Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The effects of leg prosthesis stiffness and take-off board stiffness on long jump performance
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 February 2026

The effects of leg prosthesis stiffness and take-off board stiffness on long jump performance

  • Kara R. Ashcraft1 &
  • Alena M. Grabowski1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Run-up velocity and take-off step technique influence long jump performance. We determined run-up velocity and jump distance of two athletes with transtibial amputation (TTA) who used a manufacturer-recommended stiffness running-specific prosthesis (RSP; 39.5 kN/m), and a less (36.0 kN/m) and more stiff RSP (43.9 kN/m) and eight non-amputee athletes who used a regulation run-up surface with a regulation (1630 kN/m), and two compliant (84.0 and 90.0 kN/m) take-off platforms. Athletes with TTA had no significant difference in maximum run-up velocity or jump distance between RSP stiffnesses, but jump distance was positively associated with run-up velocity (p = 0.002). Non-amputee athletes had no significant difference in maximum run-up velocity between take-off platforms but jump distance increased as platform stiffness decreased (p = 6.07 × 10−5) and as maximum run-up velocity increased (p = 0.001). Non-amputee athletes jumped 7% farther when they used the most compliant compared to regulation take-off platform and had the same run up velocity (p = 0.82) but jumped 16% further (p = 0.01) than athletes with TTA using the recommended stiffness RSP despite the RSP storing 45% more elastic energy than the most compliant take-off platform (p = 6.73 × 10−4). These results suggest take-off platform stiffness affects long jump performance in non-amputees.

Data availability

Our data and code can be accessed through the electronic supplementary material 41. LongJumpData.csv is a csv file of the data from the study. LongJump_Stats.rmd and LJgraphing.rmd are RStudio files of the code used for the statistics and to create the figures for the study, respectively. LongJump_Stats.pdf is a PDF version of the code. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24247159.

References

  1. Hay, J. G. The biomechanics of the long jump. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 14, 401–446 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hay, J. G. & Nohara, H. Techniques use by elite long jumpers in preparation for takeoff. J. Biomech. 23(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90014-T (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hay, J. G. Citius, altius, longius (Faster, Higher, Longer): The biomechanics of jumping for distance. J. Biomech. 26, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90076-Q (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seyfarth, A., Friedrichs, A., Wank, V. & Blickhan, R. Dynamics of the long jump. J. Biomech. 32(12), 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00137-2 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagahara, R., Mizutani, M., Matsuo, A., Kanehisa, H. & Fukunaga, T. Association of sprint performance with ground reaction forces during acceleration and maximal speed phases in a single sprint. J. Appl. Biomech. 34(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2016-0356 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. dos Santos Silva, D. et al. Post-activation performance enhancement effect of drop jump on long jump performance during competition. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44075-w (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grabowski, A. M. et al. Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting. Biol. Let. 6(2), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0729 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander, R. M. C. N. Optimum take-off techniques for high and long jumps. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 329(1252), 3–10 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Witters, J., Bohets, W. & Van Coppenolle, H. A model of the elastic take-off energy in the long jump. J. Sports Sci. 10(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419208729949 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Willwacher, S. et al. Elite long jumpers with below the knee prostheses approach the board slower, but take-of more efectively than non-amputee athletes. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16383-5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander, R. M. Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. J. Exp. Biol. 160, 55–69 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferris, D. P., Louie, M. & Farley, C. T. Running in the real world: Adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265(1400), 989–994 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farley, C., Houdijk, H., Strien, C. & Louie, M. Mechanism of leg stiffness adjustment for hopping on surfaces of stiffnesses. J. Appl. Physiol. 85, 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.3.1044 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coward, S. R. L. & Halsey, L. G. Energy expended during horizontal jumping: Investigating the effects of surface compliance. Biol. Open 3(9), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20148672 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Čoh, M., Žvan, M. & Kugovnik, O. Kinematic and biodynamic model of the long jump technique. Kinematics https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71418 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramos, C. D., Ramey, M., Wilcox, R. R. & McNitt-Gray, J. L. Generation of linear impulse during the takeoff of the long jump. J. Appl. Biomech. 35(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2017-0249 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nolan, L. & Lees, A. The influence of lower limb amputation level on the approach in the amputee long jump. J. Sports Sci. 25(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600717931 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nolan, L., Patritti, B. L. & Simpson, K. J. A biomechanical analysis of the long-jump technique of elite female amputee athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 38(10), 1829–1835. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000230211.60957.2e (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. “Össur. Prosthetic Solutions Catalog, https://www.ossur.com/catalogs/prosthetics/ (2016).” 2016.

  20. Beck, O. N., Taboga, P. & Grabowski, A. M. Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. J. Appl. Physiol. 123(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00896.2016 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taboga, P., Drees, E. K., Beck, O. N. & Grabowski, A. M. Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects maximum running velocity in athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56479-8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nolan, L., Patritti, B. L. & Simpson, K. J. Effect of take-off from prosthetic versus intact limb on transtibial amputee long jump technique. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 36(3), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364612448877 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Doyen, É., Szmytka, F. & Semblat, J.-F. A novel characterisation protocol of mechanical interactions between the ground and a tibial prosthesis for long jump. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31981-2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beck, O. N., Taboga, P. & Grabowski, A. M. Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses. PLoS ONE 11(12), e0168298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168298 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander, R. M. Elastic mechanisms in animal movement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts, T. J. & Azizi, E. Flexible mechanisms: The diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. J. Exp. Biol. 214(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.038588 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. McGowan, C. P., Baudinette, R. V., Usherwood, J. R. & Biewener, A. A. The mechanics of jumping versus steady hopping in yellow-footed rock wallabies. J. Exp. Biol. 208(14), 2741–2751. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01702 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nixdorf, E. & Brüggemann, G. P. Scientific Research Project at the Games of the XXIVth Olympiad - Seoul 1988. International Athletic Foundation, 1990.

  29. Kerdok, A. E., Biewener, A. A., McMahon, T. A., Weyand, P. G. & Herr, H. M. Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. J. Appl. Physiol. 92(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2000 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Funken, J. et al. Long jumpers with and without a transtibial amputation have different three-dimensional centre of mass and joint take-off step kinematics. R. Soc. open sci. 6(4), 190107. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190107 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ferris, D. P., Liang, K. & Farley, C. T. Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. J. Biomech. 32(8), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00078-0 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Baroud, N. Energy storage and return in sport surfaces. Sports Eng. 2(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2687.1999.00031.x (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lees, A., Graham-Smith, P. & Fowler, N. A biomechanical analysis of the last stride, touchdown, and takeoff characteristics of the men’s long jump. J. Appl. Biomech. 10(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.10.1.61 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bridgett, L. A. & Linthorne, N. P. Changes in long jump take-off technique with increasingrun-up speed. J. Sports Sci. 24(8), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500298040 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Linthorne, N. P. Biomechanics of the long jump. 2008.

  36. Sado, N., Yoshioka, S. & Fukashiro, S. Pelvic elevation induces vertical kinetic energy without losing horizontal energy during running single-leg jump for distance. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 23(7), 1146–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2070779 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ker, R. F., Bennett, M. B., Bibby, S. R., Kester, R. C. & Alexander, R. M. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325(7000), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/325147a0 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  38. “World Athletics Competition And Technical Rules.” edition 2020.

  39. Willwacher, S., Fischer, K, & Brüggemann, G. P. Surface stiffness affects joint loading in running. 2013.

  40. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ashcraft, K. “Leg Prosthesis Stiffness and Take-off Board Stiffness Affect Long Jump Performance: Statistics, figures, and corresponding data.” figshare, p. 20842 Bytes, 2023. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.24247159.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Angela Montgomery, CPO, for their invaluable assistance throughout our study. We thank the University of Colorado Boulder Track and Field team and Coach Lindsey Malone for donating their valuable practice time to participate in this study. We also thank Össur for donating some of the running-specific prostheses used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Biomechanics Lab, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, 354 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA

    Kara R. Ashcraft & Alena M. Grabowski

  2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Denver, CO, USA

    Alena M. Grabowski

Authors
  1. Kara R. Ashcraft
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alena M. Grabowski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AG contributed to conception and design of the study. KA acquired the data, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, prepared figures, and drafted the manuscript. Both authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kara R. Ashcraft.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashcraft, K.R., Grabowski, A.M. The effects of leg prosthesis stiffness and take-off board stiffness on long jump performance. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38100-x

Download citation

  • Received: 27 June 2025

  • Accepted: 29 January 2026

  • Published: 05 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38100-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Long jump distance
  • Elastic energy storage
  • Transtibial amputation
  • Run-up velocity
  • Long jump take-off step
  • Non-amputee
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing