Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Profiling histone post-translational modifications to identify signatures of epigenetic drug response in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

Profiling histone post-translational modifications to identify signatures of epigenetic drug response in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  • Laura Corveleyn1,2 na1,
  • Lien Provez2,3 na1,
  • Osman Satilmis4,5,
  • Nina Refhagen4,5,
  • Mattias Landfors4,
  • Wouter Sleeckx2,6,
  • Beatrice Lintermans2,3,
  • Amélie De Maesschalck1,2,
  • Rishi S. Kotecha7,8,9,
  • Barbara De Moerloose2,10,
  • Tim Lammens2,10,
  • Dieter Deforce1,2,
  • Sofie Degerman4,5,
  • Steven Goossens2,6,
  • Pieter Van Vlierberghe2,3 &
  • …
  • Maarten Dhaenens1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 675 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Oncology

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications are dynamic and reversible, making them attractive targets for therapeutic intervention in cancer. Although several drugs targeting epigenetic modifications (epidrugs) have been clinically approved, their application in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains limited, and predictive biomarkers of response are lacking. Here, we present a mass spectrometry (MS)-based pharmacoepigenetic approach to profile histone post-translational modifications (hPTMs) to identify signatures associated with drug sensitivity in T-ALL . Baseline hPTM landscapes were previously established by our group for 21 T-ALL cell lines using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Here, we treated these cell lines with a panel of nine drugs including histone deacetylase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (epidrugs), alongside anthracyclines, which were included due to their known chromatin-related effects. Correlation of cell viability data with hPTM levels revealed distinct hPTM signatures linked to sensitivity for each drug class. These signatures were subsequently evaluated in T-ALL patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. However, our analysis revealed substantial discrepancies in hPTM sensitivity signatures compared to those observed in vitro. Co-variation network analysis highlighted divergence in hPTM-hPTM correlation between the two models, underscoring limitations of cell lines for modeling dynamic epigenetic regulation in vivo. Our findings establish a framework for MS-based hPTM profiling in T-ALL and emphasize the importance of model selection in developing predictive epigenetic biomarkers.

Data availability

Cell line mass spectrometry raw data and analysis files were obtained from the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org) under the dataset identifier PXD031500. Mass spectrometry raw data (*.wiff and *.scan files) and analysis files from the T-ALL PDX models generated in this study have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE65 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD067935 and https://doi.org/10.6019/PXD06793. The data is currently accessible with the token ywBECfsz6hWu and will be made publicly available after publication. All analysis scripts to process data and re-create figures are available at https://github.com/lcorvele/pharmacoepigenetics.

References

  1. Wheeler, H. E., Maitland, M. L., Dolan, M. E., Cox, N. J. & Ratain, M. J. Cancer pharmacogenomics: Strategies and challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 23–34 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lauschke, V. M., Barragan, I. & Ingelman-Sundberg, M. Pharmacoepigenetics and toxicoepigenetics: Novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-053021 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allis, C. D. & Jenuwein, T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.59 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C. D. Translating the histone code. Science 1979(293), 1074–1080 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lauschke, V. M., Barragan, I. & Ingelman-Sundberg, M. Pharmacoepigenetics and toxicoepigenetics: Novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 58, 161–185 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raetz, E. A. & Teachey, D. T. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology: the American Society of Hematology Education Program 2016, 580 (2016).

  7. Marks, D. I. & Rowntree, C. Management of adults with T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 129, 1134–1142 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wood, B. L. et al. Prognostic significance of ETP phenotype and minimal residual disease in T-ALL: A Children’s Oncology Group study. Blood 142, 2069–2078 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Künz, T. et al. Changing landscape in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Cancers 14, 4290 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, H. et al. The clinical and molecular characterization of distinct subtypes in adult T Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Sci. 116, 1126–1138 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, S. V. et al. A Chromatin-Mediated Reversible Drug-Tolerant State in Cancer Cell Subpopulations. Cell 141, 69–80 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, M. L. & Marcato, P. Epigenetic Modifications as Biomarkers of Tumor Development, Therapy Response, and Recurrence across the Cancer Care Continuum. Cancers 10, 101 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wajapeyee, N. & Gupta, R. Epigenetic alterations and mechanisms that drive resistance to targeted cancer therapies. Cancer Res. 81, 5589–5595 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Britton, L. M., Gonzales-Cope, M., Zee, B. M. & Garcia, B. A. Breaking the histone code with quantitative mass spectrometry. Expert Rev. Proteomics 8, 631–643 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Provez, L. et al. An interactive mass spectrometry atlas of histone posttranslational modifications in T-cell acute leukemia. Sci. Data 9, 626 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Demeulemeester, N. et al. msqrob2PTM: Differential abundance and differential usage analysis of MS-based proteomics data at the posttranslational modification and peptidoform level. Mol. Cell. Proteomics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100708 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xue, S.-L. et al. Low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of relapsed or primary refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia: A retrospective study of 25 Chinese patients. Hematol Oncol 31, 206–212 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qian, J.-J. et al. CAG regimen for refractory or relapsed adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Cancer Med. 9, 5327–5334 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xue, S.-L., Wu, D.-P., Sun, A.-N. & Tang, X.-W. CAG regimen enables relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients to achieve complete remission: A report of six cases. Am. J. Hematol. 83, 167–170 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pang, B. et al. Drug-induced histone eviction from open chromatin contributes to the chemotherapeutic effects of doxorubicin. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2921 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. van der Zanden, S. Y., Qiao, X. & Neefjes, J. New insights into the activities and toxicities of the old anticancer drug doxorubicin. FEBS J. 288, 6095–6111 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pang, B., De Jong, J., Qiao, X., Wessels, L. F. A. & Neefjes, J. Chemical profiling of the genome with anti-cancer drugs defines target specificities. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1811 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Waibel, M. et al. Epigenetic targeting of Notch1-driven transcription using the HDACi panobinostat is a potential therapy against T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 32, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.282 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scuto, A. et al. The novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, LBH589, induces expression of DNA damage response genes and apoptosis in Ph- acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Blood 111, 5093–5100 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hasegawa, H. et al. LBH589, a deacetylase inhibitor, induces apoptosis in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma cells via activation of a novel RAIDD-caspase-2 pathway. Leukemia 25, 575–587 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Duvic, M. et al. Responses to romidepsin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Leuk. Lymphoma 59, 880–887 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zinzani, P. L. et al. Romidepsin in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphomas: Italian experience and results of a named patient program. Leuk. Lymphoma 57, 2370–2374 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Makena, M. R., Koneru, B., Nguyen, T. H., Kang, M. H. & Reynolds, C. P. Reactive oxygen species-mediated synergism of fenretinide and romidepsin in preclinical models of T-cell lymphoid malignancies. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 649–661 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brunvand, M. W. & Carson, J. Complete remission with romidepsin in a patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia refractory to induction hyper-CVAD. Hematol. Oncol. 36, 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2421 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pappalardi, M. B. et al. Discovery of a first-in-class reversible DNMT1-selective inhibitor with improved tolerability and efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Cancer 2, 1002–1017 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Malkaram, S. A. et al. Differential histone posttranslational modifications induced by DNA hypomethylating agents. Cancer Control 29, 10732748221074052 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Völker-Albert, M., Bronkhorst, A., Holdenrieder, S. & Imhof, A. Histone modifications in stem cell development and their clinical implications. Stem Cell Rep. 15, 1196–1205 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richter‐Pechańska, P. et al. PDX models recapitulate the genetic and epigenetic landscape of pediatric T-cell leukemia. EMBO Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201809443 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Borssén, M. et al. Promoter DNA methylation pattern identifies prognostic subgroups in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PLoS One 8, e65373 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schäfer Hackenhaar, F. et al. CpG island methylator phenotype classification improves risk assessment in pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 145, 2161–2178 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meijerink, J. P. P., Canté-Barrett, K., Vroegindeweij, E. & Pieters, R. HOXA-activated early T-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Predictor of poor outcome?. Haematologica 101, 654 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rius, M. & Lyko, F. Epigenetic cancer therapy: Rationales, targets and drugs. Oncogene 31, 4257–4265 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, T., Yang, Y. & Wang, Y. Predictive biomarkers and potential drug combinations of epi-drugs in cancer therapy. Clin. Epigenetics 13, 1–19 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Skourti, E. & Dhillon, P. Cancer epigenetics: Promises and pitfalls for cancer therapy. FEBS J. 289, 1156–1159 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pang, B. et al. Drug-induced histone eviction from open chromatin contributes to the chemotherapeutic effects of doxorubicin. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–13 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, C. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of histone modifications in decitabine sensitive and resistant leukemia cell lines. Clin. Proteomics 13, 1–11 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liebers, N. et al. Ex vivo drug response profiling for response and outcome prediction in hematologic malignancies: The prospective non-interventional SMARTrial. Nat. Cancer 4(12), 1648–1659 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roels, J. et al. Aging of preleukemic thymocytes drives CpG island hypermethylation in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov. 1, 275–289 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Benyoucef, A. et al. UTX inhibition as selective epigenetic therapy against TAL1-driven t-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genes Dev. 30, 508–521 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, C. et al. Ezh2 loss propagates hypermethylation at T cell differentiation–regulating genes to promote leukemic transformation. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 3872 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sin, C. F. & Man, PheiM. Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Diagnosis, updates in molecular pathogenesis, management, and novel therapies. Front. Oncol. 11, 750789 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ren, W. et al. Direct readout of heterochromatic H3K9me3 regulates DNMT1-mediated maintenance DNA methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 18439–18447 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rose, N. R. & Klose, R. J. Understanding the relationship between DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1839, 1362–1372 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Padeken, J., Methot, S. P. & Gasser, S. M. Establishment of H3K9-methylated heterochromatin and its functions in tissue differentiation and maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23(9), 623–640 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stacey, G. & MacDonald, C. Immortalisation of primary cells. Cell Cult. Methods In Vitro Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0996-5_3 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Noberini, R. et al. Extensive and systematic rewiring of histone post-translational modifications in cancer model systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 3817–3832 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Provez, L. et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of the hypomethylating agent Decitabine for the treatment of T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 15, 647 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Satilmis, O. Histon post-translationele modificaties als potentiële biomarkers voor T-ALL behandeling en hun rol in gepersonaliseerde geneeskunde. (Ghent University, 2022).

