Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using a fine-tuned ECG foundation model
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 January 2026

Prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using a fine-tuned ECG foundation model

  • Do Heon Kim1,
  • Youngnam Bok2,
  • Sun Hwa Lee3,4,
  • Jihye Heo5,
  • Seung Park7,
  • Dongheon Lee5,6,8,9 na1 &
  • …
  • Jae-Hyeong Park1,2,9 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 975 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Translational research

Abstract

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is an important electrocardiographic (ECG) finding strongly associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), a condition linked to poor clinical outcomes. Although early LVSD detection is crucial, standard diagnosis via echocardiography may not always be immediately accessible. In this study, we propose a fine-tuned ECG foundation model (FM) to enhance LVSD detection specifically in patients with LBBB. We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 2,031 paired ECG-echocardiographic datasets from 892 LBBB patients. The ECG-FM was fine-tuned for optimal LVSD prediction and compared against baseline models, which were conventional deep learning methods, including Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), LSTM-FCN, ResNet, and InceptionTime. The proposed ECG-FM with single-step full fine-tuning outperformed baseline models, achieving accuracy, sensitivity, and AUROC of 0.758, 0.771, and 0.807, respectively. Additionally, sequential partial fine-tuning exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.787), enhancing screening capability. DeepLIFT analysis identified QRS complex and T wave features in leads V1–V4 as critical predictive factors. Our results demonstrated that the recommended fine-tuned ECG-FM significantly improves LBBB patient LVSD detection, potentially enabling earlier clinical diagnosis in such cases when echocardiography is not readily available, thereby potentially improving patient outcomes and clinical management.

Similar content being viewed by others

U-shape-based network for left ventricular segmentation in echocardiograms with contrastive pretraining

Article Open access 29 November 2024

A hybrid spatial and temporal attention driven network for left ventricular function assessment using echocardiography

Article Open access 02 December 2025

Robust electrocardiogram delineation model for automatic morphological abnormality interpretation

Article Open access 23 August 2023

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, (Chungnam National University Hospital IRB 2025-02-001 and Jeonbuk National University Hospital IRB 2025-02-030) waived the need of obtaining informed consent.

References

  1. Pujol-López, M., Tolosana, J. M., Upadhyay, G. A., Mont, L. & Tung, R. Left bundle branch block: characterization, definitions, and recent insights into conduction system physiology. Cardiac Electrophysiol. Clin. 13, 671–684 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smiseth, O. A. & Aalen, J. M. Mechanism of harm from left bundle branch block. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 29, 335–342 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prinzen, F. W., Willemen, E. & Lumens, J. 12 978–980 (American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington DC, 2019).

  4. Wang, X. et al. Beyond conduction impairment: unveiling the profound myocardial injury in left bundle branch block. Heart Rhythm. 21, 1370–1379 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tan, N. Y., Witt, C. M., Oh, J. K. & Cha, Y. M. Left bundle branch block: current and future perspectives. Circulation: Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 13, e008239 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunekreeft, J., Graauw, M., De Milliano, P. & Keijer, J. Influence of left bundle branch block on left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and regional wall motion. Neth. Heart J. 15, 89–94 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Egbe, A. C. et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes in tetralogy of fallot: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Cardiol. 35, 1784–1790 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Members:, A. T. F. et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 24, 4-131 (2022).

  9. Glikson, M. et al. ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur. Heart J. 42, 3427–3520. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364 (2021).

  10. Sze, E. et al. Comparison of incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction among patients with left bundle branch block versus those with normal QRS duration. Am. J. Cardiol. 120, 1990–1997 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olesen, L. L. & Andersen, A. ECG as a first step in the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the elderly. ESC Heart Fail. 3, 44–52 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanna, G. et al. Left bundle branch block and ventricular dysfunction: the importance of QRS duration over strict morphological criteria; data from the RECOrd-LBBB registry. Eur. Heart J. 43, ehac544 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Attia, Z. I., Harmon, D. M., Behr, E. R. & Friedman, P. A. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur. Heart J. 42, 4717–4730. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab649 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bjerkén, L. V., Rønborg, S. N., Jensen, M. T., Ørting, S. N. & Nielsen, O. W. Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. Heart Fail. Rev. 28, 419–430 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Attia, Z. I. et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nat. Med. 25, 70–74 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brito, B. O. et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction predicted by artificial intelligence using the electrocardiogram in Chagas disease patients–The SaMi-Trop cohort. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009974 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cho, J. et al. Artificial intelligence algorithm for screening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using electrocardiography. ASAIO J. 67, 314–321 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Attia, I. Z. et al. External validation of a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm to detect ventricular dysfunction. Int. J. Cardiol. 329, 130–135 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Attia, Z. I. et al. Prospective validation of a deep learning electrocardiogram algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophys. 30, 668–674 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Attia, Z. I., Kapa, S., Noseworthy, P. A., Lopez-Jimenez, F. & Friedman, P. A. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2464–2466 (Elsevier).

  21. Kwon, J. et al. Development and validation of deep-learning algorithm for electrocardiography-based heart failure identification. Korean Circulation J. 49, 629–639 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jeong, J. H. et al. Deep learning algorithm for predicting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Eur. Heart Journal-Digital Health. 5, 683–691 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bacharova, L., Szathmary, V. & Mateasik, A. Electrocardiographic patterns of left bundle-branch block caused by intraventricular conduction impairment in working myocardium: a model study. J. Electrocardiol. 44, 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.03.007 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKeen, K. et al. Ecg-fm: An open electrocardiogram foundation model. https://arXiv.org/abs/2408.05178. (2024).

  25. Wang, Z., Yan, W. & Oates, T. 2017 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). 1578–1585 (IEEE).

  26. Karim, F., Majumdar, S., Darabi, H. & Harford, S. Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for time series classification. Neural Netw. 116, 237–245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ismail Fawaz, H. et al. Inceptiontime: finding Alexnet for time series classification. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 34, 1936–1962 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oh, J., Chung, H., Kwon, J., Hong, D. & Choi, E. Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning. 338–353 (PMLR).

  29. Le-Khac, P. H., Healy, G. & Smeaton, A. F. Contrastive representation learning: A framework and review. Ieee Access. 8, 193907–193934 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Han, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, X. & Ding, C. Foundation models in electrocardiogram: a review. https://arXiv.org/abs/2410.19877. (2024).

  31. Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P. & Kundaje, A. International Conference on Machine Learning. 3145–3153 (PMlR).

  32. Goetzinger, K. R. & Odibo, A. O. Statistical analysis and interpretation of prenatal diagnostic imaging studies, part 1: evaluating the efficiency of screening and diagnostic tests. J. Ultrasound Med. 30, 1121–1127 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kashani, A. & Barold, S. S. Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46, 2183–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.071 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hamdani, N. & El-Battrawy, I. Between the beats: unraveling Diagnostic, therapeutic Challenges, and sex differences in heart failure’s Gray zone. J. Am. Heart Association. 14, e038364. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038364 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zusterzeel, R. et al. The 43rd international society for computerized electrocardiology ECG initiative for the automated detection of strict left bundle branch block. J. Electrocardiol. 51, S25–s30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.001 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Chungnam National University Research Fund, 2023-0540-01 and by the IITP(Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation)-ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) grant funded by the Korea government(Ministry of Science and ICT)(IITP-2025-RS-2023-00258971, RS-2021-II211343, Artificial Intelligence Graduate School Program (Seoul National University)].

Author information

Author notes
  1. Dongheon Lee and Jae-Hyeong Park contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Do Heon Kim & Jae-Hyeong Park

  2. Department of Cardiology in Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Youngnam Bok & Jae-Hyeong Park

  3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

    Sun Hwa Lee

  4. Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

    Sun Hwa Lee

  5. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jihye Heo & Dongheon Lee

  6. Interdisciplinary Program in Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Dongheon Lee

  7. Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea

    Seung Park

  8. Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Dongheon Lee

  9. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

    Dongheon Lee & Jae-Hyeong Park

Authors
  1. Do Heon Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Youngnam Bok
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sun Hwa Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jihye Heo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seung Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dongheon Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jae-Hyeong Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept/design: J-H.P., D.L., Data collection: Y.B., S.H.L., Data processing: S.P, D.H.K, J.H.P, Data analysis and interpretation: D.H.K, D.L., J-H.P., Manuscript preparation: D.H.K., Manuscript editing: D.L., J-H.P., Final approval of this version to be submitted: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongheon Lee or Jae-Hyeong Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.H., Bok, Y., Lee, S.H. et al. Prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using a fine-tuned ECG foundation model. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34911-6

Download citation

  • Received: 20 March 2025

  • Accepted: 31 December 2025

  • Published: 17 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34911-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Ventricular dysfunction
  • Left bundle-branch block
  • Electrocardiography
  • ECG-foundation model
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research