Table 1 Latent and Indicator variables.
From: Perception of peri urban farmers towards farm land eviction resulted from urban expansion
Factor | Question | Action item | Item |
|---|---|---|---|
Land valuation process (F1) | Q1 | The participation level of evicted farmers during the land valuation process was adequate | participation |
Q2 | The availability of essential services and facilities in the vicinity, major infrastructure projects, and commercial developments is beneficial to land valuation | location | |
Q3 | The technical skills of land valuation committee members in land valuation outcomes are tremendous | skill | |
Q4 | The corruption and mal-practices of the land valuation experts and local administrators are paramount | corruption | |
Q5 | There are supportive government policies, land tenure reforms, and government programs targeting evicted farmers | Gov. policy | |
Compensation practices (F2) | Q6 | There is an increased number of new employment opportunities for household members who didn’t have jobs before | newjob |
Q7 | The compensation provided to evictees accounts for inflation and future losses i.e., it considers inflation and factors that bring any potential future losses or risks associated with the eviction | inflation | |
Q8 | The compensation is timely and full payment i.e., the full amount is paid to the farmers in a timely manner or not delayed or partially paid | Timely payment | |
Livelihood improvement status (F3) | Q9 | Reduced prevalence of malnutrition and decreased incidence of disease | incidence |
Q10 | Increased income and savings of the household after eviction | income | |
Q11 | Increased access to infrastructure such as health institutes, market, electricity, tap water, etc. after eviction | infrastructure |
