Introduction

Gram-positive filamentous bacteria of the genus Streptomyces are known as producers of a wide variety of biologically active secondary metabolites (SMs). Many of such SMs display anti-microbial and cytotoxic activities, and some have been developed into antibiotics and antitumor agents (e.g. tetracycline, amphotericin B, doxorubicin, mytomycin etc.). Each SM is the result of a series of reactions catalyzed by enzymes encoded by genes present in a particular biosynthetic pathway, and thus its production has certain costs for the producing cells in terms of precursors and energy. This can be taxing for the bacteria, and it is thus not surprising that production of SMs is limited to situations where a survival benefit can be expected. It is also logical that genes encoding enzymes involved in SM biosynthesis are clustered in the bacterial genomes to allow coordinated expression and regulation. Recent sequencing of Streptomyces genomes revealed many BGCs (20–50 per genome), some of which may govern production of novel bioactive compounds, not detected previously in a conventional screening1. In most cases, these BGCs are not expressed under laboratory conditions, and need to be activated to achieve production of the corresponding compounds. Therefore, the genomes of Streptomyces represent a potential treasure trove in terms of drug discovery. A number of techniques have recently been developed to address this issue, including co-cultivation with other microorganisms2addition of small molecules acting as activators of secondary metabolism3 ribosome engineering4 manipulation of pathway-specific regulators, and heterologous expression of SM biosynthesis gene clusters5. All these approaches can be applied to a single bacterial strain to implement the One-Strain-Many-Compounds (OSMAC) strategy6. The latter strategy can be implemented via simply changing the cultivation conditions, e.g. nutrients, cultivation time and temperature, co-cultivation with other organisms etc. However, having a high-quality genome sequence of a bacterial SM producer and being able to genetically manipulate it brings about new opportunities for implementation of the OSMAC strategy via targeting specific BGC of interest.

In this work, we investigated Streptomyces bambergiensis AC-800, formerly known as Streptomyces bambergiensis S800, which harbors two linear plasmids7. Along with several other Streptomyces, such as Streptomyces ghanaensis ATCC 14,672, S. ederensis ATCC 15,304 and S. geysiriensis ATCC 15,303, it produces a complex of glycolipid antibiotics known as moenomycins or flavomycins8. While no other SMs have been described so far for this strain, efficient gene transfer methods have been reported for S. bambergiensis AC-8009, making it suitable for genetic engineering strategies and OSMAC approach. Here, we report the complete sequence of the S. bambergiensis AC-800 genome, its analysis for special genome features and SM biosynthesis gene clusters, activation of a cryptic fibrostatin BGC via co-cultivation, and first insights into the secondary metabolome of this strain.

Results and discussion

Sequence of the Streptomyces bambergiensis AC-800 genome

Complete genome assembly revealed three replicons, one represented by a linear chromosome of 7,652,101 nt, and two by linear plasmids designated pSB1 (418,507 nt) and pSB2 (81,486 nt). In addition to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP)10,11 the three replicons were annotated at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using the Integrated Microbial Genomics platform, and the genome statistics are presented in Table 1. The linear plasmids pSB1 and pSB2 were detected earlier in S. bambergiensis S800 (older name for AC-800), a strain presumed to be identical to ATCC 13,879, using pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)7. Although the reported sizes of the plasmids were quite different (350 kb and 50 kb), this most likely reflects inaccuracy of size estimation based on the PGFE markers available back then. It is noteworthy that the JGI annotation pipeline predicted that only 0.45% of the chromosomally located genes seem to have been acquired via horizontal gene transfer (HGT), while percentages of HGT-derived genes for the plasmids pSB1 and pSB2 were 39% and 59%, respectively. Both plasmids harbored genes encoding the machinery for conjugative DNA transfer. Taking together, these facts strongly suggest that linear plasmids in streptomycetes serve as shuttles that can acquire foreign genes and shuttle them between species.

Table 1 Genome features of S. bambergiensis AC-800.

As all linear replicons reported up to date, the chromosome and the plasmids of S. bambergiensis featured terminal inverted repeats (TIRs). In particular, the chromosomal TIRs spanned 2.28 kb with 100% identical sequences, while TIRs of pSB1 and pSB2 plasmids spanned 2.28 kb (100% identity) and 0.3 kb (imperfect, 85% identity), respectively. We compared the ends of the S. bambergiensis AC-800 chromosome and those of the pSB1 plasmid and determined that they share 7.84 kb 100% identical sequences, including the 2.28 kb TIRs, which might be due to recombination-driven exchange. These terminal DNA fragments encoded putative DEAD/DEAH box helicase and DDE-type integrase/transposase/recombinase, suggesting the importance of terminal region for both replication and recombination, the latter presumably being important for acquisition of new DNA fragments into the replicons. Notably, S. bambergiensis ATCC 13,879, the presumed parental strain for AC-800, was re-classified to Streptomyces prasinus ATCC 13,879 in 2016 based on multi-locus sequence analysis12. The S. prasinus ATCC 13,879 genome deposited in GenBank (ASM870444v1) consists of 1 chromosome of 7,647,592 nt, which is thus 4,509 nt smaller than the chromosome of AC-800. Also, no linear plasmids have been reported for S. prasinus ATCC 13,879. Comparison of the chromosomes of AC-800 and ATCC 13,879 using ANI Calculator13 yielded an OrthoANIu value of 99.97%, which clearly indicates that the two strains are almost identical, at least at the level of their chromosomes. We were unable to identify any TIRs at the ends of S. prasinus ATCC 13,879 chromosome, which is very unusual for streptomycetes, and may suggest that the chromosomal ends were not completely sequenced.

Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters of S. bambergiensis AC-800

In order to reveal the SM biosynthesis potential of S. bambergiensis, all three replicons were scanned for the presence of BGCs using the online software tool antiSMASH 7.014. This analysis was followed by a manual inspection of the identified gene clusters using BLAST online tools, which helped to detect homologous gene clusters in the genomes of other bacteria. In total, 29 BGCs were identified – 25 of them localized to the chromosome, and 4 to the pSB1 giant linear plasmid (Fig. 1). The full list of the gene clusters is given in Table 2, along with putative or defined products and homologous clusters detected in other streptomycetes excluding S. prasinus ATCC 13,879, which chromosome had almost the same BGCs as AC-800. The main differences between the ATCC and AC-800 strains chromosomes in this respect are in BGCs 20 and 21 (Table 2). BGCs that are marked with # in Table 2 appear to be present, at the time of analysis, only in S. prasinus and S. bambergiensis, while other BGCs can be found in both these strains and also in other streptomycetes Lanthipeptide-specifying BGC20, although highly similar in gene content and arrangement in both strains, differs in the genes encoding the pre-peptides, while BGC21 for a hybrid NRPS-PKSI system has identical genes but organized in a different way.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Localization of the secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters on the chromosome and pSB1 plasmid of S. bambergiensis AC-800.

Table 2 Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters identified in the genome of Streptomyces bambergiensis AC-800 using antismash 7.0 software followed by manual curation.

Nine of the gene clusters located on the S. bambergiensis chromosome presumably specify biosynthesis of some known metabolites: hopanoids, albaflavenone, isorenieratene, geosmin, ectoine, moenomycin, spore pigment, desferroxamine, and melanin. Four chromosomally located gene clusters and one located on pSB1 appeared to be unique, as their homologues could not be detected in the bacterial genomes available in public databases. The rest of the gene clusters had close homologues in the genomes of various Streptomyces sp. (Table 2).

Insights into the evolution of the giant PKSI gene cluster

Inspection of the PKSI gene cluster 26 encoded by the linear plasmid pSB1 revealed that it most likely specifies biosynthesis of a glycosylated macrocyclic lactone related to stambomycins. The latter SMs were produced by Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC 23,877 only upon overexpression of a pathway-specific regulator of the LuxR type19. Examination of the PKS modules encoded by cluster 26 suggested that, in contrast to stambomycins, which feature a 51-membered macrolactone ring19 a putative product of this cluster may possess an unprecedented 67-membered ring. Comparison of the BGC26 PKS genes and module/domain organization of the corresponding proteins with those from the stambomycin BGC revealed a clear evolutionary relatedness between these clusters (Fig. 2). First, we performed alignments of the PKS proteins encoded by 10 genes in S. bambergiensis BGC26 with potential counterparts encoded by 9 genes in the stambomycin BGC. This analysis revealed that 7 out of 10 PKS proteins encoded by BGC26 were homologous to 7 PKS proteins from the stambomycin cluster and had same module/domain composition (Fig. 2). Further antiSMASH-assisted analysis of the BGC26 PKSs focusing on the docking domains allowed to suggest the order, in which the PKS proteins would synthesize the polyketide chain, reflected by numbers over the PKS genes in Fig. 3. At the same time, we analyzed intergenic regions between seemingly co-transcribed PKS genes using the promoter-searching software SoftBerry20. This result suggested that PKS genes 6, 7 and 4 in BGC26 are likely to be transcriptionally coupled and thus their products are likely to act successively, as their stambomycin PKSs counterparts 4, 5 and 6. We cannot resolve this discrepancy without experimental evidence, especially because we were not able to detect the product of BGC26 even after overexpression of LuxR gene from this cluster in S. bambergiensis (data not shown). Hence, the antiSMASH prediction of a polyketide chain resulting from the action of BGC26 PKSs remains speculative as to the arrangement of the building blocks. According to the antiSMASH-based prediction of building blocks to be used for assembly of BGC26-encoded PKS proteins, they would use 1 propionyl-CoA, 9 methylmalonyl CoA and 24 malonyl-CoA to generate a polyketide chain shown in Fig. 3. When cyclized, a 67-membered macrolactone ring will likely to be formed, which would feature 9 methyl and 22 hydroxy (if no hemiketal is formed) groups. This would contrast stambomycin molecule with 8 methyl and 17 hydroxy groups predicted by antiSMASH, but also true according to the actual chemical structure of stambomycins19. We next compared the composition of genes other than those coding for PKS in the stambomycin cluster and BGC26, verifying potential homologues using alignment of amino acid sequences of their products. The results of this analysis, presented in Table 3, suggest that the putative 67-membered macrolactone ring synthesized by BGC26 PKSs is most likely glycosylated with at least one sugar moiety (presumably an aminosugar), and is also modified by two P450 cytochromes in a manner similar to those in stambomycin biosynthesis. One of such reactions is likely to be hydroxylation shown to be required for macrolactonization in stambomycin biosynthesis21. BGC26 does not have many gene homologues present in the stambomycin BGC, while containing several genes not found in the latter (Table 3). While it speculation on the function of these genes in the biosynthesis of BGC26-specified compound seems unreasonable, it should be noted that ABC transporters encoded by stambomycin BGC and BGC26 are very dissimilar, indirectly supporting the idea that products of these two clusters are quite dissimilar.

Fig. 2
figure 2

PKS type I gene cluster located on the giant linear plasmid pSB1: evolutionary relations with the stambomycin gene cluster of S. ambofaciens. PKS genes are numbered according to the biosynthetic order predicted for pSB1 PKS BGC by antiSMASH and experimentally verified for stambomycins. Homologous PKS genes are shaded and marked with dotted lines and those designated in blue font are unique for each cluster. Stb _PKS – PKSI of the stambomycin BGC; Sbam_PKS – PKSI of the pSB1-licated BGC in S. bambergiensis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Putative linear polyketide products of PKS systems encoded by stambomycin BGC and BGC26 of S. bambergiensis AC-800, as predicted by antiSMASH 7.0 and actual structures of stambomycins reported by Laureti et al.19.

Table 3 Comparative analysis of genes in the stambomycin BGC and BGC26 of S. bambergiensis AC-800.

Secondary metabolites produced by S. bambergiensis AC-800 and their cognate biosynthetic gene clusters

The extracts of S. bambergiensis AC-800 grown in four different media (5288, PM4-1, NIIGEN, and A-3 M) were analyzed by LC-MS to tentatively identify secondary metabolites produced by this strain (Table 4). Moenomycin-related compounds were detected in low concentrations in all media except A-3 M. In 5288, moenomycin A and nosokomycin B were the predominant congeners (Figures S1 and S2), while in NIIGEN and PM4-1 moenomycin A12 was most abundant (Figure S3)8,22. Desferrioxamine B and several related hydroxamate sideropohores (Figures S4-S8) as well as the γ-aminobutyrate-derived ureas gaburedins A-D (Figures S9-S12) were found in higher amounts. These latter two secondary metabolite families are very commonly produced by Streptomyces sp23,24. Notably, we could not identify genes encoding GbnA and GbnB proteins reported to be required for the biosynthesis of gaburedins. It is thus plausible that these g-aminobutirate ureas are synthesized via an alternative, as yet undiscovered pathway. Furthermore, two polycyclic tetramate macrolactams, presumably products of BGC 12, were detected (Figures S13 and S14). One of them was matched by GNPS to alteramide A, but there are too many structurally similar isomers described for both congeners to safely identify them solely based on LC-MS data.

Table 4 Secondary metabolites tentatively identified by LC-MS in Streptomyces bambergiensis AC-800 cultures in at least one of four different media (5288, PM4-1, NIIGEN, and A-3 M).

Activation of fibrostatin biosynthesis via co-cultivation and identification of its biosynthetic gene cluster

Despite using four different fermentation media, we were able to detect the products of only 5 BGCs in the cultures of S. bambergiensis AC-800 by a standard dereplication approach. Co-cultivation of actinomycetes with mycolic acid-containing bacteria (MACB) is a known approach to activate BGCs which are either cryptic or silent25,26. Thus, in an attempt to activate production of additional secondary metabolites, S. bambergiensis AC-800 was co-cultivated with a new MACB isolate from the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo, Rhodococcus sp. CML ISP2-1-52 in A-3 M medium. This co-cultivation triggered production of compound(s) that gave the culture a reddish color absent in the respective monocultures. Comparative LC-MS analysis led to the tentative identification of these compounds as fibrostatin C (Figure S15), or alternatively one of the isomers fibrostatin D or E, which are N-acetyl-L-cysteinyl-containing 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives first isolated from Streptomyces catenulae27. Fibrostatin C was shown to inhibit prolyl hydroxylase purified from chicken embryo and type I collagen biosynthesis in the uterus of the immature rat28. The chemical structure of the compounds suggests that they are biosynthesized by a type III polyketide synthase (PKSIII), leaving BGC 6 the only plausible candidate in the S. bambergiensis AC-800 genome (Table 2). To validate whether BGC6 is governing fibrostatin biosynthesis, a PKSIII gene knockout mutant was generated. A stop codon was introduced instead of codon W117 in the gene SBAM_000974 encoding the PKSIII enzyme using pCRISPR-cBEST technology29. This mutation results in early termination of SBAM_000974 translation and generation of a truncated enzyme. The production of fibrostatin C was completely abolished in the SBAM_000974 knockout (KO) mutant of S. bambergiensis AC-800 upon co-cultivation with Rhodococcus sp. CML ISP2-1-52, thus proofing that BGC6 is indeed responsible for the fibrostatin biosynthesis (Figure S16). We also observed the disappearance of the reddish color in such co-cultures. We also detected very low amounts of fibrostatin C in the S. bambergiensis AC-800 wild type monocultures grown in 5288 and PM4-1 media, but not in the KO strain under the same conditions (Figure S17).

Besides the PKSIII-coding gene, the fibrostatin BGC contains genes encoding two O-methyltransferases, several oxidoreductases and a P450 monooxygenase, which could play specific roles in the proposed fibrostatin biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 4). However, BGC6 does not contain any gene which product could be responsible for the installation of the N-acetyl-L-cysteinyl (NAC) group. It thus seems plausible that fibrostatin C and other naphthoquinone NAC adducts are produced non-enzymatically by conjugation of NAC or mycothiol to a reactive naphthoquinone product of BGC6, as described for several naphthoquinones30. The red color observed in the cultures might be mainly explained by these poorly soluble fibrostatin congeners not efficiently extracted, while fibrostatin C is detected as main congener due to its higher solubility in methanol. This hypothesis is supported by the detection of several low intensity peaks that have LC-MS and UV/Vis data fitting to non-conjugated naphthoquinones, which could however not be unequivocally identified (data not shown).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Proposed fibrostatin biosynthesis pathway in S. bambergiensis AC-800.

Following a thorough analysis of the DNA regions surrounding the PKSIII-encoding gene we suggest a fibrostatins biosynthetic gene cluster encompassing 10 genes. Based on the proposed functions of the gene products we hypothesize on the possible biosynthetic pathway for fibrostatins A-F, as presented in Fig. 4. The biosynthesis starts with condensation of five malonyl-CoA units by PKSIII to form 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene, which is spontaneously oxidized to flaviolin. At this point, the pathway must diverge into two branches, one leading to the biosynthesis of fibrostatins A and E, and another yielding congeners B, C, D, and F. The pathway to A and E congeners must include a C2-dehydroxylation step, which may be catalyzed by the berberine bridge enzyme-like FAD-dependent oxidase SBAM_000976. This enzyme family, termed BBE-like oxidases, catalyze a wide range of reactions, typically resulting in complex substrate modifications and rearrangements31. The next steps toward fibrostatins A and E would be the addition of one O- and two C-methyl groups followed by the formation of an ortho-quinone methide (ο-QM). The latter could be achived by hydroxlation of the methyl group on C6 by the FAD-dependent hydroxylase SBAM_000977 followed by phosphorylation and subsequent phosphate elimination involving kinase SBAM_000978. This mechanism may be similar to that described for YcaO-like enzymes that catalyze phosphorylation of a peptide backbone amide followed by deprotonation and phosphate elimination to yield azoline heterocycles32. Alternatively, direct oxidation of the ring system harboring the C-methyl group to the ο-QM could be catalyzed by the BBE-like oxidase. Similar reactions involving ο-QM intermediate formation by BBE-like oxidase were proposes in the biosynthsis of several natural products, including e.g. chlorizidine A from Streptomyces sp. CNH-28731. The ο-QM represents an unstable intermediate that can easily react with thiols33such as N-acetyl cysteine, thus leading to the formation of fibrostatin A. Subsequent hydroxylation of the methyl group on C3 by the FAD-dependent hydroxylase SBAM_000977 would then yield fibrostatin E. The formation of fibrostatins B, C, and F presumably follows the same logic, where, however, the C2-dehydroxylation is blocked by O-methylation (Fig. 4).

Materials and methods

Culture conditions

E. coli DH5alpha and commercial E. coli Mach1 T1 were used to maintain plasmids. E. coli ET12567 (pUZ8002) was used to perform conjugations of plasmids into S. bambergiensis AC-800. All E. coli strains were cultivated in liquid and solid LB-medium at 37 °C. Streptomyces sp. were grown at 30 °C in soy flour medium (SFM)34 followed by preparation of spore suspensions in 20% glycerol. Appropriate antibiotics were supplemented as necessary (50 µg/mL apramycin; 50 µg/mL nalidixic acid; 25 µg/mL kanamycin; and 25 µg/mL chloramphenicol). Rhodococcus sp. CML ISP2-1-52 was isolated from a colony of the fresh-water bryozoan Cristatella mucedo after colony homogenization and plating of serial dilutions on the ISP2 magar medium.

DNA isolation, genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Microbial DNA Mini kit (Macherey & Nagel, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. From this gDNA, three kits (Illumina, all used according to the manufacturer’s instructions) were used to create three different sequencing libraries: the Nextera XT DNA Library Kit, the TruSeq DNA PCR Free Library Kit (due to high variation in coverage of the Nextera XT DNA library), and the Nextera Mate Pair Library Preparation Kit. For the Mate Pair library, the input DNA was sheared to a size of approximately 8 kbp using a g-Tube (Covaris). The libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina) using the either MiSeq Sequencing Kit v2 in a 2 × 250 nt run for the Nextera XT DNA library or the MiSeq Sequencing Kit v3 in 2 × 300 nt runs for the TruSeq DNA PCR Free and Nextera Mate Pair libraries. The paired reads from the Nextera XT and TruSeq libraries were then trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.3635 (http://www.usadellab.org/cms/index.php?page=trimmomatic) in PE mode with trimmers ILLUMINACLIP: [NexteraPE-PE.fa| TruSeq3-PE-2.fa]:2:30:10, SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15, and MINLEN:25. The paired reads of the Mate Pair library were merged using FLASH36 (https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/) with a maximum overlap (-M) of 250 and then split and oriented using Cutadapt 5.137 (https://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) and SeqTK 1.538 (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk). The data of all three libraries was then assembled using Newbler (454 Life Sciences), resulting in an initial assembly of 161 in 8 scaffolds. Using consed 1939 (https://bioweb.pasteur.fr/packages/pack@consed@19), these could be manually assembled into three contigs, one of which each represented the complete sequence of the three linear replicons: the chromosome and the plasmids pSB1 and pSB2. The genome was then annotated using PGAP 4.040,41 (https://github.com/ncbi/pgap).

Gene inactivation using crispr/cbest system

CRISPR-cBEST system was used to inactivate the SBAM_000974 gene in S. bambergiensis AC-800. The identification of protospacers compatible with CRISPR-cBEST was done using CRISPy-web 242 (https://crispy.secondarymetabolites.org/#/input) (Table S1). The protospacers were cloned into the linearized pCRISPR-cBEST plasmid as specified previously29. The resulting constructs were individually introduced in S. bambergiensis AC-800 via conjugation from E. coli ET12567/pUZ800234. Apramycin (50 µg/mL) was used for selection of recombinant Streptomyces strains. Primers that amplifyseveral-hundred base pairs fragment containing the edited codon were designed (Table S2). Colony PCR was used to amplify the designed DNA fragments directly from the S. bambergiensis AC-800 colonies. Lastly, the PCR products were cleaned up by Monarch(R) PCR and DNA Cleanup Kit (New England Biolabs(R) Inc.) and then sequenced at Microsynth, Austria. pCRISPR-cBEST plasmid was curated from KO strain after 24 h cultivation at 37 °C and 200 rpm in TSB medium.

Fermentation conditions, extraction, and analysis of secondary metabolites

S. bambergiensis AC-800 was fermented in medium 5288 (soy flour 10 g, glycerol 15 g, NaCl 5 g, CaCO3 1 g, CoCl2·7H2O 1 mg, in 1 L of distilled water), NIIGEN (soy flour 30 g, corn steep liquor 30 g, starch 30 g, CaCO₃ 4 g, (NH₄)₂SO₄ 3 g, K₂HPO₄ 1 g, NaCl 2 g, in 1 L of distilled water), PM4-1 (glucose 15 g, soy flour 15 g, corn steep liquor 5 g, CaCO3 2 g, 6 ml/L trace elements solution (mg/mL): FeSO47H2O, 5.0; CuSO45H2O, 0.39; ZnSO47H2O, 0.44; MnSO4H2O, 0.15; Na2MoO42H2O, 0.01; CoCl26H2O, 0.02; HCl, 50. In 1 L of distilled water) and A-3 M media (glucose 5 g, soluble starch 20 g, glycerol 20 g, cottonseed meal 15 g, yeast extract 3 g, in 1 L of distilled water, pH 7.2). Seeding cultures were prepared as previously described. 30 mL of fermentation medium was inoculated with 1.5 mL seeding culture and cultivated in 250 mL baffled flasks at 28 °C with 200 rpm for 7 days. All fermentation cultures from this study were freeze-dried and extracted with methanol. The organic phase was concentrated to 10% in vacuo.

Tentative identification of secondary metabolites in these extracts was achieved by LC-MS analysis using a Vanquish Horizon UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an Acquity Premier HSS T3 column, 2.1 × 150 mm, 1.8 μm (Waters) coupled to the ESI source of a timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) as described previously24. Compass DataAnalysis 5.3 (Bruker Daltonics), GNPS, The Natural Products Atlas, and CAS SciFinder (American Chemical Society) were used for data analysis41,42.

Co-cultivation experiments

Bacteria were cultivated separately in 100 mL flasks containing 10 mL V-22 seeding medium (soluble starch 10 g, glucose 5 g, NZ-case 3 g, yeast extract 2 g, Bacto tryptone 5 g, K2HPO4 1 g, MgSO47H2O 5 g, CaCO3 3 g, in 1 L of distilled water, pH 7.0) at 30 °C with 200 rpm for 2 days. Seeding cultures containing S. bambergiensis AC-800 or mutant strain (0.5 mL) and Rhodococcus sp. CML ISP2-1-52 (0.5 mL) were inoculated simultaneously into 250 mL baffled flasks containing 50 mL A-3 M fermentation medium and cultivated at 30 °C with 200 rpm for 7 days26. Mono-cultures were also inoculated using 0.5 mL seeding culture from each organism and cultivated as above.