Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

The arts for disease prevention and health promotion: a systematic review

Abstract

Differences in risk factor exposure and access to prevention resources have led to unequal health outcomes for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) globally. Recent studies elucidate the health benefits of arts participation, but no systematic reviews have focused on NCD prevention and health promotion. Here we share results of a mixed-methods systematic review that included 95 studies of arts programs, practices and activities, addressing NCD risk factors across 27 countries. We found that most reported outcomes were related to physical inactivity, unhealthy diets, mental health, and systemic, structural and social drivers of health. Our findings suggest that the arts may support NCDs prevention and health promotion by generating cultural relevance, providing opportunities for increased physical activity and social connectedness and by helping to identify and address systemic, structural and social forces contributing to health disparities and inequities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Systematic review flow diagram.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Primary extracted data for the included studies referenced in this article are available in Supplementary Note 3. All data are available on figshare.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (2024).

  2. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564854 (2014).

  3. Bloom, D. et al. The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases. EconPaper. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/gdmwpaper/8712.htm (2012).

  4. Habib, S. H. & Saha, S. Burden of non-communicable disease: global overview. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 4, 41–47 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Cesare, M. et al. Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses. Lancet 381, 585–597 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseinpoor, A. R. et al. Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health 12, 474 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. De Maeseneer, J. et al. Tackling NCDs: a different approach is needed. Lancet 379, 1860–1861 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrick, C., Okpako, O. & Millington, J. D. A. Unequal ecosystems of global health authorial expertise: decolonising noncommunicable disease. Health Place 71, 102670 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Airhihenbuwa, C. & Iwelunmor, J. Why culture matters in reducing the burden of NCDs and CDs in Africa. https://www.chpa.co/Documents/WhyCultureConnects-DrAirhuhenbuwa.pdf (2012).

  10. World Health Organization. Strengthening the capacity to tackle noncommunicable diseases (NCDs): meeting of collaborating centres of the WHO European Region on NCDs, with a focus on risk factors and surveillance: Moscow, Russian Federation, 5–6 December 2018. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2019-3648-43407-60948 (2019).

  11. Clift, S. et al. The state of arts and health in England. Arts Health 1, 6–35 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sonke, J., Rollins, J., Brandman, R. & Graham-Pole, J. The state of the arts in healthcare in the United States. Arts Health 1, 107–135 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wreford, G. The state of arts and health in Australia. Arts Health 2, 8–22 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cox, S. M. et al. Tipping the iceberg? The state of arts and health in Canada. Arts Health 2, 109–124 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laitinen, L., Jakonen, O., Lahtinen, E. & Lilja-Viherlampi, L.-M. From grass-roots activities to national policies—the state of arts and health in Finland. Arts Health 14, 14–31 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, M. K. B., Tan, C. M., Tan, S. G., Yoong, J. & Gibbons, B. Connecting the dots: the state of arts and health in Singapore. Arts Health 15, 119–134 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park, S. et al. The state of arts and health in the Republic of Korea. Arts Health 16, 206–223 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289054553 (2019).

  19. Griffith, D. M. & Semlow, A. R. Art, anti-racism and health equity: ‘don’t ask me why, ask me how!’. Ethn. Dis. 30, 373–380 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Annet, K. A. The role of artistic expression in social movements for health equity. IDOSR-JAM 9, 16–21 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clift, S. Creative arts as a public health resource: moving from practice-based research to evidence-based practice. Perspect. Public Health 132, 120–127 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Camic, P. M. & Chatterjee, H. J. Museums and art galleries as partners for public health interventions. Perspect. Public Health 133, 66–71 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCrary, J. M., Redding, E. & Altenmüller, E. Performing arts as a health resource? An umbrella review of the health impacts of music and dance participation. PLoS ONE 16, e0252956 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez, A. K. et al. Arts engagement as a health behavior: an opportunity to address mental health inequities. Community Health Equity Res. Policy 44, 315–322 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, J. et al. The effects of art-making intervention on mind-body and quality of life in adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 32, 186 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McQuade, L. & O’Sullivan, R. Examining arts and creativity in later life and its impact on older people’s health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the evidence. Perspect. Public Health 144, 344–353 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Burkhardt, J. & Brennan, C. The effects of recreational dance interventions on the health and well-being of children and young people: a systematic review. Arts Health 4, 148–161 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tomlinson, A. et al. A systematic review of the subjective wellbeing outcomes of engaging with visual arts for adults (‘working-age’, 15–64 years) with diagnosed mental health conditions. Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO) https://hdl.handle.net/10779/aru.23783646.v1 (2018).

  29. Bux, D. B. & van Schalkwyk, I. Creative arts interventions to enhance adolescent well-being in low-income communities: an integrative literature review. J. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 34, 1–29 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chappell, K. et al. The aesthetic, artistic and creative contributions of dance for health and wellbeing across the lifecourse: a systematic review. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being 16, 1950891 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Creech, A., Larouche, K., Generale, M. & Fortier, D. Creativity, music, and quality of later life: a systematic review. Psychol. Music 51, 1080–1100 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zarobe, L. & Bungay, H. The role of arts activities in developing resilience and mental wellbeing in children and young people a rapid review of the literature. Perspect. Public Health 137, 337–347 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sonke, J. et al. Defining ‘arts participation’ for public health research. Health Promot. Pract. 25, 985–996 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Causadias, J. M. & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. Reframing marginalization and youth development: introduction to the special issue. Am. Psychol. 73, 707–712 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baah, F. O., Teitelman, A. M. & Riegel, B. Marginalization: conceptualizing patient vulnerabilities in the framework of social determinants of health—an integrative review. Nurs. Inq. 26, e12268 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Morales, M. & Ladhari, R. Comparative cross‐cultural service quality: an assessment of research methodology. J. Serv. Manag. 22, 241–265 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Human Development Reports. Data and statistics readers guide. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI (2025).

  38. Boscardin, C. K., Sewell, J. L., Tolsgaard, M. G. & Pusic, M. V. How to use and report on p-values. Perspect. Med. Educ. 13, 250–254 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomas, J. & Harden, A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8, 45 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson, R. E., Grove, A. L. & Clarke, A. Pillar integration process: a joint display technique to integrate data in mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 13, 301–320 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dupin, C. M. & Borglin, G. Usability and application of a data integration technique (following the thread) for multi- and mixed methods research: a systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 108, 103608 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guetterman, T. C., Fàbregues, S. & Sakakibara, R. Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: a methodological review. Methods Psychol. 5, 100080 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cooper, A. L., Brennan, M. C., Leslie, G. D. & Brown, J. A. Integrating literature as a data source in mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 18, 447–461 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heyvaert, M., Maes, B. & Onghena, P. Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential. Qual. Quant. 47, 659–676 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson-Jennings, M., Paul, K., Olson, D., LaBeau, M. & Jennings, D. Ode’imin Giizis: proposing and piloting gardening as an indigenous childhood health intervention. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 31, 871–888 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Frazier, M., Massingale, S., Bowen, M. & Kohler, C. Engaging a community in developing an entertainment-education Spanish-language radio novella aimed at reducing chronic disease risk factors, Alabama, 2010–2011. Prev. Chronic Dis. 9, 110344 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Sarafian, B. & Thomas, C. R. Culturally relevant smoking prevention for minority youth. J. Sch. Health 62, 377–380 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vaughn, S. Stroke and heart disease prevention education via telenovela: a focus group’s evaluation. Rehabil. Nurs. 37, 215–219 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. DeBruyn, L., Fullerton, L., Satterfield, D. & Frank, M. Integrating culture and history to promote health and help prevent type 2 diabetes in American Indian/Alaska Native communities: traditional foods have become a way to talk about health. Prev. Chronic Dis. 17, E12 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Johnson, C. L., Begay, C. & Dickerson, D. Final development of the Native American Drum, Dance, and Regalia Program (NADDAR), a behavioral intervention utilizing traditional practices for urban Native American families: a focus group study. Behav. Ther. 44, 198–203 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Booth, J. M., Chapman, D., Ohmer, M. L. & Wei, K. Examining the relationship between level of participation in community gardens and their multiple functions. J. Community Pract. 26, 5–22 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Golembiewski, E., Allen, K. S., Blackmon, A. M., Hinrichs, R. J. & Vest, J. R. Combining nonclinical determinants of health and clinical data for research and evaluation: rapid review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 5, e12846 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ceci, S. J. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. in Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3 (ed Kazdin, A. E.) 129–133 (American Psychological Association, 2000).

  54. Sallis, J. F., Owen, N. & Fisher, E. B. Ecological models of health behavior. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, Fourth Edition (eds Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K. & Viswanath, K.) 465–485 (Jossey-Bass, 2008).

  55. Booth, A. Unpacking your literature search toolbox: on search styles and tactics. Health Info. Libr. J. 25, 313–317 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lorenza, L. et al. No dramas: using applied theatre to explore youth health issues in regional Central Queensland. Aust. J. Rural Health 31, 1115–1125 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Harris, N., Wilks, L. & Stewart, D. HYPEd-up: youth dance culture and health. Arts Health 4, 239–248 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B. & Jordan Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (2024).

  59. Abbs, E., Daniels, R. & Schillinger, D. Type 2 diabetes as a socioecological disease: can youth poets of color become messengers of truth and catalysts for change? Health Promot. Pract. 23, 583–593 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Escobar-Chaves, S. L., Shegog, R., Markham, C. & Brehm, B. J. ‘The McSpoons’: using puppetry’s narrative impact to reduce family TV time. Arts Health 2, 47–66 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Key, B., Burrell Parks, L., Gray, E. & Erskine, J. Utilizing readers theater for health promotion education in a rural setting. Online J. Rural Nurs. Health Care 22, 150–161 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sonke, J. et al. Arts participation as a health behavior: a systematic review of evidence for the roles of the arts in non-communicable disease prevention and health promotion. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024506862 (2024).

  63. Isaacs, D. et al. Jazzin’ healthy: interdisciplinary health outreach events focused on disease prevention and health promotion. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 4, 223–232 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Thomas, Y., Gray, M., McGinty, S. & Ebringer, S. Homeless adults engagement in art: first steps towards identity, recovery and social inclusion. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 58, 429–436 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Harris, M., Barnett, T. & Bridgman, H. Rural Art Roadshow: a travelling art exhibition to promote mental health in rural and remote communities. Arts Health 10, 57–64 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tischler, V. ‘It takes me into another dimension’: an evaluation of mental health-themed exhibitions in outdoor urban areas. Arts Health 10, 1–16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Allen, J. K., Elam, D. & Perry, E. Growing vegetables and values: benefits of neighborhood-based community gardens for youth development and nutrition. J. Hunger Environ. Nutr. 3, 418–439 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Omelchenko, K. L., Hall, C. A., Gainey, M. E. & Olson, G. E. ‘Rhythms of the Heart’: an interprofessional community health collaboration to increase cardiovascular health knowledge. Health Educ. J. 77, 606–614 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Renton, A. et al. Think of your art-eries: arts participation, behavioural cardiovascular risk factors and mental well-being in deprived communities in London. Public Health 126, S57–S64 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Flores, R. Dance for health: improving fitness in African-American and Hispanic adolescents. Public Health Rep. 110, 189–193 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Zick, C. D., Smith, K. R., Kowaleski-Jones, L., Uno, C. & Merrill, B. J. Harvesting more than vegetables: the potential weight control benefits of community gardening. Am. J. Public Health 103, 1110–1115 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Maani, N. et al. Global health equity requires global equity. Health Equity 7, 192–196 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Larkey, L. K., Lopez, A. M., Minnal, A. & Gonzalez, J. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer screening among underserved Latina women: a randomized pilot study. Cancer Control 16, 79–87 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Collett, L. K., Hudson, L., Prichard, C. & Vanderford, N. L. Using culturally focused storytelling to empower Appalachian Kentucky youth to understand and address cancer disparities in their communities. J. Cancer Educ. 38, 513–521 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Golden, T. L. & Wendel, M. L. Public health’s next step in advancing equity: re-evaluating epistemological assumptions to move social determinants from theory to practice. Front. Public Health 8, 131 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Nicklas, T., Lopez, S., Liu, Y., Saab, R. & Reiher, R. Motivational theater to increase consumption of vegetable dishes by preschool children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 14, 16 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wakefield, S., Yeudall, F., Taron, C., Reynolds, J. & Skinner, A. Growing urban health: community gardening in South-East Toronto. Health Promot. Int. 22, 92–101 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Grabbe, L., Ball, J. & Goldstein, A. Gardening for the mental well-being of homeless women. J. Holist. Nurs. 31, 258–266 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Niederkrotenthaler, T. et al. Association of increased youth suicides in the United States with the release of 13 Reasons Why. JAMA Psychiatry 76, 933 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Bridge, J. A. et al. Association between the release of Netflix’s 13 Reasons Why and suicide rates in the United States: an interrupted time series analysis. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 59, 236–243 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Moore, J. E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J. & Straus, S. E. Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implement. Sci. 12, 110 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Betrán, A. P., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Allen, T. & Hampson, L. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 5, 6 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N. & Garside, R. Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 18, 85 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Sadeghzadeh, C., Sheppard, B., de Groot, J. & de Marco, M. Evaluating the benefits of a SNAP-Ed-funded community garden intervention using ripple effect mapping. Health Educ. Behav. 49, 141–149 (2022).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mangadu, T., Kelly, M., Orezzoli, M. C. E., Gallegos, R. & Matharasi, P. Best practices for community gardening in a US-Mexico border community. Health Promot. Int. 32, 1001–1014 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Passy, R., Morris, M. & Reed, F. Impact of School Gardening on Learning: Final Report Submitted to the Royal Horticultural Society (National Foundation for Educational Research, 2010).

  87. Larkey, L. K. & Gonzalez, J. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer prevention and early detection among Latinos. Patient Educ. Couns. 67, 272–278 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pawlicka, N. et al. In their own words: an exploration of primary children’s participation in a dementia education program. Health Promot. J. Austr. 35, 251–259 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bell-Ellison, B. A. et al. A theater-as-education project discourages tobacco and alcohol use. Middle Sch. J. 41, 11–19 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Barnidge, E. K. et al. Association between community garden participation and fruit and vegetable consumption in rural Missouri. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 10, 128 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. What is health equity? https://www.rwjf.org/en/insights/our-research/2017/05/what-is-health-equity-.html (2025).

  92. Lanier, J., Schumacher, J. & Calvert, K. Cultivating community collaboration and community health through community gardens. J. Community Pract. 23, 492–507 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pitre, N., Stewart, S., Adams, S., Bedard, T. & Landry, S. The use of puppets with elementary school children in reducing stigmatizing attitudes towards mental illness. J. Ment. Health 16, 415–429 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Page, M. J. et al. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 118, 60–68 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. PRISMA-P Group et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4, 1 (2015).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Banatvala, N., Obermeyer, W. & Alleyne, G. United Nations high-level meetings on NCD prevention and control. In Noncommunicable Diseases: A Compendium (eds Banatvala, N. & Bovet, P.) 229–233 (Routledge, 2023).

  97. Yang, J. S., Mamudu, H. M. & John, R. Incorporating a structural approach to reducing the burden of non-communicable diseases. Global. Health 14, 66 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Adjaye-Gbewonyo, K. & Vaughan, M. Reframing NCDs? An analysis of current debates. Glob. Health Action 12, 1641043 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Zuccala, E. & Horton, R. Reframing the NCD agenda: a matter of justice and equity. Lancet 396, 939–940 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. World Health Organization. Health promotion. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/about/how-we-work/programmes/health-promotion (2025).

  101. Braveman, P. et al. What is health equity? Behav. Sci. Policy 4, 1–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wendel, M. L., Golden, T. L., Nation, M. & Kelly Pryor, B. N. Editorial: intervening in structural determinants: the role of language and narrative in enacting power to define issues and control resource distribution. Front. Public Health 12, 1381416 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Hofrichter, R. & Bhatia, R. Tackling Health Inequities through Public Health Practice: Theory to Action (Oxford University Press, 2010).

  104. Brown, T. H. & Homan, P. The future of social determinants of health: looking upstream to structural drivers. Milbank Q. 101, 36–60 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/social-determinants-of-health (2025).

  106. Hankivsky, O. Intersectionality 101 (The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, 2014).

  107. McGowan, J. et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 75, 40–46 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Morgan-Daniel, J. & Pyche, C. Arts participation as a health behaviour: a systematic review of evidence for the roles of the arts in non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention and health promotion: PubMed and other databases. Preprint at searchRxiv https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2024.0059 (2024).

  109. Harrison, R., Jones, B., Gardner, P. & Lawton, R. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multimethod studies. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 144 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Alshami, A., Elsayed, M., Ali, E., Eltoukhy, A. E. E. & Zayed, T. Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions. Systems 11, 351 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the State of Florida Division of Arts and Culture (award 24.c.ne.900.834 and 25.c.ne.900.921 to J.S.) and by a subaward from New York University (award RB678-06 to J.S.). The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the University of Florida’s Center for Arts in Medicine’s Interdisciplinary Research Lab, notably G. Hammond, Y. Chen and A. Colverson for assistance with screening, and T. Guetterman (University of Michigan) for review of the data integration. The study funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or writing of the report. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.S., D.F., N.S. and K.W. conceived the project. J.S., M.K.B.T., J.B.L., V.P., J.M.-D., M.P. and D.F. designed the study and developed the methodology (with review by all authors). J.S., J.B.L., M.K.B.T., T.G., S. Akram, S. Abdulla, C.P., S.O., J.M.-D. and V.P. conducted the search. Specifically, J.S., M.K.B.T., S.O., S. Akram, S. Abdulla, V.P. and J.B.L. contributed to data screening and extraction, with support from G. Hammond, Y. Chen and A. Colverson. J.S., M.K.B.T., J.B.L., T.G., V.P., S.O., S. Akram and S. Abdulla conducted the data analysis. J.S., M.K.B.T., J.B.L., V.P., J.M.-D., S. Akram and D.F. developed the first draft of the manuscript. J.S., J.B.L., M.K.B.T., D.F., S.A., J.J.M., N.S., M.P., C.P., J.M.-D., V.P., K.W. and J.J.M. contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript. J.M.-D., C.P., S.O. and J.B.L. managed citations. All authors approved the final manuscript. J.S. supervised the study and secured funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Sonke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

N.S. is employed by NYU and serves as the principal investigator on the primary award associated with the subaward provided for this project by NYU. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Lana Grasser, Quinette Louw and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Handling Editor: Liam Messin, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Table 1 Eligibility criteria and definitions used
Extended Data Table 2 Study designs and number of studies for each
Extended Data Table 3 Modes and forms of arts engagement
Extended Data Table 4 Quality appraisal criteria and scores
Extended Data Table 5 Joint display
Extended Data Table 6 Databases searched
Extended Data Table 7 PICOS framework

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonke, J., Tan, M.K.B., Lee, J.B. et al. The arts for disease prevention and health promotion: a systematic review. Nat Med 31, 3907–3916 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03962-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03962-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing