Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
AI-powered ultrasound radiofrequency analysis for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

AI-powered ultrasound radiofrequency analysis for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification

  • Gayoung Choi1 na1,
  • Sungwon Ham2 na1,
  • Bo-Kyung Je1 &
  • …
  • Minsoo Shin3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 670 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Gastroenterology
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) affects 30–50% of obese children, yet accurate non-invasive quantification remains challenging. While magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) represents the reference standard, its limited accessibility necessitates alternative approaches. Forty pediatric patients (age 12.16 ± 2.56 years) referred for MASLD were prospectively enrolled for same-day ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data acquisition and MRI-PDFF examination. Two artificial intelligence (AI) approaches using multiple input combinations of RF data, ultrasound-guided attenuation parameters (UGAP), and clinical parameters were developed for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification: radiomics-based models and deep learning models. The best radiomics model (XGBoost) and the best deep learning model (Mod-MHDNet) achieved optimal performance with multimodal inputs (R2 = 0.81 and 0.76, respectively). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated excellent agreement with MRI-PDFF, with a mean bias of < 0.4% points for both approaches. AI analysis of ultrasound RF data enables accurate and accessible quantification of pediatric liver fat, offering a practical alternative for MASLD evaluation.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study include patient-level imaging data and clinical information, which are not publicly available due to institutional and ethical restrictions. De-identified data may be made available from the corresponding author (B.K.J.) upon reasonable request and with approval from the Korea University Ansan Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Code availability

The underlying code for this study is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Estes, C., Razavi, H., Loomba, R., Younossi, Z. & Sanyal, A. J. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 67, 123–133 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldner, D. & Lavine, J. E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: unique considerations and challenges. Gastroenterology 158, 1967–1983 e1961 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitsinikos, T., Mrowczynski-Hernandez, P. & Kohli, R. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Pediatr. Clin. North. Am. 68, 1309–1320 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwimmer, J. B. et al. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 118, 1388–1393 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schwimmer, J. B. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and liver histology as biomarkers of hepatic steatosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 61, 1887–1895 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Awai, H. I., Newton, K. P., Sirlin, C. B., Behling, C. & Schwimmer, J. B. Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12, 765–773 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Serai, S. D., Panganiban, J., Dhyani, M., Degnan, A. J. & Anupindi, S. A. Imaging modalities in pediatric NAFLD. Clin. Liver Disease. 17, 200–208 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson, A. E., Xanthakos, S. A. & Siegel, R. M. Challenges in screening for pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Pediatr. (Phila). 57, 558–562 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, A. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and quantification of liver fat with radiofrequency ultrasound data using One-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Radiology 295, 342–350 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Idilman, I. S. et al. Hepatic steatosis: Quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology 267, 767–775 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berardis, S. & Sokal, E. Pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An increasing public health issue. Eur. J. Pediatr. 173, 131–139 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Younossi, Z. et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 11–20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Azizi, N. et al. Evaluation of MRI proton density fat fraction in hepatic steatosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 35, 1794–1807 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D’Hondt, A., Rubesova, E., Xie, H., Shamdasani, V. & Barth, R. A. Liver fat quantification by ultrasound in children: A prospective study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 217, 996–1006 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noureddin, M. et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging versus histology for quantifying changes in liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease trials. Hepatology 58, 1930–1940 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dillman, J. R., Thapaliya, S., Tkach, J. A. & Trout, A. T. Quantification of hepatic steatosis by ultrasound: Prospective comparison with MRI proton density fat fraction as reference standard. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 219, 784–791 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hernaez, R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis. Hepatology 54, 1082–1090 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dardanelli, E. P. et al. Ultrasound Attenuation imaging: A reproducible alternative for the noninvasive quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 53, 1618–1628 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fetzer, D. T. et al. US quantification of liver fat: Past, present, and future. Radiographics 43, e220178 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frankland, M. P. et al. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound hepatorenal index for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 52, 1306–1313 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jeon, S. K. et al. Quantitative ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis for the assessment of hepatic steatosis using the controlled Attenuation parameter as a reference standard. Ultrasonography 40, 136–146 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park, J., Lee, J. M., Lee, G., Jeon, S. K. & Joo, I. Quantitative evaluation of hepatic steatosis using advanced imaging techniques: Focusing on new quantitative ultrasound techniques. Korean J. Radiol. 23, 13–29 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Polti, G. et al. Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction. Pediatr. Radiol. 53, 2458–2465 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Serai, S. D., Dhyani, M., Srivastava, S. & Dillman, J. R. MR and ultrasound for liver fat assessment in children: Techniques and supporting evidence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 62, 691–706 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oelze, M. L. & Mamou, J. Review of quantitative ultrasound: Envelope statistics and backscatter coefficient imaging and contributions to diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 63, 336–351 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tahmasebi, A. et al. Ultrasound-based machine learning approach for detection of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Ultrasound Med. 42, 1747–1756 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xie, Z., Ji, N., Xu, L. & Ma, J. Ultrasound radiofrequency image improves the tissue segmentation performance of deep learning models. In 2024 IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS) 1–3 (2024).

  28. Yin, C. et al. Artificial intelligence in imaging for liver disease diagnosis. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 12, 1591523 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mansournia, M. A., Waters, R., Nazemipour, M., Bland, M. & Altman, D. G. Bland-Altman methods for comparing methods of measurement and response to criticisms. Glob Epidemiol. 3, 100045 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xie, Z., Han, J., Ji, N., Xu, L. & Ma, J. RFImageNet framework for segmentation of ultrasound images with spectra-augmented radiofrequency signals. Ultrasonics 146, 107498 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ferraioli, G. et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver steatosis in children: The clinical value of controlled Attenuation parameter. BMC Gastroenterol. 17, 61 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vos, M. B. et al. NASPGHAN clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: Recommendations from the expert committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the North American society of pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition (NASPGHAN). J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 64, 319–334 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hunter, A. K. & Lin, H. C. Review of clinical guidelines in the diagnosis of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Liver Disease. 18, 40–44 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, L. et al. An international multidisciplinary consensus on pediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. Med 5, 797–815e792 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mouzaki, M. et al. Assessment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression in children using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Pediatr. 201, 86–92 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Clemente, M. G., Mandato, C., Poeta, M. & Vajro, P. Pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Recent solutions, unresolved issues, and future research directions. World J. Gastroenterol. 22, 8078–8093 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lin, G. et al. Epidemiology and lifestyle survey of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in school-age children and adolescents in Shenyang, Liaoning. BMC Pediatr. 22, 286 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cao, W. et al. Application of deep learning in quantitative analysis of 2-Dimensional ultrasound imaging of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Ultrasound Med. 39, 51–59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zamanian, H., Mostaar, A., Azadeh, P. & Ahmadi, M. Implementation of combinational deep learning algorithm for Non-alcoholic fatty liver classification in ultrasound images. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 11, 73–84 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Davis, L. M. et al. Ultrasound innovations in abdominal radiology: Techniques and clinical applications in pediatric imaging. Abdom. Radiol. (NY). 50, 1744–1762 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao, Y. et al. Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided Attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis. Sci. Rep. 12, 2876 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mayerhoefer, M. E. et al. Introduction to radiomics. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 488–495 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rizzo, S. et al. Radiomics: The facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2, 36 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. van Griethuysen, J. J. M. et al. Computational radiomics system to Decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77, e104–e107 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Novitasari, D. C. R., Lubab, A., Sawiji, A. & Asyhar, A. H. Application of feature extraction for breast cancer using one order Statistic, GLCM, GLRLM, and GLDM. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 4, 115–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hanchuan, P., Fuhui, L. & Ding, C. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1226–1238 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.). 58, 267–288 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, T., Guestrin, C. & Xgboost A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining 785–794 (2016).

  49. Awad, M. & Khanna, R. Support vector regression. In Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers 67–80 (Springer, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Su, X., Yan, X. & Tsai, C. L. Linear regression. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Stat. 4, 275–294 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar, D. EfficientNet-B4 based deep learning for automated paddy leaf disease classification. In 2024 International Conference on Integration of Emerging Technologies for the Digital World (ICIETDW) 1–6 (IEEE, 2024).

  52. Tan, M., Le, Q. & Efficientnet Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning 6105–6114 (PMLR, 2019).

  53. Tang, P. et al. Deep learning with multi-scale Temporal hybrid structure for robust crop mapping. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 209, 117–132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, J. & Wang, J. MHDNet: A multi-scale hybrid deep learning model for person Re-Identification. Electronics 13, 1435 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chai, T. & Draxler, R. R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 1247–1250 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J. & Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj Comput. Sci. 7, e623 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rosner, B., Glynn, R. J. & Lee, M. L. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics 62, 185–192 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Korea University Ansan Hospital Grant (K2409221, O2310661).

Funding

This study was funded by Korea University Ansan Hospital (grant numbers O2310661 and K2409221).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Gayoung Choi and Sungwon Ham contributed equally to the data analysis, experimental design and operation, and drafting, and should be considered co-first authors of this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, Republic of Korea

    Gayoung Choi & Bo-Kyung Je

  2. Healthcare Readiness Institute for Unified Korea, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, Republic of Korea

    Sungwon Ham

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 15355, Republic of Korea

    Minsoo Shin

Authors
  1. Gayoung Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sungwon Ham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo-Kyung Je
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minsoo Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.C. and S.H. designed the study, performed data processing and analysis, conducted statistical analysis, and drafted and revised the manuscript. M.S., G.C., and S.H. collected data. G.C., B.K.J., and S.H. contributed to the literature review and manuscript editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo-Kyung Je.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, G., Ham, S., Je, BK. et al. AI-powered ultrasound radiofrequency analysis for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37862-8

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2025

  • Accepted: 27 January 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37862-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
  • Pediatric obesity
  • Ultrasonography
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing