Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Enhancing healthcare workers’ safety and well-being through a comprehensive qualitative analysis across hospital settings
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 January 2026

Enhancing healthcare workers’ safety and well-being through a comprehensive qualitative analysis across hospital settings

  • Emanuela Foglia1,
  • Lucrezia Ferrario1 &
  • Elisabetta Garagiola1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1208 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Health care
  • Health occupations
  • Psychology

Abstract

Healthcare professionals’ well-being is increasingly recognized as a critical organizational priority, given the risks posed by rising workloads, staff shortages, and burnout to the sustainable delivery of high-quality care. However, limited evidence exists on how work environments and technology adoption influence the healthcare professionals’ well-being across hospital settings. This study explores healthcare professionals’ perceptions of psychological and physical safety, professional engagement, and mental well-being. It also assesses the role of technology in fostering a culture of safety and well-being. A cross-sectional qualitative anonymous online survey was distributed across 13 countries in Europe, Middle East and Africa, targeting professionals working in hospital pharmacy, diagnostic laboratory, and ward settings. The questionnaire, available in five languages, included validated items. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with subgroup analyses by setting and region. Responses were collected between February and August 2024. A total of 449 healthcare professionals participated. The sample presented a positive perception of psychological safety (61%) and professional engagement (55%). However, 27% of responders frequently experienced work-related stress, with 40% feeling exhausted, 25% reporting mental distance, and 23% cognitive impairment. Perceived physical safety was generally high (70%), although ward staff reported higher exposure to stress and interpersonal aggression. Overall, 58% of responders expressed satisfaction with their professional quality of life. Technology was perceived to enhance efficiency, safety, and collaboration. However, its impact was dependent on the quality of implementation and level of organizational support. Results may inform strategic interventions and policies aimed at promoting a resilient and sustainable workforce.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Pascale, F. & Achour, N. Envisioning the sustainable and climate resilient hospital of the future. Public. Health. 237, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.028 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whitty, C. J. et al. Rising to the challenge of Multimorbidity. BMJ 368, l696. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m696 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030 (WHO, 2022).

  4. Sturmberg, J. P. & Bircher, J. Better and fulfilling healthcare at lower costs: the need to manage health systems as complex adaptive systems. F1000Research 8, 789. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19414.1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, G. A., Jacob, G., Rakovac, I., Scotter, C. & Wismar, M. Health professional mobility in the WHO European region and the WHO global code of practice: data from the joint OECD/EUROSTAT/WHO-Europe questionnaire. Eur. J. Pub. Health. 30 (Suppl_4), iv5–iv11. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa112 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michel, J. P. & Ecarnot, F. The shortage of skilled workers in europe: its impact on geriatric medicine. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 11 (3), 345–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00328-x (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conolly, A. R. et al. There was a pivotal moment: the dynamics, transitions, adaptations and trajectories of nursing at the front-line in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 19 (2), e0295394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295394 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dyrbye, L. N. et al. Burnout among health care professionals: A call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care. NAM Perspect. 7 (7), 1–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. (2016). https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/pub_globstrathrh-2030/en/.

  10. Dall’Ora, C., Griffiths, P., Ball, J., Simon, M. & Aiken, L. H. Association of 12 h shifts and nurses’ job satisfaction, burnout and intention to leave: findings from a cross-sectional study of 12 European countries. BMJ Open. 5 (9), e008331. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008331 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Panagioti, M. et al. Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 177 (7), 1026–1035. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.13097 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cimiotti, J. P., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M. & Wu, E. S. Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care–associated infection. Am. J. Infect. Control. 40 (6), 486–490 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, L. H., Johnson, J., Watt, I., Tsipa, A. & O’Connor, D. B. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: A systematic review. PLoS One. 11 (7), e0159015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159015 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Figley, C. R. Compassion fatigue: psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. J. Clin. Psychol. 58 (11), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10090 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Mol, M. M., Kompanje, E. J., Benoit, D. D., Bakker, J. & Nijkamp, M. D. The prevalence of compassion fatigue and burnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: A systematic review. PLoS One. 10 (8), e0136955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136955 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rathert, C., Williams, E. S., Lawrence, E. R. & Halbesleben, J. R. Emotional exhaustion and workarounds in acute care: Cross-sectional tests of a theoretical framework. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 49 (8), 969–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.011 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ball, J. E., Murrells, T., Rafferty, A. M., Morrow, E. & Griffiths, P. Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23 (2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001767 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olds, D. M. & Clarke, S. P. The effect of work hours on adverse events and errors in health care. J. Saf. Res. 41 (2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.01.002 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, L. Z. et al. Nurse burnout and patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open. 7 (11), e2443059. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43059 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gray, P., Senabe, S., Naicker, N., Kgalamono, S., Yassi, A., & Spiegel, J. M. Workplace-based organizational interventions promoting mental health based organizational interventions promoting mental health and happiness among healthcare workers: a realist review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 4396. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224396 (2019).

  21. Marvaldi, M., Mallet, J., Dubertret, C., Moro, M. R., & Guessoum, S. B. Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 126, 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.021 (2021).

  22. Kim, M. S., Kim, T., Lee, D., Yook, J. H., Hong, Y. C., Lee, S. Y., & Kang, M. Y.Mental disorders among workers in the healthcare industry: 2014 national health insurance data. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 30, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0258-4 (2018).

  23. Ullström, S., Andreen Sachs, M., Hansson, J., Ovretveit, J. & Brommels, M. Suffering in silence: A qualitative study of second victims of adverse events. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23 (4), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002035 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michaels, D. & Wagner, G. OSHA injury data: an opportunity for improving work injury prevention. Am. J. Public Health. 115, 588–595. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307934 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gustavsson, K. et al. Healthcare professionals’ experiences of job satisfaction when providing person-centred care: A systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 13 (6), e071178. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071178 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner, A., Rieger, M. A. & Manser, T. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Straszewski, T., Ross, C. A., Riley, C., Roy, B. & Stiefel, M. C. Testing the added value of self-reported health and well-being in Understanding healthcare utilization and costs. Qual. Life Res. 31 (11), 3189–3199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03168-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yin, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 3rd edn (Sage, 2003).

  29. Pilcher, N. & Cortazzi, M. Qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’ methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Qual. Quant. 58, 2357–2387 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saka Olawale, R., Chinagozi, O., Ononokpono Nyong, J. & G., & Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. Int. J. Res. Innov. Social Sci. 7 (5), 123–134 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Edmondson, A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 44 (2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kahn, W. A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33 (4), 692–724 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H. & Desart, S. Manual Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – Version 2.0. KU Leuven (Unpublished internal report, 2020).

  34. Stamm, B. H. Professional quality of life: Compassion satisfaction and fatigue. (2009).

  35. LeRouge, C., Mantzana, V. & Wilson, E. V. Healthcare information systems research, revelations and visions. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 16, 669–671 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Risør, B. W., Lisby, M. & Sørensen, J. Complex automated medication systems reduce medication administration errors in a Danish acute medical unit. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 30 (6), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy061 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gagnon, M. P., Desmartis, M., Gagnon, J., St-Pierre, M. & Gauvin, F. P. Sampling strategies in health services research: A practical guide. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 21, 123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A. & Alkassim, R. S. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theoretical Appl. Stat. 5 (1), 1–4 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ericson, A. et al. Optimizing survey response rates in graduate medical education research studies. Fam. Med. 55 (5), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2023.750371 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Muench, U. et al. Healthcare system differences and their impact on job satisfaction in healthcare professionals. J. Health Organ. Manag. 32 (4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-03-2017-0056 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. West, M. A. & Dawson, J. F. Understanding work and organizational psychology: the role of healthcare settings. J. Appl. Psychol. 97 (5), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028576 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings Psychol. Cult. 2 (1), 1–26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Duclos, A., Peix, J. L., Fratté, S., d’Athis, P. & Colin, C. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in hospitalized patients: results of a 4-year observational study. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 103 (6), 474–480 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fickenscher, K. M., Lesser, C. S. & O’Neil, E. H. Clinicians’ perceptions of electronic health records as a possible cause of clinician burnout. JAMA 313 (23), 2385–2386. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.594 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Friedberg, M. W., Chen, P. G., Van Busum, K. R., Aunon, F. M., Pham, C., Caloyeras,J. P., & Tutty, M. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. RAND Health Q. 3(4), 1–30 (2014).

  46. West, M. A., Armit, K., West, T. & Dawson, J. F. The impact of digital health technologies on the well-being of healthcare professionals: A systematic review. J. Health Organ. Manag. 29 (6), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2014-0215 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T. B. & Cartmill, R. S. Human factors and systems engineering in healthcare: A research agenda. J. Organizational Behav. 35 (7), 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1919 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M. & Monahan, K. Technology and its impact on the workload of healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Health Serv. Res. 42 (1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12516 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Afshar, L., Timpka, T. & H., & A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl. Clin. Inf. 9 (3), 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jedwab, R. M., Manias, E., Hutchinson, A. M., Dobroff, N. & Redley, B. Nurses’ experiences after implementation of an organization-wide electronic medical record: qualitative descriptive study. JMIR Nurs. 5 (1), e39596. https://doi.org/10.2196/39596 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Noblet, A. J. et al. The work-based predictors of job engagement and job satisfaction experienced by community health professionals. Health Care Manage. Rev. 42 (3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000134 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Becton Dickinson, but this article was conceived, written and internally reviewed, independently.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Healthcare Datascience Lab-HD LAB, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti, 22, 21053, Castellanza, VA, Italy

    Emanuela Foglia, Lucrezia Ferrario & Elisabetta Garagiola

Authors
  1. Emanuela Foglia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucrezia Ferrario
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisabetta Garagiola
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

*All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Emanuela Foglia, Lucrezia Ferrario and Elisabetta Garagiola. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Lucrezia Ferrario and Elisabetta Garagiola, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.**All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.*.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabetta Garagiola.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by Research Ethics Committee of University Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC (protocol number R15-23, dated 12nd October 2023).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foglia, E., Ferrario, L. & Garagiola, E. Enhancing healthcare workers’ safety and well-being through a comprehensive qualitative analysis across hospital settings. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35681-5

Download citation

  • Received: 11 July 2025

  • Accepted: 07 January 2026

  • Published: 13 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35681-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Healthcare professionals’ well-being
  • Hospital work environment
  • Cross-Sectional survey
  • Psychological safety
  • Physical safety
  • Technology adoption
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing