Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Gene-specific marker and trait-based evaluation of powdery mildew resistance in garden pea (Pisum sativum var Hortense L.)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 February 2026

Gene-specific marker and trait-based evaluation of powdery mildew resistance in garden pea (Pisum sativum var Hortense L.)

  • Nirmal Kumar Hedau1,
  • S. Santhiya  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0003-9358-02691,
  • Krishna Kant Mishra1,
  • Anu Singh1,
  • Anamika Thakur1,
  • Rahul Dev1,
  • Sushil Kumar1 &
  • …
  • Lakshmi Kant1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biotechnology
  • Microbiology
  • Molecular biology
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Powdery mildew (PM), caused by Erysiphe pisi DC ex. Saint-Amans, poses a major constraint in pea cultivation, underscoring the identification of resistant genotypes for effective disease management. The current study employed in-vitro, in-vivo, and molecular screening methods to assess the PM reaction behaviour of 11 pea genotypes aiming to identify reliable resistance source. Field assessments during two crop growth phases were carried out at two locations namely Hawalbagh (Almora) and Mukteshwar (Nainital). Among the genotypes tested VP-2020-101 and VP- 2024-55 were categorised as resistant and showed the lowest disease severity at both locations, with significantly limited Disease Incidence (DI) and Percent Disease Index (PDI). These results were corroborated by detached leaf method assay conducted under polyhouse (spore proof chamber) and incubator conditions, where VP-2020-101 and VP- 2024-55 consistently showed minimal sporulation macroscopically and sparse mycelial development microscopically. Molecular validation with gene-specific SCAR markers revealed the presence of resistance genes viz. er1, er2, and Er3 in VP-2020-101, while VP- 2024-55 carried only er1. Marker ScOPE-161600 relaibly tracked er1, while ScOPX-171400 and ScW4637 confirmed the presence of er2 and Er3, respectively. Integrating phen-c and geno-typic data strongly supports VP-2020-101 as a promising donor genotype for pyramiding powdery mildew resistance in the popular garden pea cultivars/genotypes. These findings demonstrate the importance of integrated disease screening approaches to precisely identify robust sources of durable resistance facilitating their effective deployment in future pea breeding programs.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article.

Abbreviations

PM:

Powdery mildew

QTL:

Quantitative trait loci

PDI:

Percent disease incidence

S:

Susceptible

MS:

Moderately susceptible

MR:

Moderately resistant

R:

Resistant

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

ICAR-VPKAS:

ICAR-Vivekananda parvatiya krishi anusandhan sansthan

HATs:

High-Altitude testing site

SCAR:

Sequence characterized amplified region

SSR:

Simple sequence repeats

Reference

  1. Azmat, M. A. et al. Single recessive gene controls powdery mildew resistance in pea. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 278–286 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, A. et al. Identification of SSR markers linked to powdery mildew resistance in table pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.). Legume Res. 47(1032), 1038 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devi, M., Bilashini, M., Devi, M. T., Jha, A. K., Yumnam, A., Balusamy, A., Verma, V. K., Talang, H. D., Deshmukh, N. A., Rymbai, H. & Assumi, S. R. Yield and yield attributes of garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.) as influenced by nutrient management practices under agroclimatic conditions of Meghalaya. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7, 3447–3454 (2018).

  4. Villalobos Solis, M. I. et al. Fatty acid profiling of the seed oils of some varieties of field peas (Pisum sativum) by RP LC/ESI MS/MS: towards the development of an oilseed pea. Food Chem. 139, 986–993 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cousin, R. Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Res. 53, 111–130 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janani, R. et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of garden pea genotypes under reproductive stage heat stress. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 71, 1177–1200 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warkentin, T. D., Rashid, K. Y. & Xue, A. G. Fungicidal control of powdery mildew in field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76, 933–935 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katoch, V. et al. Molecular mapping of pea powdery mildew resistance gene er2 to pea linkage group III. Mol. Breed. 25, 229–237 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carver, T. L. W. & Jones, S. W. Colony development by Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei on isolated epidermis of barley coleoptile incubated under continuous light or short day conditions. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 90, 114–116 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pheirim, R., Konjengbam, N. S. & Mahanta, M. Molecular markers for powdery mildew in pea (Pisum sativum L.): a review. Legume Res. 45, 399–409 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, C. G. Production of powdery mildew cleistocarp in a controlled environment. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 355–365 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sillero, J. C. et al. Screening techniques and sources of resistance to rusts and mildews in grain legumes. Euphytica 147, 255–272 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, U. P., Prithviraj, B., Wagner, K. G. & Schumacher, K. G. Effect of ajoene, a constituent of garlic (Allium sativum), on powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) of pea (Pisum sativum). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 102, 399–406 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harland, S. C. Inheritance of immunity to mildew in Peruvian forms of Pisum sativum. Heredity 2, 263–269 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heringa, K. J., Vannorel, A. & Tazelaar, M. F. Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni D.C.) in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 18, 163–169 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fondevilla, S., Carver, T. L. W., Moreno, M. T. & Rubiales, D. Identification and characterization of sources of resistance to Erysiphe pisi Syd. Pisum spp. Plant Breed. 126, 113–119 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fondevilla, S., Torres, A. M., Moreno, M. T. & Rubiales, D. Identification of a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew in Pisum fulvum, a wild relative of pea. Breed. Sci. 57, 181–184 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gawande, V. L. & Patil, J. V. Genetics of powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni DC) resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Crop Prot. 22, 567–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00202-8 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pandey, K. K., Pandey, P. K., Kalloo, G. & Banerjee, M. K. Resistance to early blight of tomato with respect to various parameters of disease epidemics. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 69, 364–371 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rasool, M., Akhter, A., Soja, G. & Haider, M. S. Role of biochar, compost and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the management of tomato early blight disease. Sci. Rep. 11, 6092 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Awan, Z. A., Shoaib, A. & Khan, K. A. Variations in total phenolics and antioxidant enzymes cause phenotypic variability and differential resistant response in tomato genotypes against early blight disease. Sci. Hortic. 239, 216–223 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sharada, P. & Makandar, R. Assessing garden pea germplasm for powdery mildew resistance through disease phenotyping and genotyping using molecular markers. Plant Gene 35, 100425 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Banyal, D. K. Studies on powdery mildew of pea caused by Erysiphe pisi DC. Ph.D. Thesis Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India. 80 (1994).

  24. Vaid, A. & Tyagi, P. D. Genetics of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Euphytica 96, 203–206 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murray, M. G. & Thompson, W. F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4321–4326 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ausubel, F. M. et al. Short protocols in molecular biology (Wiley, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Srivastava, R., Mishra, S., Singh, A. & Mohapatra, T. Development of a coupling phase SCAR marker linked to the powdery mildew resistance gene er1 in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 186, 855–866 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tiwari, K. R. & Penner, G. A. Identification of coupling and repulsion phase RAPD markers for powdery mildew resistance gene er1 in pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78, 361–367 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fondevilla, S., Rubiales, D., Moreno, M. T. & Torres, A. M. Identification and validation of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to the gene Er3 conferring resistance to Erysiphe pisi DC in pea. Mol. Breed. 22, 193–200 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fondevilla, S. & Rubiales, D. Powdery mildew control in pea: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 401–409 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rana, C. et al. In vivo and in vitro validation of powdery mildew resistance in garden pea genotypes. Sci. Rep. 13, 2243 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Raj, P. et al. Evaluation of powdery mildew resistant pyramid vegetable pea genotypes introgressed with er1 and er2 genes for yield and related traits in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. Veg. Sci. 51, 335–341 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Banyal, D. K. & Chand, J. C. Evaluation of pea genotypes for resistance against powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe pisi. Indian Phytopathol. 70, 69–74 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Özer, N., Kün, A. & İlbi, H. Detached leaf test for evaluation of resistance to powdery mildew in pepper. Agric Res. Technol. Open Access J. 14, 555923 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Miller Butler, M. A., Smith, B. J. & Babiker, E. M. Comparison of whole plant and detached leaf screening techniques for identifying anthracnose resistance in strawberry plants. Plant Dis. 102, 2112–2119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sharma, N. Evaluation of varietal susceptibility in pea to Erysiphe polygoni. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120, 110–111 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thakur, B. R., Kapoor, A. S. & Jamwal, R. S. Varietal resistance of pea to powdery mildew in dry temperature zone of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Phytopathol. 49, 92–93 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Javid, M. et al. Validation of molecular markers associated with boron tolerance, powdery mildew resistance, and salinity tolerance in field peas. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 917 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma, A. et al. Development of new powdery mildew resistant lines in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) using induced mutagenesis and validation of resistance for the er1 and er2 gene through molecular markers. Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1501661 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Devi, J. et al. Gene based resistance to Erysiphe species causing powdery mildew disease in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Genes 13, 316 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tiwari, K. R., Penner, G. A. & Warkentin, T. D. Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77, 307–310 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors are highly thankful to the Director, ICAR- VPKAS, Almora, Uttarakhand and Indian Council of Agriculture (ICAR) for consortium research project (CRP) on molecular breeding (Garden peas)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, Uttarakhand, 263601, India

    Nirmal Kumar Hedau, S. Santhiya, Krishna Kant Mishra, Anu Singh, Anamika Thakur, Rahul Dev, Sushil Kumar & Lakshmi Kant

Authors
  1. Nirmal Kumar Hedau
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Santhiya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Krishna Kant Mishra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anu Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anamika Thakur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rahul Dev
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sushil Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lakshmi Kant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NKH: Conceptualization, reviewing and editing, SS: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft; KKM: Pathological investigation AS: Investigation and data curation, writing original draft, AT: Data curation and writing review, RD: reviewing and editing, SK: Supervised molecular work, reviewing and editing LK: Resources, Supervision and reviewing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Santhiya.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethics

This study does not involve any human or animal participation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hedau, N.K., Santhiya, S., Mishra, K.K. et al. Gene-specific marker and trait-based evaluation of powdery mildew resistance in garden pea (Pisum sativum var Hortense L.). Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38836-6

Download citation

  • Received: 07 October 2025

  • Accepted: 31 January 2026

  • Published: 13 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38836-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Disease screening
  • Garden pea
  • Powdery mildew
  • Gene specific markers
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Horticultural crop improvement

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research