  54. Zhou, W., Laird, P. W. & Shen, H. Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e22–e22 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nordlund, J. et al. Genome-wide signatures of differential DNA methylation in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genome Biol. 14, 1–15 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Aryee, M. J. et al. Minfi: A flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30, 1363–1369 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tian, Y. et al. ChAMP: Updated methylation analysis pipeline for Illumina beadchips. Bioinformatics 33, 3982–3984 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Roels, J. et al. Aging of preleukemic thymocytes drives CpG island hypermethylation in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov. 1, 274–289 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Direct acid extraction. https://www.protocols.io/view/direct-acid-extraction-bp2l6x6odlqe/v1.

  60. One-dimensional SDS-PAGE (9–18% TGX gel). https://www.protocols.io/view/one-dimensional-sds-page-9-18-tgx-gel-5jyl8pz27g2w/v1.

  61. Propionylation and tryptic digestion. https://www.protocols.io/view/propionylation-and-tryptic-digestion-5jyl8pz36g2w/v1.

  62. Michailidis, T. M. et al. Aflatoxin B1 induces subtle but coordinated histone modifications in Epstein-Barr virus infected and non-infected Burkitt lymphoma cells. Environ. Int. 204, 109813 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wei T, S. V. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. (Version 0.95). https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot. (2024).

  64. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D543–D553 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by grants from The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) awarded to L.C. (1SF2622N) and M.D. (12E9716N) and a preclinical research grant from Stand Up To Cancer (Kom Op Tegen Kanker-Flanders) awarded to P.V.V. PDX models were generated with technical support from the PDXGhent core facility, with financial support from The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) for medium-scale research infrastructure, Ghent University and Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG). Additional support was provided by The Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden, and the Medical Faculty of Umeå University. The PER-117 cell line was kindly provided by the PCH Oncology Biobank (Prof. Rishi S. Kotecha) which is funded by the Western Australian Future Health Research and Innovation Fund.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, 1SF2622N,12E9716N, Western Australian Future Health and Innovation Fund, Government of Western Australia, Cancerfonden, Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland, Barncancerfonden, Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Kom op tegen Kanker

Author information

Author notes
  1. Laura Corveleyn and Lien Provez contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, ProGenTomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Laura Corveleyn, Amélie De Maesschalck, Dieter Deforce & Maarten Dhaenens

  2. Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium

    Laura Corveleyn, Lien Provez, Wouter Sleeckx, Beatrice Lintermans, Amélie De Maesschalck, Barbara De Moerloose, Tim Lammens, Dieter Deforce, Steven Goossens, Pieter Van Vlierberghe & Maarten Dhaenens

  3. Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Lien Provez, Beatrice Lintermans & Pieter Van Vlierberghe

  4. Department of Medical Biosciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden

    Osman Satilmis, Nina Refhagen, Mattias Landfors & Sofie Degerman

  5. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden

    Osman Satilmis, Nina Refhagen & Sofie Degerman

  6. Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Wouter Sleeckx & Steven Goossens

  7. Department of Clinical Haematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Australia

    Rishi S. Kotecha

  8. Leukaemia Translational Research Laboratory, WA Kids Cancer Centre, The Kids Research Institute Australia, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

    Rishi S. Kotecha

  9. Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Rishi S. Kotecha

  10. Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

    Barbara De Moerloose & Tim Lammens

Authors
  1. Laura Corveleyn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lien Provez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Osman Satilmis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nina Refhagen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mattias Landfors
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wouter Sleeckx
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Beatrice Lintermans
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Amélie De Maesschalck
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rishi S. Kotecha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Barbara De Moerloose
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tim Lammens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dieter Deforce
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sofie Degerman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Steven Goossens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Pieter Van Vlierberghe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Maarten Dhaenens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.C.: conceptualization, in vitro and ex vivo treatment, histone sample preparation, data acquisition, data analysis, writing. L.P.: conceptualization, in vitro treatment, PDX generation and in vivo treatment, writing. O.S.: in vitro treatment, writing. B.L.: cell culture. N.R. DNA methylation analysis. S.D.: DNA methylation analysis and co-supervision. M.L.: DNA methylation analysis. W.S.: PDX generation and biobanking. A.D.M.: data analysis and writing. R.S.K.: provision of cell line material. B.D.M. and T.L.: collection of patient samples and clinical data collection. S.G.: co-supervision. D.D.: co-supervision. P.V.V.: conceptualization, supervision. M.D.: conceptualization, writing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Dhaenens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 2. (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corveleyn, L., Provez, L., Satilmis, O. et al. Profiling histone post-translational modifications to identify signatures of epigenetic drug response in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44665-4

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44665-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Cancer epigenetics and epitranscriptomics

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer