Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Interactive AI assisted pediatric burn assessment based on smartphone images
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 April 2026

Interactive AI assisted pediatric burn assessment based on smartphone images

  • Hao Wang1,
  • Shuaidan Zeng2,
  • Weiqing Li2,
  • Xiaodi Chen2,
  • Qianqian Mei2,
  • Huating Chen2,
  • Lina Fu2,
  • Zhenhui Zhao2,
  • Shengping Tang2,
  • Kaize Zheng2,
  • Yanyan Liang1 &
  • …
  • Zhu Xiong1,2 

Scientific Reports (2026) Cite this article

  • 1295 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Engineering
  • Health care
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research

Abstract

Burn injuries are a common pediatric health threat with depth assessment relying heavily on subjective visual inspection. While objective techniques like laser Doppler imaging exist, their cost and portability limitations restrict use. We propose SAM-DR to address the challenge of scarce annotated burn data by repurposing pre-trained models with minimal fine-tuning. By replacing SAM’s segmentation head with dense linear regression, our method not only identifies burn locations but also perceives burn depth through continuous depth prediction. Using 294 smartphone images from 94 patients annotated by 9 clinicians, we conducted a pixel-level comparison of human disagreement. SAM-DR achieved a 0.96 Dice score in wound segmentation, establishing state-of-the-art performance, and the use of interactive thresholding enabled segmentation of different burn depths comparable to human experts, suitable for assisted annotation. We developed an interactive tool based on SAM-DR that supports both clinical diagnosis and data annotation, offering a non-contact solution for burn assessment and dataset creation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Precision diagnosis of burn injuries using imaging and predictive modeling for clinical applications

Article Open access 04 March 2025

Clinical and epidemiological profiles of burns from a regional burn center in Egypt

Article Open access 04 May 2026

Epidemiology and mortality in patients hospitalized for burns in Catalonia, Spain

Article Open access 01 September 2023

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy concerns but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission from the institutional ethics committee.

References

  1. Lawrence, J. W., Mason, S. T., Schomer, K. & Klein, M. B. Epidemiology and impact of scarring after burn injury: a systematic review of the literature. J. Burn Care Res. 33, 136–146 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meng, F. et al. Pediatric burn contractures in low-and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of causes and factors affecting outcome. Burns 46, 993–1004 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phelan, H. A. et al. Use of 816 consecutive burn wound biopsies to inform a histologic algorithm for burn depth categorization. J. Burn Care Res. 42, 1162–1167 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shin, J. Y. & Yi, H. S. Diagnostic accuracy of laser doppler imaging in burn depth assessment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns 42, 1369–1376 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taib, B. G. et al. Artificial intelligence in the management and treatment of burns: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J. Plastic Reconstruct. Aesthetic Surg. 77, 133–161 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, R., Tian, D., Xu, D., Qian, W. & Yao, Y. A survey of wound image analysis using deep learning: classification, detection, and segmentation. IEEE Access 10, 79502–79515 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention, 234–241. (Springer, 2015).

  8. Yadav, D. et al. Spatial attention-based residual network for human burn identification and classification. Sci. Rep. 13, 12516 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, X. et al. Multi-feature extraction and selection method to diagnose burn depth from burn images. Electronics 13, 3665 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ethier, O. et al. Using computer vision and artificial intelligence to track the healing of severe burns. J. Burn Care Res. 45, 700–708 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman, M. M. et al. A framework for advancing burn assessment with artificial intelligence. Military Med. 190, 387–393 (2025a).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rahman, M. M. et al. Ai-driven integrated system for burn depth prediction with electronic medical records: Algorithm development and validation. JMIR Med. Inform. 13, e68366 (2025b).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bulut, C., Kolca, D. & Tarlak, F. Development a software for detecting burn severity using convolutional neural network-based approach. Sigma 43, 598–606 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yıldız, M. et al. Segmentation and classification of skin burn images with artificial intelligence: Development of a mobile application. Burns 50, 966–979 (2024).

  15. Li, Z. et al. Gl-fusionnet: fusing global and local features to classify deep and superficial partial thickness burn. Math. Biosci. Eng. 20, 10153–10173 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pabitha, C. & Vanathi, B. Dense mesh rcnn: assessment of human skin burn and burn depth severity. J. Supercomput. 80, 1331–1362 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X., Liu, Z. & Liu, L. Pediatric burnnet: Robust multi-class segmentation and severity recognition under real-world imaging conditions. SAGE Open Med. 13, 20503121251360090 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abdolahnejad, M. et al. Novel cnn-based approach for burn severity assessment and fine-grained boundary segmentation in burn images. IEEE Trans. Instrument. Measure. (2025).

  19. Tan, P., Nyeko-Lacek, M., Walsh, K., Sheikh, Z. & Lewis, C. J. Artificial intelligence-enhanced multispectral imaging for burn wound assessment: Insights from a multi-centre uk evaluation. Burns 107550 (2025).

  20. Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 4015–4026 (2023).

  21. Ma, J. et al. Segment anything in medical images. Nat. Commun. 15, 654 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, H., Yue, K., Cheng, S., Li, W. & Fu, Z. A framework for automatic burn image segmentation and burn depth diagnosis using deep learning. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 5514224 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xie, J., Li, H., Li, J. & Xu, X. Ltb-net: A lightweight transformer-based burn depth segmentation network. In BIBE 2024; The 7th International Conference on Biological Information and Biomedical Engineering, 234–239 (2024).

  24. Zhang, D. & Xie, J. Semi-supervised burn depth segmentation network with contrast learning and uncertainty correction. Sensors 25, 1059 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chang, C. W. et al. Application of multiple deep learning models for automatic burn wound assessment. Burns 49, 1039–1051 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rozo, A. et al. A deep learning image-to-image translation approach for a more accessible estimator of the healing time of burns. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 70, 2886–2894 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ji, S., Xiao, S., Xia, Z., of Burns, C. B. A. T. R. & Trauma Committee, C.-S. M. E. A. o. C. Consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition). Burns Trauma 12, tkad061 (2024).

  28. Wang, W. Advanced auto labeling solution with added features. https://github.com/CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling (2023).

  29. Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Shlens, J. & Le, Q. V. Randaugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 702–703 (2020).

  30. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F. & Adam, H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 801–818 (2018).

  31. Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J. & Zisserman, A. The PASCAL visual object classes challenge 2012 (VOC2012) results. http://www.pascal-network.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the clinical staff of Shenzhen Children’s Hospital for their assistance with data collection and coordination. We also acknowledge the technical support provided by the research and engineering team.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Guangdong Province Graduate Education Innovation Project (2025JGXM_149).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Innovation Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, 999078, China

    Hao Wang, Yanyan Liang & Zhu Xiong

  2. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shenzhen Pediatrics Institute of Shantou University Medical College, Shenzhen, 518034, China

    Shuaidan Zeng, Weiqing Li, Xiaodi Chen, Qianqian Mei, Huating Chen, Lina Fu, Zhenhui Zhao, Shengping Tang, Kaize Zheng & Zhu Xiong

Authors
  1. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuaidan Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weiqing Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaodi Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qianqian Mei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huating Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lina Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhenhui Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shengping Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kaize Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yanyan Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhu Xiong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.W. conceived the study, designed the methodology, conducted all experiments, performed the data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. S.Z., W.L., X.C., Q.M., H.C., L.F., Z.Z, T.S. and Z.X. contributed to data collection, clinical assessment, and annotation. S.T. and K.Z. provided technical guidance, supervised model development, and revised the manuscript. K.Z., Y.L., and Z.X. supervised the overall project, provided critical revisions, and approved the final manuscript as corresponding authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kaize Zheng, Yanyan Liang or Zhu Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Zeng, S., Li, W. et al. Interactive AI assisted pediatric burn assessment based on smartphone images. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48169-z

Download citation

  • Received: 29 November 2025

  • Accepted: 06 April 2026

  • Published: 12 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48169-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Burn segmentation
  • Burn depth identification
  • Interactive AI
  • Pediatric burns
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics