Abstract
A low-cost and eco-friendly die attach process for high temperatures should be developed owing to the expansion of the field of high-temperature applications, such as high-power and high-frequency semiconductors. Pb-based and Au-based systems have been used as conventional die attach materials for high-temperature devices. However, these materials exhibit environmental problems and are expensive. Here, we show that the die attach process using the backside metal of the Ag/Sn/Ag sandwich structure is successfully developed for the mass production of Si devices. It has a low-temperature bonding process (235 °C), a high remelting temperature (above 400 °C), and rapid bonding time (20 ms). In addition, it exhibits better properties than Au-12Ge and Pb-10Sn backside metals, which are conventional materials for the high-temperature die attach process. After the die bonding process, various reliability tests of Si devices with the Ag/Sn/Ag backside metal structure were performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The demands for high-temperature die attach materials that have been utilized for high-temperature semiconductor devices are increasing because of the expansion of high-power and high-frequency device applications. A die attach process that is part of a device packaging process is extremely important for reliability and environmental stability1,2. In particular, die attach materials are an important factor in the die attach process, as they influence the characteristics of the semiconductor device. Au-based (Au-Sn, Au-Si, and Au-Ge) and high Pb-Sn (containing 85–97 wt% Pb) alloys are utilized commercially for high-temperature bonding materials in the semiconductor industry owing to their excellent properties3,4,5. Because Au-based alloys increase the manufacturing cost, they must be replaced by Au-free materials. High Pb-Sn alloys, which are cheap and exhibit good reliability, are excellent materials for high-temperature processes. However, Pb cannot be utilized in electronics because of the restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS) directive.
To replace Pb-based and Au-based materials for the high-temperature die attach process, Bi-based, Zn-based, and Sn–Sb alloys have been studied for high-temperature semiconductor devices6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Bi-based die attach materials exhibit limited wettability on a Cu lead frame and relatively low thermal and electrical conductivities6,7. Zn-based alloys exhibit several drawbacks as high-temperature die attach materials, such as lifespan and poor wetting4. Sn–Sb alloys exhibit a stable microstructure and good creep properties12. However, they cannot be used for the die attach process, due to the toxicity of Sb. These materials exhibit high melting temperatures and eutectic or near-eutectic compositions, and the die bonding process is conducted at a relatively high temperature (~300 °C). A high bonding temperature may strongly affect the reliability and lifespan of the semiconductor devices because of the increase in the thermal stress between a chip (or a die) and a lead frame caused by the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion13. Transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding and low-temperature sintering are good candidates as a die attach process for high-temperature semiconductor applications; however, the techniques have been studied for interfacial reactions and mechanical properties, and they exhibit long bonding times as long as few minutes14,15. Hence, to date, these bonding methods have not been applied for the mass production of semiconductor devices. Therefore, new cheap and eco-friendly high-temperature bonding materials or processes should be developed to increase the fabrication yield and reduce the manufacturing cost of semiconductor devices.
The Sn–Ag binary system is a good candidate for the die attach process and has been used as a conventional low-temperature solder material with a melting temperature lower than 250 °C16. Studies on the Sn–Ag binary alloy have primarily focused on the low-melting temperature alloy; few studies on high-temperature die attach materials have been conducted17. The backside metallization process is typically used to attach a chip to a lead frame for high-power and high-frequency semiconductor packaging because it exhibits several advantages such as excellent bond-line and good electrical and thermal conduction18. Herein, we report a die attach process using the backside metal (BSM) of a Ag/Sn/Ag sandwich structure with a low bonding and high remelting temperature. Our die attach process offers a rapid bonding time (only 20 ms) and is reliable; it is applicable to the mass production of semiconductor packaging.
Results
Figure 1a shows a cross-sectional image of the 1st Ag/2nd Sn/3rd Ag BSM (ASA–BSM) before die attachment. Ti/Ni/1st Ag/2nd Sn/3rd Ag metal layers were formed. The ASA–BSM exhibits a flat surface morphology as shown in Figure S1. After die attachment, three regions exist between the Ni layer and the Cu plating layer, as shown in Fig. 1b (Figure S2 shows the entire bond-line). Figures 2 and S3 show the quantitative elemental analysis of the interface line and area mapping via transmittance electron microscopy–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM–EDS), respectively. As shown in Figure S3, on average, Cu 50.1 at%, Sn 45.6 at%, and Ni 4.3 at% in the top region; Ag 75.2 at%, Sn 23.3 at%, and Cu 1.5 at% in the middle region; Cu 73.46 at%, Sn 26.54 at%, and 0.9 at% Ag in the bottom region were detected. Interestingly, the high Cu content exceeded the content of Sn and Ag in the top region. In addition, the Ag-rich region (middle region) was formed at the interface. These results will be discussed later. Further structural characterization of the interface was performed via high-resolution TEM. As shown in Figure S3, Cu6Sn5 in the top region (close to the Si chip), Ag3Sn in the middle region, and Cu3Sn in the bottom region (close to the lead frame) were confirmed from selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns and EDS results. The ASA–BSM might exhibit a high remelting temperature after the die attachment owing to the interfacial structure composed of Cu6Sn5 (415 °C), Cu3Sn (676 °C), and Ag3Sn (480 °C) intermetallic compounds (IMCs)19,20.
We assumed two possible mechanisms for the interface formation during the die attach process. The first is the epitaxial growth of the Cu3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and Ag3Sn IMCs, as heat was transferred from the lead frame to the Si chip. However, the BSM consisted of polycrystalline Cu6Sn5, Cu3Sn, and Ag3Sn IMCs, separately; additionally, a grain boundary of the IMCs was identified between the Cu3Sn and Ag3Sn, as shown in Figs 2 and S4. The second is that Ag3Sn IMC was formed initially; subsequently, Cu was diffused and Sn–Cu IMCs (Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn) were grown. This matches well with our experimental results. Figure 3 shows the schematics of the bonding process using the ASA–BSM structure between the Si chip and the Alloy 42 lead frame. First, the Ti/Ni/Ag/Sn/Ag metal layers were deposited on the backside of the Si chip, as shown in Fig. 3a. At this stage, Ag3Sn IMCs could be formed partially after the deposition of the 3rd Ag layer, because Ag–Sn is one of the fast interdiffusion couples with a mean interdiffusion coefficient of 10−13 cm2/s at room temperature21,22. Subsequently, as shown in Fig. 3b, the Si chip is picked up by a collet, which is a part of the die bonder, to attach the chip to the lead frame. The lead frame was preheated to 370 °C before the attachment of the Si chip. Figure 3c shows the Si chip attached to the Alloy 42 lead frame with a bonding force of 0.1 N for 20 ms. The lead frame temperatures were 235–400 °C. When the lead frame was heated to the die bonding temperature, the melting of the Sn layer was started from the Sn–Ag eutectic point (221 °C). At this stage, Ag3Sn was formed and grown via the reaction of the 1st and 3rd Ag layers and the molten Sn. The Ag3Sn grew via the continuous supply of Ag from the Ag layers through the grown Ag3Sn layers (Fig. 3c)23. Therefore, the observation of the Ag3Sn IMC and the high Ag content in the middle region after the die bonding of the ASA–BSM may have caused the preferential formation of the Ag3Sn IMC at the interface of the Ag and the Sn before the reaction of Cu and Sn. Furthermore, the Ag3Sn IMCs moved to the middle of the molten Sn owing to the pressure during the die attachment (Fig. 3d). After the dissolution of the 3rd Ag layer, the reaction of the Cu and the molten Sn were started, similarly to the formation of Ag3Sn, as shown in Fig. 3e. Cu6Sn5 IMCs were formed via the reaction of the Cu plating layer and molten Sn. The Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn IMCs grew continuously in the direction of the violet arrows while the temperature of the lead frame was decreased to room temperature (Figure 3f,g). Cu6Sn5 IMC formation is possible within only 5 s at 280 °C at the Sn–Ag/Cu interface24,25,26. Hence, Cu–Sn IMCs could be grown at the interface between the Si chip and the Alloy 42 lead frame. Figure 3g shows the interface structure with three regions consisting of Ag3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and Cu3Sn after our die bonding process. This die attach process using the ASA sandwich structure is highly similar to the solid–liquid interdiffusion (SLID) bonding, which is also called transient liquid-phase bonding. SLID bonding has been typically studied for the joining of high-temperature semiconductor devices27,28,29. The benefits of SLID bonding are the low bonding temperature near the melting point of the low-melting point bonding metal and high-temperature stability after the bonding process. In addition, it can form an excellent bond-line and exhibits good gap-filling capability30,31,32. Meanwhile, the most pressing problem in SLID bonding is the long bonding time, which can reach a few minutes for forming a stable bond-line28. Hence, to date, SLID bonding has not been applied for the mass production of semiconductor devices. However, this disadvantage was not observed in our experiment, owing to the optimized BSM structure and the die attach process. That is, our die attach method with the ASA sandwich structure involved a low bonding temperature (235 °C), a high remelting temperature, and rapid bonding time (20 ms).
Schematics of the interface formation of the ASA–BSM between the Si chip and the Cu-plated Alloy 42 lead frame. (a) BSM layers deposited on the backside of a Si chip. (b) Si chip is picked up by a collet. The lead frame was heated to 370 °C. (c) Si chip attached to the lead frame. The Sn was melted, and the reaction of the molten Sn and the Ag layers was started. (d) Ag3Sn IMCs were formed via the continuous reaction of molten Sn and both Ag layers. The Ag3Sn IMCs moved to the middle of the molten Sn owing to the pressure during the die attachment. (e) After the dissolution of the 3rd Ag layer, the reaction of the Cu and the molten Sn was started, similar to the formation of the Ag3Sn. (f) Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn were grown continuously in the direction of the violet arrows. (g) After the die bonding process, the interface was composed of Ag3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and Cu3Sn.
The various characteristics of the ASA–BSM were evaluated in comparison with Au-12Ge BSM, which is currently used as a conventional BSM, as shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4a,b show the wetting flow and X-ray images of the ASA and Au-12Ge BSMs after the die attach process, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4a, the Si chips with the ASA–BSM exhibited an excellent wetting property. In addition, the X-ray images demonstrate the excellent bonding property; few voids were formed in the ASA–BSM, as shown in Fig. 4b. The voids and wetting property of the ASA–BSM are comparable with those of the Au-12Ge BSM. Figure 4c shows the collector–emitter saturation voltage (VCE(sat)) of the ASA and Au-12Ge BSM bonded devices under various conditions. The VCE(sat) values of the ASA–BSM are lower than the upper specification limit, which is for KTC 3875 product (SOT-23 package), and the average VCE(sat) was 102 mV. Figure 4d shows the die shear strength when the die bonding was conducted at different temperatures ranging from 235 to 400 °C with thicknesses of 300 and 150 nm for the 1st and 3rd Ag layers, respectively. The average die shear strength was 26 MPa. When the die attach temperature was below 270 °C, the temperature was lower, and the wetting flow was the worst. As shown in Figure S5, we confirmed the poor wetting flow at the die attach temperature of 235 °C. Meanwhile, when the die attach temperature was 270 °C, the wetting flow was excellent, similar that when the die attach temperature was over 270 °C. When the die attach temperature was over 270 °C, the bulk intermetallic compound (Ag3Sn, Cu6Sn5, and Cu3Sn) sizes may affect the die shear strength33. At all die attach temperatures, the die shear strengths were larger than the lower specification limit of 5 MPa. In addition, regardless of the die attach temperatures, the die shear strengths of all samples were larger than those of the Au-12Ge BSM with 11 MPa.
Characterization after the die bonding of the Si chips with the ASA–BSM. (a,b) Wetting flow images (a) and X-ray images (b) of Si devices with Au-12Ge and ASA–BSM, obtained after the die bonding. The Au-12Ge BSM is a conventional Pb-free BSM. (c) VCE(sat) values of the ASA, Au-12Ge, and Pb-10Sn BSMs depending on the die bonding temperature. The die bonding temperatures of the Au-12Ge and Pb-10Sn BSMs were 400 and 310 °C, respectively. (d) Die shear strength of the ASA–BSM depending on the die bonding temperatures.
We conducted various reliability tests to ensure the stable quality of the die attach process using the ASA–BSM. The lifespan of 44 packages was evaluated via a steady-state operational life (SSOL) test and a high-humidity high-temperature reverse-bias (H3TRB) test. In addition, the thermal stability of 175 packages was evaluated via a solder heating test (SHT), thermal cycle test (TCT), and thermal fatigue test (TFT). After the reliability tests, the performance of all samples was retained, as shown in Supplementary Table 3. The results prove that the ASA–BSM can be applied for semiconductor packaging.
Conclusion
We demonstrated a low-cost and eco-friendly die attach process using the ASA-BSM structure for fabricating semiconductor devices. Si chips with the ASA–BSM were successfully bonded on an Alloy 42 lead frame with a low bonding temperature (235 °C), high temperature stability, and rapid bonding time (20 ms). In addition, the ASA–BSM exhibited better characteristics than conventional BSMs (Au-12Ge and Pb-10Sn) and passed various reliability tests. The results proved that the ASA–BSM can significantly reduce the manufacturing costs and increase the reliability and yield of device production. Additionally, we began mass producing Si devices with the ASA–BSM without any problems since 2014. Thus far, approximately 1 billion packages such as SOT-23, SOT-23(1), and TO-92 have been produced. More generally, we believe that the ASA–BSM can be readily expanded to fabricate many other semiconductor devices.
Methods
Backside metallization
First, the backside native oxides of patterned Si wafers (transistors and diodes) were removed in 1% hydrofluoric acid (HF) solution for 5 s. Next, the wafers were placed in deionized water for 20 min to remove the 1% HF solution. Finally, the wafers were dried at 80 °C for 20 min in a drying oven. After removing the native oxides, Ti (100 nm)/Ni (800 nm)/1st Ag (300 nm)/2nd Sn (1,800 nm)/3rd Ag (150 nm) layers were evaporated on the backside of the Si wafers using a four-pocket e-beam evaporator (CHA Industries, Mark 50) at 2 × 10−6 Torr. The deposition rates of the Ti layer and the other layers (Ni, Ag, and Sn) were 0.6 and 0.8 nm/s, respectively. The Si wafer temperatures during the evaporation of Ti, Ni, 1st Ag, 2nd Sn, and 3rd Ag were maintained at 170, 140, 70, 60, and 50 °C, respectively. In the experiment, the Ti layer was an adhesion layer and the Ni layer was a diffusion barrier layer.
Die attach process
After the deposition of BSM layers on the backside of the Si wafer, wafer dicing was conducted to produce Si chips of size 0.29 mm × 0.29 mm. The Si chips were attached to the Cu-plated Alloy 42 (Fe-42 wt% Ni, Cu thickness is 5 μm) lead frame using a die bonding equipment (TSP, KD-530) for 20 ms, which is the conventional die bonding time for Si device fabrication. The die bonding force was 0.1 N. The lead frame temperatures were varied to determine the lowest die bonding temperature and evaluate the mechanical and electrical properties in the temperature range of 235 to 400 °C.
Characteristics
After the BSM deposition, the surface morphology and cross section of the BSM stack on Si were investigated via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI, Nova 600 NanoLab). Moreover, a focused ion beam (FIB) was used to investigate the cross section of the BSM layers. The change in the cross-section of the BSM layer after the die bonding process was investigated via SEM–FIB (JSM-6500F, JEOL). In addition, field-emission transmission electron microscopy (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL) was used to obtain high-resolution images and selected-area electron diffraction patterns. X-ray inspection was conducted using X-TV 160 (M-Tek) with an X-ray source of 100 KV and 50 μA, and an output power of 20 W. Die shear-strength tests were conducted using a chip of size 0.29 mm × 0.29 mm, and approximately 200 die assemblies were tested. The electrical characteristics were evaluated for 270 pieces using a discrete device test system (TESEC, 971TT). The VCE(sat) values were measured under the condition of IC = 100 mA and IB = 10 mA. The test condition was for the KTC 3875 product (SOT-23 package), which is the epitaxial planar NPN transistor. Lifetime tests (SSOL and H3TRB) and environmental tests (SHT, TCT, and TFT) were conducted for ensuring the reliability using the SOT-23 package, which is a typical package for transistors and diodes. The SOT-23 package fabricated after the Si chip was attached to the Cu-plated Alloy 42 lead frame at temperatures of 270, 300, 320, 360, and 400 °C, respectively. The SSOL test was conducted at 25 °C. The H3TRB test was conducted at 80 °C and 85% humidity. The SHT was conducted at 265 °C for 10 s. For the SSOL test, H3TRB test, and SHT, 44 pieces were used. The TCT was conducted with 200 cycles ranging from −55 to 150 °C for 15 min. The TFT was conducted in the temperature range of 25 to 150 °C with an on-time of 10 s and an off-time of 50 s. For the TCT and TFT, 175 pieces were used.
References
Liu, J., Tolvgard, A., Malmodin, J. & Lai, Z. A reliable and environmentally friendly packaging technology-flip-chip joining using anisotropically conductive adhesive. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies 22, 186–190 (1999).
Xu, K. et al. Light emission from a poly-silicon device with carrier injection engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: B 231, 28–31 (2018).
Manikam, V. R. & Kuan Yew, C. Die Attach Materials for High Temperature Applications: A Review. Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on 1, 457–478 (2011).
Zeng, G., McDonald, S. & Nogita, K. Development of high-temperature solders: Review. Microelectronics Reliability 52, 1306–1322 (2012).
Chidambaram, V., Hald, J. & Hattel, J. Development of Au–Ge based candidate alloys as an alternative to high-lead content solders. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 490, 170–179 (2010).
Lalena, J., Dean, N. & Weiser, M. Experimental investigation of Ge-doped Bi-11Ag as a new Pb-free solder alloy for power die attachment. Journal of Electronic Materials 31, 1244–1249 (2002).
Song, J.-M., Chuang, H.-Y. & Wu, Z.-M. Interfacial reactions between Bi-Ag high-temperature solders and metallic substrates. Journal of Electronic Materials 35, 1041–1049 (2006).
Rettenmayr, M., Lambracht, P., Kempf, B. & Tschudin, C. Zn-Al based alloys as Pb-free solders for die attach. Journal of Electronic Materials 31, 278–285 (2002).
Shimizu, T., Ishikawa, H., Ohnuma, I. & Ishida, K. Zn-Al-Mg-Ga alloys as Pb-free solder for die-attaching use. Journal of Electronic Materials 28, 1172–1175 (1999).
Kim, S., Kim, K.-S., Kim, S.-S. & Suganuma, K. Interfacial Reaction and Die Attach Properties of Zn-Sn High-Temperature Solders. Journal of Electronic Materials 38, 266–272 (2009).
Lee, J.-E., Kim, K.-S., Suganuma, K., Takenaka, J. & Hagio, K. Interfacial Properties of Zn-Sn Alloys as High Temperature Lead-Free Solder on Cu Substrate. Materials Transactions 46, 2413–2418 (2005).
Jang, J. W., Kim, P. G., Tu, K. N. & Lee, M. High-temperature lead-free SnSb solders: Wetting reactions on Cu foils and phased-in Cu–Cr thin films. Journal of Materials Research 14, 3895–3900 (1999).
Lau, J. H. Thermal stress and strain in microelectronics packaging. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993).
Sang Won, Y., Glover, M. D. & Shiozaki, K. Nickel-Tin Transient Liquid Phase Bonding Toward High-Temperature Operational Power Electronics in Electrified Vehicles. Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 28, 2448–2456 (2013).
Wang, T., Chen, X., Lu, G.-Q. & Lei, G.-Y. Low-Temperature Sintering with Nano-Silver Paste in Die-Attached Interconnection. Journal of Electronic Materials 36, 1333–1340 (2007).
Suganuma, K. Advances in lead-free electronics soldering. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 5, 55–64 (2001).
Myśliwiec, M., Kisiel, R. & Fałat, T. In2016 39th International Spring Seminar on ElectronicsTechnology (ISSE). 140–143.
Kim, N. P. & Cooley, R. F. Wafer back metallization for semiconductor packaging. Thin Solid Films 153, 447–457 (1987).
Saunders, N. & Miodownik, A. P. The Cu-Sn (Copper-Tin) system. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams 11, 278–287 (1990).
Karakaya, I. & Thompson, W. T. The Ag-Sn (Silver-Tin) system. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams 8, 340–347 (1987).
Sen, S. K., Ghorai, A., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. & Sen, S. Interfacial reactions in bimetallic Ag-Sn thin film couples. Thin Solid Films 155, 243–253 (1987).
Rossi, P. J., Zotov, N., Bischoff, E. & Mittemeijer, E. J. Dependence of intermetallic compound formation on the sublayer stacking sequence in Ag–Sn bilayer thin films. Acta Materialia 103, 174–183 (2016).
Lis, A., Park, M. S., Arroyave, R. & Leinenbach, C. Early stage growth characteristics of Ag3Sn intermetallic compounds during solid–solid and solid–liquid reactions in the Ag–Sn interlayer system: Experiments and simulations. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 617, 763–773 (2014).
Bartels, F. J. W., Morris, J., Dalke, G. & Gust, W. Intermetallic phase formation in thin solid-liquid diffusion couples. J. Electron. Mater. 23, 787–790 (1994).
Choi, W. & Lee, H. Effect of soldering and aging time on interfacial microstructure and growth of intermetallic compounds between Sn-3.5Ag solder alloy and Cu substrate. Journal of Electronic Materials 29, 1207–1213 (2000).
Park, M. S. & Arróyave, R. Concurrent nucleation, formation and growth of two intermetallic compounds (Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn) during the early stages of lead-free soldering. Acta Materialia 60, 923–934 (2012).
Bernstein, L. Semiconductor Joining by the Solid‐Liquid‐Interdiffusion (SLID) Process: I. The Systems Ag‐In, Au‐In, and Cu‐In. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 113, 1282–1288 (1966).
Tollefsen, T. A., Larsson, A., Løvvik, O. M. & Aasmundtveit, K. E. High Temperature Interconnect and Die Attach Technology: Au– Sn SLID Bonding. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology 3, 904–914 (2013).
Sang Won, Y., Michael, D. G., Mantooth, H. A. & Koji, S. Reliable and repeatable bonding technology for high temperature automotive power modules for electrified vehicles. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 23, 015017 (2013).
Cook, G. III & Sorensen, C. Overview of transient liquid phase and partial transient liquid phase bonding. Journal of Materials Science 46, 5305–5323 (2011).
Zhou, Y., Gale, W. F. & North, T. H. Modelling of transient liquid phase bonding. International Materials Reviews 40, 181–196 (1995).
MacDonald, W. & Eagar, T. Transient liquid phase bonding processes. The Metal Science of Joining, 93–100 (1992).
Sui, Y.-W. et al. Morphologies and evolution of intermetallic compounds formed between Sn1.0Ag0.7Cu composite solder and Cu substrate. Rare Metals (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025761, 2018R1D1A1B07050766, 2014R1A1A4A01009268) and MSIT (Ministry of Science, ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2018-2014-1-00639) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.J.A. designed the study; G.S.C., J.C. and S.J.A. performed the research; J.C. and S.J.A. analyzed the data; and J.C. and S.J.A. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, J., Choi, G.S. & An, S.J. Reliable low-temperature die attach process using Ag/Sn/Ag sandwich structure for high-temperature semiconductor devices. Sci Rep 9, 555 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37103-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37103-7
This article is cited by
-
Backside Metallization of Ag–Sn–Ag Multilayer Thin Films and Die Attach for Semiconductor Applications
Journal of Electronic Materials (2020)






