Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among females and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women, with different management modalities. To determine the premenopausal BC patients’ clinicopathological and molecular landscape. This retrospective study was conducted on 300 primary BC patients aged 25–50 years at Hiwa Hematology and Oncology Hospital, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, from January 2016 to May 2022. Patients underwent definitive management either before chemotherapy or after neo-adjuvant, and on regular follow-up. Patients were interviewed face to face using a well-designed questionnaire to collect the data, including the type of BC and hormonal status. In this study, most of the studied patients were married (90.3%), aged 45–50 years at diagnosis (36%), aged 13–14 years at the first occurrence of menstruation (70.3%), practised breastfeeding (76.7%), parous (85%), and with no surgical history (92%). Most patients (39%) had luminal B subtype, while the fewest (0.34%) had HER2 overexpression. The overall rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was 66.7%, while the overall rate of mastectomy was 33.3% among patients. Also, 83.79% of the tumour margin was free, 9.03% was involved, and only 5.7% of the tumour margin was close. The tumour margin involved 20.3% and 15.6% of cases diagnosed with multifocal and multicentric tumour masses, respectively. It is concluded that married, aged, breastfed, and parous women showed the highest incidence of BC. The most prominent cancer subtype was luminal B, with the highest level of BCS. Most BC patients had a 2–5 cm, unifocal tumour mass with stage II-A disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous non-gynaecological cancer of females worldwide, with different characteristics, types/subtypes, stages at diagnosis, and grades1. It mainly affects women aged 50 years and older, but younger age groups can also be affected by BC. About 1 in 8 women are diagnosed with BC during their lifetime, although the incidence is highly affected by race, ethnicity, and age. However, there is a high likelihood of achieving a complete remission if the disease is diagnosed and treated at an early stage2. Physiological, behavioural, and genetic risk factors might be attributed to premenopausal (52.7%) and postmenopausal (54.7%) BC cases3. Risk factors that increase the risk of BC include fibrocystic breast disease, a first child after the age of 35 years, and chest irradiation. However, improper lifestyle, including obesity, alcoholism, smoking, low physical activity, and unhealthy diets, are among the other risk factors that enhance this cancer4.
Generally, there is a lack of awareness and knowledge of BC symptoms among women, especially in low-income and developing countries, including Iraq. BC can exhibit various symptoms, but the initial, obvious sign is usually a lump and a small mass or region of solidified breast tissue5. Thus, it’s recommended that women perform breast self-examination manually and regularly for any alterations, and mammography is recommended for general breast health above age 45 years (menopause age)6,7. BC comprises three main tumour subtypes, including luminal (A and B), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)- overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which are characterised based on estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) expression and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) gene amplification. These subtypes have diverse risk profiles and treatment modalities. The ideal treatment for the patients depends on the tumour subtype, cancer stage, tumour biology, and patient preferences8.
The survival rates for young women with BC are lower than for older women9. Thus, progress to counteract BC death could be enhanced by modifying racial differences through improved access to high-quality screening and treatment via nationwide Medicaid expansion and partnerships between community stakeholders, advocacy organisations, and healthcare systems9. There are different modalities of BC management. Chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and ovarian function suppression can be started before or after the operation based on the molecular subtype and stage of the disease. On the other hand, BCS or lumpectomy is more accepted by patients cosmetically. Previously, only the size of the tumour, its site and the grade of the cancer were considered in deciding to do BCS or mastectomy10. Thus, we aimed to study the clinicopathological and molecular landscape of premenopausal BC among patients.
Methodology
Patients and study setting
This prospective study was done on 300 primary BC patients aged 25 to 50 at Hiwa Hematology and Oncology Hospital, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, from January 2016 to May 2022. Patients underwent definitive management either before chemotherapy or after receiving neo-adjuvant (n = 13, 9.1%) and on regular follow-up.
Inclusion criteria
Female patients aged 25 to 50 years with primary BC who underwent surgical operations regardless of ethnicity or nationality were included in this study.
Exclusion criteria
BC patients with metastases, stage IV disease, and menopause were excluded from the study BC.
Questionnaire
A well-designed questionnaire, validated by four local experts in the field, was used to collect patients’ sociodemographic data, including marital status, age at diagnosis, age at menarche, history of breastfeeding, past surgery, and parity, through face-to-face interviews (Supplementary 1).
Study protocol
Post-operative patients’ samples were obtained for histopathological examination (HPE) after a surgical operation (mass excision/lumpectomy or mastectomy) by an expert surgical team, excluding the author. Consequently, BC patients were divided into six groups (luminal A, luminal B, luminal B-HER2+, HER2 (low and high), and TNBC, depending on the expression of ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and TNM (tumour size, spread, and metastases) staging11. If the axillary lymph node (LN) was positive by Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) test or sentinel biopsy by frozen section, then LN dissection levels I & II were done. Then, information on tumour stage, size, grade, and margin involvement was abstracted from pathology reports.
Ethics approval
The proposal for the current study was revised and accepted by the Scientific and Ethical Committees of the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani (No. 85/15/01/2023-COM-UOS). All procedures and tests were conducted by the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical analysis
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM, Chicago, USA, version 25) was used for data analysis. Variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the data between different variables. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Patients’ sociodemographic data
In this study, 300 patients with BC were studied. Regarding their sociodemographic data, most of them (90.3%) were married, aged 45–50 years (36%) when diagnosed, aged 13–14 years at menarche (70.3%), had a history of breastfeeding (76.7%), given childbirth (85%), and without past surgical history (92%) (Table 1). Additionally, the mean age of patients at diagnosis was 41.2 ± 5.8 years, while the mean age at menarche was 13.3 ± 1.3 years.
A molecular subtype of breast cancer
Most patients (39%) had luminal B subtype, while the fewest (0.34%) had HER2 overexpression. A significant correlation was found between the molecular subtype and type of surgery (p = 0.041). The overall rate of BCS was 66.7%, with the highest rate observed in patients with TNBC molecular subtypes (87%). The overall rate of mastectomy was 33.3%, with the highest rate (44.9%) found in patients with the luminal B-HER2 + subtype (Table 2).
Tumour margin
Most (83.79%) of the tumour margin was free (mostly in TNBC type), while 9.03% was involved (mostly in luminal A type), and only 5.7% was close (mostly in luminal B-HER2+). Concerning the involvement of the tumour margin, 12.33% with luminal A molecular subtype had involvement, followed by luminal B subtype (10.3%), then luminal B-HER2+ (5.8%), and TNBC (4.3%). There was a significant difference between the molecular subtype and tumour margin involvement (p = 0.043) (Table 3).
Tumour focality
Upon histopathological examination of the tumour mass, most patients (63.7%) had unifocal BC. Therefore, they were the most suitable for BCS, and only 4.7% ended up with involved margins and needed revision surgery. The tumour margin involved 20.3% and 15.6% of cases diagnosed with multifocal and multicentric tumour masses, respectively. However, 84.7% had a free tumour margin for all tumour mass types, while a close tumour margin was only found in 5.7% of excised masses. There was a significant association between the focality of the tumour and the margin postoperatively (p < 0.001) (Table 4).
Breast cancer stage
Most patients (n = 91) had stage II-A; the fewest (n = 47) had stage III-C. The highest rate of luminal A type (40.6%) was observed in stage III-A, but it was significantly lower in stage III-C (19.1%). Regarding luminal B-HER2+, the rate was 61.5% among those with no lesion, 16.9% in stage I-A, 19.8% in stage II-A, 25% in stage II-B, and then decreased to 6.3% in stage III-A, with a sharp increase to 36.2% in stage III-C. The HER2 overexpression had the lowest level (3.3%) in all stages. A significant association was found between molecular subtypes and the stage of the disease (p < 0.001) (Table 5). Most tumour masses (52%) were sized > 2 - <5 cm (T2) with the highest involved margin (48.3%), followed by T1 mass (37.9%), then T3 mass (10.3%), while DCIS had no involved margin. No significant association was detected between the margin involvement by tumour cells and the tumour size (p = 0.606) (Table 6).
Discussion
Generally, incidence, response to therapy, management, mortality, and survival rates of BC vary considerably in age, stage of cancer, cancer type (primary or secondary), cancer subtype, detection and diagnosis time, and therapy used12. Therefore, in this study, the sociodemographic characteristics of the enrolled patients were studied thoroughly using a well-designed questionnaire. It was realised that the incidence of BC was positively correlated with those aged 45–50 years (premenopausal), married, aged 13–14 years at menarche, practised breastfeeding, given birth, with no surgical history, and had a tumour mass of < 5 cm.
In this regard, Abousahmeen et al. (2023) reported that BC patients had a mean age of 47.3 ± 10.7 years, with most of them being premenopausal (59.2%)13. Sauder et al. 2021 mentioned that women aged 40–64 years covered the most significant proportion of BC patients14, while Al-Thoubaity et al. 2020 found that the average age of the BC patients was 49 years with an average tumour size of 3.2 cm15. Shahid et al. (2018) reported that the age of BC patients ranged between 46 and 50 years16, and de Bonifac et al. (2021) found that women aged 50–64 reported the highest incidence of BC17. Concerning the correlation between marital status and the incidence of BC in patients, the outcomes of this study were inconsistent with the results of some studies that mentioned higher rates of BC in unmarried women18,19,20. In contrast, some studies claim that marital status does not influence this malignant disease3,21. Moreover, the age at menarche (13–15 years) was directly correlated with the possibility of mammary carcinoma in this study, which disagreed with Goldberg et al. (2020)22 but agreed with Chollet-Hinton et al. (2016)23. Breastfeeding has become a well-documented protective factor for BC24. Still, the current study realised the opposite result, which disagrees with Chollet-Hinton et al. 201623 but is consistent with that of Zhou et al. 201525, which mentioned that breastfeeding was inversely related to BC. Regarding the parity status in this study, the result was in line with another study23. However, Lima et al. (2020) stated that breastfeeding could not be attributed to alterations in parity over time26.
Based on the data studied in the literature, luminal A tumours have the highest incidence but the lowest mortality rate. However, basal-like and HER2-type tumours occur less often but are associated with poorer survival12. Consequently, the luminal B subtype reported the highest rate in this study, while HER2 overexpression reported the lowest rate. In this respect, some studies23,27 have mentioned that the luminal type is more common, while the HER2 type is less common. Similarly, luminal B was noted to be the more common type among BC patients in Indonesia28. Similarly, in Libya, luminal B reported the highest (63.66%), followed by TNBC (20.04%), then HER2+ (11.6%), and luminal A (4.7%)13; however, in Saudi Arabia, it was found that luminal A was the most prevalent (58.5%), followed by triple negative (16%), luminal B (14%), then HER2-positive (11.5%)15. Whereas in Iran, it was shown that 42% were luminal A, 19.2% luminal B, 23% triple negative and 15% HER2+16, while in Egypt, it was displayed that the most commonly detected molecular subtype was luminal B (34.9%), followed by triple negative (31.4%), HER2 (19.2%), then luminal A (14. 5%)29.
Furthermore, most of the studied patients underwent BCS, while the rest underwent mastectomy as a treatment modality for this malignant disease. The same outcomes were observed in another study, and they also mentioned higher survival rates for patients with BCS than patients assigned to mastectomy27,30,31. On the contrary, Onitilo et al.32 stated that two-thirds of patients had BCS and one-third had a mastectomy, with the same survival rates. Moreover, the number of foci should be considered an independent prognostic factor, which is currently not reflected in the TNM classification. In this regard, Multicentric and multifocal BC is an independent risk factor and should be included in the risk estimation by re-evaluating the existing TNM classification of the UICC33. In the current study, the focality of the tumour mass after surgery was primarily unifocal, multifocal, and multicentric. These findings agreed with other study results, which also mentioned that most patients with BCS had unifocal tumour mass27 and higher survival rates in patients with unifocal mass34.
Regarding BC staging, the higher the number, the more the cancer has spread, and it is usually stated upon the first diagnosis. In this study, most patients had stage II-A, followed by stage II-B, while the fewest had stage III-C. The highest rate of luminal A was found in stage III-A. Other studies have mentioned stage II as the highest, followed by stage III23,27. On the other hand, stage I and II cases that had BCS alone were low in all age groups except in most older women. Also, they stated higher survival in BCS plus radiotherapy than in mastectomy in stages I and II35. Another study in Libya mentioned that 66.1% of patients were LN-positive. Most patients were in grades II and III, while 47.0% of cases were at stage II and 39.5% were at stage III13. In Egypt, it was reported that 54.4% were in grade III and 22.4% were in stage IB29. In this study, most tumour masses were sized > 2 cm and > 5 cm (T2), followed by T1 masses, and then T3 masses. Additionally, most of the tumour margin was free, the least involved portion was minimal, and only a small portion was close. Hence, a tumour mass of > 2 cm was found to be most common in patients of another study, but the relationship between tumours with invasive BC was not linear23,36,37.
The study’s limitations include the lack of consideration for potential confounders, such as smoking and body mass index, and the possible underestimation of unlisted comorbid conditions. Additionally, this study was limited by a lack of tumour biology information, such as lymphovascular and extracapsular invasions, and the size of nodal metastases. Another limitation was that the survival and death rates in BC patients were not reported; also, the information about the types of chemotherapy used was lacking.
Conclusions
Marital status, age, breastfeeding, and parity condition of women significantly correlated with the high incidence of BC. The luminal B cancer subtype was most common among patients with the highest level of BCS. Additionally, a unifocal tumour mass with stage II-A BC was more profound in the studied case.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Zewdie, E. T., Tessema, A. W. & Simegn, G. L. Classification of breast cancer types, sub-types and grade from histopathological images using deep learning techniques. Health Technol. 11 (6), 1277–1290 (2021).
Sancho-Garnier, H. & Colonna, M. Breast cancer epidemiology. Presse Med. 48 (10), 1076–1084 (2019).
Li, M. et al. Does marital status correlate with the female breast cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS One. 15 (3), e0229899 (2020).
Momenimovahed, Z. & Salehiniya, H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer: Targets Therapy. 11, 151 (2019).
Koo, M. M. et al. Typical and atypical presenting symptoms of breast cancer and their associations with diagnostic intervals: evidence from a National audit of cancer diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol. 48, 140–146 (2017).
Wang, T., Baskin, A. S. & Dossett, L. A. Deimplementation of the choosing wisely recommendations for low-value breast cancer surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 155 (8), 759–770 (2020).
Jørgensen, K. J. et al. Overview of guidelines on breast screening: why recommendations differ and what to do about it. Breast 31, 261–269 (2017).
Waks, A. G. & Winer, E. P. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA 2019, 321(3):288–300 .
Giaquinto, A. N. et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer journal for clinicians 72(6):524–541. (2022).
Łukasiewicz, S. et al. Risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment Strategies—An. Updated Rev. Cancers. 13 (17), 4287 (2021).
Harbeck, N., Thomssen, C. & Gnant, M. St. Gallen 2013: brief preliminary summary of the consensus discussion. Breast Care. 8 (2), 102–109 (2013).
Warner, E. T. et al. Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: mediating effect of tumor characteristics and sociodemographic and treatment factors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33(20):2254–2261 .
Abousahmeen, A. et al. Molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features of breast cancer in libya: a first glance. Therapeutic Radiol. Oncol. 7, 1–10 (2023).
Sauder, C. A., Li, Q., Bold, R. J., Ruddy, K. J. & Keegan, T. H. Secondary breast cancer sociodemographic characteristics and survival by age group. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 28 (13), 8118–8127 (2021).
Al-Thoubaity, F. K. Molecular classification of breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Annals Med. Surg. 49, 44–48 (2020).
Shahidsales, S. et al. Clinicopathologic features and survival of breast cancer subtypes in Northeast Iran. Middle East. J. Cancer 2018, 9(1):27–33 .
de Boniface, J., Szulkin, R. & Johansson, A. L. Survival after breast conservation vs mastectomy adjusted for comorbidity and socioeconomic status: a Swedish National 6-year follow-up of 48 986 women. JAMA Surg. 156 (7), 628–637 (2021).
Laitala, V. S., Saarto, T., Einiö, E. K., Martikainen, P. & Silventoinen, K. Early-stage breast cancer is not associated with the risk of marital dissolution in a large prospective study of women. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113(3):543–547 .
Yıldız, F. & Alagüney, M. E. Is early-stage breast cancer a risk for marital-dissolution? Breast cancer a risk for marital-dissolution? Med. Sci. Discovery. 7 (7), 566–569 (2020).
Hinyard, L., Wirth, L. S., Clancy, J. M. & Schwartz, T. The effect of marital status on breast cancer-related outcomes in women under 65: A SEER database analysis. Breast 32, 13–17 (2017).
Martínez, M. E. et al. Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: A population-based study. PloS One. 12 (5), e0175515 (2017).
Goldberg, M., D’Aloisio, A. A., O’Brien, K. M., Zhao, S. & Sandler, D. P. Pubertal timing and breast cancer risk in the sister study cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 22 (1), 1–11 (2020).
Chollet-Hinton, L. et al. Breast cancer biologic and etiologic heterogeneity by young age and menopausal status in the Carolina breast Cancer study: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 18 (1), 1–10 (2016).
Anstey, E. H. et al. Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk reduction: implications for black mothers. Am. J. Prev. Med. 53 (3), S40–S46 (2017).
Zhou, Y. et al. Association between breastfeeding and breast cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Breastfeed. Med. 10 (3), 175–182 (2015).
Lima, S. M., Kehm, R. D., Swett, K., Gonsalves, L. & Terry, M. B. Trends in parity and breast cancer incidence in US women younger than 40 years from 1935 to 2015. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020, 3(3):e200929–e200929 .
Christiansen, P. et al. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival—a population based study by the Danish breast Cancer cooperative group (DBCG). Acta Oncol. 57 (1), 19–25 (2018).
Paramita, S., Raharjo, E. N., Niasari, M., Azizah, F. & Hanifah, N. A. Luminal B is the most common intrinsic molecular subtypes of invasive ductal breast carcinoma patients in East kalimantan, Indonesia. Asian Pac. J. cancer Prevention: APJCP 2019, 20(8):2247 .
Elgasim, M. A. E. A., Abusin, H. M. & Nouri, M. M. Breast cancer molecular subtypes in relation to age, stage and grade among Sudanese women patients in Khartoum oncology hospital (2013–2017). Int. Res. J. Oncol. 2 (1), 36–44 (2019).
Hartmann-Johnsen, O. J., Kåresen, R., Schlichting, E. & Nygård, J. F. Survival is better after breast conserving therapy than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer: a registry-based follow-up study of Norwegian women primary operated between 1998 and 2008. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22 (12), 3836–3845 (2015).
Hofvind, S. et al. Women treated with breast conserving surgery do better than those with mastectomy independent of detection mode, prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO). 41 (10), 1417–1422 (2015).
Onitilo, A. A., Engel, J. M., Stankowski, R. V. & Doi, S. A. Survival comparisons for breast conserving surgery and mastectomy revisited: community experience and the role of radiation therapy. Clin. Med. Res. 13 (2), 65–73 (2015).
Zati zehni, A. et al. Hormone receptor expression in multicentric/multifocal versus unifocal breast cancer: especially the VDR determines the outcome related to focality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (22), 5740 (2019).
Ataseven, B. et al. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on surgery and locoregional, distant and overall survival of 6,134 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22 (4), 1118–1127 (2015).
Fisher, S., Gao, H., Yasui, Y., Dabbs, K. & Winget, M. Survival in stage I–III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system. Ann. Oncol. 26 (6), 1161–1169 (2015).
Welch, H. G., Prorok, P. C., O’Malley, A. J. & Kramer, B. S. Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N. Engl. J. Med. 375 (15), 1438–1447 (2016).
Sopik, V. & Narod, S. A. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 170 (3), 647–656 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the healthcare staff from Hiwa Hematology/Oncology at Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, for their kind assistance and support of this study. This manuscript is available as a preprint in Research Square with the given link: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2451720/v1.
Funding
The study is self-funded; no grant or funding was obtained from national or international agencies, organisations, or Universities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HAMA: Conceptualization, data collection, data analysis, prepared tables and figures, written the original manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All women (aged 25 years and above) provided written informed consent as voluntary participants in this study. Information regarding the survey, its plan, and its objectives has been explained to them thoroughly. Additionally, participants were informed about the confidentiality of the data and were free to leave at any time without providing a reason.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdulla Mohammed Ameen, H. The clinicopathological and molecular landscape of breast cancer patients: a retrospective study in Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. Sci Rep 15, 30549 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12896-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12896-6


