Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Profiling large-scale protein occupancy on bacterial genomes using IPOD-HR

Abstract

Identifying genomic regions bound by individual proteins such as transcription factors is essential to understanding bacterial gene regulation; however, comprehensive understanding of the effect of protein occupancy on gene regulation would be prohibitively laborious and expensive to achieve using methods such as chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) and ChIP with exonuclease treatment (ChIP-exo) for every protein and condition of interest. Here we describe a protocol for performing in vivo protein occupancy display–high resolution (IPOD-HR), a powerful method for genome-wide profiling of protein-bound DNA in prokaryotic systems. Although assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) is the method of choice for assaying general protein occupancy in eukaryotic systems, bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins can affect ATAC-seq, rendering it unsuitable for use in bacteria. In contrast, IPOD-HR can be used to identify regions of bacterial genomes that are highly bound by proteins, regardless of the identity of the proteins bound, allowing the identification of condition- and genotype-dependent changes in protein occupancy associated with changes in gene regulation. The technique is coupled to RNA polymerase ChIP, followed by sequencing of the extracted samples and downstream analysis using open-source, automated software that we provide and actively maintain. Once cross-linked samples are obtained, the core DNA selection portion of the IPOD-HR protocol takes 3 calendar days to perform. The resulting DNA extracts are subjected to high-throughput sequencing, resulting in sequencing data that are analyzed, which typically requires a few additional days, depending on the number of samples and computing resources. The IPOD-HR experimental method requires familiarity with standard molecular biology techniques suitable for preparing Illumina sequencing inputs, and the computational post-processing pipeline requires basic knowledge of the Linux command line environment.

Key points

  • IPOD-HR enables high-resolution, genome-wide profiling of protein–DNA interactions in bacteria under physiological conditions, overcoming limitations of ATAC-seq caused by bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins.

  • The protocol provides detailed wet-lab and computational steps, including integration with RNA polymerase ChIP-seq and automated open-source software for downstream analysis, to assess condition- and genotype-dependent changes in protein occupancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The IPOD-HR workflow.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Changes in protein occupancy due to alanine supplementation in E. coli.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Condition-dependent changes in protein occupancy in E. coli.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Example test digestion of a sonicated sample.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Example directory structure, files and plots before and after running the computational pipeline.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6: Data flow through the IPOD computational post-processing pipeline.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7: Gantt style chart for timing of IPOD workflows.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8: Examples of data from successful versus failed experiments.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data appearing in Fig. 2 (ref. 21) and Fig. 3 (refs. 8,14) are available in the original publications listed in the figure legends.

Code availability

Exhaustive and up-to-date documentation for the open-source software that we provide and actively maintain can be found at the github repository for the IPOD pipeline (https://github.com/freddolino-lab/ipod). To simplify the process of establishing a compatible environment, we provide a conda environment definition in the conda_environment.yml file available in the IPOD github repository. Information about Apptainer is available at https://apptainer.org/docs/user/main/quick_start.html. A permanent mirror of the version used for this paper is provided at https://zenodo.org/records/17336331.

References

  1. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Badel, C., Samson, R. Y. & Bell, S. D. Chromosome organization affects genome evolution in Sulfolobus archaea. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 820–830 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marinov, G. K. et al. The chromatin landscape of the euryarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. Genome Biol. 24, 253 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitfield, C. R., Wardle, S. J. & Haniford, D. B. The global bacterial regulator H-NS promotes transpososome formation and transposition in the Tn5 system. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 309–321 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly, T. K. et al. Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation within individual DNA molecules. Genome Res. 22, 2497–2506 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tavazoie, S. & Church, G. M. Quantitative whole-genome analysis of DNA-protein interactions by in vivo methylase protection in E. coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 566–571 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vora, T., Hottes, A. K. & Tavazoie, S. Protein occupancy landscape of a bacterial genome. Mol. Cell 35, 247–253 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Freddolino, L., Amemiya, H. M., Goss, T. J. & Tavazoie, S. Dynamic landscape of protein occupancy across the Escherichia coli chromosome. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001306 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Amemiya, H. M., Schroeder, J. & Freddolino, L. Nucleoid-associated proteins shape chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation across the bacterial kingdom. Transcription 12, 182–218 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, P. J. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 669–680 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Serandour, A. A., Brown, G. D., Cohen, J. D. & Carroll, J. S. Development of an Illumina-based ChIP-exonuclease method provides insight into FoxA1-DNA binding properties. Genome Biol. 14, R147 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Giresi, P. G., Kim, J., McDaniell, R. M., Iyer, V. R. & Lieb, J. D. FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res. 17, 877–885 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amemiya, H. M. et al. Distinct heterochromatin‐like domains promote transcriptional memory and silence parasitic genetic elements in bacteria. EMBO J. 41, e108708 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rakibova, Y., Dunham, D. T., Seed, K. D. & Freddolino, L. Nucleoid-associated proteins shape the global protein occupancy and transcriptional landscape of a clinical isolate of Vibrio cholerae. mSphere 9, e0001124 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeinert, R. D. et al. A legacy role for DNA binding of Lon protects against genotoxic stress. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/317677 (2018).

  17. Ekdahl, A. M. et al. Conserved heterochromatin-like structures with local regulators mediate the iron stress response in mycobacteria. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.23.671944 (2025).

  18. Palomar, V. M. et al. Membrane association of active genes organizes the chloroplast nucleoid structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2309244121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mihailovic, M. K. et al. Uncovering transcriptional regulators and targets of sRNAs using an integrative data-mining approach: H-NS-regulated RseX as a case study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 696533 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekdahl, A. M. et al. Multiscale regulation of nutrient stress responses in Escherichia coli from chromatin structure to small regulatory RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf647 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Trouillon, J., Doubleday, P. F. & Sauer, U. Genomic footprinting uncovers global transcription factor responses to amino acids in Escherichia coli. Cell Syst. 14, 860–871.e4 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyle, A. P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311–322 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gross, D. S. & Garrard, W. T. Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 159–197 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rychel, K. et al. iModulonDB: a knowledgebase of microbial transcriptional regulation derived from machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D112–D120 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lempp, M. et al. Systematic identification of metabolites controlling gene expression in E. coli. Nat. Commun. 10, 4463 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hommais, F. et al. Large-scale monitoring of pleiotropic regulation of gene expression by the prokaryotic nucleoid-associated protein, H-NS. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 20–36 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Orans, J., Kovach, A. R., Hoff, K. E., Horstmann, N. M. & Brennan, R. G. Crystal structure of an Escherichia coli Hfq Core (residues 2–69)–DNA complex reveals multifunctional nucleic acid binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 3987–3997 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Solomon, M. J. & Varshavsky, A. Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 6470–6474 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergendahl, V., Thompson, N. E., Foley, K. M., Olson, B. M. & Burgess, R. R. A cross-reactive polyol-responsive monoclonal antibody useful for isolation of core RNA polymerase from many bacterial species. Protein Expr. Purif. 31, 155–160 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lacazette, E. A laboratory practical illustrating the use of the ChIP-qPCR method in a robust model: estrogen receptor alpha immunoprecipitation using Mcf-7 culture cells. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 45, 152–160 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel, L. A., Cao, Y., Mendenhall, E. M., Benner, C. & Goren, A. The wild west of spike-in normalization. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1343–1349 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Carroll, T. S., Liang, Z., Salama, R., Stark, R. & de Santiago, I. Impact of artifact removal on ChIP quality metrics in ChIP-seq and ChIP-exo data. Front. Genet. 5, 75 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Babraham Institute. Fast QC. Babraham Bioinformatics https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2026).

  35. Rashid, F.-Z. M. & Dame, R. T. 2024: A ‘nucleoid space’ odyssey featuring H-NS. Bioessays 46, e2400098 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work in the L.F. lab was supported by US National Institutes of Health R35 GM128637, and work in the US lab was supported by the ETH Postdoctoral Fellowship program (to J.T.). The authors are grateful to other members of the Sauer and Freddolino labs for helpful writing and figure suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed jointly to the writing, editing, figure generation and review. Contributions on experimental procedures were mainly from R.L.H.; contributions on the computational pipeline and data analysis were from J.W.S.; and contributions on data interpretation and application were mainly from R.L.H. and J.T. U.S. and L.F. performed substantial editing and revision of the manuscript and are responsible for the contributions from their respective labs.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Freddolino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Fabian Blombach; Rob Phillips, who co-reviewed with Tom Roeschinger, Kian Faizi and Rosalind Pan; and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key references

Freddolino, L. et al. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001306 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001306

Trouillon, J. et al. Cell Syst. 14, 860–871.e4 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2023.09.003

Amemiya, H. et al. EMBO J. 41, e108708 (2022): https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021108708

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurto, R.L., Schroeder, J.W., Trouillon, J. et al. Profiling large-scale protein occupancy on bacterial genomes using IPOD-HR. Nat Protoc (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-026-01357-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-026-01357-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology