Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Automated grading and diagnosis of sacroiliitis on CT images using a 3D convolutional neural network: a multicenter retrospective study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 March 2026

Automated grading and diagnosis of sacroiliitis on CT images using a 3D convolutional neural network: a multicenter retrospective study

  • Yong-ku Du1,
  • Run Liu2,
  • Hua Guo1,
  • Chao Li1,
  • Pei Chen4,
  • Hang Qiu1,
  • Dan-dan Shi1,
  • Jie Cheng4,
  • Jun Yan4 &
  • …
  • Yi-shan Li3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 486 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research

Abstract

Radiographic grading of the sacroiliac joints plays a critical role in the differential diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and in guiding the treatment. The aim of this study was to develop an automated 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN) for grading and diagnosing sacroiliitis on CT images to assist clinicians. This study included CT images from 2,144 participants, comprising healthy controls and patients with suspected ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A V-Net based segmentation model was applied, followed by training a three-dimensional DenseNet-based convolutional neural network (3D CNN) for both five-class and three-class classification tasks. Grading by three radiologists according to the New York criteria served as the reference standard. The model’s diagnostic performance was evaluated on an external multicenter validation set and compared with radiologist interpretations. For the five-class task, the model’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for grades 0–IV were 0.966, 0.937, 0.881, 0.962, and 0.994, respectively. In the simplified three-class task, AUCs for classes 0, 1, and 2 were 0.984, 0.967, and 0.994, respectively. On the external validation set, three-class AUCs were 0.957, 0.934, and 0.992. With AI assistance, two radiologists’ diagnostic accuracy improved by 6.9% and 8.4%, respectively. The proposed segmentation–classification framework enables accurate and reproducible CT grading of sacroiliitis.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

References

  1. Agrawal, P., Tote, S. & Sapkale, B. Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Cureus 16 (1), e52559. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52559 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taurog, J. D., Chhabra, A. & Colbert, R. A. Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. N Engl. J. Med. 374, 2563–2574. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1406182 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Linden, S., Valkenburg, H. A. & Cats, A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 27(4), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780270401 (1984).

  4. van den Berg, R. et al. Agreement between clinical practice and trained central reading in reading of sacroiliac joints on plain pelvic radiographs. Results from the DESIR cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66, 2403–2411 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Swami, V. G. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI-based sacroiliitis scoring systems: a systematic Review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 12, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Topol, E. J. High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25, 44–56 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, K. et al. Automatic Image Segmentation and Grading Diagnosis of Sacroiliitis Associated with AS Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network on CT Images. J. Digit. Imaging. 36 (5), 2025–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00858-1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shenkman, Y. et al. Automatic detection and diagnosis of sacroiliitis in CT scans as incidental findings. Med. Image Anal. 57, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.07.007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, W., Mei, W. & Huang, R. Sacroiliitis diagnosis based on interpretable features and multi-task learning. Phys. Med. Biol. 69(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad2010 (2024).

  10. Lee, J. S., Oh, B. L., Lee, H. Y., Song, Y. W. & Lee, E. Y. Comorbidity, disability, and healthcare expenditure of ankylosing spondylitis in Korea: A population-based study. PLoS One. 13 (2), e0192524. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192524 (2018). Published 2018 Feb 8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melchior, J. et al. Radiography, abdominal CT and MRI compared with sacroiliac joint CT in diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis. Eur. J. Radiol. 95, 169–176 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poddubnyy, D. et al. Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 70 (8), 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.145995 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. van den Berg, R. et al. Agreement between clinical practice and trained central reading in reading of sacroiliac joints on plain pelvic radiographs. Results from the DESIR cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 66 (9), 2403–2411. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38738 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inman, R. D. Axial Spondyloarthritis: Current Advances, Future Challenges. J. Rheum. Dis. 28 (2), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2021.28.2.55 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, H. et al. Comprehensive AI-assisted tool for ankylosing spondylitis based on multicenter research outperforms human experts. Front. Public. Health. 11, 1063633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1063633 (2023). 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maksymowych, W. P. et al. Data-driven definitions for active and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint in spondyloarthritis and their predictive utility. Rheumatol. (Oxford). 60 (10), 4778–4789. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab099 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lambert, R. G. W., Hermann, K. G. A. & Diekhoff, T. Low-dose computed tomography for axial spondyloarthritis: update on use and limitations. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 33 (4), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000803 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kingsmore, K. M. et al. An introduction to machine learning and analysis of its use in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 17 (12), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00708-w (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, G. et al. A deep-learning pipeline for the diagnosis and discrimination of viral, non-viral and COVID-19 pneumonia from chest X-ray images. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 (6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00704-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quanyang, W. et al. Artificial intelligence in lung cancer screening: Detection, classification, prediction, and prognosis. Cancer Med. 13 (7), e7140. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7140 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya, Y., Akat, E., Yıldırım, S. & Fusion-Brain-Net A Novel Deep Fusion Model for Brain Tumor Classification. Brain Behav. 15 (5), e70520. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70520 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, W. et al. Neural network-based prognostic predictive tool for gastric cardiac cancer: The worldwide retrospective study. BioData Min. 16(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00335-z (2023).

  23. Chaudhari, M. et al. Graph Neural Network-Based Approaches for Protein Function Prediction. Methods Mol. Biol. 2947, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4662-5_3 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kanev, G. K. et al. Predicting the target landscape of kinase inhibitors using 3D convolutional neural networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19 (9), e1011301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011301 (2023). Published 2023 Sep 5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Den Berghe, T. et al. Neural network algorithm for detection of erosions and ankylosis on CT of the sacroiliac joints: multicentre development and validation of diagnostic accuracy. Eur. Radiol. 33 (11), 8310–8323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09704-y (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meng, X. et al. Deep learning for automated grading of radiographic sacroiliitis. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 15 (6), 5137–5150. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2024-2742 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tenório, A. P. M. et al. Radiomic Quantification for MRI Assessment of Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Spondyloarthritis. J. Digit. Imaging. 35 (1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00559-7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Canayaz, E., Altikardes, Z. A., Unsal, A., Korkmaz, H. & Gok, M. Development and validation of machine learning algorithms for early detection of ankylosing spondylitis using magnetic resonance images. Technol. Health Care. 33 (3), 1182–1198. https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241297887 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bressem, K. K. et al. Deep Learning Detects Changes Indicative of Axial Spondyloarthritis at MRI of Sacroiliac Joints. Radiology 307 (3), e239007. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.239007 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bordner, A. et al. A deep learning model for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis according to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria with magnetic resonance imaging. Diagn. Interv Imaging. 104 (7–8), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.03.008 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, H. et al. A novel semi-supervised learning model based on pelvic radiographs for ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis reduces 90% of annotation cost. Comput. Biol. Med. 184, 109232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109232 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lin, Y., Chan, S. C. W., Chung, H. Y., Lee, K. H. & Cao, P. A deep neural network for MRI spinal inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis. Eur. Spine J. 33 (11), 4125–4134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08099-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2025SF-YBXM-052), Shaanxi Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Innovation and Capacity Improvement Plan (TZKN-CXPT-04); Research Project of Shaanxi Provincial Health Commission(2021B001); Xi’an Basic Ability Enhancement Program for Scientific and Technological Innovation (24YXYJ0076); Xi’an Municipal Health Commission Research Project (2025yb26).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Xi’an Fifth Hospital, Xi’an, China

    Yong-ku Du, Hua Guo, Chao Li, Hang Qiu & Dan-dan Shi

  2. Department of Radiology, Xi’an Center Hospital, Xi’an, China

    Run Liu

  3. Xi’an Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Imaging, Xi’an No.3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, 710000, China

    Yi-shan Li

  4. Department of Rheumatology, Xi’an Fifth Hospital, Xi’an, China

    Pei Chen, Jie Cheng & Jun Yan

Authors
  1. Yong-ku Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Run Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hua Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pei Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hang Qiu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dan-dan Shi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jie Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yi-shan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y. D and R.L drafted the paper, C.L, H.G and H.Q contributed to data collection, H.G, D.S and J.Y contributed to analysis, J.C, P.C and Y.L contributed to the entire research implementation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-shan Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

Due to the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was waived. This study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under registration number ChiCTR2500096632. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Xi’an Fifth Hospital with the ethics approval number 2024 (84).

Consent for publication

Any subject who appears in this manuscript has been informed and informed consent to share data has been obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Yk., Liu, R., Guo, H. et al. Automated grading and diagnosis of sacroiliitis on CT images using a 3D convolutional neural network: a multicenter retrospective study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44911-9

Download citation

  • Received: 27 October 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 18 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44911-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Sacroiliitis
  • 3D convolutional neural network
  • Computed tomography
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics