Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Artificial intelligence based assessment of treatment response in wet age related macular degeneration using paired OCT angiography
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Artificial intelligence based assessment of treatment response in wet age related macular degeneration using paired OCT angiography

  • Mohamed Sherif Morsy2,3,
  • Nandini Avijit Dutta4,5,
  • Elsaid Ibrahim Eldessouky3,
  • Mamdouh Mahmoud Kabil3,
  • Hamdy Abd El Azim El-Koumy3,
  • Nehal Nailesh Mehta2,
  • Amr Lotfy Ali1,2,3,
  • Soumya Jena1,2,
  • Haochen Zhang5,
  • Dirk-Uwe Bartsch1,2,
  • Lingyun Cheng1,2,
  • Cheolhong An5,
  • Truong Nguyen5 &
  • …
  • William R. Freeman1,2,5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 647 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in retinal imaging, yet its application to longitudinal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) remains limited. This study developed and evaluated an AI model for classifying treatment response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using paired OCTA images acquired before and after anti-VEGF therapy. In this retrospective cohort study, paired OCTA en-face images and corresponding OCT B-scans were collected for each treatment course. OCTA image pairs were manually segmented and aligned for AI input, while ground-truth labels (Improved, Unchanged, Worsened) were determined based on structural OCT findings and clinical visual acuity outcomes. After quality exclusion, 1033 OCTA pairs were included and divided into training, validation, and independent testing subsets. Two experienced retina specialists graded all OCTA pairs for comparison. On the test set, the AI model achieved an overall accuracy of 82.08%, with class-specific accuracies of 74.29% (worsened), 81.48% (unchanged), and 88.64% (improved). In contrast, overall human grading accuracy was 61.40%. Human graders were significantly more likely to misclassify treatment response than the AI model for all groups (odds ratio = 2.88; 95% CI 1.68–4.92; p < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate that AI-based paired OCTA analysis can provide a more accurate and objective assessment of treatment response in nAMD.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to patient privacy considerations but are available from the corresponding author, Dr. William R. Freeman, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bourne, R. R. A. et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 1, (2013).

  2. Baybora, H. Perifoveal retinal thickness changes after intravitreal aflibercept injection for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 46, (2024).

  3. Garweg, J. G. et al. Continued anti-VEGF treatment does not prevent recurrences in eyes with stable neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a treat-and-extend regimen: a retrospective case series. Eye (Lond). 36, 862–868 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spaide, R. F. et al. Consensus nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration data: Consensus on neovascular age-related macular degeneration nomenclature study group. Ophthalmology. 127, 616–636 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faatz, H. & Lommatzsch, A. Overview of the use of optical coherence tomography angiography in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J. Clin. Med. 13, 5042 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, D. M. et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1432–1444 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liang, M. C. et al. Retina. 36, 2265–2273 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kozak, I. et al. Discrepancy between fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography in detection of macular disease. Retina. 28, 538 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. El Ameen, A. et al. Type 2 neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 35, 2212–2218 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuehlewein, L. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 1 neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 160, 739–748e2 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faatz, H. & Lommatzsch, A. Overview of the use of optical coherence tomography angiography in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J. Clin. Med.. 13, 5042 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, M., Kim, S. W., Yun, C., Oh, J. H. & Oh, J. Predictive role of optical coherence tomography angiography for exudation recurrence in patients with type 1 neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with pro-re-nata protocol. Eye 37, 34 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hormel, T. T. et al. Artificial intelligence in OCT angiography. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 85, (2021).

  14. Burlina, P. M. et al. Automated grading of age-related macular degeneration from color fundus images using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. 135, 1170–1176 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hormel, T. T. et al. Artificial intelligence in OCT angiography. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 85, (2021).

  16. Heinke, A. et al. Artificial intelligence for OCTA-based disease activity prediction in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 44, 465 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wongchaisuwat, N. et al. Detection of macular neovascularization in eyes presenting with macular edema using OCT angiography and a deep learning model. Ophthalmol. Retina. 9, 378–385 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heinke, A. et al. Cross-instrument optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCTA)-based prediction of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) disease activity using artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep. 14, (2024).

  19. Morsy, M. S. et al. Effect of faricimab on optical coherence tomography angiography and artificial intelligence-based analysis in resistant choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmologica. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000548690 (2025).

  20. Fırat, M. et al. AI-based response classification after anti-VEGF loading in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Diagnostics. 15, 15 (2025).

  21. Miere, A. et al. Retina. 39, 548–557 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Faatz, H. et al. The architecture of macular neovascularizations predicts treatment responses to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular AMD. Diagnostics (Basel). 12, (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following financial support: This article has been supported in part by UCSD Vision Research Center Core Grant P30EY022589, NIH grant R01EY033847, an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, NY (WRF), and unrestricted funds from UCSD Jacobs Retina Center.

Funding

This article has been supported in part by UCSD Vision Research Center Core Grant P30EY022589, NIH grant R01EY033847, an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, NY (WRF), and unrestricted funds from UCSD Jacobs Retina Center. No conflicting relationship exists for any author. No author(s) have commercial associations that pose conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jacobs Retina Center, 9415 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

    Amr Lotfy Ali, Soumya Jena, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Lingyun Cheng & William R. Freeman

  2. Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, La Jolla, 92093, USA

    Mohamed Sherif Morsy, Nehal Nailesh Mehta, Amr Lotfy Ali, Soumya Jena, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Lingyun Cheng & William R. Freeman

  3. Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Mohamed Sherif Morsy, Elsaid Ibrahim Eldessouky, Mamdouh Mahmoud Kabil, Hamdy Abd El Azim El-Koumy & Amr Lotfy Ali

  4. National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirapalli, India

    Nandini Avijit Dutta

  5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Nandini Avijit Dutta, Haochen Zhang, Cheolhong An, Truong Nguyen & William R. Freeman

Authors
  1. Mohamed Sherif Morsy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nandini Avijit Dutta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elsaid Ibrahim Eldessouky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mamdouh Mahmoud Kabil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hamdy Abd El Azim El-Koumy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nehal Nailesh Mehta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amr Lotfy Ali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Soumya Jena
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haochen Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dirk-Uwe Bartsch
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lingyun Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Cheolhong An
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Truong Nguyen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. William R. Freeman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: M.M., W.R.F. Data collection: M.M., N.N.M., A.L.A., S.J. Analysis and interpretation: M.M., L.C. Methodology and software development (AI model): N.A.D., H.Z.C.A., T.N. Writing-original draft: M.M. Writing review and editing: M.M., N.N.M., A.L.A., E.I.E., M.M.K., H.A.E., W.R.F., D.U.B. Obtainment of funding: W.R.F., D.U.B .The guarantor: WRF. All authors listed have contributed to the work and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Freeman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Statement

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the University of California San Diego for review of patient charts and imaging data (IRB #120516). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the IRB. The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations. All data were de-identified to ensure patient confidentiality.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download TIFF )

Supplementary Material 2 (download TIFF )

Supplementary Material 3 (download TIFF )

Supplementary Material 4 (download TIFF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morsy, M.S., Dutta, N.A., Eldessouky, E.I. et al. Artificial intelligence based assessment of treatment response in wet age related macular degeneration using paired OCT angiography. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42999-7

Download citation

  • Received: 19 December 2025

  • Accepted: 28 February 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42999-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Optical coherence tomography angiography
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
  • Treatment response
  • Anti-VEGF therapy
  • Paired imaging
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing