Table 11 Mechanism analysis: team size.

From: The impact of collaboration networks constructed through common project experience on research output

Dependent variable

WHum

Tnum

Tquo

Vrs

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Cen

0.001***

0.017***

1.032***

0.026***

 

(2.93)

(6.56)

(9.54)

(7.08)

WHum

 

1.363***

22.390***

0.788***

  

(21.47)

(8.38)

(8.67)

Tit

0.210***

4.201***

137.263***

6.360***

 

(12.45)

(33.34)

(19.44)

(28.92)

Fund

0.009***

0.086***

1.777***

0.089***

 

(4.57)

(11.34)

(7.09)

(10.39)

Time

0.158**

2.421***

19.525

−0.427

 

(1.99)

(8.63)

(1.42)

(−0.71)

Constant

6.026***

−17.220***

−388.043***

−4.160*

 

(33.61)

(−17.88)

(−8.18)

(−1.88)

Year_FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Discipline_FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Funding_FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Institution_FE

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sobel test P value

 

0.000

0.000

0.000

Adj. R2

0.364

0.354

0.217

0.255

N

42996

42996

42996

42996

  1. All regressions include project start year, discipline type, funding type, and host institution fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered by institution. T statistic is presented in parenthesis. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.
Back to article page