Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29827-y, published online 14 February 2023


The original version of this Article contained errors.


In Figures 2 and 3, the labels and text did not display correctly.


The original Figures 2 and 3 and accompanying legends appear below.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Full size image

Predicted total, arm, and leg skeletal muscle (SM) mass versus corresponding value measured with MRI in the validation sample (n = 47 women; 48 men) on the left (A,C,E) and associated Bland–Altman plots on the right (B,D,F). The regression equations, lines, R2s, and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are shown in the figures. The statistical significance of each panel is summarized in the text.

Figure 3
Figure 3
Full size image

Total skeletal muscle (SM) mass predicted by Kim’s equation8 versus SM measured with MRI at Kiel (A) and corresponding Bland–Altman plot (B) (n = 475). Total body skeletal muscle (SM) mass predicted by the newly developed Kiel equation versus SM measured with MRI by Kim et al.8 (C) and corresponding Bland–Altman plot (D) (n = 270). The lines of identity (thin solid line), regression equations and lines (solid lines with gray shading indicating 95% CI), and R2s are shown in (A,C). The regression lines with 95% CI and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) (dashed lines) are shown in (B,D). Statistical significance of each panel is summarized in the text.


The original Article has been corrected.