Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20435-w, published online 28 September 2022

The original version of this Article contained an error in the gene name PFDN5, which was incorrectly given as PRDN5 in six instances.

As a result, Table 2

HKG

COX7A2

UBA52

HPRT1

SLC25A3

TMBIM6

PRELID1

RPL36AL

ATP5F1C

PRDN5

now reads,

HKG

COX7A2

UBA52

HPRT1

SLC25A3

TMBIM6

PRELID1

RPL36AL

ATP5F1C

PFDN5

Table 3

Gene

Delta-Ct

Bestkeeper

geNorm

NormFinder

RefFinder

Mean SD

Rank

SD

Rank

M value

Rank

Stability

Rank

Geomean

Comprehensive ranking

RPL36AL

0.19

4

0.39

7

1.37

6

0.23

6

2.91

1

TMBIM6

0.25

12

0.34

5

1.28

7

0.17

3

2.91

2

MORF4L2

0.21

6

0.57

14

1.18

8

0.25

8

4.21

3

HPRT1

0.22

8

0.31

3

1.10

9

0.25

9

4.76

4

SLC25A3

0.24

11

0.31

4

2.26

1

0.09

1

5.36

5

GANAB

0.34

17

0.85

16

0.77

14

0.52

17

5.69

6

RPN2

0.29

15

0.54

11

0.89

12

0.23

7

5.92

7

GUSB

0.28

14

0.56

13

1.03

10

0.20

4

6.96

8

PRDN5

0.20

5

0.42

9

1.54

4

0.28

11

6.98

9

now reads,

Gene

Delta-Ct

Bestkeeper

geNorm

NormFinder

RefFinder

Mean SD

Rank

SD

Rank

M value

Rank

Stability

Rank

Geomean

Comprehensive ranking

RPL36AL

0.19

4

0.39

7

1.37

6

0.23

6

2.91

1

TMBIM6

0.25

12

0.34

5

1.28

7

0.17

3

2.91

2

MORF4L2

0.21

6

0.57

14

1.18

8

0.25

8

4.21

3

HPRT1

0.22

8

0.31

3

1.10

9

0.25

9

4.76

4

SLC25A3

0.24

11

0.31

4

2.26

1

0.09

1

5.36

5

GANAB

0.34

17

0.85

16

0.77

14

0.52

17

5.69

6

RPN2

0.29

15

0.54

11

0.89

12

0.23

7

5.92

7

GUSB

0.28

14

0.56

13

1.03

10

0.20

4

6.96

8

PFDN5

0.20

5

0.42

9

1.54

4

0.28

11

6.98

9

In addition, Figures 1, 2, and 3 contained the incorrect gene in their X-axes, and in the Supplementary Information in Table S1. The incorrect files appear below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean Ct values. Mean Ct values of iPSCWT, iPSCSSERPINE1-FOSB, iPSC-ECWT of each housekeeping gene were shown in a box-and-whisker plot and sorted from the lowest (left) to the highest (right). The five added common housekeeping genes are denoted with an asterisk. The whiskers represent SD of nine samples, three samples per cell line (iPSCWT, iPSCSSERPINE1-FOSB, and iPSC-ECWT).

Fig. 2
figure 2

geNorm ranking of stability M value. Housekeeping genes are plotted based on their stability M value from the highest (left) to the lowest (right). Black bars are ideal housekeeping genes and grey bars are acceptable housekeeping genes. The five added common housekeeping genes are denoted with an asterisk. Note: this tool is not calculating SD.

Fig. 3
figure 3

NormFinder ranking based on stability value. Housekeeping genes are plotted based on their stability value from the least (left) to the most stable (right). The five added common housekeeping genes are denoted with an asterisk.

The original Article has been corrected.