-derived beta cells. Diabetologia 60, 126–133 (2017).
Hu, X. et al. Human hypoimmune primary pancreatic islets avoid rejection and autoimmunity and alleviate diabetes in allogeneic humanized mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eadg5794 (2023).
Hu, X. et al. Hypoimmune islets achieve insulin independence after allogeneic transplantation in a fully immunocompetent non-human primate. Cell Stem Cell 31, 334–340 (2024).
Shapiro, A. M. J. & Verhoeff, K. A spectacular year for islet and stem cell transplantation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 19, 68–69 (2023).
Schulz, T. C. et al. A scalable system for production of functional pancreatic progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 7, e37004 (2012).
Verhoeff, K. et al. Scalable bioreactor-based suspension approach to generate stem cell-derived islets from healthy donor-derived iPSCs. Transplantation 109, e22–e35 (2025).
Kropp, C. et al. Impact of feeding strategies on the scalable expansion of human pluripotent stem cells in single-use stirred tank bioreactors. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 5, 1289–1301 (2016).
Ullmann, K. et al. Matrix-free human pluripotent stem cell manufacturing by seed train approach and intermediate cryopreservation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 15, 89 (2024).
Pollock, S. D., Galicia-Silva, I. M., Liu, M., Gruskin, Z. L. & Alvarez-Dominguez, J. R. Scalable generation of 3D pancreatic islet organoids from human pluripotent stem cells in suspension bioreactors. STAR Protoc. 4, 102580 (2023).
Lei, Y. & Schaffer, D. V. A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E5039–E5048 (2013).
Borys, B. S. et al. Overcoming bioprocess bottlenecks in the large-scale expansion of high-quality hiPSC aggregates in vertical-wheel stirred suspension bioreactors. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12, 55 (2021).
Tang, X. et al. The combination of dextran sulphate and polyvinyl alcohol prevents excess aggregation and promotes proliferation of pluripotent stem cells in suspension culture. Cell Prolif. 54, e13112 (2021).
Sen, A., Kallos, M. S. & Behie, L. A. Effects of hydrodynamics on cultures of mammalian neural stem cell aggregates in suspension bioreactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40, 5350–5357 (2001).
Schulz, T. C. Concise review: manufacturing of pancreatic endoderm cells for clinical trials in type 1 diabetes. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4, 927–931 (2015).
Pepper, A. R. et al. Transplantation of human pancreatic endoderm cells reverses diabetes post transplantation in a prevascularized subcutaneous site. Stem Cell Rep. 8, 1689–1700 (2017).
Iworima, D. G. et al. Metabolic switching, growth kinetics and cell yields in the scalable manufacture of stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 15, 1 (2024).
Zhan, L. et al. Pancreatic islet cryopreservation by vitrification achieves high viability, function, recovery and clinical scalability for transplantation. Nat. Med. 28, 798–808 (2022).
Kojayan, G. G., Alexander, M., Imagawa, D. K. & Lakey, J. R. T. Systematic review of islet cryopreservation. Islets 10, 40–49 (2018).
Barra, J. M. et al. Cryopreservation of stem cell–derived β-like cells enriches for insulin-producing cells with improved function. Diabetes 73, 1687–1696 (2024).
Agulnick, A., Martinson, L., Kroon, E, Scott, M. & Green, C. Cryopreservation, hibernation and room temperature storage of encapulated pancreatic endoderm cell aggregates. US patent application US10695380B2 (2017).
Murray, K. A. & Gibson, M. I. Chemical approaches to cryopreservation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 579–593 (2022).
Marquez-Curtis, L. A. et al. Cryopreservation and post-thaw characterization of dissociated human islet cells. PLoS ONE 17, e0263005 (2022).
ViaCyte Incorporated. An open-label,phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, engraftment and efficacy of VC-01 combination product in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/57/NCT04678557/Prot_000.pdf (2020).
Fahy, G. M., MacFarlane, D. R., Angell, C. A. & Meryman, H. T. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology 21, 407–426 (1984).
Tanaka, M. et al. Achievements and challenges of the Sakigake designation system in Japan. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 87, 4027–4035 (2021).
Tanaka, M., Miyazawa, H., Terashima, R. & Ikuma, M. Conditional early approval for new drug applications in Japan: current and emerging issues. Clin. Transl. Sci. 16, 1289–1293 (2023).
International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities. ICMRA-ICH-IPRP-PICS Joint Work Plan for Harmonisation and Convergence Work to Advance Development of a Regulatory Pharmaceutical Quality Knowledge Management Capability. https://www.icmra.info/drupal/en/strategicinitatives/pqkms/joint_work_plan (2023).
World Health Organization. Considerations in developing a regulatory framework for human cells and tissues and for advance therapy medicinal products, Annex 3, TRS 1048. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/considerations-in-developing-a-regulatory-framework-for-human-cells-and-tissues-and-for-advance-therapy-medicinal-products-annex-3-trs-1048 (2023).
Madrid, M. et al. Considerations for the development of iPSC-derived cell therapies: a review of key challenges by the JSRM-ISCT iPSC Committee. Cytotherapy 26, 1382–1399 (2024).
