Table 5 Assessment of the structural model (bootstrapping = 5000).

From: The effect of articulation in sports posters on betting behavior

Relationship-construct

Path

R2

f2

Q2

SRMR

H1a: AttGamb → GambInt

0.545***

 

0.439

  

H1b: AttGamb → GambBeh

0.231***

 

0.073

  

H2: GambInt → GambBeh

0.570***

 

0.444

  

H3a: AttSpo → AttGamb

−0.036

 

0.001

  

H3b: AttSpo → GambInt

−0.06

 

0.002

  

H4a: Congruence → AttSpo

0.36***

 

0.234

  

H4b: Congruence → Sincerity

0.485***

 

0.308

  

H4c: Congruence → AttGamb

−0.045

 

0.001

  

H4d: Congruence → BetInt

0.064

 

0.004

  

H5a: Sincerity → AttSpo

0.516***

 

0.480

  

H5b: Sincerity → AttGamb

0.369***

 

0.079

  

H5c: Sincerity → GambInt

0.193***

 

0.029

  

H6: Articulation → Fit

0.113***

 

0.013

  

H6b: Articulation → AttSpo

0.048

 

0.005

  

AttSponsor

 

0.576

 

0.404

 

AttGamb

 

0.107

 

0.079

 

GambInt

 

0.396

 

0.363

 

Sincerity

 

0.236

 

0.158

 

Congruence

 

0.013

 

0.011

 

GambBeh

 

0.536

 

0.525

 

Common factor model

    

0.036

  1. ***p < 0.001.