Abstract
The combined effect of admission systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains insufficiently characterized. This retrospective cohort study investigated these associations to identify potential blood pressure thresholds linked to minimized mortality risk. We utilized restricted cubic splines (RCS) to characterize nonlinear associations, identifying specific BP levels (nadirs) associated with the lowest risk of mortality. Segmented analysis was employed to assess linear relationships flanking these nadirs, and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the impact of different BP ranges after adjusting for potential confounders. Our results revealed a significant J-shaped correlation for admission SBP and DBP regarding long-term mortality. Mortality risks escalated at SBP levels departing from a nadir of 143.4 mmHg and at DBP departing from 83.7 mmHg. Specifically, an admission SBP/DBP range of 130–160/80–88 mmHg was associated with the lowest long-term all-cause mortality risk, serving as the risk-nadir interval in this cohort. Other independent predictors of mortality included advanced age, myocardial infarction, higher heart rate, history of heart bypass, elevated NT-proBNP and hsTNT, while type B AAD, normal heart rhythm and surgery within 24 h were protective factors. In conclusion, admission SBP and DBP exhibit significant nonlinear associations (J-shaped) with long-term all-cause mortality in AAD. The identified 130–160/80–88 mmHg range represents a potential reference interval for admission hemodynamic management, while acknowledging the need for validation in diverse clinical settings.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants but are available from the first author Y.C., [chenyi1109@126.com](mailto: chenyi1109@126.com) upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- HTN:
-
Hypertension
- RBC:
-
Red blood cell
- HB:
-
Hemoglobin
- WBC:
-
White blood cell
- NE:
-
Neutrophils
- Lym:
-
Lymphocyte
- FPG:
-
Fasting plasma glucose
- TG:
-
Triglycerides
- TC:
-
Total cholesterol
- HDLC:
-
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- LDLC:
-
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- Cr:
-
Creatinine
- UA:
-
Uric acid
- CRP:
-
C-Reactive protein
- NTproBNP:
-
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
- hsTNT:
-
High-sensitivity troponin T
- LVEF:
-
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- LVD:
-
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter
- IMH:
-
Intramural hematoma
- IRAD:
-
International register of acute aortic dissection
References
Isselbacher, E. M. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 111, 816–828 (2005).
Kalkan, A. K. et al. The predictive value of admission fragmented QRS complex for in-hospital cardiovascular mortality of patients with type 1 acute aortic dissection. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 20 (5), 454–463 (2014).
Tsai, T. T., Nienaber, C. H. & Eagle, K. A. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation 112, 3802–3813 (2005).
Olsson, C. et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002. Circulation 114, 2611–2618 (2006).
Dawber, T. R., Moore, F. E. & Mann, G. V. II. Coronary heart disease in the framingham study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44 (6), 1767–1780 (2015).
Bangalore, S. et al. J-curve revisited: an analysis of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Trial†. Eur. Heart J. 31 (23), 2897–2908 (2010).
Bossone, E. et al. Presenting systolic blood pressure and outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection. 71(13). (2018).
Zhang, J., Jiang, Y., Gao, C., Feng, J. & Wang, A. Risk factors for hospital death in patients with acute aortic dissection. Heart Lung Circulation. 24 (4), 348–353 (2015).
Zhang, R. et al. Biomarkers investigation for in-hospital death in patients with stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Int. Heart J. 57 (5), 622–626 (2016).
Yang, G. et al. Admission Systolic Blood Pressure and In-hospital Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Observational Study. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 8, 542212 (2021).
Sari, S. et al. Check the diastolic blood pressure twice in aortic dissection as it is associated with prognosis. Pak J. Med. Sci. 37 (2), 339–344 (2021).
Strachan, D. P. Predictors of death from aortic aneurysm among middle-aged men: The. Whitehall study. Br. J. Surg. 78 (4), 401–404 (1991).
Reed, D., Reed, C., Stemmermann, G. & Hayashi, T. Are aortic aneurysms caused by atherosclerosis? Circulation 85 (1), 205–211 (1992).
Age-specific relevance. of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360 (9349), 1903–1913 (2002).
Kobeissi, E., Hibino, M., Pan, H. & Aune, D. Blood pressure, hypertension and the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 34 (6), 547–555 (2019).
Hibino, M. et al. Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic dissection incidence and mortality: results from the J-SCH study, the UK biobank study, and a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Circulation 145 (9), 633–644 (2022).
Erbel, R. et al. [2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases]. Kardiol Pol. 72 (12), 1169–1252 (2014).
Durrleman, S. & Simon, R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat. Med. 8 (5), 551–561 (1989).
Whelton, P. K., O’Connell, S., Mills, K. T. & He, J. Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension 81 (11), 2329–2339 (2024).
Haykowsky, M. J. et al. Aorta wall stress during exercise in patients with an ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm: insights from a case series. Aorta (Stamford). 12 (5), 108–116 (2025).
Sundt, T. M. Indications for aortic aneurysmectomy: Too many variables and not enough equations? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 145 (3), S126–S129 (2013).
Beller, C. J., Gebhard, M. M., Karck, M. & Labrosse, M. R. Usefulness and limitations of computational models in aortic disease risk stratification. J. Vasc. Surg. 52 (6), 1572–1579 (2010).
Winzap, P. A. et al. Initial systolic blood pressure associates with systemic inflammation, myocardial injury, and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 12 (7), 437–450 (2023).
Sánchez-Enrique, C. et al. Cause and long-term outcome of cardiac tamponade. Am. J. Cardiol. 117 (4), 664–669 (2016).
Orbach, A., Schliamser, J. E., Flugelman, M. Y. & Zafrir, B. Contemporary evaluation of the causes of cardiac tamponade: Acute and long-term outcomes. Cardiol. J. 23 (1), 57–63 (2016).
D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., Kannel, W. B. & Cruickshank, J. M. Relation of low diastolic blood pressure to coronary heart disease death in presence of myocardial infarction: the Framingham Study. BMJ 303 (6799), 385–389 (1991).
Böhm, M. et al. Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials. Lancet 389 (10085), 2226–2237 (2017).
Messerli, F. H. et al. Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous? Ann. Intern. Med. 144 (12), 884–893 (2006).
Dell’Aquila, A. M. et al. Malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing repair for acute type A aortic dissection: Presentation, mortality, and utility of the Penn classification. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 170 (3), 687–697 (2025).
Li, J. W. et al. Longitudinal blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure: An individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 27 (9), 1686–1694 (2025).
Shoji-Asahina, A., Usui, T. & Tabara, Y. U-shaped association between blood pressure and all-cause mortality in older adults: the Shizuoka study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 39 (1), 66–71 (2025).
Böhm, M. et al. Myocardial reperfusion reverses the J-curve association of cardiovascular risk and diastolic blood pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure after myocardial infarction: insights from the EPHESUS trial. Eur. Heart J. 41 (17), 1673–1683 (2020).
Aïdoud, A. et al. High Prevalence of Geriatric Conditions Among Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 12 (2), e026850 (2023).
Catalano, M. A. et al. Age, sex, and contemporary outcomes in surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample. JTCVS Open. 11, 23–36 (2022).
Salem, M. et al. Risk factors for mortality in acute aortic dissection type A: A centre experience over 15 Years. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 69, 322–328 (2020).
Wang, J. X. et al. The impact of age in acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 17 (1), 40 (2022).
Carrel, T., Sundt, T. M., Von Kodolitsch, Y. & Czerny, M. Acute aortic dissection. Lancet 401 (10378), 773–788 (2023).
Vrsalovic, M., Vrsalovic Presecki, A. & Aboyans, V. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and short-term mortality in acute aortic dissection: A meta-analysis. Clin. Cardiol. 43 (11), 1255–1259 (2020).
Talwar, S. et al. Profile of plasma N-terminal proBNP following acute myocardial infarction; correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Eur. Heart J. 21 (18), 1514–1521 (2000).
Jenab, Y., Ahmadi-Tafti, S. H., Davarpasand, T., Jalali, A. & Khederlou, H. Association of the high-sensitive cardiac troponin T levels and long-term mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A. J. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Res. 15 (2), 116–120 (2023).
Ahn, J. M. et al. Differential clinical features and long-term prognosis of acute aortic syndrome according to disease entity. Eur. Heart J. 40 (32), 2727–2736 (2019).
Nazerian, P. et al. Diagnostic performance of the aortic dissection detection risk score in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 3 (4), 373–381 (2014).
Samet, P. Hemodynamic sequelae of cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation 47 (2), 399–407 (1973).
Acknowledgements
We extended our heartfelt gratitude to the committed personnel at the Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University in Guilin and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in Nanning, Guangxi, China, for their essential role in the precise and diligent gathering of data.
Funding
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Z-A20230040); Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Special Talents’ Project (GK AD17129026); Guangxi Science and Technology Specialized Project (GKG 14124003-9); Fund Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health Commission (S2020116-1) and Guangxi Medical and health key cultivation discipline construction project. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.C., QW. J and XW.L. were responsible for study design and planning. XR.S. , XX.P. , N.C. and L.S. contributed to data collection and cleaning. Y.C., LM.Z. and XR.S. contributed to data analysis. Y.C. and XX.P. contributed to writing the original report. QW.J., XW.L. and L.L. contributed to writing-review and editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The current study was a retrospective study, the nursing follow-up was conducted by staff out of our study team, the personal information for patients was de-identified after data extraction, so no direct patient was involved in this research. Therefore, informed consent from each participant was waived. The waiver of informed consent for the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China (IRB-KY-ZC-2023-049). This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China (IRB-KY-ZC-2023-049) as well.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Peng, X., Ji, Q. et al. Admission blood pressure and mortality in acute aortic dissection: Southwest China multicenter retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43101-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43101-x