Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 March 2026

Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics

  • Mengsi Hu1,2 na1,
  • Xia Li3 na1,
  • Huihui Wang3,
  • Yuezhong Zhang3,
  • Ximing Wang4,
  • Jikai Liu5,
  • Zhenxia Mu4,
  • Peixian Gao6 &
  • …
  • Xiufeng Song7 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 731 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Engineering
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

The gold standard assessment of coarctation of aorta (CoA) was achieved invasively by cardiac catheterization, which is associated with several risks including radiation exposure. The present study aimed to validate a multimodal imaging-based non-invasive computational framework for assessment of trans-coarctation pressure gradients (PG) in patients with severe coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Here we developed a non-invasive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling framework based on multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and ultrasound-derived input parameters, which incorporated into a lumped parameter model (LPM) and validated the results against measurements obtained via cardiac catheterization, both preoperatively and postoperatively. We used conventional Doppler estimates to make these correlations and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical PG. The results indicated that for 18 patients with severe CoA the CFD simulation exhibited better concordance and correlation with catheter measurements compared to Doppler gradients (pre-intervention: 58.44 ± 17.77 vs. 55.72 ± 19.71 vs.57.78 ± 18.02 mmHg; post-intervention: 17.94 ± 10.54 vs. 15.65 ± 5.15 vs.20.61 ± 7.43 mmHg). Specifically, the CFD-derived PG showed a stronger correlation with catheter measurements (pre-intervention r = 0.89, post-intervention r = 0.90) than did Doppler-derived PG (pre-intervention r = 0.71, post-intervention r = 0.30). This CFD framework facilitated reliable quantification of PG and visualization of hemodynamic forces in patient-specific geometric models, and suggesting its potential as a non-invasive and effective approach for the assessment of CoA.

Data availability

Data available within the article or its supplementary materials.

References

  1. Shih, M. C. et al. Surgical and endovascular repair of aortic coarctation: Normal findings and appearance of complications on CT angiography and MR angiography. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 187(3), W302-12 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salciccioli, K. B. & Zachariah, J. P. Coarctation of the aorta: Modern paradigms across the lifespan. Hypertension 80(10), 1970–1979 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chetan, D. & Mertens, L. L. Challenges in diagnosis and management of coarctation of the aorta. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 37(1), 115–122 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keshavarz-Motamed, Z. et al. Elimination of transcoarctation pressure gradients has no impact on left ventricular function or aortic shear stress after intervention in patients with mild coarctation. JACC. Cardiovasc. Interv. 9(18), 1953–65 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, L. & Cook, S. C. Coarctation of the aorta: Strategies for improving outcomes. Cardiol. Clin. 33(4), 521–30 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatt, A. B. & Defaria Yeh, D. Long-term outcomes in coarctation of the aorta: An evolving story of success and new challenges. Heart 101(15), 1173–5 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aslan, S. et al. Non-invasive Prediction of Peak Systolic Pressure Drop across Coarctation of Aorta using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2020, 2295–2298 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dijkema, E. J., Leiner, T. & Grotenhuis, H. B. Diagnosis, imaging and clinical management of aortic coarctation. Heart 103 (15), 1148–1155 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins, N. P. & Ward, C. Coarctation of the aorta: Natural history and outcome after surgical treatment. QJM 92(7), 365–71 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brickner, M. E., Hillis, L. D. & Lange, R. A. Congenital heart disease in adults. First of two parts. N. Engl. J. Med. 342(4), 256–63 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uematsu, M. et al. Direct angioscopic and serial computed tomographic observations of the progression of atypical aortic coarctation leading to heart failure. Can. J. Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.05.011 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, Y. et al. Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cardiol. 73(6), 544–552 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karaosmanoglu, A. D. et al. CT and MRI of aortic coarctation: Pre- and postsurgical findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 204(3), W224-33 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leo, I. et al. Non-invasive imaging assessment in patients with aortic coarctation: A contemporary review. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010028 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nair, P. J. et al. Non-invasive estimation of pressure drop across aortic coarctations: validation of 0D and 3D computational models with in vivo measurements.. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 52(5), 1335–1346 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brüning, J. et al. Uncertainty quantification for non-invasive assessment of pressure drop across a coarctation of the aorta using CFD. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 9(4), 582–596 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seifert, B. L. et al. Accuracy of Doppler methods for estimating peak-to-peak and peak instantaneous gradients across coarctation of the aorta: An In vitro study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 12 (9), 744–753 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nair, P. J. et al. Non-invasive estimation of pressure drop across aortic coarctations: Validation of 0D and 3D computational models with in vivo measurements. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 52(5), 1335–1346 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. LaDisa, J. F. Jr. et al. Computational simulations for aortic coarctation: Representative results from a sampling of patients. J. Biomech. Eng. 133(9), 091008. (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arzani, A. et al. In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(4), 860–70 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bonfanti, M. et al. Patient-specific haemodynamic simulations of complex aortic dissections informed by commonly available clinical datasets. Med. Eng. Phys. 71, 45–55 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stout, K. K. et al. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 139 (14), e698–e800 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goubergrits, L. et al. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: Clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 41(4), 909–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mirzaee, H. et al. MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 45 (1), 139–146 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goubergrits, L. et al. Patient-specific requirements and clinical validation of MRI-based pressure mapping: A two-center study in patients with aortic coarctation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 49(1), 81–89 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ladisa, J. F. Jr., Taylor, C. A. & Feinstein, J. A. Aortic coarctation: Recent developments in experimental and computational methods to assess treatments for this simple condition. Prog. Pediatr. Cardiol. 30(1), 45–49 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Midulla, M. et al. Haemodynamic imaging of thoracic stent-grafts by computational fluid dynamics (CFD): Presentation of a patient-specific method combining magnetic resonance imaging and numerical simulations. Eur. Radiol. 22(10), 2094–102 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vergara, C. et al. Influence of bicuspid valve geometry on ascending aortic fluid dynamics: A parametric study. Artif. Organs 36(4), 368–78 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gallo, D. et al. On the use of in vivo measured flow rates as boundary conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the human aorta: Implications for indicators of abnormal flow. Ann Biomed Eng 40(3), 729–41 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jin, S., Oshinski, J. & Giddens, D. P. Effects of wall motion and compliance on flow patterns in the ascending aorta. J Biomech Eng 125(3), 347–54 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kousera, C. A. et al. A numerical study of aortic flow stability and comparison with in vivo flow measurements. J Biomech Eng 135(1), 011003 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morbiducci, U. et al. Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: Impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta. J Biomech 46(1), 102–9 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Armour, C. H. et al. The influence of inlet velocity profile on predicted flow in type B aortic dissection. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 20 (2), 481–490 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lin, S. et al. Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 7023078 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pirola, S. et al. Computational study of aortic hemodynamics for patients with an abnormal aortic valve: The importance of secondary flow at the ascending aorta inlet. APL Bioengineering 2(2), 026101 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Youssefi, P. et al. Impact of patient-specific inflow velocity profile on hemodynamics of the thoracic aorta. J. Biomech. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037857 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rafiei, D. et al. The effect of coarctation degrees on wall shear stress indices. Sci Rep 11(1), 12757 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Desai, L. et al. Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of pediatric coarctation of the aorta. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 55(1), 200–208 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fathi, M. F. et al. Super-resolution and denoising of 4D-Flow MRI using physics-informed deep neural nets. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 197, 105729 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mercuri, M. et al. Subject-specific simulation for non-invasive assessment of aortic coarctation: Towards a translational approach. Med. Eng. Phys. 77, 69–79 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Swanson, L. et al. A patient-specific CFD pipeline using Doppler echocardiography for application in coarctation of the aorta in a limited resource clinical context. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 409 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, M. et al. CTA-based non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients across a CoA: A validation against cardiac catheterisation. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 14(5), 873–882 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Donati, F. et al. Beyond Bernoulli: Improving the accuracy and precision of noninvasive estimation of peak pressure drops. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 10(1), e005207 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ververs, F. A. et al. Preclinical Aortic Atherosclerosis in Adolescents With Chronic Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 11 (14), e024675 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Krishnamurthy, Y. et al. Subclinical burden of coronary artery calcium in patients with coarctation of the aorta. Am. J. Cardiol. 123(2), 323–328 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kartal Öztürk, G. et al. Evaluation of increased arterial stiffness in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis by augmentation index and pulse wave velocity analysis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 55(5), 1147–1153 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Coogan, J. S. et al. Computational fluid dynamic simulations for determination of ventricular workload in aortic arch obstructions. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 145(2), 489-495.e1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Timmins, L. H. et al. Focal association between wall shear stress and clinical coronary artery disease progression. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43(1), 94–106 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Andersson, M., Ebbers, T. & Karlsson, M. Characterization and estimation of turbulence-related wall shear stress in patient-specific pulsatile blood flow. J. Biomech. 85, 108–117 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.W. and Y.Z. conceptualized the manuscript. M.H., X.L. and H.W. participated in data collection. M.H., X.L., H.W. and Y.Z. conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. X.W., J.L., Z.M., P.G. and X.S. contributed to revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2022MH227) and Key R&D Program (Soft Science Project) of Shandong Province, China (Grant No. 2022CXGC010504).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Mengsi Hu and Xia Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China

    Mengsi Hu

  2. Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Mengsi Hu

  3. Department of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China

    Xia Li, Huihui Wang & Yuezhong Zhang

  4. Department of Imaging, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Ximing Wang & Zhenxia Mu

  5. Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture (Ministry of Education), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Jikai Liu

  6. Department of Vascular Surgery, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Peixian Gao

  7. Department of Dermatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong, First Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China

    Xiufeng Song

Authors
  1. Mengsi Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xia Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huihui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuezhong Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ximing Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jikai Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhenxia Mu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Peixian Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiufeng Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.W. and Y.Z. conceptualized the manuscript. M.H., X.L. and H.W. participated in data collection. M.H., X.L., H.W. and Y.Z. conducted the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. X.W., J.L., Z.M., P.G. and X.S. contributed to revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huihui Wang or Yuezhong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, M., Li, X., Wang, H. et al. Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42761-z

Download citation

  • Received: 14 September 2025

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 09 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42761-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Aorta coarctation
  • CoA
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • MDCTA
  • Doppler
  • Pressure gradient
  • PG
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Congenital heart defects: Diagnosis and treatment

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing