Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a clinical marker used to assess autonomic function, and the application of filtering algorithms may significantly influence data quantification and interpretation. Although HRV has been extensively studied in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the impact of artefact correction methods remains underexplored. To evaluate the effects of different artefact correction filters in Kubios software on short-term HRV parameters in individuals with T2DM. This cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational study included adults (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with T2DM. Anthropometric and metabolic data were collected, including fasting blood samples for glucose, insulin, and lipid profiles. HRV indices were analyzed across time-domain, frequency-domain, nonlinear, and global metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA or Friedman tests according to data distribution, with significance set at p < 0.05. The sample consisted of 52 individuals (67% male, mean age 52 ± 8 years, mean BMI 29.65 ± 5.50 kg/m²). The median duration of T2DM was 3 years (IQR 1.5–10). Median metabolic parameters were insulin 12.50 µU/mL, triglycerides 141.50 mg/dL, fasting glucose 149.50 mg/dL, and HbA1c 8.65% (IQR 7.20–10.00). Application of the most restrictive artefact correction setting (“very strong”) in Kubios significantly modified overall HRV as well as time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear parameters (p < 0.05), highlighting its influence on HRV quantification. This study demonstrates that artefact correction filters, particularly the “very strong” setting, substantially affect HRV analysis in individuals with T2DM. Excessively restrictive filtering may distort autonomic metrics and potentially bias interpretation. Standardization of artefact correction methods is essential to ensure accurate and reproducible HRV assessment in clinical and research settings.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Guariguata, L. et al. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 103, 137–149 (2014).
Galicia-Garcia, U. et al. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–34 (2020).
De Rosa, S. et al. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease: Genetic and Epigenetic Links. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 9, 1 (2018).
Balcıoğlu, A. S. & Müderrisoğlu, H. Diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy: Clinical manifestations, cardiovascular consequences, diagnosis and treatment. World J. Diabetes. 6, 80 (2015).
Ewing, D. J., Martyn, C. N., Young, R. J. & Clarke, B. F. The Value of Cardiovascular Autonomic Function Tests: 10 Years Experience in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 8, 491–498 (1985).
Benichou, T. et al. Heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta–analysis. PLoS One. 13, e0195166 (2018).
Wheeler, T. & Watkins, P. J. Cardiac Denervation in Diabetes. Br. Med. J. 4, 584 (1973).
Sassi, R. et al. Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace 17, 1341–1353 (2015).
Vanderlei, L. C. M., Pastre, C. M., Hoshi, R. A., de Carvalho, T. D. & de Godoy M. F. Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardiovasc. 24, 205–217 (2009).
Catai, A. M. et al. Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Brazilian J. Phys. Ther. 24, 91–102 (2020).
Bassi, D. et al. Inter and intra-rater reliability of short-term measurement of heart rate variability on rest in diabetic type 2 patients. J Med. Syst 42 (12):236 (2018).
Alcantara, J. M. A. et al. Impact of using different levels of threshold-based artefact correction on the quantification of heart rate variability in three independent human cohorts. J Clin. Med 9 (2):325 (2020).
Santos-de-Araújo, A. D. et al. Impact of different corrective filters on heart rate variability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: conclusions and recommendations for future research. Res. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42600-024-00368-1/FIGURES/3 (2024).
Aranda, C., de la Cruz, B. & Naranjo, J. Effects of different automatic filters on the analysis of heart rate variability with Kubios HRV software. Arch. Med. Deport. 34, 196–200 (2017).
Cutrim, R. C. et al. Impact of applying different levels of threshold-based artifact correction on the processing of heart rate variability data in individuals with temporomandibular disorder. Sci. Rep. 2024. 141 (14), 1–9 (2024).
Ribeiro, G. et al. Can RR intervals editing and selection techniques interfere with the analysis of heart rate variability? Brazilian J. Phys. Ther. 22, 383–390 (2018).
Benichou, T. et al. Heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta–analysis. PLoS One 13 (4):e0195166 (2018).
Li, A. Q. & Zhang, F. Blood glucose variability impacts heart rate dynamics in older type 2 diabetic and coronary heart disease patients. World J. Diabetes. 16, 110722 (2025).
Alcantara, J. M. A. et al. Impact of using different levels of threshold-based artefact correction on the quantification of heart rate variability in three independent human cohorts. J Clin. Med 9 (2):325 (2020).
Sucharita, S., Bantwal, G., Idiculla, J., Ayyar, V. & Vaz, M. Autonomic nervous system function in type 2 diabetes using conventional clinical autonomic tests, heart rate and blood pressure variability measures. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 15, 198 (2011).
Da Silva, A. K. F., De Rezende Barbosa, D. C., Vanderlei, M. P., Christofaro, F. M., Vanderlei, L. & D. G. D. & C. M. Application of Heart Rate Variability in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 21, 223–235 (2016).
Silva, A. K. F., da, Christofaro, D. G. D., Bernardo, A. F. B., Vanderlei, F. M. & Vanderlei, L. C. M. Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Value of Heart RateVariability Indices in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 108, 255 (2017).
Moraes, D. N. et al. Prognostic Value of Resting Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in the 12-lead Electrocardiogram: Mortality Data from the CODE Database. Am. J. Cardiol. 248, 23–31 (2025).
Han, Z. et al. Prognostic value of admission heart rate in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Role of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 12, 104 (2012).
Lai, Y. R. et al. Feasibility of combining heart rate variability and electrochemical skin conductance as screening and severity evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Investig. 12, 1671 (2021).
Monzer, N. et al. The cardiac autonomic response to acute psychological stress in type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 17 (3):e0265234 (2022).
Silva, A. K. F., da, Christofaro, D. G. D., Bernardo, A. F. B., Vanderlei, F. M. & Vanderlei, L. C. M. Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Value of Heart Rate Variability Indices in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 108, 255–262 (2017).
Da Silva, A. K. F., De Rezende Barbosa, D. C., Vanderlei, M. P., Christofaro, F. M., Vanderlei, L. & D. G. D. & C. M. Application of Heart Rate Variability in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 21, 223 (2016).
Silva-E-Oliveira, J., Amélio, P. M., Abranches, I. L. L., Damasceno, D. D. & Furtado, F. Heart rate variability based on risk stratification for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Einstein (São Paulo) 15, 141–147 (2017).
Tuttolomondo, A. et al. Assessment of heart rate variability (HRV) in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic foot: correlations with endothelial dysfunction indices and markers of adipo-inflammatory dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 20, 1–12 (2021).
Wang, K. et al. Heart Rate Variability and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in General Population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 108, 2510 (2023).
Veiga, T. P. et al. Braden scale has low reliability in different patients under care in intensive care unit. Rev Assoc. Med. Bras 68 (9):1221-1227 (2022).
Stapelberg, N. J. C., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K. & McConnell, H. Hamilton-Craig, I. The sensitivity of 38 heart rate variability measures to the addition of artifact in human and artificial 24-hr cardiac recordings. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 23, e12483 (2017).
Bourdillon, N., Yazdani, S., Vesin, J. M., Schmitt, L. & Millet, G. P. RMSSD Is More Sensitive to Artifacts Than Frequency-Domain Parameters: Implication in Athletes’ Monitoring. J. Sports Sci. Med. 21, 260 (2022).
Task Force of the European. Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 93, 1043–1065 (1996).
Tarvainen, M. P., Niskanen, J. P., Lipponen, J. A., Ranta-aho, P. O. & Karjalainen, P. A. Kubios HRV - Heart rate variability analysis software. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 113, 210–220 (2014).
Shaffer, F. & Ginsberg, J. P. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public. Heal. 5, 258 (2017).
D’Ippolito, I., Carlucci, M. A., D’Amato, C., Lauro, D. & Spallone, V. Determinants of Orthostatic Hypotension in Type 2 Diabetes: Is Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy the Main Factor? Endocr. Pract. 30, 802–809 (2024).
Vinik, A. I., Erbas, T. & Casellini, C. M. Diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J. Diabetes Investig. 4, 4 (2013).
Ewing, D. J., Campbell, I. W. & Clarke, B. F. Assessment of cardiovascular effects in diabetic autonomic neuropathy and prognostic implications. Ann. Intern. Med. 92, 308–311 (1980).
Grisanti, L. A. Diabetes and Arrhythmias: Pathophysiology, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Outcomes. Front. Physiol. 9, 1669 (2018).
Kaze, A. D., Fonarow, G. C. & Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B. Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Risk of Silent Myocardial Infarction Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. Cardiovasc. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 12, e029814 (2023).
Wang, K. et al. Heart Rate Variability and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in General Population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 108, 2510 (2023).
Wedzicha, J. A. & Seemungal, T. A. COPD exacerbations: defining their cause and prevention. Lancet (London England). 370, 786 (2007).
Rusinowicz, T., Zielonka, T. M. & Zycinska, K. Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with Exacerbation of COPD. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1022, 53–62 (2017).
Acknowledgements
To the Foundation to Support Research and Scientific Development and Maranhão Technology (FAPEMA), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for their support and commitment to maintaining postgraduate programs in Brazil. Professor Ph.D. Audrey Borghi-Silva is CNPq Research Productivity Scholarship - Level 1B. Professor Ph.D. Daniela Bassi-Dibai is FAPEMA Research Productivity Scholarship.
Funding
This study was funded by a research productivity grant granted by the Foundation to Support Research and Scientific Development and Maranhão Technology (FAPEMA) (process number BEPP-02544/23), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (process number: 402329/2023-6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: DB, ADS, AB; Data curation: ADS, DB, AB; Formal Analysis: ADS, DB, DSR, LVA, JKF, LARG, MRFD, VPF, MCM, PMS, AB; Validation: ADS, DB, AB; Visualization: ADS, DB, DSR, LVA, JKF, LARG, MRFD, VPF, MCM, PMS, AB; Writing – original draft: ADS, DB; Writing – review & editing: ADS, DB, DSR, LVA, JKF, LARG, MRFD, VPF, MCM, PMS, AB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Ceuma University (protocol number 4.179.747), and conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki. All participants who voluntarily agreed to participate signed a consent form.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bassi-Dibai, D., Santos-de-Araújo, A.D., Rocha, D.S. et al. Threshold-based artefact correction methods influence heart rate variability measurements in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42255-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42255-y