Introduction

Buffalo rearing is an important part of rural farming systems in the world, making a significant contribution to the world’s dairy and meat supply1. Although buffaloes possess a high degree of adaptability to diverse ecological environments and an innate capacity to withstand climatic stresses, their use has yet to be fully exploited in most countries, particularly in Bangladesh. Subclinical mastitis (SCM) is a significant barrier to the achievement of the highest productive efficiency, yet economically significant intra-mammary infection threatens milk quality, udder health, and farm profitability2. Two common buffalo ecotypes, the swamp and riverine, are found in Bangladesh under various agro-ecological circumstances3. Riverine buffaloes thrive in riverine areas like Jamalpur, while swamp buffaloes are mainly found in the flooded haor regions of northeastern Bangladesh3. In Bangladesh, dairy products derived from buffalo milk are gaining popularity and have the potential to contribute significantly to the dairy sector. However, buffalo farming and milk production remain underdeveloped and insufficiently expanded across the country. The Buffalo Development Project has been initiated to develop expansion and improve production systems at the national level. Such initiatives, however, are generally faced with vigorous challenges due to the widespread, subclinical occurrence of mastitis, which gradually undermines herd productivity.

Over the past half-century, buffalo farming has seen tremendous expansion across Asia, producing about 13% of global milk output4. In the 2023–2024 fiscal year, Bangladesh had a ruminant population of 575.57 lakh (57.557 million), producing 150.44 lakh (15.044 million) metric tons of milk, with buffalo numbers increasing to 15.24 lakh (1.524 million)5. Even with this growth, however, mastitis has remained one of the most persistent and economically draining diseases among dairy farming, significantly reducing the volume and value of milk. The disease is responsible for tremendous economic losses, primarily in the form of therapy and lost productivity, with an estimated annual loss of $70 per infected buffalo, comprising 55% for therapeutic intervention and 16% for lost milk production6,7. Mastitis also presents in its clinical (CM) and SCM forms where SCM is more frequent and insidious. Occurring 15 to 40 times more frequently than CM, SCM lacks apparent clinical symptoms so that it can barely be noticed and treated, hence leading to extended milk production loss and long-term economic consequences8. SCM is caused by multiple factors, including host immunity, nutrition, pathogen virulence, and poor management practices9. Among the pathogens, S. aureus especially MRSA is highly significant due to its prevalence, chronic and recurrent nature, as well as impact on both animal and public health10. Milk-borne MRSA is an emerging threat in dairy production due to its biofilm-forming ability, which enhances resistance to antibiotics and sanitizers. Biofilm-producing MRSA has been found in raw, pasteurized, and UHT (Ultra Heat Treatment) milk, with higher rates in pasteurized milk11. Genes like icaA and icaD aid its persistence in dairy settings12. Interventions such as improving hygiene or introducing lactic acid bacteria show promise in reducing MRSA biofilms.

As a widely circulating zoonotic agent, S. aureus causes damage to both humans and animals, thus generating huge health problems in most contributing sectors13,14. Moreover, Methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), also referred to as “superbugs,” cause serious hospital-acquired infections, which lead to higher mortality and higher health expenditure14,15. In livestock, particularly dairy buffalo and cattle, S. aureus is a primary etiologic cause of mastitis and the primary contributor to SCM burden16,17,18,19,20,21. It has been implicated in approximately one-third of SCM cases, a pathogenicity that is most affected by its ability to produce a range of virulence factors19,20. The most prominent characteristic among the features of S. aureus is its high effectiveness in becoming resistant to extremely wide ranges of antimicrobial drugs because it carries a wide variety of antimicrobial resistance genes, often on mobile genetic elements. This allows the bacterium to quickly adapt and thrive even when antibiotics are present22. Over time, this has therefore led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MDR-SA) strains, which are resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and hence have narrow therapeutic options14,23,24. According to internationally recognized criteria set forth by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), MDR S. aureus is defined as being non-susceptible to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes, while extensively drug-resistant (XDR) S. aureus refers to strains that are non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial classes25. The continued emergence of such drug-resistant strains, particularly those falling under the XDR category, poses a grave and growing threat to both animal and human health, particularly within dairy settings due to heightened zoonotic risk; thus, comprehensive genomic surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and targeted prevention are vital for safeguarding well-being26,27,28.

To address the emerging issue of AMR, planned and prudent treatment is essential for controlling SCM in buffaloes. But the rapid increase of antibiotic resistance, fueled by inappropriate usage, now gravely imperils the effective treatment of buffalo mastitis, escalating costs and fostering resilient pathogens that threaten both animal welfare and public health29. In particular, treatment of mastitis induced by S. aureus is most commonly marred by the MRSA strain30.

While numerous studies in Bangladesh have investigated the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and risk factors associated with S. aureus in bovine SCM; data pertaining specifically to buffaloes, especially regarding MRSA, remain scarce. This gap is particularly notable in regions like Jamalpur, Bangladesh, which host large populations of riverine buffaloes, underscoring a broader need for species-specific surveillance across endemic areas. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence, AMR profile, biofilm-forming ability, and virulence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant MRSA strains isolated from buffaloes with subclinical mastitis in Bangladesh.

Methods

Ethical consideration

This study was approved by the Animal Experimentation and Ethics Committee (AEEC, SAU) of Sylhet Agricultural University under the approval number AUP2023001. All experimental procedures were performed by qualified personnel in full accordance with the university’s ethical standards and regulations. Animal welfare was given the highest priority, and the well-being of all animals was rigorously monitored and maintained throughout the study.

Study design, location, and sampling strategy

A cross-sectional study was conducted in four Upazilas of Jamalpur District in Bangladesh, which are primarily buffalo-populated areas (Fig. 1). These Upazilas included Bakshiganj, Dewanganj, Islampur, and Jamalpur Sadar. The study population required to estimate prevalence was calculated using a standard Eqs. 31,32.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study area showing the selected upazilas of Jamalpur district, Bangladesh, along with the number of samples collected from each upazila. The map was generated using ArcMap 10.8.

$$\:\varvec{n}=\frac{{\varvec{Z}}^{2}\times\:\varvec{P}\varvec{e}\varvec{x}\varvec{p}\times\:\left(1-\varvec{P}\varvec{e}\varvec{x}\varvec{p}\right)}{{\varvec{d}}^{2}}$$

[Where, n = Desired sample size; Z = 1.96 for 95% CI; Pexp = 0.323, Expected prevalence (32.3%); d = 0.05]33.

Based on the calculations, a minimum of 336 quarter milk samples were required to conduct the test. The study proceeded with the collection of 344 quarter milk samples from 86 buffaloes to determine both quarter-level and animal-level prevalence. The samples were collected using a random-cluster sampling strategy from June 2023 to May 2024. A detailed flow chart outlining the methodology employed in this study is presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The flow chart of the detailed methodology used in this study.

Preliminary detection of SCM

The National Mastitis Council’s (NMC) recommendations were followed when aseptically collecting milk samples from each quarter of buffaloes that appeared to be in good health34. The Modified Whiteside test (MWST), outlined by Emon et al.35 along with the California Mastitis Test (CMT)21 were utilized as widely used field-based excellent screening tools that are practical, cost-effective, and rapid methods for early detection and on-farm monitoring of subclinical mastitis (SCM)21. Following aseptic milk collection, the samples were combined on a CMT paddle with a CMT reagent in a predetermined ratio. After giving the mixture a gentle whirl, the reaction was monitored for consistency changes. The CMT results are interpreted based on the degree of gel formation that occurs when milk is mixed with the reagent. A CMT grade of 0 (Negative) indicates that the mixture remains liquid and similar to normal milk, suggesting no infection and a healthy udder with a normal SCC36. A grade of 1+ (Trace, possible early SCM) shows slight slime formation or a faint gel, which may indicate a mild or early-stage infection with a slightly elevated SCC and warrants monitoring. A grade of 2+ (Distinct Positive, likely SCM) is characterized by moderate gel formation, where the mixture thickens noticeably, suggesting a moderate level of infection and a significantly increased SCC, indicative of subclinical mastitis. Finally, a grade of 3+ (Strong Positive, Definite SCM) is marked by a thick gel that clumps and adheres to the paddle, reflecting a high SCC and confirming a severe form of subclinical mastitis with marked inflammation in the udder33. The primarily positive milk samples (CMT graded as 1+, 2+, 3+) underwent pre-enrichment immediately in Trypticase Soya Broth (Oxoid, UK) at a 1:10 dilution, just after initial detection on the same day. Subsequent incubation of these cultures was at 37 °C for around 24 h.

Isolation and identification of pathogens

Mannitol Salt Agar (Oxoid, UK) was used to detect S. aureus in accordance with NMC, USA recommendations and procedures followed by Eidaroos et al.37. The streak plate method was applied and incubated at 37 °C for 18 to 24 hours38. Biochemical tests confirmed the presence of S. aureus with positive results for gram staining, DNase, Methyl Red (MR) test and Voges-Proskauer (VP), catalase, coagulase, citrate utilization, methyl red, and urease tests, while negative results were obtained for motility, indole, gas production, and the triple sugar iron test35,39. Positive samples were prepared for genomic DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Genomic DNA extraction and molecular detection of pathogens, virulence genes, and ARGs

The DNA from S. aureus was extracted using the boiling method as described by Aldous et al.40. The monoplex PCR assays targeted the tuf, nuc, mecA, aac(3)-iv, sul1, hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA gene. The multiplex PCR assays focused on the tetA, and strA gene. In this study, the tuf and nuc genes are essential for Staphylococcus aureus identification and basic cellular functions, with nuc also contributing to virulence and biofilm degradation. Resistance to antibiotics is conferred by mecA (methicillin), aac(3)-iv (aminoglycosides), sul1 (sulfonamides), and the tetA and strA/strB genes (tetracycline and streptomycin, respectively), often through efflux pumps or enzymatic modification. Virulence and biofilm formation are significantly mediated by hla (alpha-hemolysin), sea (enterotoxin A), icaA (biofilm polysaccharide synthesis), and fnbA (fibronectin binding and adhesion), all crucial for pathogenesis and host interaction. However, the molecular detection of Staphylococcus species, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) was conducted using different PCR techniques. For the detection of the Staphylococcus genus and S. aureus, monoplex PCR targeted the tuf gene and the nuc gene, respectively, utilizing reagents from SFC Probes Ltd. (Gyeonggi, Korea). Here, the tuf gene, responsible for producing the elongation factor Tu, is a conserved gene found across all Staphylococcus species. Its stability and presence in all staphylococci make it a reliable tool for confirming that a bacterial isolate belongs to the Staphylococcus genus41,42. In contrast, the nuc gene, which codes for a heat-resistant nuclease, is specific to Staphylococcus aureus43,44. Additionally, more separate monoplex PCRs were employed to identify MRSA by targeting the mecA gene as well as antibiotic-resistant genes (aac(3)-iv and sul1) and virulence genes (hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA). The components of the PCR reaction mixture and the thermal cycling parameters for the multiplex and monoplex assays are listed in Table S1. Using either 1.8% or 1.5% standard agarose gels, amplified PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis for analysis. To verify the anticipated fragment sizes, a 100 bp plus DNA ladder was used. All the detected positive genes are illustrated in Fig. 3. Sequences of primers utilized to amplify each target gene are detailed in Table 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

PCR amplification of different genes. (A) tuf gene (235 bp); (B) nuc gene (267 bp); (C) mecA (286 bp); (D) sea gene (120 bp); (E) hla gene (209 bp); (F) icaA gene (770 bp); (G) strA gene (983 bp); (H) aac(3)-iv gene (333 bp); (I) sul1 gene (433 bp); (J) tetA gene (502 bp). M: Marker 100 bp DNA ladder; NC: negative control; PC: positive control.

Table 1 Primer details used for monoplex and multiplex PCR for the detection of Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, methicillin resistance (mecA), virulence genes, and selected antimicrobial resistance genes.

Detection of biofilm producers

To evaluate the biofilm-forming ability of the bacterial isolates, a Congo Red Agar (CRA) assay was conducted, with modifications based on the protocol described by Freeman et al.45. The CRA medium was formulated by enriching Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar with 0.8 g/L Congo Red dye and 36 g/L sucrose (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India). Freshly prepared CRA plates were inoculated by streaking the test isolates and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Biofilm production was inferred from the phenotypic appearance of the colonies. Isolates that developed dry, black, and rough colonies with a crystalline consistency were interpreted as strong biofilm producers. In contrast, colonies that appeared smooth, red, or lacked pigmentation were identified as weak or non-biofilm formers. This phenotypic approach provided a rapid and cost-effective means of discriminating between high and low biofilm-producing strains. The quantitative determination of biofilm-forming potential among bacterial isolates was carried out using the Crystal Violet Microtiter Plate (CVMP) assay, with methodological adaptations based on Kouidhi et al.46. The whole procedure was conducted according to the standard protocol as described by Chowdhury et al.47. Bacterial cultures were overnight adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard and diluted 1:100 in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) with 1% glucose for enhanced biofilm formation. A 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plate was used, in which 200 µL of the diluted bacterial suspension was inoculated in each test well. Negative control wells had only sterile TSB with 1% glucose. The plate was kept at 37 °C for incubation under static conditions for 24 h. Non-adherent cells were removed after incubation by washing the wells gently three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). The adhered biofilm was then stained using 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. Excess stain was washed off by washing the wells three times with sterile distilled water, and the bound dye was solubilized with 95% ethanol. The absorbance was read at 570 nm (OD570) in a microplate reader, and biofilm production was categorized based on OD570 values, with non-biofilm (OD ≤ 0.2), weak (0.2 < OD ≤ 0.4), moderate (0.4 < OD ≤ 0.6), and strong (OD > 0.6) biofilm producers identified accordingly.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing (AST) was executed employing the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plate, following the guidelines followed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)48,49. We tested a total of 13 antibiotics comprising 8 distinct groups according to CLSI guidelines 2020, as shown in Table S2, which are most commonly used in Bangladesh, especially for treating mastitis and other bacterial infections in large ruminants, including buffaloes. To meet the 0.5 McFarland standard, freshly isolated colonies of bacteria were suspended in 5 mL of regular saline. After spreading this suspension evenly onto MHA plates, it was incubated for 18 to 24 h at 35 to 37 °C. Following incubation, CLSI breakpoints were compared to the inhibition zone diameters, which were measured in millimeters (mm). To ensure precision and repeatability, each assay was carried out in triplicate50. The Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) index was ascertained following the protocol delineated by Naser et al.32 Utilizing the equation: MAR = (Number of antibiotics exhibiting resistance by an isolate)/(Total number of antibiotics subjected to testing). MAR index values spanned from 0 to 1, where values closer to zero indicated heightened susceptibility, while those nearing 1 signified pronounced resistance. A MAR index of 0.20 or higher suggests a significant presence of bacterial contamination or resistance, which could pose a public health concern. In addition, non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three classes of antibiotics or three antimicrobial categories is designated as MDR25 while non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but 2 or fewer antimicrobial categories is termed as XDR51.

Geo-spatial mapping and plot

In this study, the map of the study area was generated using ArcMap 10.8. The shapefile was initially obtained from DIVA-GIS, and the selected upazilas relevant to the study were subsequently visualized. All graphical representations and plots were created using GraphPad Prism 8.4 and Chiplot (https://www.chiplot.online/).

Statistical analysis

All data were initially recorded and organized in Microsoft Excel. To assess variations in the prevalence across different levels of measured variables, the chi-square test was performed. Descriptive statistics were also employed, and confidence intervals were calculated using the binomial exact test. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

Prevalence of SCM based on CMT scores

The prevalence of SCM varied among the regions tested. Out of 344 quarter milk samples, Bakshiganj Upazila found 41 positive samples (51.3%), with the majority of scoring 1 + to 3+. Islampur Upazila showed a relatively lower prevalence with 30 positive quarters (34.1%). In contrast, Dewanganj had the highest rate, with 46 positive quarters (54.8%), primarily scoring 1 + or 2 + and Jamalpur Sadar recorded 43 positives (46.7%), mostly with mild (1+) scores (Table 2).

Table 2 California mastitis test (CMT) results and prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy buffaloes across different upazilas of Jamalpur district.

At the animal level, the highest prevalence was observed in Dewanganj (71.4%; 95% CI: 52.1–90.8%), followed by Bakshiganj (65.0%), Jamalpur (52.2%), and Islampur (36.4%) with an overall rate of 55.8% (95% CI: 45.3–66.3%). Quarter-level prevalence followed a similar trend, highest in Dewanganj (54.8%) and lowest in Islampur (34.1%), with an overall rate of 46.5% (95% CI: 41.2–51.8%). No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was found among the Upazilas (Table 3).

Table 3 Animal and quarter level prevalence based on CMT result.

Identification of the pathogen through different methods

A combination of screening (MWST, CMT), culture, biochemical, and molecular methods (PCR) was used to identify Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) from milk samples of different buffalo quarters (LF, LR, RF, RR) as shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Distribution of subclinical mastitis screening results and molecular identification of Staphylococcus species in different quarters of dairy buffaloes.

Out of 344 quarter samples examined, MWST and CMT identified 163 (47.4%) and 160 (46.5%) quarters as subclinical mastitis positive, respectively. Culture and biochemical tests confirmed 77 (22.4%) staphylococcal isolates, of which PCR confirmed 73 (21.2%) as Staphylococcus spp. Among the Staphylococcus spp., 30 (41.1%) were confirmed as S. aureus, while 43 (58.9%) were non-aureus staphylococci (NAS). The S. aureus isolates were identified based on characteristic colony morphology on Mannitol Salt Agar and further supported by positive catalase and DNase activity, along with a distinct biochemical profile as described in the Methods.

Further characterization revealed that 10 (33.3%) of the S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and 20 (66.7%) were methicillin-susceptible (MSSA). The highest detection of S. aureus (57.1%) was found in the RR quarters, whereas NAS was most frequently isolated from the LF and LR quarters. Notably, MRSA was identified in all quarters, with the highest proportion in the RF quarter (60.0%).

Antibiogram profile of MRSA and distribution of virulence and antibiotic-resistant genes

The antibiogram profile of Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates revealed a high level of multidrug resistance. The isolates showed the highest resistance to ampicillin (80%), tetracycline (80%), and cefoxitin (80%), followed by azithromycin (70%), streptomycin (70%), gentamicin (70%), chloramphenicol (70%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (60%). Intermediate resistance was observed against ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and a few others. Among all tested antibiotics, the highest proportion of susceptible isolates was found for ceftriaxone (50%), followed by gentamicin (40%) and nalidixic acid (40%) shown in Fig. 4a.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Antimicrobial resistance profile of MRSA isolates. (a) Sensitive, Intermediate and Resistant profile of MRSA isolates; (b) Polar Heat map showing resistance pattern the isolates.

The heatmap showed the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of MRSA isolates, revealing distinct clustering based on resistance profiles. Most isolates were resistant to commonly used antibiotics such as tetracycline, ampicillin, cefoxitin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, showing widespread multidrug resistance. The dendrogram highlights similarities among isolates and antibiotic response patterns (Fig. 4b).

Molecular analysis supported these findings, with key antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence genes detected at varying frequencies. The distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including MRSA and MSSA, showed considerable variation (Fig. 5). Among the 30 S. aureus isolates, resistance genes were detected at varying frequencies: aac(3)-iv in 36.7%, tetA in 43.3%, sul1 in 56.7%, and strA in 26.7%. Notably, MRSA isolates harbored higher proportions of resistance genes, with aac(3)-iv (70.0%) and tetA (80.0%) being most prevalent (Table 5). In contrast, MSSA isolates showed lower frequencies for these genes: aac(3)-iv (20.0%) and tetA (25.0%). However, sul1 was more common in MSSA (60.0%) than in MRSA (50.0%).

Fig. 5
figure 5

(a) Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes among S. aureus (b) isolates, including MRSA and (c) MSSA.

Table 5 Distribution of virulent and resistant genes isolated from MRSA (n = 10) isolates.

Regarding virulence genes, hla was the most frequently detected (66.7%) among all S. aureus isolates, followed by sea (50.0%) and icaA (23.3%). MRSA and MSSA showed similar patterns for hla (70.0% vs. 65.0%) and sea (both 50.0%). The icaA gene was detected in 30.0% of MRSA and 20.0% of MSSA isolates. The fnbA gene was not detected in any of the isolates (Fig. 5).

Resistance determinants of S. aureus and MRSA

Among the isolated S. aureus and MRSA strains, diverse antimicrobial resistance patterns were observed, with several isolates exhibiting XDR and MDR profiles. Among the S. aureus isolates (n = 30), 10% of S. aureus isolates showed resistance to 11 antibiotics across 8 classes, with a high MARI of 0.85, considered as XDR and also harboring aac(3)-iv, tetA, and sul1 genes. Several other resistance patterns were also observed, with MARI values ranging from 0.38 to 0.77.

In the MRSA group (n = 10), a higher proportion (60%) of XDR patterns, with one isolate showing resistance to 12 antibiotics from 8 classes and the highest MARI (0.92). The ARGs frequently detected included aac(3)-iv, tetA, sul1, and strA, showed high resistance burden in MRSA compared to other S. aureus isolates. The results showed high burden of MDR and XDR in MRSA isolates (Table 6).

Table 6 Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns, resistance types, ARGs, and MARI values of S. aureus and MRSA isolates.

Biofilm production and its association with virulence and resistance genes

Out of 10 MRSA-positive isolates, 6 (60%) demonstrated biofilm-forming ability (Fig. 6a). Among these biofilm-MRSA, 2 isolates (33.3%; 2/6) were strong biofilm producers, 3 (50%; 3/6) were moderate, and 1 (16.7%; 1/6) was a weak biofilm producer, while the remaining 4 isolates (40%) were non-biofilm producers. A heatmap was generated to visualize the association between biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance (MDR/XDR) profiles, and the presence of virulence and resistance genes. Strong and moderate biofilm producers frequently co-expressed virulence genes such as icaA, hla and sea, along with resistance genes like tetA, sul1, and aac(3)-iv. The clustering pattern indicated a potential relationship between biofilm-forming ability and multidrug resistance, as most biofilm-producing isolates were categorized as MDR or XDR (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Biofilm production status among MRSA-positive isolates. (a) Classification of isolates based on biofilm-forming ability; (b) Heatmap illustrating the distribution and correlation between biofilm production and the presence of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes.

Discussion

The present study provides critical insights into the prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and virulence attributes of S. aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus, in subclinical mastitis cases among riverine buffaloes in Jamalpur, Bangladesh. The high quarter-level prevalence of SCM in different agro-ecological regions, indicating a substantial burden of intra-mammary infections in buffaloes under smallholder or semi-intensive systems.

The investigation revealed high prevalence in both animal and quarter level. The animal-level prevalence aligns closely with previously reported rates from Bangladesh (51.5%, 53.8%)53,54. However, it remains lower than the substantially higher prevalence figures documented in other studies from these regions, which range from 64.9 to 81.6%35. Conversely, the present findings exceed those from certain regions in India, where lower rates, such as 26.2%, have been reported54. Quarter-level prevalence in the current investigation (46.5%) mirrors observations from parts of India (45.8–61.6%) and Nepal (46.3%)13,55 yet stands considerably higher than figures reported in Bangladesh (27–42.5%)33,52 and markedly above the 19.3% recorded in Chitwan, Nepal13. Another study in Bangladesh showed a higher prevalence of SCM in buffaloes47. The apparently higher occurrence of subclinical mastitis (SCM) at the animal level than at the quarter level is largely a product of diagnostic protocols wherein the detection of one infected mammary quarter is sufficient to make the whole animal SCM positive4. Collectively, these reports underscore significant geographical differences in SCM prevalence, a process influenced by a diversity of interacting determinants, including local hygiene, milking procedures, lactation phase, and host genetic susceptibility. Adding to this variability are differences in geographical and climatic conditions, housing facilities, milking practices, udder hygiene, and the adoption of biosecurity practices. Moreover, differences in farmer awareness, education level, and access to veterinary care could further influence the risk profile of SCM.

The reported prevalence of subclinical mastitis (SCM) often varies depending on the diagnostic methods employed. While rapid screening tools such as the Modified Whiteside Test (MWST) and California Mastitis Test (CMT) provide quick results, they are generally less precise compared to molecular methods. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), being highly sensitive, can detect low levels of bacterial DNA, often resulting in higher reported prevalence of SCM56. In the current study, conventional culture and biochemical analyses identified 22.4% of isolates as Staphylococcus spp., among which 21.2% were further confirmed by PCR. These findings differ from some previous reports from India and Bangladesh24,55. Specifically, the prevalence observed in this study is somewhat higher than that reported in a similar study conducted in Mymensingh, Bangladesh, yet lower than the rates documented in West Bengal, India57,58.

In this study, among the Staphylococcus spp. isolates, 41.1% were confirmed as S. aureus, which is comparable to the 37.4% reported in another study on riverine buffaloes in Bangladesh24. In this investigation, most of the isolates from our inquiry (58.9%) were non-aureus Staphylococci (NAS), similar to findings from previous studies performed in Bangladesh and Iran56,59,60. Because of their wide host range, adaptability (e.g., ability to form biofilm), and effective transmission, NAS may be more common. Diagnostic difficulties and antimicrobial resistance may also explain their presence. Moreover, among the S. aureus isolates, 33.3% were identified as methicillin-resistant (MRSA), closely matching findings from a similar study on riverine buffaloes in Bangladesh24. However, this prevalence exceeds that reported in Pakistan (19.6%)61 but remains lower than the 61.54% observed in a study from the Philippines62. Interestingly, the highest proportion of S. aureus isolates was detected in the right rear (RR) quarters, while MRSA was most frequently identified in the right front (RF) quarters (60.0%). This distribution contrasts with findings from Pakistan, where the left quarters were more frequently infected61. These differences reflect spatial heterogeneity of patterns of infection, potentially due to environmental stress or tension of a mechanical nature, that favors colonization of some udder quarters by S. aureus and MRSA.

The antibiogram profile and the heatmap analysis of MRSA isolates in this study indicated a significant level of multidrug resistance. Notably, the highest resistance rates were observed against tetracycline and cefoxitin. These findings are consistent with the findings of another study, which also documented high levels of resistance to cefoxitin and ampicillin in MRSA strains isolated in Egypt63. However, our data diverge from several earlier reports concerning the susceptibility patterns of tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. While these antibiotics have been described as effective treatment options against MRSA in previous studies64,65our results revealed high level of resistance (70–80%) to both agents. These differences may reflect geographical variations in antibiotic usage practices, selective pressure from over-the-counter availability, or clonal differences in MRSA strains across regions. Interestingly, ceftriaxone and amikacin demonstrated the highest susceptibility rates among the antibiotics tested in this investigation. This observation contrasts with numerous studies that identify vancomycin as the most effective and widely recommended therapeutic agent for MRSA infections66,67.

In this study, the tetA and aac(3)-iv resistance genes were considerably prevalent in S. aureus isolates, particularly in MRSA strains, indicating a strong association with multidrug resistance. This contrasts with findings from Pakistan, where tetA was common but aac(3)-iv was among the least prevalent68 suggesting regional differences in resistance gene dissemination. Additionally, the sul1 gene was moderately prevalent across S. aureus, MRSA, and MSSA isolates, substantially lower than the 100% prevalence reported in Egypt69. These variations may reflect differences in local antibiotic usage and selective pressures. In this study, the hla gene was the most frequently detected virulence factor in S. aureus isolates (66.7%), followed by icaA and sea, while the fnbA gene was entirely absent. This pattern aligns with findings from Iraq, where hla was universally present (100%), and icaA and sea were also prevalent70, suggesting a conserved virulence profile in certain regional strains and a localized virulence signature potentially shaped by host–pathogen interactions, selective pressure, and ecological niche. However, the results contrast with a study from Egypt, where sea was the predominant gene (72.9%), followed by icaA, hla, and fnbA71. These differences likely reflect geographic and host-specific variations in S. aureus pathogenicity and also underscore the influence of regional ecological and epidemiological factors on virulence gene distribution71.

Furthermore, the study found that 53.3% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR), a rate lower than that reported from clinical samples in Sudan but higher than the 39.4% MDR prevalence observed in animal-based food samples in Shanghai, China72,73. Additionally, 30% of isolates demonstrated XDR, a figure substantially exceeding previous reports, such as the 1.58% XDR prevalence in Sudanese clinical isolates72. This higher resistance may be driven by the bacteria’s capacity for horizontal gene transfer and its ecological adaptability, particularly in antibiotic-rich environments. Contributing factors likely include the misuse of antibiotics and insufficient infection control measures, which have been previously linked to the emergence and spread of XDR S. aureus14.

Variability in MDR and MARI values across studies likely reflects differences in antimicrobial usage patterns, sampling sources, geographic and temporal factors, and methodological approaches.

The emergence of biofilm-producing MRSA isolates presents a serious challenge in both veterinary and public health contexts. Biofilm formation significantly enhances bacterial survival by shielding the pathogens from host immune responses and antimicrobial treatments74. In this study, a substantial proportion of MRSA isolates from milk samples in Sylhet were identified as biofilm producers, with varying degrees of biofilm-forming ability. The coexistence of biofilm production with multiple virulence (e.g., icaA, hla, sea) and resistance genes (tetA, sul1, aac(3)-iv) suggests a synergistic relationship that likely contributes to enhanced pathogenicity and drug resistance75,76. Such isolates pose a significant threat, particularly when present in raw or improperly heated milk, potentially leading to foodborne infections75. The detection of strong biofilm producers with MDR/XDR profiles underlines the potential for these MRSA strains to act as superbugs. This situation necessitates the continuous monitoring of biofilm-associated traits due to their clinical and public health significance.

Although this study is limited by a relatively small sample size, restricted geographic coverage, and the absence of genotypic analysis of biofilm-associated genes, it highlights areas for future research to better understand the genetic linkage between biofilm formation, resistance, and virulence. Despite these limitations, the study’s strength lies in its integrated phenotypic and genotypic approach, offering critical insights into MRSA prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and virulence in subclinical mastitis of riverine buffaloes in Bangladesh. It effectively reveals the significant burden of MDR/XDR MRSA and its biofilm-forming potential, emphasizing serious risks to both animal and public health.

Conclusion

This study clearly shows that subclinical mastitis is a major problem in buffaloes. Staphylococcus aureus was the main bacteria causing SCM, and 33.3% of them were methicillin-resistant. Many of the isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics, with 60% being extensively drug-resistant, and the highest Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI) was 0.92. Resistance genes like tetA (80%), aac(3)-iv (70%), and sul1 (50%) were common. Virulence genes such as hla (66.7%), sea (50%), and icaA (23.3%) were also detected. Around 60% of the S. aureus isolates from raw milk could produce toxins and form biofilms. These findings show a serious risk to both animal health and human health, as these bacteria can spread from animals to people. These findings emphasize the urgent need for improved mastitis control strategies, rational antimicrobial use, and routine surveillance in buffalo farming systems. Moreover, enhancing awareness among farmers about subclinical mastitis, hygienic milking practices, and the consequences of indiscriminate antibiotic use is critical. This research provides important baseline data that can inform antimicrobial stewardship policies, guide targeted interventions, and contribute to the broader efforts to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in livestock and protect public health.