Table 7 Fuzzy DEMATEL dimensions and criteria.

From: Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis

Dimensions/Criteria

R

D

D + R

D-R

Characteristic

Socio-ecological environment (D1)

4.423

4.354

8.777

−0.07

Effect

Social welfare (D2)

7.994

8.115

16.319

0.122

Cause

Social equity (D3)

4.128

4.523

8.652

0.395

Cause

Social Inclusion (D4)

6.097

5.651

11.749

−0.445

Effect

Improving the living conditions of residents (C1)

1.298

1.185

2.483

−0.113

Effect

Improving the sanitation environment (C2)

1.144

1.095

2.239

−0.049

Effect

Improving the built environment (C3)

0.97

1.001

1.971

0.031

Cause

Use of environmentally friendly building materials (C4)

1.011

1.073

2.084

0.061

Cause

Happiness Enhancement (C5)

1.719

1.206

2.925

−0.513

Effect

Enhancing village mobility (C6)

0.918

1.087

2.005

0.169

Cause

Improvement of infrastructure facilities (C7)

1.106

1.288

2.394

0.183

Cause

Securing Homeownership (C8)

0.921

1.107

2.028

0.186

Cause

Safeguarding Homestead Compensation Benefits (C9)

1.085

1.294

2.379

0.209

Cause

Improving the quality of housing (C10)

1.084

1.152

2.236

0.068

Cause

Improving health (C11)

1.161

0.981

2.142

−0.18

Effect

Enabling the disadvantaged (C12)

1.242

1.135

2.377

−0.107

Effect

Improving education levels (C13)

0.946

1.202

2.148

0.256

Cause

Promoting social equality in employment (C14)

0.931

1.02

1.951

0.089

Cause

Enhanced Local Government Support Policy (C15)

1.009

1.166

2.176

0.157

Cause

Enhancing residents’ sense of belonging (C16)

1.604

1.317

2.922

−0.287

Effect

Enhancing Social Inclusion (C17)

1.438

1.164

2.603

−0.274

Effect

Preservation of local heritage (C18)

1.05

1.058

2.107

0.008

Cause

Preservation of folk art and folklore activities (C19)

1.035

1.026

2.061

−0.009

Effect

Designing with local culture (C20)

0.97

1.086

2.056

0.117

Cause