Department of Health and Social Care. Donation of starting material for advanced cell-based therapies. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/donation-of-starting-material-for-advanced-cell-based-therapies (2014).
European Union. Commission Directive 2006/17/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/17/oj (2006).
US Food and Drug Administration. Complete list of donor screening assays for infectious agents and HIV diagnostic assays. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/complete-list-donor-screening-assays-infectious-agents-and-hiv-diagnostic-assays (2024).
US Food and Drug Administration. Use of serological tests to reduce the risk of transmission of Trypanosomacruzi infection in blood and blood components. https://www.fda.gov/media/101270/download (2017).
Pamies, D. et al. Guidance document on Good Cell and Tissue Culture Practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0). ALTEX 39, 30–70 (2022).
O’Shea, O., Steeg, R., Chapman, C., Mackintosh, P. & Stacey, G. N. Development and implementation of large-scale quality control for the European bank for induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 45, 101773 (2020).
Pamies, D. et al. Recommendations on fit-for-purpose criteria to establish quality management for microphysiological systems and for monitoring their reproducibility. Stem Cell Rep. 19, 604–617 (2024).
Solomon, J. et al. Current perspectives on the use of ancillary materials for the manufacture of cellular therapies. Cytotherapy 18, 1–12 (2016).
Tanaka, T. et al. Comparison of guidelines for biological ancillary materials used for the manufacture of gene and cellular therapy products in Asia. Cytotherapy 25, 220–228 (2023).
Ball, O. & Zylberberg, C. Towards a common framework for defining ancillary material quality across the development spectrum. Cytotherapy 21, 1234–1245 (2019).
United States Pharmacopeia. 〈1043〉 Ancillary materials for cell, gene, and tissue-engineered products. https://doi.usp.org/USPNF/USPNF_M620_02_01.html (2024).
Thom, R. L., Cronin, A. J. & Consortium, V. Legal and regulatory challenges for emerging regenerative medicine solutions for diabetes. Transplantation 108, 1072–1079 (2024).
Seet, W. T. et al. Current Good manufacturing practice (cGMP) facility and production of stem cell. In Stem Cell Production: Processes, Practices and Regulations (ed. F. A. Khan) 37–68 (Springer, 2022).
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme. Guide to good manufacturing practice for medicinal products annexes. https://picscheme.org/docview/8881 (2023).
World Health Organization. Considerations in developing a regulatory framework for human cells and tissues and for advanced therapy medicinal products. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/biologicals/annex-3-hcts-atmps-regulatory-considerations-clean-for-posting-12-may-2023.pdf?sfvrsn=cc1f9a8a_1&download=true (2023).
World Health Organization. Executive Summary of WHO Implementation Workshop on ‘WHO considerations in developing a regulatory framework for human cells and tissues and for advanced therapy medicinal products’. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/executive-summary-of-who-implementation-workshop-cgtp (2024).
Hankey, K. G. et al. Eight-day point of care CAR T-cell manufacturing on clinimacs prodigy from healthy donors as a proof-of-concept study. Blood 138, 2851 (2021).
Smith, T. A. CAR-T cell expansion in a Xuri cell expansion system W25. Methods Mol. Biol. 2086, 151–163 (2020).
Dias, J., Garcia, J., Agliardi, G. & Roddie, C. CAR-T cell manufacturing landscape—lessons from the past decade and considerations for early clinical development. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101250 (2024).
Grinstein, J. D. Cellares unveils clinically-compliant cell therapy manufacturing platform. GEN Edge 6, 209–211 (2024).
Markarian, J. Automation aids cell and gene therapy production. https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/automation-aids-cell-and-gene-therapy-production (2023).
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on human cell-based medicinal products. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-cell-based-medicinal-products-scientific-guideline (2007).
Food and Drug Administration. Safety testing of human allogeneic cells expanded for use in cell-based medical products. https://www.fda.gov/media/178113/download (2024).
Lee, A. S. et al. Effects of cell number on teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Cell Cycle 8, 2608–2612 (2009).
Gropp, M. et al. Standardization of the teratoma assay for analysis of pluripotency of human ES cells and biosafety of their differentiated progeny. PLoS ONE 7, e45532 (2012).
Wang, Z. et al. Ultrasensitive and rapid quantification of rare tumorigenic stem cells in hPSC-derived cardiomyocyte populations. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay7629 (2020).
Chong, E. A. et al. CAR T cell viability release testing and clinical outcomes: is there a lower limit? Blood 134, 1873–1875 (2019).
US Food and Drug Administration. Potency tests for cellular and gene therapy products. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/potency-tests-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products (2011).
Simon, C. G. et al. Mechanism of action, potency and efficacy: considerations for cell therapies. J. Transl. Med. 22, 416 (2024).
Kaestner, K. H. et al. What is a β cell? - Chapter I in the Human Islet Research Network (HIRN) review series. Mol. Metab. 53, 101323 (2021).
Barsby, T. & Otonkoski, T. Maturation of beta cells: lessons from in vivo and in vitro models. Diabetologia 65, 917–930 (2022).
Marchetti, P., Bugliani, M., De Tata, V., Suleiman, M. & Marselli, L. Pancreatic beta cell identity in humans and the role of type 2 diabetes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 5, 55 (2017).
US Food and Drug Administration. Part 1271—human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-L/part-1271 (2001).
US Food and Drug Administration. Part 600—biological products: general. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-600 (2020).
US Food and Drug Administration. Part 312—Investigational new drug application. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-312 (1987).
US Food and Drug Administration. Part 211—Current good manufacturing practice for finished pharmaceuticals. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-211 (1978).
US Food and Drug Administration. Part 820—Quality system regulation. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-820 (1996).
US Food and Drug Administration cellular & gene therapy guidances. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/biologics-guidances/cellular-gene-therapy-guidances
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for human somatic cell therapy and gene therapy. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-human-somatic-cell-therapy-and-gene-therapy (1998).
US Food and Drug Administration. Testing of retroviral vector-based human gene therapy products for replication competent retrovirus during product manufacture and patient follow-up. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/testing-retroviral-vector-based-human-gene-therapy-products-replication-competent-retrovirus-during (2020).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/83/oj (2001).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Commission Directive 2009/120/EC of 14 September 2009 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use as regards advanced therapy medicinal products. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/120/oj (2009).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Commission Directive 2003/94/EC of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products for human use. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0094&qid=1745758751723
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. https://health.ec.europa.eu/medicinal-products/eudralex/eudralex-volume-4_en
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on quality, non-clinical and clinical requirements for investigational advanced therapy medicinal products in clinical trials. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-quality-non-clinical-clinical-requirements-investigational-advanced-therapy-medicinal-products-clinical-trials_en.pdf (2025).
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A03952/latest/text (1990).
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990. https://www.legislation.gov.au/F1996B00406/latest/text (1990).
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods (Excluded Goods) Determination 2018. https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2018L01350/latest/text (2018).
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods (Standard for Human Cell and Tissue Products—Donor Screening Requirements) (TGO 108) Order 2021. https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2021L01326/latest/text (2021).
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Therapeutic Goods (Standards for Biologicals—General and Specific Requirements) (TGO 109) Order 2021. https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2021L01332/asmade/text (2021).
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) Act on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (PMD Act). https://www.jqa.jp/english/safety/service/mandatory/pharmaceutical/
Ministry of the Environment Japan Biosafety Clearing House (J-BCH). https://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/law.html
Tobita, M. et al. Japan’s challenges of translational regenerative medicine: Act on the safety of regenerative medicine. Regen. Ther. 4, 78–81 (2016).
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Standards for Biological Raw Materials, Operational Guideline. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000268475.pdf (2014).
National Medical Products Administration. 关于再次公开征求《临床试验期间生物制品药学变更和研究技术指导原则》和《已上市疫苗药学变更研究技术指导原则》意见的通知 (Translated title: Technical guidelines on the chemistry, manufacturing and controls change and research on biologics during clinical trial) (2023).
National Medical Products Administration. 关于《腺相关病毒载体类体内基因治疗产品临床试验申请药学研究与评价技术指导原则 (征求意见稿)》征求意见的通知 (Translated title: Technical guidelines on chemistry, manufacturing and controls study and evaluation for clinical trials for in vivo gene therapy with adenoassociated virus as a vector). https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/c81e168ac50a3bc7cf325a71f7742568 (2023).
National Medical Products Administration. 国家药监局药审中心关于发布《人源干细胞产品药学研究与评价技术指导原则 (试行)》的通告 (2023年第33号) (Translated title: Technical guidelines on chemistry, manufacturing, and controls study and evaluation of human stem cell products (Trial)). https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/1dfacaa7804aca84d648edb83b10c40b (2023).
Health Sciences Authority. Health Products Act. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/HPA2007/Uncommenced/20210228?DocDate=20210217&ValidDt=20210301#Sc1- (2007).
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the laboratory of A.K.K.T. for critical reading and feedback. J.T.C. is supported by the A*STAR Graduate Academy. A.K.K.T. is supported by IMCB, A*STAR, HLTRP/2022/NUS-IMCB-02, OFIRG21jun-0097, CSASI21jun-0006, MTCIRG21-0071, HLCA23Feb0031, SC36/19-000801-A044, H24G1a0015 and M24N2K0087.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, C.J.T. and A.K.K.T.; Writing—original draft, C.J.T., N.D. and E.H.P.T.; Writing—review and editing, C.J.T., N.D., E.H.P.T., N.H.J.N., M.B.C.K., J.S. and A.K.K.T.; Supervision, A.K.K.T.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
N.H.J.N. and A.K.K.T. are cofounders and shareholders of BetaLife but are not employed by BetaLife. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Medicine thanks James Shaw and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Karen O’Leary, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J.T., Dadheech, N., Tan, E.H.P. et al. Stem cell therapies for diabetes. Nat Med 31, 2147–2160 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03767-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03767-8


