Abstract
The clinical manifestations of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are non-specific, and few patients qualify for surgical resection at diagnosis, thus limiting treatment options. Anticancer peptides (ACPs) exhibit potent tumour inhibition, minimal side effects, easy modification, and low production costs, making them promising for clinical use. Simultaneously, the development of patient-derived three-dimensional organoids as a novel disease model has enabled the replication of the structure and heterogeneity of solid tumours. These organoids provide valuable tools for understanding disease mechanisms, conducting drug sensitivity tests, and developing targeted therapies. However, ACPs’ effect on ICC organoids remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the potential of ACPs in treating ICC using patient-derived organoids (PDOs). We designed and synthesised a series of ACPs sequences and applied them to PDOs model. The organoid model exhibits histological and genomic characteristics similar to those of maternal tumours. Drug sensitivity revealed that ACPs affected the growth of tumour cells and exerted anticancer effects through direct membrane disruption and indirect induction of apoptosis. In this study, organoids can be used as an in vitro model to evaluate the therapeutic response of ACPs and offer novel insight for the study of ICC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare hepatobiliary malignancy accounting for approximately 10–15% of primary liver cancers1,2. It occurs in the liver with cholangiocyte differentiation and has limited treatment options. Moreover, it is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of ICC is associated with several known risk factors, including pathological conditions of the biliary system (such as cholangitis, cholestasis, and bile duct cell injury), chronic liver disease (caused by viral or non-viral infection), and metabolic abnormalities3. The clinical manifestations of ICC include dull pain in the right upper abdomen, weight loss, and discomfort, with little history of jaundice. Imaging features of ICC are characterized by low-density lesions with biliary dilatation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging shows hypointense lesions on T1-weighted images and hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted images. Additionally, the levels of tumour markers such as glycoprotein 199 (CA199), carcinoembryonic antigen, and alpha-fetoprotein are abnormally elevated. CA199, in particular, is associated with a poor prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma4. Currently, surgical resection is the only treatment approach to cure ICC; however, only about 20% of patients meet the requirements for resection. Surgical resection is not recommended for patients with vascular invasion or lymph node metastasis. For patients with unresectable tumours, chemotherapy and immunotherapy are used to slow disease progression. The median survival time for patients treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined chemotherapy regimen is only 11.7 months5. Currently, no specific treatment for ICC exists, warranting the urgent development of novel drugs and innovative approaches for its management. Organoids are complex multicellular structures formed by three-dimensional (3D) culture technology, which can simulate the structural characteristics and physiological functions of real organs and reproduce cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. In contrast, the traditional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture system is difficult to maintain cytoskeletal changes and cell polarity due to the lack of 3D spatial support. In addition, although animal models can reflect the complexity of biological systems, organoids can show unique advantages: the characteristics of organoids based on human tissue can avoid experimental bias caused by species differences and reduce the ethical controversy of animal experiments. And the high-throughput culture ability of organoids significantly improved the efficiency of drug screening and toxicity testing, and significantly reduced the research cost and cycle6. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are constructed by needle biopsy or surgery to obtain tumour specimens, which can highly retain the histomorphological characteristics and genomic information of the primary tumour7. Although there are still technical limitations such as limited angiogenesis, difficulties in multi-organ system simulation, and lack of standardized culture system. Organoids are expected to further form a complementary system with 2D cell models and animal experiments to jointly promote precision medicine research through technology optimization and standardized process construction in the future.
Therapeutic peptides offer several advantages, including high specificity, low toxicity, low immunogenicity, and rapid clearance, making them a promising alternative to drug-resistant chemotherapeutic agents. Anticancer peptides (ACPs) are derived from natural or modified peptides or are identified through phage display peptide library technology8,9. Appropriate modification is feasible and effective for overcoming practical obstacles such as poor stability and low permeability in the development of ACPs. Common modification methods employed include replacing neutral or anionic amino acids with cationic amino acids (such as lysine and arginine), adding chemical groups, and coupling ACPs with chemotherapeutic drugs or macromolecular polymers to enhance their targeting of cancer cells. Newly modified ACPs can potentially be transformed into drugs and vaccines. Currently, several peptide-based drugs are undergoing clinical trials to reduce disease progression and mortality. We conducted a search for ACPs-related studies on the clinicaltrials.gov website and found that the included cancer types ranged from common tumours (such as melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer) to unclassified cancers. Over 98% of these studies are interventional, while the others are observational10. The direct anticancer mechanism of ACPs involves forming pores in the plasma membrane, resulting in irreparable necrosis and cell lysis11,12,13. The indirect mechanism of action involves dissolving internal membranes, such as mitochondrial membranes, which further triggers apoptosis14,15. In previous studies, our research group designed and synthesised multiple ACPs based on the repetitive sequence KLLK. These ACPs demonstrate broad-spectrum anticancer activity in vitro against various cancer cell lines, including cervical cancer (HeLa), breast cancer (MCF-7), liver cancer (HepRG), and non-small cell lung cancer cells (A549). These peptides effectively inhibit the growth of tumour cells through multiple mechanisms such as cell membrane lysis, induction of cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. However, there is no research on the application of ACPs in ICC organoids. Therefore, this study aims to employ several ACPs synthesised in the previous study to target cholangiocarcinoma cell lines and PDOs models to identify alternative drugs for treating ICC.
Results
Peptide sequence optimization process
In our previous study, the repetitive sequence KLLK exhibited a certain degree of anticancer properties, especially KL-8, which showed excellent broad-spectrum anticancer activity15. The KL-8 peptide (H-LLKKLLKKLLKKLL-NH2) was synthesised by deleting two lysine (K) residues from the N-and C-terminal ends of the KLLK sequence, resulting in a net positive charge of + 7. The 14E series was developed using the amino acid scanning method to introduce glutamic acid (E) at different positions within the KL-8 sequence, with the naming scheme indicating the specific substitution site of E in the peptide chain. Substituting K with E resulted in a peptide sequence exhibiting strong haemolytic toxicity. However, replacing leucine (L) with E significantly reduced hemolytic toxicity. Therefore, we continuously replaced L residues in the peptide sequence with E, resulting in a net charge of + 6. Finally, the peptide chain was further modified by incorporating Aad, an analogue of E, maintaining a net charge of + 6 (Fig. 1a).
Novel anticancer peptides inhibit the proliferation of cholangiocarcinoma cells. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating peptide design. (B) Zeta potential value of cell membrane after anticancer peptides KL-8 treatment. (C, E) Representative images of the scratch test showing HCCC-9810 cells treated with drugs for 24 h. Scale bar, 500 µM. (D, F) Representative images of Transwell migration assay showing HCCC-9810 cells treated with drugs for 24 h. Scale bar, 200 µM. *P value < 0.05, ***P value < 0.001, ****P value < 0.0001.
Novel acps inhibit the proliferation of cholangiocarcinoma cells and exhibit anticancer activity
Human cholangiocarcinoma cell line-9810 (HCCC-9810) and human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells (HIBEpiC) were selected to evaluate the anticancer effects of various ACPs at the cellular level. The IC50 values, determined through the CCK-8 assay, were used as indicators of anticancer activity. Table 1 presents a summary of these values. Treatment with ACPs for 1 h significantly reduced the viability of HCCC-9810 cells, with peptides such as KL-8, 14E and 14Aad exhibiting IC50 values of <6 µM. In contrast, ACPs exhibited reduced cytotoxicity toward HIBEpiC cells, though without statistical significance. While demonstrating some selectivity, these peptides require further optimization.
Studies show differences in surface electrodynamic properties of normal and tumour cells after polypeptide treatment16. To investigate these interactions, the surface charge of the cell membrane in HCCC-9810 and HIBEpiC cells was analysed. After exposure to varying concentrations of KL-8 (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 µM) for 1 h, the zeta potential of the cells was measured. For tumour cells, the zeta potential increased from − 20.40 mV–16.41 mV in a concentration-dependent manner. However, no statistically significant changes in zeta potential were observed in normal cells. Combined with the significant decrease of zeta potential on the surface of tumour cells, the interaction between ACPs and tumour cells may be related to its potential difference (Fig. 1b).
Based on the above results, we selected three peptide sequences —KL-8, 14E, and 14Aad—for further studies. Gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic agent with proven efficacy and safety in cholangiocarcinoma treatment, and sorafenib, a first-line drug for primary liver cancer17. The anticancer effects of these two established chemotherapeutic drugs were compared with those of the selected peptides. The inhibitory effects of drug treatments on HCCC-9810 cells were evaluated using scratch and Transwell migration assays. All drug treatment groups demonstrated a reduction in the rate of cell migration toward the centre of the scratch after 24 h. A significant difference was observed in the wound healing rate in the experimental groups compared to that of the blank control group without drugs (Fig. 1c, e). The ACPs treatment group exhibited superior inhibition of cell migration compared to that of the gemcitabine and sorafenib groups. The Transwell migration assay revealed a significant inhibition of the migration of cholangiocarcinoma cells in the experimental group compared to that of the control group (Fig. 1d, f). These findings indicate that the newly designed ACPs exhibit potent anti-cholangiocarcinoma activity and effectively suppress the migration of cholangiocarcinoma cells.
Establishment and long-term culture of organoids from ICC
Following the methodology established by Broutier et al.18, we obtained tumour specimens from partial hepatectomies of three patients with ICC. These specimens were successfully cultured in vitro to develop PDOs. The experimental flowchart is as follows (Fig. 2a). The primary tumour exhibited a spectrum of differentiation, ranging from low to high. Table 2 summarises the clinical information of the patients. All three patients had a history of HBV infection, and the tumour size was > 50 cm3. The PDOs derived from these patients were cultured and expanded in vitro for over 6 months, with a passaging frequency of 1:2–1:3 every 7–14 days. The PDOs exhibited a uniform, hollow, cyst-like morphology. With the increase of culture duration, the volume and number of PDOs increased, with the larger diameters > 500 μm19 (Fig. 2b).
Establishment and characterization of ICC organoids. (A) Flow chart of organoid in vitro culture. (B) Morphological changes of organoids over time within 14 days. Scale bar, 500 µM. (C) Representative gross drawings, H&E staining, and immunohistochemical detection of primary tumours, including ICC universal markers (EpCAM and KRT19). Scale bar, 200 µM. (D) Bright-field diagram, H&E staining, and immunofluorescence of organoids. EpCAM (green), KRT19 (red), and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 100 µM. (E) ICC organoids live cell (green), dead cell (red), live dead cell staining merge. Scale bar, 500 µM.
Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence were used to characterise the tumour tissues and derived organoids. H&E staining revealed that the organoids exhibited irregular cyst-like and adenoid shapes, similar to the original tumour tissue structure. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), a cell surface glycoprotein extensively expressed in several epithelial cells, plays a critical role in cell adhesion, signalling, and differentiation20. Keratin 19 (KRT19) is an important intermediate filament protein primarily expressed in epithelial cells21. In patients with ICC, high expression levels of EpCAM and KRT19 correlate with increased tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis. These proteins serve as potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. EpCAM and KRT19 were highly expressed in all tumour tissues and derived organoids. This result is consistent with a previous study by Yang et al.22.This suggests that organoids retain the histopathological features of parental tissues (Fig. 2c and d).
Organoids are 3D structures composed of multiple cell types. Some emerging methods can help understand cell viability and death in complex 3D environments, such as based on physics, microscopy, and biosensors23. Using calcein acetoxymethyl ester and propidium iodide fluorescent staining to differentiate between live and dead PDO cells, the proliferation and apoptosis states of the organoids can be visually observed. This staining process also revealed that the organoids exhibited hollow, cystic structures, with most cells in a viable state. These findings indicate that the cultured PDOs maintain high cell viability (Fig. 2e).
In general, PDOs retain the tissue structure of the original specimen and exhibit high viability even after long-term culture and expansion.
Genetic characteristics of PDOs
Whole exome sequencing can verify genetic stability and reveal disease driver mutations. Following the methodological approach described by Wang et al.24, we performed whole-exome sequencing on the three organoids and their corresponding parental tumours to assess whether the organoids retained the genome of the parental tumour. The results showed that tumour tissues and their derived organoids from the same patient shared the majority of variant sites (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, all three sample groups consistently expressed AHNAK, PDE4DIP, PABPC1, and BCLAF1. Studies show that these genes affect the occurrence and progression of ICC or cholangiocarcinoma25,26,27,28. Besides commonly observed ICC-related mutation sites, each patient exhibited unique mutation sites specific to their disease status. For example, T_S and PDO_S express ubiquitin-specific peptidase 8 (USP8), which is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ICC. USP8 enhances ICC malignancy by stabilising O-GlcNAc transferase through its deubiquitination activity29. Human leukocyte antigen-A, a critical component of highly immunogenic ICC, is moderately and strongly expressed in approximately 66% of ICC cases30. This mutation was also detected in the T_K and PDO_K samples. Additionally, T_L and PDO_L exhibited more mutations associated with poor prognosis, including COL7A1, DNMT3A, FCGBP, and IDH1 among others31,32,33,34. In addition, we performed scatter plots of variant allele frequency for all gene loci in the initial tumour tissue and derived organoids to reflect the matching degree between the two. The closer it is to the asymptote, the higher the matching degree. Most of the sample results are concentrated at both ends of the asymptotes, indicating that the proportion of bio-base mutation patterns in the corresponding organoids has been well maintained (Fig. 3b).
These results show that the PDOs established in vitro effectively retain the genetic characteristics of the parental tumours and reproduce the mutation profile unique to individual patients.
Anticancer peptide drug sensitivity study of established PDOs
Different dilution series of ACPs, gemcitabine, and sorafenib were added to the organoid culture medium to evaluate the specific response of patients to the drug. After the intervention, the viability of 3D cultured cells was determined by measuring ATP levels, and drug sensitivity was expressed as the IC50 value35 (Fig. 4a). PDOs in the experimental group exhibited significant morphological changes, including shrinkage, reduced volume, and loss of their original 3D morphology. The organoid changed colour from transparent to dark and cloudy, with some areas showing black necrotic regions. In the 3D culture system, the overall structure of the organoids became loose, often detaching from the matrix. Additionally, the Matrigel dome structure was affected, losing its ability to maintain a stable 3D structure. In contrast, the control group showed no morphological changes, continued to grow, and maintained strong viability (Fig. 4c).
We observed that, compared to that of the IC50 values obtained for the HCCC-9810 cell line, the IC50 values for each group of organoids were higher. These findings indicate that the 3D organoid model more closely replicates the in vivo environment compared to that of the 2D cell culture, offering more accurate drug sensitivity results36,37. However, individual differences in drug sensitivity were observed among the patients. KL-8 demonstrated the best therapeutic effect on PDO-K and PDO-L, while gemcitabine was most effective for PDO-S. Overall, the three PDOs exhibited the highest sensitivity to KL-8 and the lowest sensitivity to sorafenib (Fig. 4b). PDOs demonstrated potential as a valuable drug screening tool with varying responses to different drugs.
Anticancer mechanism of acps on ICC
Studies show that ACPs can disrupt and lyse cell membranes through interactions with the cells38. To further investigate this mechanism, we employed scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging to observe the morphological changes in the organoids after drug intervention. PDOs in the control group showed tight junctions between cells, forming aggregated cell clumps. The overall morphology of the cell surface was smooth, continuous, and well-defined, displaying a refined microstructure. The cell surface contains microvilli, which enhance surface area and facilitate absorption and excretion39. Cilia are involved in cell movement, sensing the external environment, and facilitating cell-cell communication40. Additionally, cell protrusions contribute to the roughness of the cell surface. Owing to the action of the ACPs, the surfaces of the PDOs became rough. Obvious voids and content exudation were observed in single cells. Simultaneously, microvilli and cilia appeared to detach or break, indicating significant cell damage (Fig. 5a). We collected the culture medium from PDOs treated with varying concentrations of ACPs to measure the release of nucleic acid DNA and protein. The results showed that all three ACPs significantly increased the levels of released nucleic acid DNA and protein (Fig. 5b). However, no notable differences were observed between the different concentrations tested (data not shown). These findings indicate that ACPs effectively disrupt cell membranes, resulting in the leakage of nucleic acid and protein from the cells. This suggests that ACPs directly induce tumour cell death through rapid membrane lysis.
Anticancer mechanism of anticancer peptides. (A) Morphological changes of organoids after anticancer peptides treatment. (B) After exposure to anticancer peptides, nucleic acids and proteins in organoid culture medium leak. **P value < 0.01, ***P value < 0.001, ****P value < 0.0001. (C, D) Organoids were treated with anticancer peptides for 24 h and digested into single cells for apoptosis assays.
Besides their direct membrane-disrupting mechanisms, ACPs can also induce apoptosis. PDOs were treated with 1× IC50 concentrations of the respective intervention drugs for 24 h, after which cells were digested into single-cell suspensions using trypsin and analysed for apoptosis via flow cytometry. Compared to that of the control group, the experimental group induced apoptosis to different degrees (Fig. 5c and d).
In summary, ACPs disrupt the integrity of the cell membrane, resulting in cell death through direct interaction with the membrane. Moreover, it plays an anticancer role by promoting cancer cell apoptosis.
Discussion
Although significant progress has been made in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ICC in recent years, no new drug types have been discovered. Studies show that therapeutic peptides have been developed for the treatment of various diseases, including cancer, microbial infections, and metabolic disorders. ACPs have emerged as a class of potential drug candidates owing to their broad-spectrum anticancer activity and high biocompatibility. Adjustments to physical and chemical properties have been implemented to optimise ACPs, including modifications to their conformation, net charge, hydrophobicity, and secondary structure41. The optimal peptide identified in this study showed a high α-helix structure with appropriate hydrophobicity and ideal modification sites. It demonstrated a rapid killing effect within 30 min of application. Regarding anticancer mechanisms, cancer and normal cells show obvious differences in appearance, genome stability, growth and reproduction, angiogenesis, and other characteristics. Cancer cells are characterised by unlimited proliferation, immune system evasion, metastasis, and invasion. The cell membrane resists adverse cellular environments and plays an important role in various anticancer mechanisms. The ACPs designed and synthesised had a higher tendency to bind to cancer cell membranes. The possible reasons for this result are as follows: the cell membrane consists of lipids and proteins, with phosphatidylserine (PS) being a key component, which is negatively charged. The PS of cancer cells is located in the outer layer of the membrane, resulting in a negatively charged surface. Additionally, other anionic components, such as O-glycosylated mucin, sialylated gangliosides, and heparan sulphate, contribute to the negative charge of the cancer cell membrane. In normal cells, amphoteric phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin are present in the outer layer of the plasma membrane, typically maintaining a neutral charge. However, the tumour microenvironment, characterised by high levels of reactive oxygen species and hypoxia, disrupts the balanced distribution of outer membrane components. This imbalance can lead to an increased presence of anionic molecules, resulting in a higher negative charge on the cell membrane42,43. Cancer cells have numerous microvilli on their outer membrane, resulting in a larger surface area and enhancing membrane fluidity44. This structural difference in the cell membrane allows our ACPs to exhibit partial selectivity for tumour cells, which is a potential therapeutic method.
Organoids are promising preclinical models with significant potential for evaluating the effects of drug treatments. Tumour organoids can accurately summarise some important characteristics of solid tumours, including their internal structure, cellular heterogeneity, signalling pathways, cell-cell interactions, growth dynamics, gene expression profiles, and drug resistance mechanisms45,46. In this study, we successfully established three ICC organoid models using clinical samples obtained from surgical procedures. These organoids demonstrated stable and long-term expansion capabilities. Histological and genetic characterisations confirm that the PDOs were derived from tumour tissue and maintained consistency with their parental tumour. Further, in vitro drug evaluation revealed that the organoids exhibited patient-specific heterogeneity, with varying drug sensitivities among patients. This 3D model allowed us to observe the effective inhibition of ICC by ACPs and explore its potential anticancer mechanism. Scanning electron microscopy revealed detailed insight into the sub-microscopic structure of the organoids. The cells on the surface of the organoids were tightly connected and formed compact clusters. The cell surfaces featured functional microvilli and cilia, which provided structural support and facilitated cellular interactions. Upon ACPs treatment, the integrity of the cell membrane was compromised, leading to visible damage and leakage of intracellular contents. Additionally, cilia and microvilli detached or broke across an extensive area, affecting the movement and absorption functions of tumour cells, thereby inhibiting tumour growth and migration. ACPs eliminate cancer cells primarily by disrupting the integrity of the cell membranes. Additionally, beyond this direct mechanism of membrane destruction, ACPs also destabilise cancer cells indirectly by inducing apoptosis.
The main limitation of this study was its small sample size, which prevents the determination of the preference and correlation of ACPs in drug treatment effects on patients with ICC having different pathological types. Additionally, the limited number of organoids and lack of standardisation culture protocols restricted the ability to perform high-throughput drug screening. Transitioning to automated organoid culture procedures could significantly enhance screening efficiency47. Additionally, our culture system lacks a tumour microenvironment, such as immune cells, fibroblasts, and vascular system, which limits its ability to accurately predict immunotherapy outcomes. In future experiments, immune system-related cells could be incorporated into co-culture models to address this limitation48. Finally, our ACPs have not been clinically tested; hence, the data obtained from organoid experiments cannot yet provide patients with reliable references for clinical medication. The clinical application of ACPs in combination with PDOs will require extensive experimental validation49.
In conclusion, our results provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of ACPs in ICC organoids. The study showed novel designed ACPs inhibited the progression of ICC by destroying the cell membrane and inducing apoptosis. These findings suggest that ACPs may be effective candidate compounds for the treatment of ICC in the future, offering novel ideas for therapeutic development.
Materials and methods
Peptide synthesis and purification
The peptide sequence was designed by Ms. Xiao-Yan Wu from the School of Pharmacy at Lanzhou University. It was synthesised using the standard Fmoc solid-phase synthesis method, then purified and analysed using reverse high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC; Waters, MA, USA). The molecular weight of the peptide chain was determined using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS; MaXis 4G, Bruker, USA). All samples had a purity > 95% and were stored at -20℃ in the form of lyophilised powder.
Cell culture
HCCC-9810 and HIBEpiC were obtained from the Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University. The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (VivaCell) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Animal Blood Ware), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Service Bio). The cultures were maintained in a humidified constant temperature incubator at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2.
Cytotoxicity assays
The CCK-8 assay (Wilber) was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of several peptides in vitro. HCCC-9810 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (NEST) at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and incubated for 24 h. The cells were treated with a peptide-containing medium at various concentrations for 1 h. The control group cells were treated with drug-free blank medium. Further, 10 µL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, followed by incubation for an additional 4 h. A microplate reader (BioTek, Synergy H1, USA) was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm, and the results were expressed as half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). HIBEpiC cells were used to assess the toxicity of polypeptides on normal cells.
Membrane potential measurement
The zeta potentials of the HCCC-9810 and HIBEpiC cells were measured using a NanoZetasizer system (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). The KL-8 peptide solution at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 µM was incubated with a 1 × 105 cells/mL cell suspension for 1 h. The mixture was then transferred to a folded capillary sample cell (DST1070) to measure the zeta potential value.
Wound healing assays
HCCC-9810 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (NEST) and cultured until they reached confluence. A 200 µL pipette tip was used to create a scratch on the cell monolayer. The cells were washed with PBS (Servicebio) to remove detached cells and debris before being treated with a medium containing 1 µM polypeptide, gemcitabine (Solarbio) or sorafenib (Solarbio). The control group cells were treated with drug-free blank medium. Images were captured at 0 h and 24 h post-treatment using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus, U-HGLGPS, Japan). The wound healing percentage was calculated based on changes in the wound area.
Transwell assays
In Transwell-24 wells (Corning) with a pore size of 8 μm, HCCC-9810 cells (1 × 10⁵ cells/well) were suspended in 200 µL of serum-free medium containing 1 µM polypeptide, gemcitabine or sorafenib and added to the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with 600 µL of RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio) for 30 min. The cells were then washed again with PBS, stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Solarbio) for 30 min, and washed again with PBS. After removing the excess stain with a cotton swab, the sample was visualised and photographed using an inverted fluorescence microscope. The relative gray levels of each group were analysed using ImageJ software.
Clinical specimens
Human ICC tumour tissues were obtained from hepatectomy procedures performed in the Department of General Surgery at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University and adhered to relevant ethical guidelines (LDYYLL-2024-788).
Patient-derived organoid culture
These tissue were divided into three parts: one for organoid culture, another for histological identification, and the third for genome sequencing. Pathological examination of the intraoperative specimens showed all cases to be ICC. The tumour tissue was placed in a precooled tissue preservation solution and cut into 1 mm3 piece using a sterile scalpel in the dish. A small amount of digestive solution was added, and the mixture was subjected to shaking digestion at 37℃. Digestion was terminated when a sufficient number of cell clusters or single cells were observed under the microscope. The suspension was then filtered through a 100 μm mesh (Corning). The filtrate was collected and centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min, after which the resulting supernatant was removed. The cell pellet was mixed with Matrigel (Corning) at a volume of 1:1 ratio and seeded into a 24-well plate (NEST) of 50 µL / well. After the Matrigel solidified into a gel, 500 µL of human cholangiocarcinoma organoid culture medium (Absin) was added to each well. The medium was replaced every 2–3 days. Based on the growth rate of the organoids, they were passaged at a 1:2 or 1:3 volume ratio.
Histological evaluation of tumours and organoids
Paraffin-embedded tumour tissues and PDOs (5 μm thick) were used for histological characterisation. The prepared slides were dewaxed and rehydrated before staining. H&E staining was performed using the H&E Kit (Solarbio), followed by microscopic examination and image acquisition. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were conducted by incubating the slides overnight with anti-KRT19 (1:200, Proteintech) and anti-EpCAM (1:500, Proteintech) antibodies. All procedures were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Live/dead staining of organoids
The reaction buffer and staining working solution were prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The organoid medium was aspirated, and the cells were gently washed with PBS by slowly adding the solution. Further, 500 µL of the staining working solution (Elabscience) was added to each well of the 24-well plate and incubated at 37℃ for 1 h. Live and dead cells were visualised using an inverted fluorescence microscope with FITC and TRITC channels, respectively. The captured images were merged and analysed using ImageJ software.
Drug sensitivity experiment of organoids
Using a drug screening method, the response of organoids from various donors to multiple therapeutic agents was evaluated. Organoids in optimal growth conditions were embedded in 96-well plates, with 10 µL Matrigel organoid mixture per well, and cultured in a 3D environment. Bright-field images of representative wells were captured on the day treatment began. Organoids were treated with different concentrations of the compound-containing medium for 24 h. At the end of the treatment, bright-field images of the organoids from the same location were captured. The luminescence value was measured following the protocol outlined in the CellTiter-Glo kit (Promega). Wells containing only the medium and organoids served as negative controls, and the results were reported as IC50.
Whole exome sequencing and data analysis
The data comprised three pairs of tumour tissues and their corresponding derived organoids. DNA was extracted from the samples and assessed for quality. The qualified DNA fragments ranged from 150 to 350 bp in length. After end repair and the addition of a poly-A tail, a genomic library was constructed by ligating double-ended linkers. The genomic library was hybridised in the liquid phase with biotin-labelled exome capture probes to isolate exon sequences. The target library was obtained through PCR amplification. Following quality inspection, the library was sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with PE150 sequencing.
Scanning electron microscopy assay
Organoids in the experimental group were incubated with peptide medium at a concentration of 1× IC50 and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h, while those in the control group were cultured under standard conditions. Following treatment, the organoids were extracted from the Matrigel, and the resulting pellet was collected, suspended, and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Lilai). After washing with ultrapure water, cells were fixed with 1% osmic acid (EMCN) for 1 h before being washed again. The samples were then dehydrated step by step with graded alcohol concentrations, dried using a Quorum (K850, UK), and the coverslips were mounted onto the sample stage using conductive glue. The mounted samples underwent gold sputter coating for conductivity enhancement (JEOL, Smart Coater, Japan). Images of the samples were acquired using SEM ( JEOL, JSM-IT700HR, Japan).
Nucleic acid and protein leakage assays
The leakage of cellular contents serves as an indicator of cell membrane integrity. Organoids were treated with KL-8, 14E, and 14Aad at a concentration of 1× IC50 for 24 h. Following treatment, the organoid culture medium was collected, and the levels of nucleic acid DNA and proteins in the secretion supernatant were measured using an ultramicro spectrophotometre (ThermoFisher Scientific, Nanadrop 2000, USA). The resulting supernatant from the organoid culture medium of the untreated group served as the negative control. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.
Flow cytometry apoptosis assays
Organoids in the experimental group were incubated with a peptide-containing medium at 1× IC50 concentration at 37℃ for 24 h, while those in the control group were cultured under standard conditions. After removing the Matrigel from the organoids and collecting the precipitates, the organoids were digested into single cells using trypsin (Servicebio). The cells were then washed with PBS and centrifuged. Following this, the Annexin V-FITC/PI Kit (Elabscience) protocol was used to stain the cells, and they were incubated in the dark for 20 min. The level of apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry (Agilent, NovoCyte Advanteon Dx, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.1.2. The significance of the results was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and two-tailed Student’s t-test. t A P -value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Data availability
Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioProject number PRJNA1268718.
Abbreviations
- ICC:
-
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- ACPs:
-
Anticancer peptides
- PDOs:
-
Patient-derived organoids
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- 2D:
-
Two-dimensional
- HCCC-9810:
-
Human cholangiocarcinoma cell line-9810
- HIBEpiC:
-
Human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells
- H&E:
-
Haematoxylin and eosin
- EpCAM:
-
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule
- KRT19:
-
Keratin 19
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- USP8:
-
Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 8
- PS:
-
Phosphatidylserine
References
Khan, S. A., Tavolari, S., Brandi, G. & Cholangiocarcinoma Epidemiology and risk factors. Liver International: Official J. Int. Association Study Liver. 39 (Suppl 1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14095 (2019).
Machairas, N., Lang, H., Jayant, K., Raptis, D. A. & Sotiropoulos, G. C. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: limitations for resectability, current surgical concepts and future perspectives. Eur. J. Surg. Oncology: J. Eur. Soc. Surg. Oncol. Br. Association Surg. Oncol. 46, 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.028 (2020).
Banales, J. M. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-0310-z (2020).
Moris, D. et al. Advances in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an overview of the current and future therapeutic landscape for clinicians. Cancer J. Clin. 73, 198–222. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21759 (2023).
Sato, K. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: novel therapeutic targets. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 24, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2020.1733528 (2020).
Corrò, C., Novellasdemunt, L. & Li, V. S. W. A brief history of organoids. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 319, C151–c165. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00120.2020 (2020).
Liu, L., Yu, L., Li, Z., Li, W. & Huang, W. Patient-derived organoid (PDO) platforms to facilitate clinical decision making. J. Translational Med. 19, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02677-2 (2021).
Wu, D. et al. Peptide-based cancer therapy: opportunity and challenge. Cancer Lett. 351, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.05.002 (2014).
Qi, Y. K., Zheng, J. S. & Liu, L. Mirror-image protein and peptide drug discovery through mirror-image phage display. Chem (2024).
Chiangjong, W., Chutipongtanate, S. & Hongeng, S. Anticancer peptide: physicochemical property, functional aspect and trend in clinical application (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 57, 678–696. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2020.5099 (2020).
Fu, X. Y. et al. Three rounds of stability-guided optimization and systematical evaluation of oncolytic peptide LTX-315. J. Med. Chem. 67, 3885–3908 (2024).
Yin, H. et al. The hybrid oncolytic peptide NTP-385 potently inhibits adherent cancer cells by targeting the nucleus. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 44, 201–210 (2023).
Yin, H. et al. Design, synthesis and anticancer evaluation of novel oncolytic peptide-chlorambucil conjugates. Bioorg. Chem. 138, 106674 (2023).
Xie, M., Liu, D. & Yang, Y. Anti-cancer peptides: classification, mechanism of action, reconstruction and modification. Open. Biology. 10, 200004. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200004 (2020).
Wu, X. et al. Rational design of a new short anticancer peptide with good potential for cancer treatment. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116519 (2024).
Chai, J. et al. Antitumor effects of Scorpion peptide Smp43 through mitochondrial dysfunction and membrane disruption on hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Nat. Prod. 84, 3147–3160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00963 (2021).
Llovet, J. M. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Reviews Disease Primers. 2 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.18 (2016).
Broutier, L. et al. Human primary liver cancer-derived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening. Nat. Med. 23, 1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4438 (2017).
Saito, Y. et al. Establishment of Patient-Derived organoids and drug screening for biliary tract carcinoma. Cell. Rep. 27, 1265–1276e1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.088 (2019).
Sulpice, L. et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule is a prognosis marker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Surg. Res. 192, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.017 (2014).
Wang, P. & Lv, L. miR-26a induced the suppression of tumor growth of cholangiocarcinoma via KRT19 approach. Oncotarget 7, 81367–81376. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13229 (2016).
Yang, H. et al. Pharmacogenomic profiling of intra-tumor heterogeneity using a large organoid biobank of liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 42, 535–551e538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2024.03.004 (2024).
Debruyne, A. C., Okkelman, I. A. & Dmitriev, R. I. Balance between the cell viability and death in 3D. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 144, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.09.005 (2023).
Wang, Z. et al. Establishment and drug screening of patient-derived extrahepatic biliary tract carcinoma organoids. Cancer Cell Int. 21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02219-w (2021).
Chen, Z. et al. Integrative analysis reveals different feature of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma subtypes. Liver International: Official J. Int. Association Study Liver. 44, 2477–2493. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.16015 (2024).
Wang, Y. et al. Novel genetic alterations in liver cancer distinguish distinct clinical outcomes and combination immunotherapy responses. Front. Pharmacol. 15 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1416295 (2024).
Liang, S. et al. A PLCB1-PI3K-AKT signaling Axis activates EMT to promote cholangiocarcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 81, 5889–5903. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-21-1538 (2021).
Yuan, F. et al. Heparanase interacting BCLAF1 to promote the development and drug resistance of ICC through the PERK/eIF2α pathway. Cancer Gene Ther. 31, 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-024-00754-y (2024).
Long, G., Wang, D., Tang, J., Hu, K. & Zhou, L. USP8 promotes the tumorigenesis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via stabilizing OGT. Cancer Cell Int. 24, 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-024-03370-w (2024).
Konishi, D. et al. Regulatory T cells induce a suppressive immune milieu and promote lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 127, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01838-y (2022).
Ma, Y. et al. The COL7A1/PI3K/AKT axis regulates the progression of cholangiocarcinoma. Heliyon 10, e37361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37361 (2024).
Wu, G. et al. Upregulation of RSPO3 via targeted promoter DNA demethylation inhibits the progression of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin. Epigenetics. 15, 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01592-9 (2023).
Wang, A. et al. Whole-exome sequencing reveals the origin and evolution of hepato-cholangiocarcinoma. Nat. Commun. 9, 894. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03276-y (2018).
Abou-Alfa, G. K. et al. Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30157-1 (2020).
Driehuis, E., Kretzschmar, K. & Clevers, H. Establishment of patient-derived cancer organoids for drug-screening applications. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3380–3409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0379-4 (2020).
Aboulkheyr Es, H., Montazeri, L., Aref, A. R., Vosough, M. & Baharvand, H. Personalized Cancer medicine: an organoid approach. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.12.005 (2018).
Ren, X., Chen, W., Yang, Q., Li, X. & Xu, L. Patient-derived cancer organoids for drug screening: basic technology and clinical application. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 37, 1446–1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15930 (2022).
Chinnadurai, R. K. et al. Current research status of anti-cancer peptides: mechanism of action, production, and clinical applications. Biomed. pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine Pharmacotherapie. 164, 114996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114996 (2023).
Morales, E. A., Gaeta, I. & Tyska, M. J. Building the brush border, one Microvillus at a time. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 80, 102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102153 (2023).
Satir, P. & Christensen, S. T. Overview of structure and function of mammalian cilia. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69, 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.040705.141236 (2007).
Li, C. M. et al. Novel Peptide Therapeutic Approaches for Cancer Treatment. Cells 10, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112908
Norouzi, P., Mirmohammadi, M. & Houshdar Tehrani, M. H. Anticancer peptides mechanisms, simple and complex. Chemico-Biol. Interact. 368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110194 (2022).
Baxter, A. A., Lay, F. T., Poon, I. K. H., Kvansakul, M. & Hulett, M. D. Tumor cell membrane-targeting cationic antimicrobial peptides: novel insights into mechanisms of action and therapeutic prospects. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 3809–3825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2604-z (2017).
Tyagi, A. et al. In Silico models for designing and discovering novel anticancer peptides. Sci. Rep. 3, 2984. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02984 (2013).
Shiota, J., Samuelson, L. C. & Razumilava, N. Hepatobiliary organoids and their applications for studies of liver health and disease: are we there yet?? Hepatol. (Baltimore Md). 74, 2251–2263. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31772 (2021).
Zhao, Y. et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Uncovers Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Underlying Mechanisms for Drug Resistance in Hepatobiliary Tumor Organoids. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 8, e2003897, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003897
van Tienderen, G. S. et al. Hepatobiliary tumor organoids for personalized medicine: a multicenter view on establishment, limitations, and future directions. Cancer Cell. 40, 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2022.02.001 (2022).
Xie, C. et al. Opportunities and challenges of hepatocellular carcinoma organoids for targeted drugs sensitivity screening. Front. Oncol. 12, 1105454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1105454 (2022).
Veninga, V. & Voest, E. E. Tumor organoids: opportunities and challenges to guide precision medicine. Cancer Cell. 39, 1190–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.020 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We sincerely appreciate all the participants in our work. We also acknowledge assistance from medical writers, proof-readers and editors.
Funding
This work was supported by Grant(s) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160230, 82173678, 81773564), Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project in Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province (2022RCCX0024), and 1st Hospital of Lanzhou University Scientifc Research Foundation (ldyyyn2019-03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y. Z, Y.C.L, and Q.X.Z for cell culture, X.K.H and H.X.Z was responsible for specimen collection, and they were the main contributors to writing the manuscript. X.K.H cultured and identified organoids. Y. Z, Y.C.L, and Q.X.Z and H.X.Z modifies the image and participates in data processing. X.K.H, Y.Z, Y.C.L, Q.X.Z, H.X.Z and Y.Z organized the data of all experiments. J.M.N and J.Y conceived, designed, and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical declarations
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Lanzhou University First Hospital, Gansu, China (Approval number: LDYYLL2024-788).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y. et al. Application and mechanism of anticancer peptides in organoid models of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep 15, 22870 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06127-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06127-1







