Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 March 2026

A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease

  • Xidong He1 na1,
  • Xiyu Sun2 na1,
  • Guannan Zhang2 na1,
  • Wenbo Li3,
  • Xiaoyin Bai1,
  • Gechong Ruan1,
  • Yinghao Sun1,
  • Hui Xu1,
  • Hong Lv1,
  • Huijun Shu1,
  • Yue Li1,
  • Bei Tan1,
  • Ji Li1,
  • Jing Qin3,
  • Li Wang4,
  • Qingli Zhu3,
  • Lin Cong2,
  • Hong Yang1 &
  • …
  • Jiaming Qian1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 850 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Gastroenterology
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) is frequently complicated by intestinal strictures, which substantially affect patients quality of life and long-term outcomes. Accurate classification of strictures—as inflammatory, fibrotic, or mixed—is critical for selecting optimal therapeutic strategies. In clinical practice, multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation is often employed to assess stricture characteristics. However, the accuracy and inter-specialty consistency of stricture evaluation within MDTs remain inadequately characterized. This study aimed to assess the intra-disciplinary consistency and accuracy of decision-making for CD-related strictures, evaluate the accuracy of post MDT decisions, and propose recommendations for stricture nature assessment and MDT workflow optimization. A mixed-methods study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital involving 42 patients with CD and intestinal strictures. MDT participants—including specialists from gastroenterology, surgery, ultrasound, and MDT meeting chairs—were involved in evaluating intra-disciplinary decision consistency and accuracy. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were also conducted to explore factors influencing clinical decision-making. Gastroenterologists demonstrated the highest intra-team consistency (PABAK = 0.75) and diagnostic accuracy (89.3%). Ultrasound specialists showed improved consistency following targeted training (from 0.46 to 0.93). The overall accuracy of historical MDT decisions was 92.9%. Key factors influencing stricture nature judgment included clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging features, and endoscopic evaluation. Seven core components were identified to improve MDT workflow: expert selection, team building, training, pre-meeting preparation, in-meeting procedures, post-meeting actions, and continuous quality improvement. This study reveals variability in decision-making for CD-related strictures across different specialties. To improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, we propose clear stricture classification criteria and a structured MDT workflow to standardize and enhance multidisciplinary management of CD.

Similar content being viewed by others

The effect of fecal bile acids on the incidence and risk-stratification of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Open access 04 January 2025

A temporal classifier predicts histopathology state and parses acute-chronic phasing in inflammatory bowel disease patients

Article Open access 24 January 2023

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics of stricturing Crohn’s disease highlights a fibrosis-associated network

Article 25 June 2025

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

References

  1. Dolinger, M., Torres, J. & Vermeire, S. Crohn’s disease. Lancet Lond. Engl. 403 (10432), 117791 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, H. et al. Trend and geographic variation in incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in regions across China: A nationwide employee study between 2013 and 2016. Front Med 9, 900251 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Louis, E. et al. Behaviour of Crohn’s disease according to the Vienna classification: Changing pattern over the course of the disease. Gut 49(6), 777–82 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai, X. et al. Long-term Disease Behavior and Surgical Intervention Analysis in Hospitalized Patients With Crohn’s Disease in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 28 (Suppl 2), S35–41 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, C. et al. Systematic review: Medical therapy for fibrostenosing Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 51(12), 1233–46 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cosnes, J., Gower-Rousseau, C., Seksik, P. & Cortot, A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140 (6), 1785–1794 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coelho, R., Ribeiro, H. & Maconi, G. Bowel thickening in Crohn’s disease: Fibrosis or inflammation? Diagnostic ultrasound imaging tools. Inflamm Bowel Dis 23(1), 23–34 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, X. et al. Effectiveness comparison between ustekinumab and infliximab for Crohn’s disease complicated with intestinal stenosis: A multicenter real-world study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 17, 17562848241290663 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quaia, E., Sozzi, M., Angileri, R., Gennari, A. G. & Cova, M. A. Time-intensity curves obtained after microbubble injection can be used to differentiate responders from nonresponders among patients with clinically active Crohn disease after 6 weeks of pharmacologic treatment. Radiology 281(2), 606–616 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ripollés, T. et al. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease: A comparison with surgical histopathology analysis. J. Crohns Colitis 7(2), 120–8 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chiorean, M. V. et al. Correlation of CT enteroclysis with surgical pathology in Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102(11), 2541–50 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kobeissy, A. et al. Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing strictures in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 38(1), 258 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rieder, F. et al. Reliability of CT enterography for describing fibrostenosing Crohn disease. Radiology 312(2), e233038 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Kock, I. et al. MRI texture analysis of T2-weighted images is preferred over magnetization transfer imaging for readily longitudinal quantification of gut fibrosis. Eur. Radiol. 33(9), 5943–52 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bettenworth, D. et al. Assessment of Crohn’s disease-associated small bowel strictures and fibrosis on cross-sectional imaging: A systematic review. Gut 68(6), 1115–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Y.-J. et al. Real-time shear wave ultrasound elastography differentiates fibrotic from inflammatory strictures in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 24(10), 2183–90 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlidis, A. N. et al. Implementation and consistency of Heart Team decision-making in complex coronary revascularisation. Int. J. Cardiol. 206, 37–41 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long, J., Luckraz, H., Thekkudan, J., Maher, A. & Norell, M. Heart Team discussion in managing patients with coronary artery disease: Outcome and reproducibility. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 14(5), 594–598 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scott, R., Hawarden, A., Russell, B. & Edmondson, R. J. Decision-making in Gynaecological Oncology Multidisciplinary Team meetings: A cross-sectional, observational study of ovarian cancer cases. Oncol. Res. Treat. 43(3), 70–77 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ichikawa, M. et al. Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: An observational study at a single Japanese institution. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22(1), 111 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton, D. W., Heaven, B., Thomson, R. G., Wilson, J. A. & Exley, C. Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 6(7), e012559 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, Q. et al. Role of a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease: A single Chinese center’s experience. Biosci. Trends 15(3), 171–9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Chinese Medical Association, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality Control Center of China. 2023 Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and management of Crohn’s Disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 137(14), 1647–50 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gomollón, F. et al. 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management. J. Crohns Colitis. 11 (1), 3–25 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rieder, F. et al. An expert consensus to standardise definitions, diagnosis and treatment targets for anti-fibrotic stricture therapies in Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 48, 347–57 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J. & Swann, W. B. Jr. A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37(6), 504–528 (2003).

  27. Ma, H. et al. Optimal Heart Team Protocol to Improve Revascularization Decisions in Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease: A Sequential Mixed Method Study. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes. 8 (7), 739–749 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Byrt, T., Bishop, J. & Carlin, J. B. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46(5), 423–429 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, R. et al. Comparison of Radiomics and Deep Learning Using Intestinal Ultrasound Images for Differentiating Inflammatory and Fibrotic Intestinal Strictures in Crohn’s Disease. J. Inflamm. Res. 18, 16399–16410 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tie, C., Birks, Y. & Francis, M. 30 K. Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Med ;7:2050312118822927. (2019).

  31. Li, X. X. et al. Diarrhea, large retroperitoneal mass, and chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Xiehe Med. J. 9 (2), 183–189 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liang, Y. et al. Analysis of factors influencing chemotherapy decision changes for early-stage breast cancer under a multidisciplinary model. Chin. J. Cancer Prev. Treat. 22 (22), 1769–1773 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lamb, B. W. et al. Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: An investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 18(13), 3535–43. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Russell, L. et al. How experienced ICU specialists make decisions on prophylactic platelet transfusions—A qualitative study. Transfusion 65 (7), 1231–1241 (2025).

  35. Nguyen, Q. T. et al. Aspirations to study medicine, perceptions of a good doctor, and their influence on specialty choice among medical students. PLoS One. 20 (6), e0326266 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Morse, J. M. et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XXIII: qualitative research in health care. Are results study valid? JAMA. 284 (3), 357–362 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mays, N. & Pope, C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320(7226), 50–52 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Professor Zhe Zheng and Dr. Shen Lin’s team from Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, for their valuable guidance and insightful suggestions on the study design and methodological developmen.

Funding

This work was supported by The National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-C-018), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (82570621), and National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding – Achievement Transformation ‘Qihang Fund’ (2025-PUMCH-H-002).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Xidong He, Xiyu Sun and Guannan Zhang contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Beijing, 100730, China

    Xidong He, Xiaoyin Bai,  Gechong Ruan, Yinghao Sun, Hui Xu, Hong Lv, Huijun Shu, Yue Li, Bei Tan, Ji Li, Hong Yang & Jiaming Qian

  2. Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Xiyu Sun, Guannan Zhang & Lin Cong

  3. Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Wenbo Li, Jing Qin & Qingli Zhu

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

    Li Wang

Authors
  1. Xidong He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiyu Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guannan Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenbo Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoyin Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gechong Ruan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yinghao Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hui Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hong Lv
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Huijun Shu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yue Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Bei Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ji Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jing Qin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Li Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Qingli Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Lin Cong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hong Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Jiaming Qian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xidong He designed the study, acquired/analyzed data, developed software, and drafted the manuscript; Xiyu Sun and Guannan Zhang acquired/analyzed data and revised the manuscript; Wenbo Li, Xiaoyin Bai and Gechong Ruan acquired/analyzed data; Yinghao Sun, Hui Xu, Hong Lv, Huijun Shu, Yue Li, and Bei Tan contributed to data acquisition and analysis; Ji Li, Jing Qin, and Li Wang revised the manuscript; Qingli Zhu, Lin Cong, Hong Yang, and Jiaming Qian supervised the study and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingli Zhu, Lin Cong or Hong Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics and consent to participate declarations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (1-24PJ0075). The requirement for patient informed consent was waived by the same Ethics Committee due to the retrospective use of anonymized data (1-24PJ0075). Physician informed consent was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

†Xidong He, Xiyu Sun and Guannan Zhang contributed equally to this study.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Sun, X., Zhang, G. et al. A mixed methods study of multidisciplinary team assessment and therapeutic decision making for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42386-2

Download citation

  • Received: 04 December 2025

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 04 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42386-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Crohn’s disease
  • Intestinal stricture
  • Multidisciplinary team (MDT)
  • Decision making
  • Qualitative analysis
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing