Abstract
Plant secondary compounds (PSCs) impose physiological and nutritional constraints on herbivores, yet many species continue to rely on PSC-rich forage during critical periods of the year. Moose (Alces alces) on Isle Royale National Park depend heavily on balsam fir (Abies balsamea) during winter, exposing them to a chemically defended and nutritionally limited diet. To investigate how this foraging strategy shapes both physiological responses and gut microbial communities, we integrated fecal diet composition, urinary markers of detoxification and nutritional status, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and shotgun metagenomic profiling from free ranging moose of two separated populations from the western and eastern region of the island. Balsam fir consumption varied strongly by region and was positively associated with glucuronic acid to creatinine (GA:C) and urea nitrogen to creatinine (UN:C) ratios, indicating increased detoxification activity and reduced nutritional condition. Microbial alpha diversity declined with higher fir intake in nutritionally limited individuals, while beta diversity differed by region, balsam fir consumption, and UN:C. Several bacterial genera responded to PSC exposure, including increases in the butyrate-producing genus Roseburia and shifts in network prominence of Phascolarctobacterium. Metagenomic data revealed pathways involved in the degradation of aromatic and terpenoid PSCs, although pathway abundances did not differ significantly with balsam fir consumption after multiple testing correction. These results show that winter foraging on balsam fir produces coordinated dietary, physiological, and microbial patterns, with both host and gut microbial detoxification capacities interacting to accommodate the chemical and nutritional challenges of a PSC-rich winter diet.
Introduction
Many plant species have evolved chemical defense mechanisms, known as plant secondary compounds (PSCs), to deter herbivory. These compounds are synthesized by the plant secondary metabolism, which, unlike the plant primary metabolism, is not directly involved in plant development and growth1. Secondary metabolism provides plants with a diverse array of PSCs to defend against herbivory2,3,4. The three main groups are phenolics, terpenoids and alkaloids. The wide range of chemical structures across the groups is associated with a correspondingly broad spectrum of adverse effects in herbivores following ingestion, including disruption of cell membranes, tissue damage, generation of free radicals, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and carcinogenic effects, with death being the most severe outcome 5.
In response, herbivores have developed a variety of behavioral and physiological mechanisms to counteract PSCs. Behaviorally, herbivores can limit toxic concentration of PSCs by regulating intake through altered meal size and frequency6,7 and diet mixing8. After ingestion, tannin-binding salivary proteins discovered in several mammal species9,10,11, including moose (Alces alces)12, can prevent ingested tannins from reducing protein digestion. Several animals, including parrots, elephants and primates, may use geophagy to bind ingested PSCs to prevent their bioactivity or absorption13,14,15. In addition, efflux transporters in the gut can limit absorption16 but are energetically expensive6,17. Detoxifying enzymes in the liver convert ingested PSCs into more water-soluble metabolites, facilitating their excretion from the body via the urine18,19. Furthermore, the co-evolution of plants and herbivores has led to genetic diversification of host genes20,21 involved in metabolic detoxification, which helps herbivores mitigate the negative effects of PSC intake21,22. All these mechanisms prevent herbivores from overloading detoxification pathways23 which serve as the key physiological mechanism by which herbivores reduce exposure to ingested and absorbed PSCs.
Other studies have highlighted the significance of the gut microbiome for herbivores consuming plants rich in PSCs, as they provide additional metabolic pathways for PSC detoxification24. For instance, the gut microbiome of the cabbage root fly possesses plasmids encoding a gene responsible for catalyzing the conversion of a plant toxin25. Noteworthy research on dietary specialists has underscored the pivotal role of gut bacteria in overcoming high levels of PSCs in their primary diet26,27,28. Consequently, gut microbes possess the capacity to expand the dietary niche of mammalian herbivores29, enabling them to consume food sources that would otherwise be toxic30. Gut microbes, on the other hand, benefit from the host by gaining access to substrates required for their metabolism.
Building on this understanding of microbial contributions to PSC metabolism, we examined these processes in a natural system where herbivores experience pronounced spatial variation in availability of a major food source rich in PSC. Isle Royale National Park (IRNP), North America, provides such a setting, with moose (Alces alces) populations inhabiting regions that differ markedly in the abundance of balsam fir (Abies balsamea), a conifer tree species rich in PSCs. While the occurrence of balsam fir has declined markedly in the western region of the island, it has remained relatively stable in the eastern part31,32,33. Correspondingly, previous studies have reported an east-west division in the proportion of balsam fir in moose diet32. Moose rely heavily on woody browse during the winter, including balsam fir despite its high content of PSCs32,33. The juxtaposition of a major herbivore species with a dominant winter food source that varies spatially in abundance creates a unique opportunity for examining how differences in exposure to PSCs shape the physiology and gut microbiome of a large herbivore. Thus, to improve our understanding of how dietary PSCs shape both host physiological responses and gut microbial dynamics in moose, we used an integrative approach that combined ecological, nutritional, physiological, and gut microbiome data within this natural experimental setting.
Specifically, we:
-
1.
Collected demographic data of moose including age and sampling location.
-
2.
Analyzed the diet composition of individual moose to understand the relative proportions of plant species consumed using microhistology of food content in moose fecal samples.
-
3.
Measured the glucuronic acid to creatinine ratio (GA:C) as a measure of detoxification status and the urinary urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (UN:C) in snow urine samples as an indicator of nutritional status.
-
4.
Analyzed moose fecal bacterial 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomics sequences to investigate how gut microbial community composition and metagenomic functional profiles were influenced by both intrinsic (physiological) and extrinsic (environmental) factors.
Given the strong west-east differences in balsam fir availability on IRNP, we hypothesized that moose in the eastern region would experience greater exposure to PSC rich forage and therefore exhibit higher detoxification investment, reduced nutritional status, and corresponding shifts in gut microbial community composition and metabolic pathways associated with PSC degradation.
Materials and methods
Sampling of moose feces and urine
71 moose fecal pellets were collected in the eastern (n = 45) and western (n = 26) region of IRNP during a narrow four-week sampling period during winter of 2017 (Fig. 1). Sampling locations within each region were sufficiently spaced to make sure that samples came from different moose individuals. The park encompasses 544 km² and has supported a moose population since the early 20th century32. During the year of sample collection (2017), the population was estimated at approximately 1,600 individuals32. The eastern and western sampling regions were seperated by 45 km, a distance sufficient to ensure that no sampled moose was represented in both regions. To minimize environmental bacterial contamination, fecal samples were collected from the core of the pellets under sterile conditions. Samples were then stored in RNAlater, incubated for 24 h and frozen at -20 °C until DNA isolation. In addition to fecal samples, urine was collected following voluntary release into the snow; only snow urine samples paired with fecal samples from the same location and moose individual were included in the analyses.
Diet composition
To determine the diet of each individual moose, microhistology of food content was analyzed from the fecal samples. Briefly, moose fecal samples were dried, ground, drained, bleached and fixed on microscope slides. Using a light microscope and a predefined number of grids, plant material was compared to a curated reference collection, and the proportion of each plant species was determined. A more detailed description can be found in Parikh34.
Physiological status of moose
To determine the physiological status of moose, measurements of urea nitrogen (UN), creatinine (C) and glucuronic acid (GA) were taken from urine samples as detailed in Parikh et al. (2017). UN:C ratios represent our measure of nutritional status of moose. UN:C ratios greater than 3.5 are associated with increased catabolism of endogenous protein, indicating starvation and severely reduced nutritional status in ungulates35. Additionally, prolonged low UN:C ratios in wild populations may reflect increased renal reabsorption of urea nitrogen, signaling chronic nutrient limitation that could precede dangerously high UN:C ratios (> 3.5)36. GA:C ratios represent our measure of detoxification status. GA is a urinary metabolite that is related to the amount of toxin that is consumed, absorbed, and metabolized by the glucuronidation pathway37. Higher GA:C therefore represents higher intake of PSCs by moose and is associated with reduced nutritional status (i.e., higher UN:C) in moose at IRNP32,38. To measure UN:C and GA:C ratios, snow urine samples were melted and analyzed using spectrophotometry (UN and C) and colorimetry (GA). Each sample was measured twice, and the results were averaged.
Microbiome sequencing
Prior to DNA extraction, samples were pre-treated to remove excess RNAlater and to enrich bacterial DNA relative to non-bacterial DNA. This was achieved by first transferring 200 mg of fecal matter into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes using a spatula. 400 µL ice-cold PBS (phosphate-buffered saline)39 was then added to each individual tube and the mixture vortexed for 10–15 s, after which the samples were centrifuged (Centrifuge 5424, Eppendorf) at 700 rpm for two min. The supernatant was then transferred to a new 1:5 mL Eppendorf tube (avoiding the transfer of pelleted plant material), and centrifuged again, this time at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. After discarding the supernatant, the remaining pellet was used as the starting material for DNA isolation with the commercially available NucleoSpin®Food kit from Macherey-Nagel. An additional bead-beating step was incorporated between the step of chemical lysis of sample cells with the provided CF Buffer and the DNA binding adjustment step. This was done to mechanically lyse bacterial cells present in the samples by transferring the solution from the lysis step to tubes with ceramic beads and subsequently beating the solution twice at 20 s per round. After centrifugation at 11,000 rpm for two min., the clear supernatant was transferred into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes before proceeding with the DNA binding adjustment step of the protocol. For normalization of sample DNA concentrations, each sample was measured on the TECAN infinite F200PRO fluorescence plate reader (serial number: 1701007484).
16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing
The Illumina MiSeq DNA Amplicon sequencing library was prepared using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Fluidigm chemistry (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, CA, USA) and PCR protocol. To amplify the V4 target region of the 16S rRNA, the primers 515F ( 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′ ) and 806R ( 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were used40. These primers were adapted to the Fluidigm system and equipped with a tail that is complementary to parts of the Illumina sequencing adapters resulting in 515 F-CS1 and 806R-CS2. All PCRs were performed with a total volume of 20 µl containing 3 µl H2O, 10 µl AmpliTaq Gold® 360 Master Mix, 2 µl TS primer mix (96 µl H2O, 2 µl primer 515 F-CS1, and 2 µl primer 806R-CS2), 3 µl of barcode-containing sequencing adapter, and 2 µl DNA sample. The PCR was run on a SimpliAmpTM Thermo Cycler (Fisher Scientific) with a complex cycling protocol by which the DNA is first amplified and subsequently equipped with Illumina-compatible sequencing adapters.
Before normalization, samples were cleaned using the ‘NucleoMag® NGS Clean-up and Size Select Kit’ (Machery & Nagel, Düren, Germany) with the ‘Gene Theatre Robot’ (Analytic Jena) using the program system program ‘Application Studio’ and the clean-up program ‘Variable Volume 2018’. The DNA concentrations of cleaned samples were measured on the ‘Qiagen Qiaxcel Advanced’ with an alignment marker ranging from 15 to 1000 bp and a size marker ranging from 50 to 800 bp using 5 ng/µl each. Finally, samples were pooled at an equimolar amount of DNA (3 ng), again using the ‘Gene Theatre Robot’ and transferred to a 1.5 µl Eppendorf tube. DNA concentration of the pool was measured on the ‘TECAN infinite F200PRO’ fluorescence reader (serial number: 1701007484) to prepare the final concentration of 6 nM.
For sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing library on Illumina, the ‘protocol A’ of the ‘Illumina®MiSeq System Denature and Dilute Libraries Guide’ (15039740) was applied. As an additional step and after incubation of the sequencing library and PhiX control (Illumina®, San Diego, CA, USA) at room temperature, both tubes were incubated at 95 °C in a thermoshaker for 2 min. Then, the library and the PhiX control were combined resulting in a proportion of 5% PhiX. Finally, the sequencing library was loaded in the reagent cartridge (MiSeq® Reagent Kit v2 (500 cycle) MS-102-2003) and a paired-end read was performed. We sequenced 18 blanks to control for contamination following the same sample preparation.
FASTQ files from the Illumina MiSeq run were processed using ‘Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology 2’ (QIIME 2)41. First, the demultiplexed FASTQ files and metadata were imported into QIIME 2 and converted into an artifact file. Next, using dada242, sequencing reads were quality filtered, primers were trimmed (p-trim-left-f 23, p-trim-left-r 20), chimera were removed, and final sequencing reads were collapsed into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs).
Blanks showed very little contamination (min reads: 0, max reads: 116, mean: 24.11, median: 17.50, SD: 29.31). We removed those ASV from all samples but protected the 20 most abundant ASVs. In addition, we removed moose samples of insufficient sequencing depth and dropped archaeal, chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences. Subsequently, sequences were aligned to generate a midpoint-rooted phylogenetic tree for microbial diversity analyses and taxonomy was assigned to ASVs using a pre-trained native Bayes classifier trained on the Greengenes 13_8 99% OTUs43,44. For downstream analyses, we imported the taxonomy-containing biom table, a phylogenetic tree, and the reference sequences into R45. Finally, we added a metadata file and combined all into a phyloseq object46. The final ASV table consisted of 66 moose samples with total of 3,852,703 reads (58,374 ± 23,644) and 3,329 bacterial taxa.
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
To obtain gut microbial functional information, we sequenced isolated DNA from fecal samples using a metagenomic shotgun approach using the ‘Nextera®XT DNA Library Preparation Kit’ from Illumina®. In brief, an enzymatic reaction cuts DNA into fragments of approximately 300 bp, whilst simultaneously tagging these fragments with oligonucleotides, which are complementary to parts of the sequencing adapter and are added during the subsequent barcoding-PCR. All reactions were carried out following the instructions from the ‘Nextera®XT DNA Library Prep Reference Guide’ (Document #15031942 v01). Following amplification and DNA clean-up, DNA concentrations of the sequencing libraries were measured as recommended in the reference guide (Sect. 2.3) and samples were equimolarised to 4 ng of DNA. The concentration of the sequencing library pool from Sect. 2.6 was also measured using the TECAN infinite F200PRO fluorescence plate reader. The sequencing library pool was then diluted to a 2 nM library, resulting in a loading concentration of 10 pM (’Protocol A’ of the ‘Illumina®MiSeq System Denature and Dilute Libraries Guide’, Document # 15039740 v01 from January 2016). An additional step was incorporated into the denaturation step: Directly after incubation at room temperature of the 2 nM library in 0.2 N NaOH, the tube was incubated at 95 ◦C for 2 min. In a final step, before loading the final sequencing library pool onto the reagent cartridge, the library pool was spiked with PhiX control of ≥ 5%.
Assignment of reads to bacterial taxa and functions followed the subsequent steps. Step 1 was installation of MEGAN6 - Metagenome Analyzer47. Step 2 was download and extraction of the NCBI-NR database of non-redundant protein sequences (‘https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/FASTA/nr.gz’). Step 3 was download and extraction of the NCBI taxdump file. Step 4 was download of NCBI accession files. Step 5 was creating a database for sequence comparison using DIAMOND48. Step 6 was merging and quality filtering of paired-end reads using PEAR49. Step 7 was conversion of FASTQ to FASTA using SED50. Step 8 was read alignment with DIAMOND BLASTX against a subset of the NCBI-NR database that only contained bacterial sequences (parameter: --taxonlist 2). Step 9 was meganizing the DIAMOND alignment archive files (.daa) and functional binning by mapping the NCBI database accessions of sequencing reads to KEGG Orthologs (KOs) of KEGG (acc2kegg-Dec2017X1-ue.abin) functional classifications51,47. KOs are functional orthologs, meaning they represent genes or proteins that perform the same function across different species. Each entry is assigned a unique identifier called a K number (e.g., K00131 for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). Step 10 was importing the resulting files into MEGAN6 for further investigation and exporting to biom format for additional analyses in R45.
Data analyses
Moose diet, detoxification investment and nutritional status
We quantified regional differences in dietary composition by modelling the proportional contribution of each plant group as a function of region (east vs. west) using beta regression52,53. For each plant variable, percentages were mapped to the open unit interval via the Smithson-Verkuilen transformation, to accommodate zeros and ones, and then fitted with betareg function (logit link) from the betareg R package54 as ‘y∼region’ with east as the reference. Model-based marginal means (and 95% CIs) for each region were obtained on the response scale using R package emmeans55 and reported on the percentage scale, whereby the east-west contrast was the primary estimand, with two-sided p-values derived from the asymptotic Wald test. As a sensitivity analysis robust to distributional shape, we computed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on the untransformed percentages. We plotted results as region-specific means ± 95% CIs annotated with significance stars, the test statistic, and p-values.
Additionally, to unravel the associations among moose investment in detoxification, nutritional condition, and consumption of toxic PSCs based on proportion of balsam fir in diet, we conducted Pearson correlation analyses for proportion of balsam fir consumption vs. GA:C ratios, and proportion of balsam fir consumption vs. UN:C ratios, and GA:C ratios vs. UN:C ratios. Prior to analysis, outliers were removed using the interquartile range method56. Finally, we derived individual moose diet diversity using the Shannon diversity index. This metric was subsequently used as a predictor to assess the relationship between dietary diversity and microbial alpha diversity.
Gut microbiota diversity and composition
Explanatory variables for statistical testing were the categorical variables region (west vs. east) and age of moose (adult vs. calf), and the continuous variables balsam fir consumption, and urinary GA:C and UN:C ratios. In cases where a binary representation was required, balsam fir consumption and GA:C ratios were converted into high vs. low using the ntile function of the R package dplyr57. For UN:C ratios, values were considered high when above 3.535,36. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, continuous variables were used for statistical testing.
Alpha diversity
We calculated gut microbiota alpha diversity as phylogenetic diversity (Faith’s PD)58 and applied a linear model to test the impact of age, region, balsam fir consumption, GA:C, UN:C, and the interactions of region with GA:C and UN:C, and interactions of balsam fir consumption with GA:C and UN:C. Model assumptions were evaluated using residual diagnostics, including assessment of linearity, homoscedasticity, normality of residuals, influential observations, and collinearity (variance inflation factors)59. Significance of predictors was assessed using Type II sums of squares using Anova function of the car R package60. As with the GA:C and UN:C ratios, we conducted Pearson correlation analyses to evaluate the relationship between Faith’s PD and the proportion of balsam fir consumption, and between Faith’s PD and dietary diversity (Shannon index).
Beta diversity
Multivariate community structure was modelled using redundancy analysis (RDA), implemented in the R package vegan61, with CLR-transformed genus abundances as the response matrix62. As for alpha diversity testing, the full model included age, region, balsam fir consumption, GA:C, UN:C, and the interactions of region with GA:C and UN:C, and the interactions of balsam fir consumption with GA:C and UN:C. Genus scores and site scores were extracted, and taxonomic annotations were merged with ordination scores to allow genus-level interpretation. Multicollinearity of constraints was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIFs), and eigenvalues of constrained axes were inspected to ensure adequate model conditioning.
To evaluate the significance of ecological predictors identified in the RDA model, we conducted a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the adonis2 function of the R package vegan61 with the same formula structure. A phylogenetically informed distance matrix based on the UniFrac metric63,64 was computed using the R package GuniFrac65 with parameter = 0.5, which balances the sensitivity between weighted and unweighted UniFrac metric giving moderate weight to relative abundance differences while retaining sensitivity to phylogenetic structure. We used the the same distance representation for both PERMANOVA and constrained ordination. PERMANOVA tests used 999 permutations and marginal (type II-like) sums of squares. Terms with P < 0.05 were considered significant.
To allow simultaneous visual assessment of ordination patterns and statistical significance of ecological constraints, biplot arrows for model predictors were extracted from the RDA object and matched to PERMANOVA p-values. Significant predictors were displayed with solid lines and non-significant predictors with dotted lines. For genera, vector magnitudes were computed as √(RDA1² + RDA2²), and the top 20 genera were retained for visualization. To ensure interpretability, only genera with vector lengths > 0.1 were plotted.
Differential abundance analyses
Differential abundance analyses were performed at the ASV level using R package DESeq266 to estimate variance-mean dependence to test for differential expression based on a model using the negative binomial distribution. We first conducted a series of quality-control steps on the input phyloseq object by removing samples with zero total read counts and ASVs with zero abundance across all retained samples. To improve numerical stability and mitigate collinearity between main effects and interactions, we centered and scaled (z-score normalization) balsam fir consumption, and GA:C and UN:C ratios. A design formula was then constructed testing the impact of region, balsam fir consumption, age, and GA:C and UN:C ratios. Size factors were estimated using the poscounts method to accommodate sparse microbial count data, and dispersion and model fitting followed DESeq2’s local trend method. We set the fitType parameter to local as it resulted in the best model fit as checked using DESeq2’s plotDispEsts function that plots the per-gene dispersion estimates together with the fitted mean-dispersion relationship. For categorical predictors, all non-reference levels were contrasted pairwise against the reference level. For continuous predictors, differential abundance was obtained using Wald statistics on the coefficient corresponding to the numeric variable. Significant ASVs were identified using Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p-values (false discovery rate, FDR < 0.05). For each tested predictor, a full DESeq2 results table including taxonomy and test results was created.
Microbial networks and community assembly
We characterized gut microbial ecological processes and interaction structure using complementary community assembly modeling and microbial association network analyses. Analyses were conducted in R, using the packages phyloseq46 and NetCoMi67. ASVs were agglomerated to the genus level to reduce sparsity, and a global filtering step was applied prior to any group comparisons to ensure a consistent taxonomic basis for all analyses. Genera were retained if they occurred in ≥ 20% of all samples and exceeded 0.1% mean relative abundance. Taxa with zero abundance variance were removed. Samples were then stratified by ecological or physiological categories, including age, region, balsam fir consumption, detoxification status (GA:C ratio), and nutritional status (UN:C ratio). Within-group filters (≥ 5% prevalence) were applied to reduce noise from extremely rare taxa. Microbial association networks were inferred separately for each group using the SparCC algorithm68 as implemented in NetCoMi. Networks were analyzed using NetCoMi’s netAnalyze functions to quantify topological properties including degree, eigenvector centrality (hub identification), betweenness, and modularity, with community structure detected using the fast-greedy clustering algorithm. Networks were visualized using standardized layouts with node size proportional to eigenvector centrality and node color indicating cluster membership using R packages ggplot269 and cowplot70.
To complement network analyses, we quantified ecological assembly processes using phylogenetic null-model approaches that partition beta diversity into contributions from stochastic (dispersal limitation, drift, and homogenizing dispersal) and deterministic (homogeneous selection and variable selection) processes71. Specifically, we applied Stegen’s null model to estimate the relative contributions of these processes based on βMNTD, βNTI and RCbray71,72,73,74 using custom code in combination with the R package picante75. Assembly processes were compared across groups defined by age, region, balsam fir consumption, detoxification status (GA:C ratio), and nutritional status (UN:C ratio) to test the impact of those factors on corresponding shifts in stochastic vs. deterministic ecological processes.
Gut microbiome metabolic pathways
We focused on the Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism and Biosynthesis of Polyketides and Terpenoids categories as they contain pathways involved in PSC degradation. To determine whether pathways were significantly affected by age, region, balsam fir consumption, and GA:C and UN:C ratios, we again applied DESeq2. Functional KEGG ortholog tables derived from shotgun metagenomics sequencing were limited in sequencing throughput and characterized by sparsity, resulting in many orthologs with very low baseMean values. The inclusion of multiple covariates in a multivariate DESeq2 design inflated dispersion estimates and reduced the identifiability of individual coefficients. We thus followed established recommendations for sparse metagenomic count data and applied single-predictor DESeq2 models to ensure stable coefficient estimation and adequate statistical power.
Results
Moose diet, detoxification investment and nutritional status
Dietary composition differed markedly between regions (Fig. 2). Balsam fir constituted a substantially greater proportion of the diet in the eastern compared to the western region (50.5% ± SE vs. 31.1%, β = -0.82, z = 6.9, p < 0.001), while cedar showed the opposite pattern, being more abundant in western diets (20.3% ± SE vs. 4.2%, z = -7.0, p < 0.001). For both plant taxa, the non-parametric Wilcoxon tests yielded consistent significance (p < 0.001). By contrast, the proportional intake of deciduous species, spruce, white pine, and unidentified plants did not differ significantly between regions. Collectively, these results indicate a pronounced east-west dietary shift driven mainly by reciprocal differences in balsam fir and cedar consumption. We also found that balsam fir consumption was positively correlated with both the GA:C ratio (t = 2.47, R = 0.30, p = 0.014; Fig. 3a) and the UN:C ratio (t = 4.3, R = 0.47, p < 0.001; Fig. 3b). Interestingly, GA:C and UN:C ratios showed a strong positive correlation (t = 2.91, R = 0.5, p < 0.001, Fig. 3c).
Regional differences in moose forage. Estimated marginal means (± SE) of the proportional contribution of major plant forage categories to moose diet in the eastern (red) and western (blue) regions of Isle Royale National Park. Significance labels represent pairwise regional contrasts derived from model-based estimates (z-statistics and associated p-values). Asterisks denote levels of statistical significance (*** p < 0.001; ns = not significant). Balsam fir and cedar exhibited strong regional divergence, with higher balsam fir consumption in the east and higher cedar consumption in the west. Deciduous browse and other minor forage categories (spruce, white pine, unknown) showed no detectable regional differences.
Moose gut microbiota analyses
16S rRNA gene sequencing
Microbial taxa composition
The average gut microbiota of moose from IRNP consisted of the typical herbivore community of bacterial phyla with the most abundant being Firmicutes (81.43%), Bacteroidetes (10.15%), Proteobacteria (6.27%), Verrucomicrobia (0.82%), Actinobacteria (0.69%), and Planctomycetes (0.61%) (Supplementary Table 1). When analyzing ASVs that were assigned to a genus, the most abundant genera detected in the moose were Roseburia (49.70%), followed by 5-7N15 (16.37%) and Oscillospira (6.71%) (Supplementary Table 2).
Alpha diversity
Testing the effect of proportion of balsam fir consumption on gut microbial alpha diversity using a Pearson correlation revealed that the higher the proportion of balsam fir consumption, the lower the Faith’s PD (t-value = -2.02, r = -0.25, p = 0.047, Fig. 4a). A positive trend existed for the relationship between dietary diversity and gut microbial alpha diversity (Faith’s PD), although not statistically significant (t-value = 1.63, r = 0.20, p = 0.108, Fig. 4b).None of the main effects, age (F₁,₅₃ = 0.27, p = 0.603), region (F₁,₅₃ = 0.11, p = 0.742), balsam fir consumption (F₁,₅₃ = 2.23, p = 0.141), GA:C (F₁,₅₃ = 0.43, p = 0.516), or UN:C (F₁,₅₃ < 0.01, p = 0.996) were statistically significant in their relationship with gut microbial diversity. Among interaction terms, balsam fir consumption × UN:C was the only significant predictor of Faith’s PD (F₁,₅₃ = 11.83, p = 0.001). To facilitate interpretation of this interaction, we created an interaction plot (Fig. 5). All other interaction terms were non-significant. Residual diagnostics indicated that model assumptions were adequately met.
Beta diversity
For beta diversity, results of the PERMANOVA revealed significant effects of region (F1,63 = 6.0, R2 = 0.08, p = 0.001), balsam fir consumption (F1,63 = 4.4, R2 = 0.06, p = 0.002), and UN:C ratio (F1,63 = 2.7, R2 = 0.04, p = 0.009). There was a marginal statistical significance for the interaction of balsam fir consumption and UN:C (F1,63 = 1.62, R2 = 0.02, p = 0.095) on beta diversity, whereas there was no effect of GA:C (F1,63 = 1.32, R2 = 0.02, p = 0.188). The sum of R² for significant terms was 17.6%. The RDA model explained 22.5% of the total variance in CLR-transformed gut microbial community composition (constrained inertia = 14.48). The remaining inertia was unconstrained (49.83; 77.5%) by the environmental and physiological variables included in the model. The overlay of PERMANOVA test results with the RDA plot nicely visualizes how the different environmental and physiological factors explain the separation of moose gut microbiota (Fig. 6).
Relationship between balsam fir consumption and gut microbial phylogenetic alpha diversity (Faith’s PD) across levels of urinary urea-nitrogen to creatinine ratio (UN:C). Lines represent predicted Faith’s PD at high (+ 1 SD; solid brown), mean (dashed black), and low (–1 SD; dotted blue) UN:C values. The plot illustrates how the association between balsam fir consumption and gut microbial alpha diversity varies with physiological nutritional status.
Differential abundance analyses
Differential abundance analysis using DESeq2 on data agglomerated on genus level identified eight genera that differed significantly with respect to moose age class (Supplementary Table 3), among which Clostridium (log₂FC = -27.6, baseMean = 4.51, p-adjusted < 0.001) and Mycoplasma (log₂FC = -18.5, baseMean = 1.06, p-adjusted < 0.001) exhibited the largest fold-change being more abundant in adults. Fifteen genera were associated with region (Supplementary Table 4) with several genera displaying large fold-changes, including Nocardioides (log₂FC = 15.6, baseMean = 0.14, p-adjusted = 0.002 ) and Brevundimonas (log₂FC = 14.7, baseMean = 0.19, p < 0.001), which ranked among the strongest habitat-associated responses being more abundant in eastern compared to western moose. Six genera were significantly associated with balsam fir consumption (Supplementary Table 5). The largest effects within this predictor included Actinomycetospora (log₂FC = 16.6, baseMean = 0.12, p-adjusted < 0.001) and Nocardioides (log₂FC = 11.6, baseMean = 0.14, p-adjusted < 0.001) being more abundant when balsam fir consumption was high. Importantly, Roseburia was also identified as significantly associated with increasing balsam fir consumption (log₂FC = 0.24, baseMean = 11,046, p-adjusted = 0.037), representing one of the genera with the highest abundance detected across all significant results. Detoxification status (GA:C) was associated with five genera (Supplementary Table 6), among which Brevundimonas displayed the largest absolute fold change (log₂FC = -14.5, baseMean = 0.19, p-adjusted < 0.001) being less abundant when GA:C was higher, followed by Kocuria (log₂FC = 7.19, baseMean = 0.08, p-adjusted < 0.001) being more abundant when GA:C was higher. Three genera were significantly associated with nutritional status (UN:C) (Supplementary Table 7). The largest effects were observed for Methyloversatilis (log₂FC = -6.82, baseMean = 0.22, p-adjusted = 0.013) and Nocardioides (log₂FC = -6.62, baseMean = 0.14, p-adjusted = 0.013), being less abundant when UN:C was higher.
Network and community analysis
Across all factors examined, gut microbial community assembly was consistently dominated by drift or undominated processes, which accounted for approximately 74–82% of all pairwise comparisons, indicating a strong and pervasive influence of stochasticity across age classes, regions, and balsam fir consumption (Fig. 7), and GA:C and UN:C ratios (Fig. 8). In contrast, deterministic selection processes were uniformly rare, with homogeneous and variable selection together contributing ≤ 1–2% in all comparisons, underscoring their limited role in structuring communities under the conditions examined. Within this shared stochastic framework, the most notable differences among factors were expressed through dispersal-related processes. Age classes exhibited largely comparable assembly profiles, with drift or undominated processes occurring at similar frequencies in adults (80.7%) and calves (81.3%). The primary age-related difference was a higher contribution of homogenizing dispersal in calves (13.2%) compared to adults (7.2%), while variable selection was detected only in adults (1.1%). Regional comparisons revealed clearer contrasts, with dispersal limitation occurring more frequently in the western (19.4%) than in the eastern region (10.9%), whereas homogenizing dispersal was less prevalent in the west (4.6%) relative to the east (8.1%). Balsam fir consumption, GA:C and UN:C ratios showed the strongest shifts in dispersal dynamics. Along the balsam fir consumption gradient, low consumption was associated with a substantially higher contribution of homogenizing dispersal (13.5%) compared to high consumption (4.9%), while drift or undominated processes remained dominant in both groups (74.2–81.6%). Similarly, high GA:C ratios were characterized by increased dispersal limitation (15.0%) relative to low GA:C ratios (7.7%). A comparable pattern was observed for nutritional status, where high UN:C ratios exhibited markedly higher dispersal limitation (21.8%) and minimal homogenizing dispersal (1.8%), whereas low UN:C ratios showed lower dispersal limitation (9.5%) and substantially greater homogenizing dispersal (11.0%).
Multivariate redundancy analysis plot illustrating associations between moose gut microbiota and extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (physiological) factors. Samples are colored by region and shaped by categorical balsam fir consumption (low vs. high), with 95% confidence ellipses for each region. Genus vectors are shown as grey arrows with italicized labels, whereas predictors are shown as blue arrows annotated with descriptive labels and significance coding based on PERMANOVA, where continuous lines are significant and dotted lines are non-significant predictors.
Microbial community assembly processes and co-occurrence network structure across extrinsic (environmental: region) and intrinsic (moose: age and balsam fir consumption) gradients in moose. Stacked bar plots (left panels) summarize the proportional contribution of community assembly processes to pairwise community turnover for a) age class (calf vs. adult), d) region (west vs. east), and g) balsam fir consumption (low vs. high). Assembly processes are color-coded as follows: dispersal limitation (purple), drift/undominated processes (grey), homogeneous selection (orange), homogenizing dispersal (pink) and variable selection (green). Corresponding co-occurrence networks (central and right panels) display genus-level gut microbial associations for b) calves and c) adults; e) west and f) eastern regions; and h) low and i) high balsam fir consumption groups. Nodes represent gut microbial genera and are scaled by eigenvector centrality, while edges represent significant pairwise associations (green = positive; red = negative).
Networks stratified by moose age, region, and balsam fir consumption were all densely connected, but differed in the prominence and distribution of highly central nodes, with some groups (e.g. adults, eastern region, high balsam fir consumption) exhibiting more concentrated hub structures and thicker positive edges around a limited subset of taxa, whereas others (calves, western region, low balsam fir consumption) showed a more even distribution of centrality across the network (Fig. 7). Physiological predictors revealed even stronger topological contrasts with low GA:C ratio (lower detoxification) and low UN:C ratio (higher nutritional status) networks forming dense, mesh-like architectures with many interlinked hubs, whereas especially the high UN:C ratio (poorer nutritional status) network collapsed into a star-like configuration dominated by two highly central nodes connected to numerous peripheral taxa and relatively few links among non-hub nodes (Fig. 8).
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
KEGG functional profiling
Read alignment using DIAMOND BLASTX against a subset of the NCBI-NR database containing only bacterial sequences resulted in 1,246,723 matches. Subsequent functional binning by mapping the NCBI database accessions to KEGG functional classification identifiers resulted in 528,529 matches to KEGG orthologs (KOs).
Functional profiling of KEGG pathway categories revealed that gut microbial communities were dominated by metabolic processes (Fig. 9). Carbohydrate Metabolism constituted the largest proportion of predicted functional potential (20.5%), followed by Amino Acid Metabolism (11.4%) and KO20013 Translation (11.1%). Additional functions with notable representation included Membrane Transport (7.9%) and Replication and Repair (7.8%). Pathways associated with nutrient processing and cellular maintenance, such as Metabolism of Other Amino Acids (4.6%), Metabolism of Cofactors and Vitamins (4.4%), and Folding, Sorting and Degradation (4.0%) were also moderately abundant. Xenobiotic-related pathways, including Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism (3.6%) and Biosynthesis of Polyketides and Terpenoids (3.2%), contributed smaller but relevant proportions. All remaining pathway categories individually accounted for ≤ 3% of total predicted reads, with several (e.g., Cell Communication, Cardiovascular System, Circulatory System) representing < 0.1%.
Microbial community assembly processes and microbial co-occurrence network structure across intrinsic physiological gradients in moose. Stacked bar plots (left panels) display the proportional contribution of community assembly processes to pairwise community turnover for a) glucuronic acid-to-creatinine (GA:C) categories (low vs. high) and d) urea nitrogen-to-creatinine (UN:C) categories (low vs. high). Assembly processes are color-coded as follows: dispersal limitation (purple), drift/undominated processes (grey), homogeneous selection (orange), homogenizing dispersal (pink) and variable selection (green). Corresponding co-occurrence networks (central and right panels) show genus-level gut microbial associations inferred for b) low and c) high GA:C groups, and for e) low and f) high UN:C groups. Nodes represent gut microbial genera and are scaled according to eigenvector centrality, and edges denote significant associations (green = positive; red = negative).
Within the KEGG functional category Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism (Fig. 10a), microbial communities were overwhelmingly dominated by Drug metabolism- other enzymes, which accounted for 31.5%. Additional pathways with substantial representation included Nitrotoluene degradation (11.0%) and Benzoate degradation (9.6%), followed by Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation (6.8%). Several other aromatic compound degradation pathways were present at lower but detectable levels, such as 1,2-dichloroethane degradation (3.7%), Styrene degradation (3.1%) or Benzoate degradation (3.0%). Most remaining xenobiotic pathways each contributed < 3% of reads.
In the Biosynthesis of Polyketides and Terpenoids category (Fig. 10b), functional potential was dominated by Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, comprising 43.2% of all reads assigned to this category. Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis (17.0%) and Biosynthesis of ansamycins (11.5%) were also prominently represented. Other pathways exhibited moderate contributions, including Tetracycline biosynthesis (8.2%), Biosynthesis of vancomycin group antibiotics (5.3%), and Carotenoid biosynthesis (4.4%). Functions associated with Zeatin biosynthesis, Limonene and pinene degradation, and Biosynthesis of siderophore group non-ribosomal peptides each accounted for < 5% of reads.
Differential abundance analyses
A total of twelve KEGG pathways exhibited nominal differences in abundance across environmental and physiological predictors (p < 0.05), although none remained significant after false-discovery rate correction (Fig. 11, Supplementary Tables 8–12). Age effects were limited to the pathways Chlorocyclohexane and chlorobenzene degradation (K1000361) and Fluorobenzoate degradation (K1000364), both of which showed reduced abundance in adults relative to calves. Regional differences were restricted to the Biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides (K1001053) pathway, which was more abundant in the eastern region. Balsam fir consumption was associated with the largest number of pathways and showed a consistent pattern in which several xenobiotic and aromatic compound degradation pathways increased with higher balsam fir consumption, including Dioxin degradation (K1000621), Xylene degradation (K1000622), Styrene degradation (K1000643), Aminobenzoate degradation (K1000627), Fluorene degradation, and Carbazole degradation. In contrast, Zeatin biosynthesis (K1000908) and 1,2-Dichloroethane degradation decreased with balsam fir consumption. UN:C ratio showed a nominal positive association with Biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides (K1001053), the only pathway linked to more than one predictor. Although most test results did not reach nominal significance, several pathways displayed consistent directional patterns across predictors. In particular, the same set of xenobiotic and aromatic degradation pathways that increased with high balsam fir consumption also tended to show higher abundance in samples from the eastern region, suggesting a shared directional response despite limited statistical support.
Proportion of KEGG functional pathways across metagenomic data derived from moose fecal samples. Horizontal bars represent the proportion of reads assigned to a pathway within the a) Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism or b) Biosynthesis of Polyketides and Terpenoids pathway categories across moose fecal metagenomic samples.
Differential abundance of KEGG pathways across extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (physiological) predictors. Bubble plot displaying the log2-fold-change (log2FC) of each pathway for the predictors age, region, balsam fir consumption, GA:C, and UN:C. Each bubble represents a pathway-predictor association, with bubble size proportional to log10(baseMean), reflecting overall pathway abundance, and bubble color denoting the direction and magnitude of log2FC (blue = decreased abundance; red = increased abundance). Stars indicate significant p-value before correction of multiple testing (all p-adjusted were non-significant).
Discussion
We examined how dietary exposure to plant secondary compounds, host physiological state, and gut microbial communities interacted in free-ranging moose on IRNP. By integrating fecal diet composition, urinary biomarkers of detoxification and nutritional status, and 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing, we assessed how a PSC-rich winter diet influenced both host metabolic investment and gut microbial structure to cope with this extreme situation.
We hypothesized that balsam fir consumption would be positively associated with moose investment in detoxification. Our results support this hypothesis, because moose in the eastern region of IRNP consumed a higher proportion of balsam fir than those in the western region32 and the amount of balsam fir consumed was positively correlated with both GA:C and UN:C ratios. This means that moose feeding on larger amounts of balsam fir had a higher metabolic investment in detoxification and were more nutritionally restricted. In addition, GA:C and UN:C ratios were positively correlated which suggests that the behavioral and physiological processes involved in the ingestion, absorption, and detoxification of PSCs, particularly through the glucuronidation pathway, may negatively impact moose nutritional status. In fact, moose individuals that had UN:C ratios > 3.5 lived predominately in the eastern region of IRNP and consumed more balsam fir. Balsam fir in the eastern region is known to have less protein than the ones in the western region and consuming high concentrations of PSCs whilst on a low-protein diet can cause a negative nitrogen balance76. These patterns are consistent with earlier findings for this population32 and with independent annual patterns reported previously38. The link between PSC intake and GA are consistent with findings across vertebrate taxa. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fed on a diet consisting of 55% of balsam fir had GA:C ratios almost threefold higher compared to a diet based on deciduous plants77. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer increased GA excretion with increasing intake of PSCs78. In addition, ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) assimilated less energy, excreted more GA and ornithine, and reduced body mass when fed a PSC-rich diet79,80. Both the type of PSC and the herbivore’s ecological experience with PSC may influence reliance on GA and nutritional costs of PSC intake. For example, intake of monoterpenes resulted in higher GA excretion than the intake of tannins in deer78 In addition, feeding experiments carried out on specialist (Neotoma stephensi) and generalist (N. albigula) woodrats, revealed that specialist were less energetically impacted by high PSC in juniper foliage (Juniperus monosperma) ) and excreted less GA relative to PSC intake than generalists81. Interestingly, research has shown that in addition to the herbivore physiology itself, gut microbiota play an important role in detoxification of PSC82 and therefore may influence reliance on GA by the host.
Inspired by those pioneer studies on the role of gut microbiota in detoxification of PSC in herbivores, we further hypothesized that differences in diet between moose from the eastern and western region of IRNP should affect gut microbial diversity and composition, with an increase of bacterial taxa associated with PSC detoxification associated with a greater intake of balsam fir. We found that the phylogenetic diversity of individual moose gut microbiota was negatively correlated with the proportion of balsam fir consumption and positively, albeit not significantly, with dietary diversity. This pattern aligns with previous studies showing that a chemically defended diet can shape gut microbial composition and even reduce microbial diversity26,28,83,84. The significant stress and selective pressure on moose gut microbial communities to adopt bacterial taxa with an increased capacity to detoxify PSC may have led to the observed decrease in alpha diversity. Thus, the lower gut microbial alpha diversity in moose from the eastern region of IRNP is most likely due to a shift in the gut microbiota community driven by a less diverse and PSC-enriched diet. Results indicate that the moose gut microbiota may shift towards a more specialized bacterial community that is beneficial for moose when counteracting PSC. One potential mechanism underlying shifts in moose gut microbiota composition is the broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of balsam fir tannins.85.
Interestingly, the variation in phylogenetic diversity (Faith’s PD) was not explained by individual factors such as age, region, or the main effects of diet and physiological indicators when considered independently. Instead, the strong and highly significant interaction between balsam fir consumption and UN:C ratios indicates that the relationship between diet composition and gut microbial diversity is fundamentally conditional on the nutritional status of individual moose (Fig. 5). Moose in good nutritional condition maintained or even increased gut microbial alpha diversity when consuming more balsam fir, while nutritionally limited individuals (UN:C > 3.5) experienced steep declines in diversity as fir consumption increased. These patterns highlight that the gut microbiota consequences of consuming PSC-rich forage are not uniform across individuals but are modulated by physiological state. Nutritional status appears to determine whether balsam fir consumption aligns with gut microbiota maintenance or disruption. The absence of interactions involving GA:C suggests that detoxification activity may be less influential than nutritional status in shaping gut microbiota responses to balsam fir consumption within this dataset. Although further work is needed to partition the relative contributions of toxin load and nutrient balance in moose, studies on other herbivores have shown gut microbiota changes in response to nutritional stress86. Consistent with findings in howler monkeys87, our results suggest the existence of a threshold in plant secondary compound (PSC) intake beyond which the moose gut microbiota shifts in a manner that diminishes its nutritional contributions to the host.
In contrast to phylogenetic alpha diversity, beta diversity analyses revealed the impact of region, age, balsam fir consumption, and UN:C ratio on gut microbial community composition, whereas GA:C ratio did not. As with Faith’s PD, there was an interaction of balsam fir consumption and UN:C. The strongest driver in explaining beta diversity differences was region, indicating that in addition to the factors investigated in this study, other factors specific to the western or eastern region of IRNP contributed to shaping gut microbial communities. The fact that there was a dispersal limitation between the two moose populations contributed further to gut microbiota community composition differences32. Obviously, regional belonging is an umbrella variable behind which many other drivers could potentially act upon gut microbiota community differences like social complexity88, heritability89, or an almost infinite range of subtle environmental differences as was shown for an island bird population where gut microbiota communities exhibited high-resolution spatial variation over fine scales90.
On the bacterial genus level, the positive association between balsam fir consumption and Roseburia, identified through differential abundance testing, is particularly noteworthy because Roseburia was among the most abundant genera in moose and is a known butyrate-producer. Butyrate-producing bacteria have been linked to the regulation of hepatic detoxification genes (Lucas et al. 2022) and can influence gut epithelial integrity and host xenobiotic metabolism91,92.
The assembly analyses revealed that stochastic processes structured the moose gut microbiota across demographic, spatial, dietary, and physiological gradients, with drift or undominated processes accounting for approximately 74–82% of pairwise comparisons. Deterministic selection was consistently rare across all factors with variable selection and homogeneous selection playing a limited role in shaping microbial community composition in this system. Variation among factors was primarily expressed through shifts in dispersal-related processes. Age-related differences were modest, with broadly similar assembly profiles in adults and calves, although calves exhibited a higher contribution of homogenizing dispersal, suggesting greater gut microbiota similarity among juveniles93. Regional effects were more pronounced, with increased dispersal limitation in the western region and higher homogenizing dispersal in the eastern region, suggesting that gut microbial exchange was higher among moose of the east. Balsam fir consumption and physiological gradients showed the clearest divergence in assembly dynamics. Low balsam fir consumption and low GA:C ratios were associated with higher contributions of homogenizing dispersal, whereas high balsam fir intake and elevated GA:C ratios corresponded to increased dispersal limitation. Moose with poor nutritional status (high UN:C ratios) exhibited a particularly strong pattern with markedly greater dispersal limitation and minimal homogenizing dispersal, while individuals with better nutritional status (low UN:C ratios) displayed substantially greater microbial exchange. Collectively, these results indicate that while stochastic processes dominate the moose gut microbiome assembly, ecological, dietary, and physiological gradients modulated community structure primarily through shifts in dispersal dynamics. Rather than increasing deterministic selection, poorer nutritional and detoxification states were associated with increased dispersal limitation and greater gut microbiota individuality, highlighting dispersal as a key mechanism linking moose condition to their gut microbiota assembly.
Microbial network structure differed markedly across dietary and physiological gradients, despite overall community assembly being dominated by drift or undominated processes. Low PSC exposure and more favorable nutritional status of moose produced densely connected networks with many interacting hubs such as Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Coprococcus, Prevotella, Roseburia and Ruminococcus. Moose with high PSC exposure displayed a restructured network where bacterial taxa that were distantly associated with each other suddenly showed strong connections forming a strong hub with the central taxon Phascolarctobacterium. Some of the associated bacterial taxa are known to be involved in metabolism of aromatic plant compounds94 or acting as important butyrate-producers95,96. The biggest difference was observed between low and high UN:C ratio networks where under strong nutritional restrictions the network experienced a strong reorganization with central hubs formed by Roseburia and Dorea, another genus of the Firmicutes capable of producing SCFA97. As in moose, PSC-associated network reorganizations have also been observed in woodrats98 and black howlers monkeys87. Taken together, these findings indicate that detoxification is not reflected merely in gut microbiota diversity shifts, but in a broader rewiring of gut microbial interactions. This supports the view that the gut microbiome contributes functionally to PSC tolerance in wild herbivores, not only through the presence of bacterial taxa capable of detoxifying PSCs, but through the emergence of PSC-adapted microbial network architectures that may enhance metabolic resilience.
We further hypothesized that the increased need for PSC detoxification associated with a diet rich in PSCs would be reflected in KEGG functional pathways of the moose gut microbiome. Indeed, shotgun metagenomic sequencing revealed that moose gut microbiota carried genes corresponding to pathways involved in the biodegradation of xenobiotics such as the prominent Benzoate degradation via CoA ligation and Benzoate degradation pathway. Many toxic compounds, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or phenolics, are typically degraded to benzoate, which then enters the benzoate degradation pathway for further degradation to acetyl-CoA, which can be consumed in the citrate cycle. The importance of bacteria involved in benzoate degradation has also been demonstrated in other herbivore species that feed on plants containing potentially toxic PSCs99. A striking contrast was the relatively low representation of the Limonene and pinene degradation pathway, which accounted for less than 5%, despite the high concentrations of β-pinene and R-limonene typically found in balsam fir100. This finding suggests that gut microbial activity may be directed toward other PSCs present in balsam fir foliage. Compounds such as camphene, Δ3 carene, α terpineol, piperitone, bornyl acetate, thymol, longifolene, and β bisabolene typically present in balsam fir101 may have engaged distinct microbial degradation pathways.
When testing for differentially abundant KEGG functional pathways, we did not identify significant differences in abundance of xenobiotic pathways after correction for multiple testing. This is in line with a study on woodrats where despite gut microbiome community differences, no difference in the functional profiles between PSC and non-PSC feeding woodrats could be observed102. Nevertheless, a trend was detected with several pathways such as Dioxin degradation (K1000621), Xylene degradation (K1000622) or Styrene degradation (K1000643) being more abundant when balsam fir consumption by moose was higher.
Overall, our results indicate that moose responded to the chemical and nutritional challenges of a PSC-rich winter diet through a combination of host physiology and gut microbial functions. Balsam fir consumption imposed clear physiological costs on moose and simultaneously restructured the gut microbiome at multiple levels, including diversity, taxonomic composition, interaction networks, and functional potential. Although we found evidence that the moose gut microbiome carried genes involved in PSC detoxification and that some bacterial groups responded to balsam fir consumption, there was no indication that microbial detoxification pathways were upregulated in a manner that mirrored physiological detoxification responses of moose. It seems that the combined detoxification capacities of moose and their gut microbiomes might be sufficient to deal with the amount of ingested PSC independent of whether balsam fir intake was lower or higher. It appears that the additional support of the gut microbiome under a high balsam fir consumption regime is to maintain fermentative function and network stability under chemically and nutritionally challenging conditions. Finally, the presence of several bacterial taxa capable of producing short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate reveals an important interaction by which bacteria can boost host metabolic detoxification processes103. Altogether, the detoxification capabilities of moose, their gut microbiota, and more importantly, their interactions, enable moose to persist on a winter diet that is both energetically limited and chemically demanding in the extreme ecological context of IRNP.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that a winter diet dominated by balsam fir imposes measurable detoxification and nutritional demands on moose and that these pressures are reflected in distinct shifts in gut microbial diversity, community composition, and network structure. Moose gut microbiota exhibited microbial pathways with the capacity to degrade aromatic and terpenoid PSCs. Balsam fir consumption was associated with changes in the prominence of key fermentative taxa, including butyrate-producing genera such as Roseburia and taxa involved in intermediary metabolism such as Phascolarctobacterium. These gut microbial shifts, together with host detoxification responses, indicate that PSC tolerance emerges from an integrated interaction between host physiology and the gut microbiome. Collectively, these findings provide new insight into how large herbivores persist on PSC-rich winter forage and underscore the importance of considering both host and gut microbial processes when evaluating herbivore dietary ecology.
Data availability
Data associated with this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession PRJNA1226922.
References
Khadiga, G., Abd Elaleem, E. A. S. & Abd Elaleem, H. G. Potential antibacterial activity of hibiscus rosasinensis Linn flowers extracts. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6, 1066–1072 (2017).
Erb, M. & Kliebenstein, D. J. Plant secondary metabolites as Defenses, Regulators, and primary metabolites: the blurred functional trichotomy. Plant. Physiol. 184, 39–52 (2020).
Mello, M. O. & Silva-Filho, M. C. Plant-insect interactions: an evolutionary arms race between two distinct defense mechanisms. Braz J. Plant. Physiol. 14, 71–81 (2002).
Mostafa, S., Wang, Y., Zeng, W. & Jin, B. Plant responses to Herbivory, Wounding, and infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 7031 (2022).
Queiroz, A. C. M., Contrera, F. A. L. & Venturieri, G. C. The effect of toxic nectar and pollen from Spathodea campanulata on the worker survival of Melipona fasciculata Smith and Melipona seminigra Friese, two Amazonian stingless bees (Hymenoptera: apidae: Meliponini). Sociobiology 61, 536–540 (2014).
Sorensen, J. S., Heward, E. & Dearing, M. D. Plant secondary metabolites alter the feeding patterns of a mammalian herbivore (Neotoma lepida). Oecologia 146, 415–422 (2005).
Torregrossa, A. M. & Dearing, M. D. Nutritional toxicology of mammals: regulated intake of plant secondary compounds. Funct. Ecol. 23, 48–56 (2009).
Papachristou, T. G., Dziba, L. E., Villalba, J. J. & Provenza, F. D. Patterns of diet mixing by sheep offered foods varying in nutrients and plant secondary compounds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 108, 68–80 (2007).
Espinosa-Gómez, F. C. et al. Salivary tannin-binding proteins are a pervasive strategy used by the folivorous/frugivorous black howler monkey. Am J. Primatol 80 (2018).
Hagerman, A. E. & Robbins, C. T. Specificity of tannin-binding salivary proteins relative to diet selection by mammals. Can. J. Zool. 71, 628–633 (1993).
Mole, S., Butler, L. G. & Iason, G. Defense against dietary tannin in herbivores: A survey for proline rich salivary proteins in mammals. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 18, 287–293 (1990).
Juntheikki, M. R. Comparison of tannin-binding proteins in saliva of Scandinavian and North American moose (Alces alces). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 24, 595–601 (1996).
Gilardi, J. D., Duffey, S. S., Munn, C. A. & Tell, L. A. Biochemical functions of geophagy in parrots: detoxification of dietary toxins and cytoprotective effects. J. Chem. Ecol. 25, 897–922 (1999).
Houston, D. C., Gilardi, J. D. & Hall, A. J. Soil consumption by Elephants might help to minimize the toxic effects of plant secondary compounds in forest browse. | EBSCOhost. vol. 31 249 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00091.x (2001).
Pebsworth, P. A., Huffman, M. A., Lambert, J. E. & Young, S. L. Geophagy among nonhuman primates: A systematic review of current knowledge and suggestions for future directions. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 168, 164–194 (2019).
Sorensen, J. S. & Dearing, M. D. Efflux transporters as a novel herbivore countermechanism to plant chemical defenses. J. Chem. Ecol. 32, 1181 (2006).
Karthika, C., Sureshkumar, R., Karthika, C. & Sureshkumar, R. P-Glycoprotein Efflux Transporters and Its Resistance Its Inhibitors and Therapeutic Aspects. In Biomarkers and Bioanalysis Overview (IntechOpen, 2020). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90430
Grant, D. M. Detoxification pathways in the liver. in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (eds (eds Harkness, R. A., Pollitt, R. J. & Addison, G. M.) 421–430 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9749-6_2. (1991).
Lamb, J. G., Marick, P., Sorensen, J., Haley, S. & Dearing, M. D. Liver biotransforming enzymes in woodrats Neotoma stephensi (Muridae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 138, 195–201 (2004).
Klure, D. M., Greenhalgh, R., Orr, T. J., Shapiro, M. D. & Dearing, M. D. Parallel gene expansions drive rapid dietary adaptation in herbivorous woodrats. Science 387, 156–162 (2025).
You, M. et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat. Genet. 45, 220–225 (2013).
Hammer, T. J. & Bowers, M. D. Gut microbes May facilitate insect herbivory of chemically defended plants. Oecologia 179, 1–14 (2015).
Marsh, K. J., Wallis, I. R., Andrew, R. L. & Foley, W. J. The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going? J. Chem. Ecol. 32, 1247–1266 (2006).
Sugio, A., Dubreuil, G., Giron, D. & Simon, J. C. Plant-insect interactions under bacterial influence: ecological implications and underlying mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 467–478 (2015).
Welte, C. U. et al. Plasmids from the gut Microbiome of cabbage root fly larvae encode SaxA that catalyses the conversion of the plant toxin 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate: isothiocyanate biotransformation by insect gut bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1379–1390 (2016).
Kohl, K. D. & Dearing, M. D. The woodrat gut microbiota as an experimental system for Understanding microbial metabolism of dietary toxins. Front Microbiol 7 (2016).
Kohl, K. D. & Dearing, M. D. Experience matters: prior exposure to plant toxins enhances diversity of gut microbes in herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1008–1015 (2012).
Miller, A. W., Kohl, K. D. & Dearing, M. D. The Gastrointestinal tract of the White-Throated woodrat (Neotoma albigula) harbors distinct consortia of Oxalate-Degrading bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 1595–1601 (2014).
Zhu, L. et al. Potential mechanism of detoxification of cyanide compounds by gut microbiomes of bamboo-eating pandas. mSphere 3 (2018).
Karban, R. & Agrawal, A. A. Herbivore offense. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 641–664 (2002).
DeIgiudice, G. D., Peterson, R. O. & Samuel, W. M. Trends of winter nutritional Restriction, Ticks, and numbers of moose on Isle Royale. J. Wildl. Manag. 61, 895 (1997).
Parikh, G. L. et al. The influence of plant defensive chemicals, diet composition, and winter severity on the nutritional condition of a free-ranging, generalist herbivore. Oikos 126 (2017).
Peterson, R. & Vucetich, J. A. Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royal - Annual Report 2016–17. Sch. For. Resour. Environ. Sci. Mich. Technol. Univ. (2017).
Parikh, G. L. et al. The influence of plant defensive chemicals, diet composition, and winter severity on the nutritional condition of a free-ranging,generalist herbivore. Oikos 126 (2017).
DelGiudice, G. D. Assessing winter nutritional restriction of Northern deer with urine in snow: Considerations, Potential, and limitations. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1973–2006. 23, 687–693 (1995).
Delgiudice, G. D., Mech, L. D. & Seal, U. S. Effects of winter undernutrition on body composition and physiological profiles of White-Tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manag. 54, 539–550 (1990).
Perreault, M. et al. Role of glucuronidation for hepatic detoxification and urinary elimination of toxic bile acids during biliary obstruction. PLOS ONE. 8, e80994 (2013).
Hoy, S. R. et al. The nutritional condition of moose co-varies with climate, but not with density, predation risk or diet composition. Oikos 2022 (2022).
Menke, S., Gillingham, M. A. F., Wilhelm, K. & Sommer, S. Home-Made cost effective preservation buffer is a better alternative to commercial preservation methods for Microbiome research. Front Microbiol 8 (2017).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 Suppl 1, 4516–4522 (2011).
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90 (2018).
Callahan, B. J., Sankaran, K., Fukuyama, J. A., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Bioconductor Workflow for Microbiome Data Analysis: from raw reads to community analyses. F1000Research 5, 1492 (2016).
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).
McDonald, D. et al. An improved greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610–618 (2012).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
McMurdie, P. J., Holmes, S. & Package ‘phyloseq’. (2013). http://bioconductor.fhcrc.org/packages/2.13/bioc/manuals/phyloseq/man/phyloseq.pdf
Huson, D. H., Mitra, S., Ruscheweyh, H. J., Weber, N. & Schuster, S. C. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 21, 1552–1560 (2011).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods. 12, 59–60 (2015).
Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate illumina Paired-End read merger. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620 (2014).
Mcmahon, L. E. SED - a non-interactive text editor. In UNIX Programmer’s Manual – 7th Edition, volume 2, Bell Telephone Laboratories (Murray Hill, 1979).
Bağcı, C., Patz, S., Huson, D. H. & DIAMOND + MEGAN Fast and easy taxonomic and functional analysis of short and long Microbiome sequences. Curr. Protoc. 1, e59 (2021).
Geissinger, E. A., Khoo, C. L. L., Richmond, I. C., Faulkner, S. J. M. & Schneider, D. C. A case for beta regression in the natural sciences. Ecosphere 13, e3940 (2022).
Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M. & Milliken, G. A. Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means. Am. Stat. 34, 216–221 (1980).
Zeileis, A. et al. betareg: Beta Regression (2025).
Lenth, R. V. & Piaskowski, J. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (2025).
Beyer, H. & Tukey, J. W. Exploratory data Analysis. Addison-Wesley publishing company Reading, Mass. — Menlo Park, Cal., London, Amsterdam, don Mills, Ontario, Sydney 1977. S Biom J. 23, 688 (1981).
Wickham, H., Romain, F., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version (2018).
Faith, D. P. & Baker, A. M. Phylogenetic diversity (PD) and biodiversity conservation: some bioinformatics challenges. Evol. Bioinforma Online. 2, 121–128 (2007).
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P. & Makowski, D. Performance: an R package for Assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J. Open. Source Softw. 6, 3139 (2021).
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion To Applied Regression (SAGE, 2011).
Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).
van den Boogaart, K. G. & Tolosana-Delgado, R. Compositions: A unified R package to analyze compositional data. Comput. Geosci. 34, 320–338 (2008).
Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005).
Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Kelley, S. T. & Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1576–1585 (2007).
Chen, J., Zhang, X., Yang, L. & Zhang, L. GUniFrac: Generalized UniFrac Distances, Distance-Based Multivariate Methods and Feature-Based Univariate Methods for Microbiome Data Analysis. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.gunifrac (2012).
Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression of RNA-Seq data at the gene level–the DESeq package. Heidelb. Ger. Eur. Mol. Biol. Lab. EMBL. http://watson.nci.nih.gov/bioc_mirror/packages/2.11/bioc/vignettes/DESeq/inst/doc/DESeq.pdf (2012).
Peschel, S. & NetCoMi Network Construction and Comparison for Microbiome Data (2025).
Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer New York, 2009).
Wilke, O. C. cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for ‘ggplot2’ (2025).
Stegen, J. C., Lin, X., Fredrickson, J. K. & Konopka, A. E. Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly. Front. Microbiol. 6, 370 (2015).
Stegen, J. C. et al. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7, 2069–2079 (2013).
Stegen, J. C. et al. Groundwater–surface water mixing shifts ecological assembly processes and stimulates organic carbon turnover. Nat. Commun. 7, 11237 (2016).
Chase, J. M., Kraft, N. J. B., Smith, K. G., Vellend, M. & Inouye, B. D. Using null models to disentangle variation in community dissimilarity from variation in α-diversity. Ecosphere 2, 24 (2011).
Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinforma Oxf. Engl. 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
Au, J., Marsh, K. J., Wallis, I. R. & Foley, W. J. Whole-body protein turnover reveals the cost of detoxification of secondary metabolites in a vertebrate browser. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 183, 993–1003 (2013).
Servello, F. A. & Schneider, J. W. Evaluation of urinary indices of nutritional status for White-Tailed deer: tests with winter browse diets. J. Wildl. Manag. 64, 137–145 (2000).
Staudenmaier, A. R. et al. Mule deer do more with less: comparing their nutritional requirements and tolerances with white-tailed deer. J. Mammal. 103, 178–195 (2022).
Guglielmo, C. G., Karasov, W. H. & Jakubas, W. J. Nutritional costs of a plant secondary metabolite explain selective foraging by ruffed Grouse. Ecology 77, 1103–1115 (1996).
Hewitt, D. G. & Kirkpatrick, R. L. Ruffed Grouse consumption and detoxification of evergreen leaves. J. Wildl. Manag. 61, 129–139 (1997).
Sorensen, J. S., McLister, J. D. & Dearing, M. D. Plant secondary metabolites compromise the energy budgets of specialist and generalist mammalian herbivores. Ecology 86, 125–139 (2005).
Kohl, K. D., Weiss, R. B., Cox, J., Dale, C. & Dearing, M. D. Gut microbes of mammalian herbivores facilitate intake of plant toxins. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1238–1246 (2014).
Ceja-Navarro, J. A. et al. Gut microbiota mediate caffeine detoxification in the primary insect pest of coffee. Nat. Commun. 6, 7618 (2015).
Rand, E. E. et al. Detoxification mechanisms of honey bees (Apis mellifera) resulting in tolerance of dietary nicotine. Sci. Rep. 5, srep11779 (2015).
Huang, J. et al. Tannins as antimicrobial agents: Understanding toxic effects on pathogens. Toxicon Off J. Int. Soc. Toxinology. 247, 107812 (2024).
Guo, J. et al. Response of the gut microbiota to changes in the nutritional status of red deer during winter. Sci. Rep. 14, 24961 (2024).
Mallott, E. K., Skovmand, L. H., Garber, P. A. & Amato, K. R. The faecal metabolome of black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) varies in response to seasonal dietary changes. Mol. Ecol. 31, 4146–4161 (2022).
Pinacho-Guendulain, B., Montiel-Castro, A. J. & Ramos-Fernández, G. Pacheco-López, G. Social complexity as a driving force of gut microbiota exchange among conspecific hosts in non-human primates. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 16, 876849 (2022).
Org, E. & Lusis, A. J. Using the natural variation of mouse populations to understand host-gut Microbiome interactions. Drug Discov Today Dis. Models. 28, 61–71 (2018).
Worsley, S. F. et al. Gut Microbiome communities demonstrate fine-scale Spatial variation in a closed, Island bird population. ISME Commun. 5, ycaf138 (2025).
Nie, K. et al. Roseburia intestinalis: A beneficial gut organism from the discoveries in genus and species. Front Cell. Infect. Microbiol 11 (2021).
Hays, K. E., Pfaffinger, J. M. & Ryznar, R. The interplay between gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and implications for host health and disease. Gut Microbes. 16, 2393270 (2024).
Sepp, E. et al. Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in centenarians and young people: impact of eating habits and childhood living environment. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12, 851404 (2022).
Stoll, D. A. et al. Adlercreutzia rubneri sp. nov., a resveratrol-metabolizing bacterium isolated from human faeces and emended description of the genus Adlercreutzia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71, 004987 (2021).
Louis, P. & Flint, H. J. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 29–41 (2017).
Hou, L., Yang, Y., Sun, B., Jing, Y. & Deng, W. Dietary Fiber, gut Microbiota, Short-Chain fatty Acids, and host metabolism. Am. J. Life Sci. 9, 162–172 (2021).
Huang, C. et al. The effect of different dietary structure on Gastrointestinal dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy and epilepsy based on gut microbiota. Brain Dev. 43, 192–199 (2021).
Miller, A. W., Dale, C. & Dearing, M. D. Microbiota diversification and crash induced by dietary oxalate in the mammalian herbivore Neotoma albigula. mSphere 2, e00428–e00417 (2017).
Kohl, K. D. et al. Metagenomic sequencing provides insights into the location of microbial detoxification in the gut of a small mammalian herbivore. 299198. https://doi.org/10.1101/299198 (2018).
Pichette, A., Larouche, P. L., Lebrun, M. & Legault, J. Composition and antibacterial activity of abies balsamea essential oil. Phytother Res. PTR. 20, 371–373 (2006).
Yang, X. W., Li, S. M., Shen, Y. H. & Zhang, W. D. Phytochemical and biological studies of abies species. Chem. Biodivers. 5, 56–81 (2008).
Stapleton, T. E., Lindsey, L. M., Sundar, H. & Dearing, M. D. Rodents consuming the same toxic diet harbor a unique functional core Microbiome. Anim. Microbiome. 6, 43 (2024).
Zapletal, O. et al. Butyrate alters expression of cytochrome P450 1A1 and metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene via its histone deacetylase activity in colon epithelial cell models. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 2135–2150 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank Rothärmel, J for conducting the 16S rRNA gene sequencing and express special gratitude to Wilhelm, K. for all her incredible support at the high-throughput sequencing facilities of Prof. Sommer’s lab. We are grateful to the many individuals who contributed to the collection of field data and assisted with laboratory analyses, especially Robb, B. We further like to thank our supportive colleagues from the Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics (Ulm University), School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science (Michigan Technological University), and Department of Biological Sciences (Boise State University). We are also grateful to the U.S. National Park Service for permitting us to conduct research in Isle Royale National Park. Note that the views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. National Park Service.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DEB-1146194; OIA-1826801 to JSF; DEB-1453041 to JAV; Isle Royale National Park (CESU Task Agreement No. P16AC00004 to JAV)), and a McIntire-Stennis Grant (USDA-Nifa No. 1014575 to JAV).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.F., J.S.F., J.A.V., L.M.V., S.M., and S.S. conceptualized the project. G.F. performed microbial shotgun sequencing. J.S.F. performed metabolite measurements. J.A.V. provided faculty resources and logistical support. L.M.V. organized and participated in moose sampling at IRNP. S.M. performed bioinformatics and statistics and drafted the manuscript. S.S. provided sequencing facilities. G.F., J.F., J.A.V., L.M.V., and S.S. reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Menke, S., Fackelmann, G., Vucetich, L.M. et al. Forage quality shapes physiological and gut microbial responses in moose (Alces alces) of Isle Royale National Park. Sci Rep 16, 3724 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35555-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35555-w










