Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial

Abstract

Access to hypertension care remains insufficient, particularly in remote rural areas in resource-limited settings. Community health workers (CHWs), lay providers living in the communities they serve, may help close this gap, but the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led hypertension care—including independent initiation and titration of medication—remain uncertain. We conducted a 1:1 cluster-randomized trial nested within the Community-Based Chronic Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) cohort study in 103 rural villages in Lesotho. Following community-based hypertension screening, 547 nonpregnant adults with blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg were enrolled (274 control and 273 intervention). In intervention clusters, lay CHWs independently prescribed and titrated a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide, guided by a mobile clinical decision support system. In control clusters, participants were referred to health facilities for standard care. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of lay CHW-led care, with the primary outcome defined as BP <140/90 mm Hg at 12 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis (543 participants with 4 exclusions owing to intercurrent pregnancy), BP control was achieved by 156/271 (58%) versus 130/272 (48%) in intervention and control arms, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.29, P = 0.046). A predefined complete case analysis yielded consistent results. No relevant differences in safety outcomes were observed. Among people with uncontrolled hypertension, lay CHW-led, CDSS-supported care was safe and more effective than referral to facility-based professional care. These findings support expanding first-line hypertension management by lay CHWs in remote, resource-limited settings. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT05684055.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Participant flow chart.
Fig. 2: Mean BP in intervention and control arms.
Fig. 3: Engagement in care, BP control rates and type of care provider.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

A de-identified individual-level key dataset alongside the statistical code for reproducing the primary and secondary endpoints is openly available from publication until at least 25 years thereafter via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16903262 (ref. 73). The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05684055), where a full protocol and statistical analysis plan are available. A study protocol manuscript has been published previously36. Requests for access to more detailed data may be made to the corresponding author by submitting a proposal. The proposal will be reviewed by the corresponding author and access granted if deemed reasonable within 4 weeks.

Code availability

The code for the CDSS application used by CHWs for data collection and service delivery is available via GitHub at https://github.com/clinepi-usb/cht-combacal. Access to the test environment of the CDSS application is available from the corresponding author upon written request. The request will be reviewed by the corresponding author and credentials for the test environment shared if deemed reasonable within 4 weeks.

References

  1. Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 396, 1223–1249 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, B. et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 398, 957–980 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Global Report on Hypertension: The Race Against a Silent Killer (World Health Organization, 2023).

  4. Lamloum, D., Fassio, F., Osetinsky, B. & Tediosi, F. Care cascades for hypertension in low-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Public Health 68, 1606428 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, G., Wu, J., Zhang, P., Yu, Y. & Sun, Y. Implementation research and results of hypertension control strategy and model in rural areas. Cardiol. Discov. 04, 1–4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kontis, V. et al. Three public health interventions could save 94 million lives in 25 years: global impact assessment analysis. Circulation 140, 715–725 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. González Fernández, L. et al. Prevalence and determinants of cardiovascular risk factors in Lesotho: a population-based survey. Int. Health 16, 313–324 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández, L. G. et al. Awareness, treatment, and control among adults living with arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus in two rural districts in Lesotho. PLOS Glob. Public Health 4, e0003721 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Firima, E. et al. High rates of undiagnosed target organ damage among adults with elevated blood pressure or diabetes mellitus in a community-based survey in Lesotho. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00158-5 (2023).

  10. AIDS, Crisis and the Power to Transform: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2025 (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2025).

  11. Mishra, S. R., Neupane, D., Preen, D., Kallestrup, P. & Perry, H. B. Mitigation of non-communicable diseases in developing countries with community health workers. Global. Health 11, 43 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030 (World Health Organization, 2016).

  13. What Do We Know About Community Health Workers? A Systematic Review of Existing Reviews (World Health Organization, 2020); https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/340717/9789241512022-eng.pdf?sequence=1

  14. Scott, K. et al. What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers. Hum. Resour. Health 16, 39 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Joshi, R. et al. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries—a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9, e103754 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogungbe, O. et al. Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine 47, 101388 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mills, K. T. et al. Role of health care professionals in the success of blood pressure control interventions in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 17, e010396 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jafar, T. H. et al. Community-based interventions to promote blood pressure control in a developing country: a cluster randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, 593–601 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwalm, J.-D. et al. A community-based comprehensive intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in hypertension (HOPE 4): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 394, 1231–1242 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jafar, T. H. et al. A community-based intervention for managing hypertension in rural South Asia. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 717–726 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. He, J. et al. Effect of a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention on blood pressure control in low-income patients in Argentina: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318, 1016–1025 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Siedner, M. J. et al. Home-based care for hypertension in rural South Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2509958 (2025).

  23. Sun, Y. et al. A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial. Lancet 399, 1964–1975 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. He, J. et al. Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 401, 928–938 (2023).

  25. Jafar, T. H. & Jabbour, S. Village doctors managing hypertension in rural China. Lancet 399, 1922–1923 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vedanthan, R. et al. Innovative approaches to hypertension control in low- and middle-income countries. Cardiol. Clin. 35, 99–115 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Satheesh, G. et al. Effectiveness and safety of using standardized treatment protocols for hypertension compared to usual care: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Hypertens. 27, e14950 (2025).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A. & Lobach, D. F. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Brit. Med. J. 330, 765 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Källander, K. et al. Mobile health (mHealth) approaches and lessons for increased performance and retention of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a review. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e17 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ministry of Health Lesotho Lesotho Community-Based Health Policy (hera: right to health & development, 2024).

  31. Matsushita, K. et al. Priorities for research on hypertension care delivery: a WHO report executive summary. Hypertension 82, 971–976 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernández, L. G. et al. Community-based care models for arterial hypertension management in non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a literature scoping review and framework for designing chronic services. BMC Public Health 22, 1126 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lejone, T. I. et al. Feasibility and acceptability of diabetes and hypertension screening and diagnosis by community health workers in rural Lesotho: a mixed‑methods pilot study. Ann. Glob. Health 91, 59 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gerber, F. et al. Cohort profile: the open, prospective Community-Based chronic Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) cohort—design, baseline chronic disease risk factors and hypertension and diabetes care cascades. BMJ Open https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093852 (2025).

  35. Gerber, F. et al. eConsent administered by community health workers in a study using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design—experiences from the Community-Based chronic Care Lesotho (ComBaCaL) project. Digit. Health 10, 20552076241288757 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gerber, F. et al. Community-based management of arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors by lay village health workers for people with controlled and uncontrolled blood pressure in rural Lesotho: joint protocol for two cluster-randomized trials within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL aHT TwiC 1 and ComBaCaL aHT TwiC 2). Trials 25, 365 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gerber, F. et al. Community-based type 2 diabetes care by lay village health workers in rural Lesotho: protocol for a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL T2D TwiC). Trials 24, 688 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hendriks, M., van Andel, J., Asiki, G. & Kyobutungi, C. Cardiovascular risk in hypertension: open questions about HOPE 4. Lancet 396, 309–310 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, X. et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet 390, 2584–2594 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun, Y. et al. Rationale and design of a cluster randomized trial of a village doctor-led intervention on hypertension control in China. Am. J. Hypertens. 34, 831–839 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jobe, M. et al. Hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: burden, barriers and priorities for improving treatment outcomes. Circ. Res. 137, 106–118 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. The Village Health Program Policy (Ministry of Health Lesotho, 2020).

  43. Community Health Toolkit Version 4.13 (Medic Mobile, 2024); https://communityhealthtoolkit.org

  44. Joseph, P. & Yusuf, S. Coordinating efforts to reduce the global incidence of cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 1329–1331 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mbuthia, G. W. et al. Preliminary efficacy of a community health worker homebased intervention for the control and management of hypertension in Kiambu County, Kenya—a randomized control trial. PLoS ONE 19, e0293791 (2024).

  46. Gamage, D. G. et al. Effectiveness of a scalable group-based education and monitoring program, delivered by health workers, to improve control of hypertension in rural India: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 17, e1002997 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kondal, D. et al. Structured lifestyle modification interventions involving frontline health workers for population-level blood pressure reduction: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial in India (DISHA Study). J. Am. Heart Assoc. 11, e023526 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Khetan, A. K. et al. The effectiveness of community health workers for CVD prevention in LMIC. Glob. Heart 12, 233–243 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Spaolonzi, N. et al. Costs and coverage of community health worker-led hypertension and diabetes screening in rural Lesotho (ComBaCaL): cost–consequence analysis of a cohort study. Lancet Prim. Care https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100034 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ojji, D. B. et al. Comparison of dual therapies for lowering blood pressure in Black Africans. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 2429–2439 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gerber, F. et al. Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomised trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5653533 (2025).

  52. Amstutz, A. et al. Characteristics, consent patterns, and challenges of randomized trials using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design—a scoping review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 174, 111469 (2024).

  53. Joseph, J. K. et al. Lay health workers and HIV care in rural Lesotho: a report from the field. AIDS Patient Care STDS 26, 141–147 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Amstutz, A. et al. Home-based oral self-testing for absent and declining individuals during a door-to-door HIV testing campaign in rural Lesotho (HOSENG): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet HIV 7, e752–e761 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dunachie, S. & Chamnan, P. The double burden of diabetes and global infection in low- and middle-income countries. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 113, 56–64 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Noncommunicable Diseases Data Portal: Lesotho NCD Country Profile (World Health Organization, 2022); https://ncdportal.org/CountryProfile/GHE110/LSO#risk-factor6

  57. Standard Treatment Guidelines for Lesotho (Ministry of Health Lesotho, 2022).

  58. The Community Health Toolkit’s Core Framework: An Overview (Medic Mobile, 2019).

  59. WHO CVD Risk Charts Working Group World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Glob. Health 7, e1332–e1345 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, P. H., Macfarlane, D. J., Lam, T. & Stewart, S. M. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8, 115 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Okeyo, A. P. et al. Dietary practices and adolescent obesity in secondary school learners at disadvantaged schools in South Africa: urban–rural and gender differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 5864 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. STEPwise Approach to NCD Risk Factor Surveillance (STEPS) (World Health Organization, 2022); https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/surveillance/systems-tools/steps

  63. Rotondi, M. & Donner, A. Sample size estimation in cluster randomized trials: an evidence-based perspective. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 1174–1187 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Amstutz, A. et al. Offering ART refill through community health workers versus clinic-based follow-up after home-based same-day ART initiation in rural Lesotho: the VIBRA cluster-randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med. 18, e1003839 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee, Y. L., Lim, Y. M. F., Law, K. B. & Sivasampu, S. Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Trials 21, 530 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Donner, A. & Klar, N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research (Wiley, 2000).

  67. Stata Statistical Software release 16 (StatCorp, 2019).

  68. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024).

  69. Lesotho Community-Based Health Services Strategy 2024/25–2029/30 (Ministry of Health Lesotho, 2024).

  70. Staehelin, D., Dolata, M., Peyer, N., Gerber, F. & Schwabe, G. in Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023 (eds Abdelnour Nocera, J. et al.) 94–114 (Springer, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_6

  71. Staehelin, D., Greve, M. & Schwabe, G. Empowering community health workers with mobile health: learnings from two projects on NCD care. In Proc. 32nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (eds Avital, M. et al.) (Association for Information Systems, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2023).

  72. Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G. & CONSORT Group Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Brit. Med. J. 345, e5661 (2012).

  73. Labhardt, N. D., Gerber, F., Sanchez-Samaniego, G., Amstutz, A. & Chammartin, F. Data set and analysis code “Lay Community Health Worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial.” Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18411694 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the SolidarMed team in Lesotho and Switzerland, the involved CHWs and the participants for their essential contributions. This study was part of the ComBaCaL project funded by the TRANSFORM grant of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (project no. 7F-10345.01.01) and a grant by the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF-1778). F.G.’s salary was funded through a personal MD/PhD grant by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 323530_207035). A.A.’s salary was funded through a grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation (Postdoc mobility no. P500PM_221961). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, data interpretation or writing of the publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.A. and N.D.L. were the principal investigators; they acquired the funding, led the project and conceptualized the study together with F.G. F.G. drafted the study protocol and the final paper and led the clinical development of the CDSS application together with T.T. and F.R., and the local implementation together with R.G., I.A. and P.G. T.I.L., M.C., T.K., M. Mathulise, M. Maphenchane, M. Mokaeane, M. Mota, M. Mofokeng, M. Molulela, M.K., M.P.S., M.B. and R.M. were responsible for the local implementation through training and supervision of CHWs and local data monitoring. G.S.-S. was responsible for central data management and S.M. for the local data management. M. Mphunyane, L.S., M.T. and M.L. were involved in the conceptualization of the study and ensured alignment with local guidelines and practices. D.B.B. and K.K. led the technical development of the CDSS application. T.B. reviewed and approved the clinical algorithms. F.C. wrote the statistical analysis plan and conducted sample size calculations and all analyses. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Felix Gerber or Niklaus Daniel Labhardt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Nompilo Dlamini, Anthony Etyang and Zong-Chao Liu for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: Ming Yang, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Predefined subgroup analyses for blood pressure control rates ( < 140/90 mmHg) at 12 months in intervention versus control.

Adjusted odds ratio and its 95% CI were obtained by mixed-effect regression models adjusted for clustering and covariates (sex, age, district, facility access and baseline values when appropriate). The p value was two-sided and was not adjusted for multiple comparison. Hard health facility access defined as needing to cross a mountain or river or travel >10 km to the nearest health facility.

Extended Data Table 1 Interaction with the intervention of prespecified potential effect modifiers. OR: odds ratio
Extended Data Table 2 Intervention effects on further secondary endpoints

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerber, F., Sanchez-Samaniego, G., Gupta, R. et al. Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial. Nat Med 32, 915–923 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04208-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04208-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing