Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Validation and application of a standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 March 2026

Validation and application of a standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water

  • Laura C. Scott1,
  • Christina A. Ahlstrom1,
  • Hanna Woksepp2,3,
  • Jonas Bonnedahl3,4,
  • Cherie M. McKeeman1,
  • Mark E. Miller5,
  • Dave Schirokauer6 &
  • …
  • Andrew M. Ramey1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1212 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Biotechnology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Molecular biology

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance can be an indicator of anthropogenic contamination in surface waters and is a potential public health threat. Methodological standardization for characterization of antimicrobial resistance in the environment is lacking. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used for rapid assessment of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from environmental sources, including surface water. Here we describe the validation and application of a qPCR assay for 47 bacterial gene targets intended for surface water samples. The qPCR assay displayed excellent sensitivity (97.66%) and specificity (98.71%) for detecting ARGs when compared to whole genome sequencing of bacterial isolates. The qPCR assay was able to detect up to 6/8 (75.0%) of ARGs spiked into sterile water at varying concentrations and four sample ultrafiltration volumes. Nineteen different ARGs were detected across six samples sites at three national parks in Alaska using ultrafiltered surface water samples. The number of unique ARGs detected was higher at sites within parks with greater visitation. The relative abundance of ARGs/16S from Exit Creek in Kenai Fjords National Park, downstream from a visitor center was greater than all other sampled sites. We have demonstrated a robust qPCR assay for monitoring ARGs in surface waters, including those that are minimally human impacted.

Data availability

Quantitative PCR data presented in this paper are publicly available at [https://doi.org/10.5066/P14G9MJW]60 . The sequencing data generated during the current study are available in NCBI (BioProject ID: PRJNA1214890).

References

  1. Franklin, A. M. et al. A one health approach for monitoring antimicrobial resistance: developing a National freshwater pilot effort. Front. Water 6 (2024).

  2. Larsson, D. G. J. & Flach, C-F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 257–269 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, L-G., Huang, Q., Yin, X. & Zhang, T. Source tracking of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment — Challenges, progress, and prospects. Water Res. 185, 116127 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liguori, K. et al. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring of water environments: A framework for standardized methods and quality control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 9149–9160 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Milligan, E. G. et al. A systematic review of Culture-Based methods for monitoring Antibiotic-Resistant Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, and Pseudomonas as environmentally relevant pathogens in wastewater and surface water. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 10, 154–171 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nappier, S. P., Liguori, K., Ichida, A. M., Stewart, J. R. & Jones, K. R. Antibiotic resistance in recreational waters: state of the science. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17 (2020).

  7. Chen, Z. et al. Unraveling the influence of human fecal pollution on antibiotic resistance gene levels in different receiving water bodies using crassphage indicator gene. J. Hazard. Mater. 442, 130005 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drane, K., Sheehan, M., Whelan, A., Ariel, E. & Kinobe, R. The role of wastewater treatment plants in dissemination of antibiotic resistance: Source, Measurement, removal and risk assessment. Antibiotics 13, 668 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J. J. et al. Persistence of antibiotic resistance from animal agricultural effluents to surface water revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. J. Hazard. Mater. 457, 131761 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Z., Cai, M., Du, P. & Li, X. Wastewater surveillance for antibiotics and resistance genes in a river catchment: Spatiotemporal variations and the main drivers. Water Res. 251, 121090 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burch, T. R. et al. Microbial source tracking and land use associations for antibiotic resistance genes in private wells influenced by human and livestock fecal sources. J. Environ. Qual. 52, 270–286 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kocurek, B. et al. Metagenomic survey of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Maryland surface waters differentiated by high and low human impact. Microbiol. Resource Announcements. 13, e00477–e00423 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nolan, T. M. et al. Land use as a critical determinant of faecal and antimicrobial resistance gene pollution in riverine systems. Sci. Total Environ. 871, 162052 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta, S., Graham, D. W., Sreekrishnan, T. R. & Ahammad, S. Z. Heavy metal and antibiotic resistance in four Indian and UK rivers with different levels and types of water pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159059 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, S., Wang, P., Wang, X. & Chen, J. Ecological insights into the elevational biogeography of antibiotic resistance genes in a pristine river: metagenomic analysis along the Yarlung Tsangpo river on the Tibetan plateau. Environ. Pollut. 286, 117101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reichert, G. et al. Determination of antibiotic resistance genes in a WWTP-impacted river in surface water, sediment, and biofilm: influence of seasonality and water quality. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144526 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vadde, K. K., McCarthy, A. J., Rong, R. & Sekar, R. Quantification of microbial source tracking and pathogenic bacterial markers in water and sediments of Tiaoxi river (Taihu watershed). Front. Microbiol. 10 (2019).

  18. Abramova, A., Berendonk, T. U. & Bengtsson-Palme, J. A global baseline for qPCR-determined antimicrobial resistance gene prevalence across environments. Environ. Int. 178, 108084 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D’Costa, V. M. et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 477, 457–461 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rothrock, M. J. Jr et al. How should we be determining background and baseline antibiotic resistance levels in agroecosystem research? J. Environ. Qual. 45, 420–431 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baron, J. S. et al. Marmots do not drink coffee: human urine contributions to the nitrogen budget of a popular National park destination. Ecosphere 14, e4504 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clow, D. W. et al. Effects of stock use and backpackers on water quality in wilderness in sequoia and kings Canyon National Parks, USA. Environ. Manage. 52, 1400–1414 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Forrester, H., Clow, D., Roche, J., Heyvaert, A. & Battaglin, W. Effects of backpacker Use, pack stock trail Use, and pack stock grazing on Water-Quality Indicators, including Nutrients, E. coli, Hormones, and Pharmaceuticals, in Yosemite National park. USA Environ. Manage. 60, 526–543 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goodwin, K., Loso, M. G. & Braun, M. Glacial transport of human waste and survival of fecal bacteria on Mt. McKinley’s Kahiltna Glacier, Denali National Park, Alaska. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 44, 432–445 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin, D. W., Gray, M. A., Lyles, M. B. & Northup, D. E. The transport of nonindigenous microorganisms into caves by human visitation: A case study at Carlsbad caverns National park. Geomicrobiol J. 31, 175–185 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moldovan, O. T. et al. Management of water bodies in show caves – A microbial approach. Tour. Manag. 78, 104037 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scott, L. C. et al. Use of microbial fecal indicator monitoring and fecal source tracking as a park management tool in Rocky mountain National park. Environ. Challenges. 8, 100583 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahlstrom, C. A., Scott, L. C., Woksepp, H., Bonnedahl, J. & Ramey, A. M. Environmental antimicrobial resistance gene detection from wild bird habitats using two methods: A commercially available culture-independent qPCR assay and culture of indicator bacteria followed by whole-genome sequencing. J. Global Antimicrob. Resist. 33, 186–193 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rochegüe, T. et al. An inventory of 44 qPCR assays using hydrolysis probes operating with a unique amplification condition for the detection and quantification of antibiotic resistance genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 100, 115328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ng, L. K., Martin, I., Alfa, M. & Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell Probes. 15, 209–215 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Poirel, L., Walsh, T. R., Cuvillier, V. & Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 70, 119–123 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tolosi, R. et al. Rapid detection and quantification of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes (mcr‐1 to mcr‐5) by real‐time PCR in bacterial and environmental samples. J. Appl. Microbiol. 129, 1523–1529 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hozalski Raymond, M., Zhao, X., Kim, T. & LaPara Timothy, M. On-site filtration of large sample volumes improves the detection of opportunistic pathogens in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 90, e01658–e01623 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kahler, A. M. et al. Evaluation of an Ultrafiltration-Based procedure for simultaneous recovery of diverse microbes in source waters. Water 7, 1202–1216 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Korajkic, A., Kelleher, J., Shanks, O. C., Herrmann, M. P. & McMinn, B. R. Effectiveness of two wastewater disinfection strategies for the removal of fecal indicator bacteria, bacteriophage, and enteric viral pathogens concentrated using dead-end Hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF). Sci. Total Environ. 831, 154861 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kraft, A. L. et al. A comparison of methods to detect low levels of Salmonella enterica in surface waters to support antimicrobial resistance surveillance efforts performed in multiple laboratories. Sci. Total Environ. 905, 167189 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li, X., Harwood Valerie, J., Nayak, B. & Weidhaas Jennifer, L. Ultrafiltration and microarray for detection of microbial source tracking marker and pathogen genes in riverine and marine systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1625–1635 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, P. et al. Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for simultaneous recovery of viruses, bacteria and parasites from reclaimed water. J. Microbiol. Methods. 88, 155–161 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, P. et al. Development of Moore swab and ultrafiltration concentration and detection methods for Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi A in wastewater and application in Kolkata, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh. Front. Microbiol. 12 (2021).

  40. Pascual-Benito, M. et al. Assessment of dead-end ultrafiltration for the detection and quantification of microbial indicators and pathogens in the drinking water treatment processes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ Health. 230, 113628 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robla, J. et al. Determination of the efficiency of filtration of cultures from microalgae and bacteria using Hollow fiber filters. Environ. Science: Water Res. Technol. 7, 1230–1239 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith Carmela, M. & Hill Vincent, R. Dead-End Hollow-Fiber ultrafiltration for recovery of diverse microbes from water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5284–5289 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Polaczyk, A. L. et al. Ultrafiltration-based techniques for rapid and simultaneous concentration of multiple microbe classes from 100-L tap water samples. J. Microbiol. Methods. 73, 92–99 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gallardo, V. J., Morris, B. J. & Rhodes, E. R. The use of Hollow fiber Dialysis filters operated in axial flow mode for recovery of microorganisms in large volume water samples with high loadings of particulate matter. J. Microbiol. Methods. 160, 143–153 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mull, B. & Hill, V. R. Recovery of diverse microbes in high turbidity surface water samples using dead-end ultrafiltration. J. Microbiol. Methods. 91, 429–433 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nadkarni, M. A., Martin, F. E., Jacques, N. A. & Hunter, N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148, 257–266 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–d6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Alcock, B. P. et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–d9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zankari, E. et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2640–2644 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. SAS Institute. 9.4. Cary (SAS Institute Inc., 2013).

  51. Service, N. P. National Park Service Visitor Use Statistics (National Park Service, Department of the Interior, 2024). https://irma.nps.gov

  52. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 14.0 (2024).

  53. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1–e (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Illumina. 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation. Preparing 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons for the Illumina MiSeq System (2016).

  55. Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Brown, G. R. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D130–D135 (2012). Epub 20111124.

    Google Scholar 

  57. kraken-biom. Enabling interoperative format conversion for Kraken results 1.2 (2016).

  58. Andersen, K. S., Kirkegaard, R. H., Karst, S. M. & Albertsen, M. ampvis2: an R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data. BioRxiv :299537 (2018).

  59. R Core Team. R:A language and environment for statistical computing. 4.2.0: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).

  60. Juul, S. et al. Validation and advantages of using novel RT-qPCR melting curve analysis assays for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Sci. Rep. 12, 13069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Scott, L. C. et al. Data for validation and application of standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P14G9MJW (2025).

  62. Bridle, H., Jacobsson, K. & Schultz, A. C. Chapter 4 - Sample processing. In: (ed Bridle, H.) Waterborne Pathogens (Second Edition): Academic; 63–109. (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Forés, E. et al. Evaluation of a virus concentration method based on ultrafiltration and wet foam elution for studying viruses from large-volume water samples. Sci. Total Environ. 829, 154431 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. USEPA. 1060 Collection and Preservation of Samples. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2017).

  65. Amarasiri, M., Sano, D. & Suzuki, S. Understanding human health risks caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in water environments: current knowledge and questions to be answered. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 2016–2059 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Goh, S. G. et al. Assessing the additional health burden of antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae in surface waters through an integrated QMRA and DALY approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 458, 132058 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chettri, U., Nongkhlaw, M. & Joshi, S. R. Molecular evidence for occurrence of heavy metal and antibiotic resistance genes among predominant metal tolerant Pseudomonas sp. and Serratia sp. Prevalent in the Teesta river. Curr. Microbiol. 80, 226 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, P., Wu, D., You, X., Li, W. & Xie, B. Distribution of antibiotics, metals and antibiotic resistance genes during landfilling process in major municipal solid waste landfills. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113222 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Blanco-Picazo, P. et al. Antibiotic resistance genes in phage particles from Antarctic and mediterranean seawater ecosystems. Microorganisms 8, 1293 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Jang, J. et al. Abundance and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial communities in the Western Pacific and Southern oceans. Sci. Total Environ. 822, 153360 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lu, J., Wu, J., Zhang, C., Wang, J. & He, X. Occurrence and possible sources of antibiotic resistance genes in seawater of the South China sea. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 18, 108 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Scott, L. C. et al. Assessing visitor use impact on antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in soil and water environments of Rocky mountain National park. Sci. Total Environ. 785, 147122 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E. & Larsson, D. G. J. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ora Russ and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Genetics for the use of their equipment and space. We appreciate constructive reviews provided by Ora Russ and John Pearce. We thank Eleni Petrou for helpful conversations about the illustration of data. This research used resources of the Core Science Analytics and Synthesis Advanced Research Computing program at the U.S. Geological Survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA

    Laura C. Scott, Christina A. Ahlstrom, Cherie M. McKeeman & Andrew M. Ramey

  2. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Region Kalmar County, 391 85, Kalmar, Sweden

    Hanna Woksepp

  3. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Hanna Woksepp & Jonas Bonnedahl

  4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden

    Jonas Bonnedahl

  5. National Park Service, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Copper Center, AK, USA

    Mark E. Miller

  6. National Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, Denali Park, AK, USA

    Dave Schirokauer

Authors
  1. Laura C. Scott
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina A. Ahlstrom
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanna Woksepp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonas Bonnedahl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cherie M. McKeeman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark E. Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dave Schirokauer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrew M. Ramey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to study design. LCS, CA, CMM, MEM, and AMR conducted field work. LCS, HW, JB, and CMM conducted lab work. LCS, CA, and HW conducted data analysis. LCS, CA, and CMM generated figures. LCS, CA, and HW contributed to manuscript writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura C. Scott.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, L.C., Ahlstrom, C.A., Woksepp, H. et al. Validation and application of a standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35635-x

Download citation

  • Received: 29 September 2025

  • Accepted: 07 January 2026

  • Published: 02 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35635-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • One health
  • Quantitative PCR
  • Microbial source tracking
  • Water quality
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research