Abstract
Most existing studies on sustainable tourism development (STD) focus on resource protection, with limited progress in management methods, particularly in evaluation and measurement systems. This study integrates literature reviews, interviews, and survey data to establish logical hypotheses between total quality management (TQM) and STD. A TQM-STD scale was developed and empirically tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The key findings are as follows: (1) A five-dimensional scale (Full participation-FP, Whole participation management-WPM, Comprehensive management-CM, Overall perception-OP, Tourism benefits-TB) with 30 items was constructed, demonstrating strong reliability (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8), validity (validity >0.7, average variance extracted >0.5, composite reliability >0.7), and broad applicability. (2) An SEM model was established based on the logical relationships between TQM and STD. The model exhibited a good fit (χ²/df >1.2, incremental fit index >0.9), supporting the proposed hypotheses and confirming the applicability of TQM to STD management at tourist attractions. (3) TQM positively influences STD. At p < 0.001, the three TQM dimensions ranked by their impact on STD are FP at 0.34, WPM at 0.28, and CM at 0.26. FP directly contributes to STD (55.1% variance explained), while WPM and CM exert indirect effects through TB and OP, explaining 57.6% and 62.7% of the variance, respectively. (4) This study highlights the practical implications of innovatively introducing TQM from the industrial manufacturing sector into STD management, providing a systematic framework for improving management efficiency at tourist attractions. The proposed scale offers actionable insights for policymakers and practitioners to enhance tourism sustainability through evidence-based decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
China will build an economic model based on green, low-carbon, and sustainable development by 2025. From 2018 to 2022, tourism revenue in Sichuan Province contributed 9.3% to the GDP, indicating its significant role in economic development. By 2023, the Development and Reform Commission of Sichuan released a policy emphasizing the need for innovation in management to optimize STD. The Chengdu-Chongqing region, known for its abundant tourism resources, has witnessed increasing tourism development activities under the rural revitalization strategy. To ensure long-term sustainability, it is essential to incorporate systematic management frameworks. In recent years, researchers have employed both qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to study sustainable tourism development. E.g., Arora and Sharma (2024) explored the role of tourism in alleviating poverty. Zaman (2024) investigated promoting the benign development of tourism destinations through tourist behavior and local involvement. Schlesinger et al. (2024) examined the influence of residents’ support and economic development level on STD. Targeted development has been carried out in the aforementioned areas, leading to the creation of scales such as destination trust (Liu et al. 2019), destination quality (Chandralal and Valenzuela 2015), and tourist perception (Mukherjee et al. 2018). Additionally, scholars have analyzed the constraining factors and management approaches affecting STD, including policy enforcement (Yuan et al. 2024), sustainable development ideas (Nieuwland 2024), ecological and societal elements (Kim et al. 2024), performance assessment levels (Li et al. 2024), and low-carbon lifestyles (Sakcharoen et al. 2024). The multidimensional and multi-perspective approaches have been employed to develop scales measuring the impact of community and tourist involvement on STD (Fatma et al. 2016; Jeong et al. 2021; Woosnam 2012). However, there has been limited success in enhancing STD through the reinforcement of the tourist attraction lifecycle management.
Total Quality Management (TQM), originally from the industrial sector, provides a structured approach to optimizing resources, enhancing service quality, and ensuring continuous improvement in tourism development. TQM fundamentally highlights the comprehensive management of products throughout their life cycle (Ahmed and Nahar 2024) and has been widely applied in infrastructure construction management (Anand 2024), corporate performance and innovation management (Anil and Satish 2016; Yusr et al. 2017), accumulating significant experience and knowledge in scale development and design. Moreover, it has gradually played an important role in emerging industries including ecological sustainability (Jum’a et al. 2023) and renewable energy (Deka et al. 2024). Despite its proven effectiveness in structured management, the application of TQM in tourism remains underexplored. Given the rapid expansion of tourism activities in the Chengdu-Chongqing region, a well-defined TQM framework tailored for STD is essential to support sustainable destination management. However, there is a scarcity of literature that utilizes the multidimensional aspects of TQM to study STD, particularly the lack of mature TQM scales tailored specifically for STD.
The Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, a major metropolitan area in Asia, is characterized by abundant tourism resources and diverse application scenarios, accompanied by a steadily increasing demand for tourism. In this context, the present study investigates the innovative application of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Sustainable Tourism Development (STD). Specifically, the study establishes the logical hypothesis relationship between TQM and STD, develops and designs a survey scale tailored to sustainable tourism development at the scale of tourism attractions, and constructs a structural equation model (SEM) for TQM and STD. The analysis focuses on examining the impact of various dimensions of TQM on STD, aiming to provide an innovative theoretical framework and empirical evidence for optimizing sustainable tourism management at the attraction scale. Additionally, the findings offer valuable theoretical insights and practical implications for the tourism development in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration basin.
Literature review
STD dimensions
Tourism, as an integral component of the circular economy (Li et al. 2024), is regarded as a crucial industry for China’s implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Sustainable tourism development (STD) should address the current needs of tourist destinations and travelers, while also considering the future requirements of these stakeholders. According to the Sustainable Tourism for Development Guidebook, it involves achieving coordinated development among governments, businesses, communities, and tourist attractions, leading to a sustainable state characterized by expected quality of life, environmental standards, and ongoing benefits for governments and businesses. The Global Sustainable Tourism Council outlines five objectives for sustainable tourism development: enhancing ecological awareness, promoting fair tourism development, improving the quality of life for residents in tourist destinations, providing high-quality tourism experiences to travelers, and preserving environmental quality.
Previous research (Fig. 1) on STD has primarily focused on three dimensions: economic benefits, social benefits, and ecological benefits (León-Gómez et al. 2021; Czernek-Marszałek 2020; Khan et al. 2020). These studies have explored aspects such as ecological awareness, fair development, resident livelihoods, tourism experiences, and environmental quality (Bramwell 2015). Among them, the widely accepted connotation of STD is that it refers to “In a certain manner and scale, developing in specific areas, sustaining vitality over the long term without causing environmental degradation or alteration” (Spenceley and Rylance 2019; Zhao et al. 2024;Fernandez-Abila et al. 2024; Boluk et al. 2019). This definition underscores the necessity of balancing development with environmental responsibility. It further highlights the importance of advocacy and education, social participation, community culture, and green concepts in STD (Tabatabaei et al. 2024). Tourism management, tourism impact, and tourism relationships are also extensions of the connotations of STD. Some researchers emphasize that sustainable tourism development requires addressing the relationships between tourists, the environment, and local communities (Cheung and Li 2019). Achieving this balance requires long-term planning and layout (Angelevska-Najdeska and Rakicevik, 2012), broadening the perspectives of tourism managers (Ruhanen 2008), innovating management concepts (Martínez-Martínez et al. 2023), and prioritizing the needs of stakeholders (Roxas et al. 2020). Additionally, STD’s influencing factors and management approaches can also constrain the direction of future tourism development. For example, some scholars argue that factors such as economic development levels (Filipiak et al. 2023), tourism management strategies (Ziyadin et al. 2019), and green development concepts may limit sustainable tourism development. To achieve sustainable tourism development, strategies may involve enhancing performance assessment frameworks, altering energy consumption patterns (Hasan 2024), reducing carbon emissions (Sakcharoen et al. 2024), and enhancing overall tourism benefits (Rahman et al. 2024).
A bibliometric analysis of recent research on sustainable tourism development (according to the PRISMA guidelines).
TQM impact on STD
Total Quality Management (TQM) is a significant management strategy (Ahmed and Nahar 2024) that has found wide application across various fields, such as transportation system management (Akhmatova et al. 2022), building quality control (Othman et al. 2020), managing corporate performance (Anil and Satish 2016; Singh et al. 2018), and fostering innovation (Yusr et al. 2017). Despite this, there remains a gap in the literature regarding TQM’s application to sustainable tourism development. TQM encompasses full participation, process management, and comprehensive oversight. For example, linking TQM’s process management principle to the practical challenge of stakeholder engagement in STD could offer a more structured approach to involving various stakeholders in decision-making. In this context, existing research results mainly analyze the impact of STD by studying single dimensions. Such as, studies suggest that community involvement is a prerequisite for sustainable tourism destination development (Iqbal et al. 2023). Tourism stakeholders and residents play a significant role in shaping sustainable tourism (Walas et al. 2024), highlighting the importance of stakeholder participation in tourism management to enhance visitor experiences (Roxas et al. 2020). Local governments, tourists, residents, and employees all contribute as key stakeholders in this process (Liu et al. 2019). Moreover, some studies have explored the entire process of tourism area development based on the concept of the whole process management, thereby revealing that tourism area development conforms to the lifecycle theory (Moore and Whitehall 2005). This ties into TQM’s emphasis on comprehensive process management, which could offer valuable insights into managing the lifecycle of tourism development more effectively. Scholars have analyzed the impact of comprehensive management on STD from multiple perspectives. For instance, Li (2024) suggests that community involvement, tourism certification, and public-private partnerships are important strategies for achieving sustainable tourism development. Likewise, Ahmad (2022) explores the impact of innovation management on sustainable development using panel data, while Roxas et al. (2020) employ systems thinking tools to establish causal relationships between sustainable tourism variables and analyze the impact of leadership management on STD.
TQM and STD scales
Through the literature review above, we have gained a clearer understanding of the essence of Sustainable Tourism Development (STD) and the influence mechanism of Total Quality Management (TQM) on STD. Building on these insights, we further analyzed the development of scales in the TQM and STD fields. We found that TQM has yielded scale development outcomes in areas such as manufacturing (Das et al. 2008), government management (Musenze and Thomas 2020), and social responsibility (Wang 2023; Khurshid et al. 2022), with the number of dimensions typically ranging from 3 to 8. By contrast, scale development in the STD field mainly focuses on aspects such as residents (Lee 2013), as well as communities, tourism practitioners (Eslami et al. 2019), while also addressing environmental impacts (Rasoolimanesh et al. 2024; Chi and Liu 2023). These focal points align closely with previous literature on the fundamental aspects of STD. However, through comparative analysis of the literature, we found a lack of mature scale systems for assessing the influence of TQM on STD, with related research being scarce. Furthermore, direct comparisons with previous studies (as shown in Table 1) reveal significant differences in the dimensions and content of similar studies and our own, which further underscores the novelty of our perspective. To bridge this gap, we have developed a TQM-STD scale suitable for the scale of tourist areas, grounded in a comprehensive understanding of STD’s essence and the potential impact of TQM on STD.
Literature synthesis and research gaps
The literature analysis results reveal that the concept of STD emphasizes maintaining its long-term vitality while not compromising environmental improvement. Its connotations focus on the sustainability of tourism benefits and sustainable tourism perceptions, revolving around five major aspects: ecological awareness, fair development, resident livelihoods, tourism experiences, and environmental quality. STD underscores the construction of harmonious tourism relationships among stakeholders, including local governments, local communities, tourists, and tourism practitioners. It is crucial to identify the influencing factors of STD, particularly emphasizing the impact of tourism planning, tourism management, and community participation. Additionally, regional economic development levels, performance management approaches, and the promotion of green development concepts are considered important management approaches to achieve sustainable tourism development. TQM, as a significant management approach, has gradually been applied in various fields of sustainable development, encompassing dimensions of FP, WPM, and CM. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive research on the application of TQM to STD, with existing studies predominantly focusing on single dimensions, particularly emphasizing full participation and whole-process management. Thus, it is evident that there is a gap in the literature regarding the integration of TQM into sustainable tourism development research, indicating a need to encourage further exploration of TQM within the context of STD. Both TQM and STD have rich scales in their respective research fields. However, there is a clear gap in applicable scales for integrating TQM into the STD field, particularly in terms of assessing the impact of TQM on STD. Therefore, it is highly valuable to develop a TQM-STD scale that merges the essence of STD with the mechanisms of TQM’s impact on STD. This scale will have guiding significance for optimizing management methods for sustainable tourism development at the tourist attraction level.
Questions and hypotheses
Given the prosperous tourism development in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, especially when considering the diverse types and distribution of tourism resources, which make it an ideal experimental setting for this study, and in light of the identified research gaps, this study aims to explore how TQM can promote STD in this region. Specifically, the study will address the following questions:
Q 1. What is the impact of FP on STD?
Q 2. What is the impact of WPM on STD?
Q 3. What is the impact of CM on STD?
This study aims to fill the gaps in the existing literature by conducting an in-depth analysis of the role of TQM in sustainable tourism development, particularly in the context of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. To address the above questions, based on bibliometric analysis (Moher et al. 2010), relevant literature was reviewed (Table 1), and the potential impacts of the three dimensions of TQM on STD were examined, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
Blue circle indicates the independent variables (endogenous variables), the green circle denotes the mediating variables, and the red circle signifies the dependent variables (exogenous variables).
Methodology
Materials and declarations
This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical guidelines for academic research set forth by the National Science and Technology Ethics Committee of China. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (Approval No. SUSE20250107-001) on 31 August 2024, ensuring compliance with ethical standards for human research. All participants were informed about the study’s purpose, procedures, potential risks, and voluntary nature before participating in interviews and surveys. They provided written informed consent to confirm their voluntary participation. Personal information was kept strictly confidential, and all data were processed anonymously, accessible only to the research team, and securely stored to prevent unauthorized access. Participants had the right to withdraw from the study at any time without any negative consequences.
The materials for this study were divided into three stages. The first stage involved interviews with tourists, employees, and local officials, resulting in 66 interview records used to analyze the logical relationship between TQM and STD. The second stage was the pilot testing of the scale, during which 180 questionnaires were collected (response rate: 91.7%). The third stage was the formal testing phase, with 1050 questionnaires collected (response rate: 90.2%). Data collection was conducted in 13 tourist attractions within the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration (Fig. 3), with assistance from tourist attraction management departments, utilizing both online and offline methods.
A Geographical location of the study area within China; B distribution of sampling sites within graded tourist attractions (1A–5A classes); C sampling site map with representative landscape photographs from each investigated tourist attraction.
Methodology
The framework of this paper is mainly divided into four sections (Fig. 4). The first section is the establishment of the logical relationship between TQM and STD. Based on bibliometric analysis and interview data, the construction relationship between TQM and STD is developed. The second section is scale development, where an item pool is constructed based on the logical relationship between TQM and STD and a small sample survey (180), using Discriminatory analysis (DA) and EFA analysis methods (Kvale and Brinkmann 2009; Worthen et al. 2014; Shrestha 2020). The third section involves a large sample survey (700) based on the item pool, and EFA is used to optimize the scale items, resulting in the formal scale. The fourth section verifies the impact of TQM on STD using an SEM model based on the formal scale. The CFA and path analysis conducted at this stage used the remaining 350 questionnaires from the total sample.
Research framework and flowchart.
Analysis and findings
Item development
The settings of each construct dimension were evaluated through expert scoring and subjected to Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) testing, with the results shown in Table 2. Among them, the IOC value for TB is 0.71 (greater than 0.5), which is relatively lower compared to other constructs. This is due to either insufficient clarity in the definition of the construct or excessive complexity in the design of the items. Before the pre-survey, the dimensions of TB were optimized in the questionnaire to address this issue. TQM’s effect on STD and the extent of its impact are uncertain. To accurately establish the hypothetical relationship between multiple dimensions of TQM and STD, as well as to define the conceptual constructs of each dimension, we conducted interviews at two randomly selected scenic spots in the study area. The interviews focused on the relationship between TQM and STD and involved scenic spot visitors, employees, and local officials. We collected a total of 66 interview records, including 32 visitors, 18 scenic spot employees, and 16 local officials. Using Nvivo12 software, we conducted statistical analysis on the interview records. The results showed that the interviewees mainly believed that participation and process management play a facilitating role in STD. They also believed that full participation and process management have positive effects on tourism revenue and tourism experiences. Based on the interview results and existing reference literature, we constructed five dimensions of TQM for STD and initially defined the constructs of the five dimensions as follows: whole process management (WPM), full participation (FP), overall perception (OP), comprehensive management (CM), and tourism benefits (TB). For the concepts of each dimension, please consult Table 2.
Scale development
Item analysis
Item development has undergone construction and screening of items through IOC and collinearity diagnosis. To ensure the scientific rationality of item composition and quantity, we need to conduct item analysis using questionnaires based on the item pool and survey data. This allows us to reassess whether any items need to be removed. Supported by the tourism administration agencies of the surveyed attraction were carried out. The survey questionnaires were collected and preprocessed, resulting in a total distribution of 180 questionnaires. After removing 15 invalid questionnaires, there were 165 valid questionnaires, yielding an effective questionnaire rate of 91.7%. The data from these 165 pretest questionnaires were then subjected to discriminant analysis, reliability analysis, and factor analysis.
The 165 questionnaires were sorted based on the total average score for each variable, with the top 27% of scores categorized as the high-score group and the bottom 27% as the low-score group. The average scores for each variable in the high and low-score groups were calculated separately, and the difference between the two averages represented the discriminant coefficient for each variable (Fig. 5). A larger absolute value of the difference indicates higher discriminant power for the item. Through independent sample t-tests, it was found that the t-values for WPM3, OP3, and OP9 were all less than 3 and not significant (p > 0.05), indicating poor discriminant power for these items. Therefore, they were removed, resulting in a final item pool of 33 items.
A–C Discriminant coefficients of individual items across five dimensions: FP, WPM, CM, TB, and OP, respectively. The item marked in red has a t-value less than 3, and p > 0.05, indicating that it is not significant.
Based on the discriminant analysis of items, a reliability analysis was also conducted. As shown in Fig. 6, deleting three items (FP1, WPM5, and OP6) would increase Cronbach’s α coefficients for FP, WPM, and OP to 0.881, 0.875, and 0.892, respectively, all exceeding 0.80. This represents a significant improvement from the original Cronbach’s α coefficients of 0.813, 0.778, and 0.773, respectively. However, deleting these three items would result in a significant decrease in Cronbach’s α coefficients for the corresponding scales compared to when all 30 items are retained. Therefore, removing FP1, WPM5, and OP6 items was deemed necessary to further optimize the scale. After deletion, the Cronbach’s α coefficients for the scale exceeded 0.8, indicating excellent internal consistency of the scales. From a theoretical perspective, the removal of these items suggests that certain aspects of FP, WPM, and OP may not align well with the core constructs being measured. This refinement ensures that each dimension of the scale remains conceptually coherent while improving reliability. The results suggest strong associations among the factors in this study, with high internal consistency. Thus, the items within each dimension of the scale are deemed reliable.
The second column shows the Cronbach’s alpha for OP-FP, while the fourth column displays the Cronbach’s alpha for OP-FP after removing FP1, WPM5, and OP6.
The KMO statistic is one of the measures used to assess the suitability of a factor analysis model. After conducting statistical analysis on the 165-pre-test data, the results revealed a KMO value of 0.85, with a chi-square value of 2836.16 for Bartlett’s test (p < 0.001) and 741 degrees of freedom. This indicates that there is a significant correlation among the variables, suggesting the presence of underlying common factors, making the data highly suitable for factor analysis. Upon examining the communalities (Table 3), it was found that all values exceeded 0.2, and the factor loadings were all above 0.45, indicating that all items could be retained. Through independent sample tests, reliability analysis, commonalities analysis, and item reduction, an initial scale was formed, with the FP, WPM, CM, TB, and OP scales containing 5, 5, 5, 9, and 6 items, respectively.
Exploratory factor analysis
After conducting item analysis and validation, an initial scale was obtained. A total of 700 surveys were handed out, with 643 collected. After excluding 11 entries due to extremely short completion times or uniform answers, 632 were deemed valid, leading to an effective response rate of 90.2%.
The validity of items was examined and the factor structure of observed variables was explored using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to explore the dimensionality of STD (Table 4). Initially, the valid questionnaires (N = 632) were imported into SPSS software for analysis, resulting in a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.941, and a significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity chi-square value of 11166.271 (p < 0.001), with 435 degrees of freedom. These results suggest the presence of correlations among items and indicate the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Varimax rotation were then employed to extract and orthogonalize factors. Factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were retained, resulting in the extraction of 5 common factors. The cumulative variance contribution reached 66.96%, exceeding the 60% extraction criterion. The scree plot test also indicated the suitability of retaining 5 factors. Based on the relationships among items, the structure of the 5 factors reflected the theoretical framework well, confirming the extraction of the 5 factors.
The PCA analysis revealed that FP2, FP3, FP4, FP5, and FP6 had higher loadings on the 4th factor, which was named “full participation (FP)”; WPM1, WPM2, WPM4, WPM6, and WPM7 had higher loadings on the 5th factor, named “whole process management (WPM)”; CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4, and CM5 had higher loadings on the 3rd factor, named “comprehensive management (CM)”; TB1, TB2, TB3, TB4, TB5, TB6, TB7, TB8, and TB9 had higher loadings on the 1st factor, named “tourism benefits (TB)”; OP1, OP2, OP4, OP5, OP7, and OP8 had higher loadings on the 2nd factor, named “overall perception (OP)”. This dimensional division is consistent with the expected dimensions, demonstrating good validity, and leading to the formation of the final version of the scale.
Scale evaluation
1050 questionnaires were distributed (90.2% response rate), with 25 invalid questionnaires, 632 valid for EFA, and 290 for CFA. In this study, AMOS software was used to conduct CFA to validate the structural stability of the scale. As shown in Fig. 7, the goodness-of-fit indices for the overall dimension measurement model were examined. It was found that X2/df = 1.377, CFI = 0.99, GFI = 0.95, AGFI = 0.93, IFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.02. All of these indices met the standard criteria for goodness-of-fit, indicating that the measurement model met the fit criteria.
Fit test of the CFA model.
Convergence analysis results (Table 5) indicate that the factor loading values of the 30 items range from 0.69 to 0.87, demonstrating the high construct validity of the scale. The convergent validity of the scale was tested by combining the composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE). The CR values for each dimension ranged from 0.88 to 0.93, all exceeding the standard of 0.70. Additionally, the AVE values for each dimension were all greater than the standard value of 0.50, indicating good convergent validity of the scale. The discriminant validity of the scale was assessed by determining whether the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE) for each dimension was greater than the correlation coefficients between other dimensions. The data (Table 5) show that the square root values of AVE for all five dimensions are higher than the correlation coefficients between other related dimensions. The correlation coefficients between dimensions (Table 5) are all below the standard of 0.75 (Kline 2015), demonstrating ideal discriminant validity among the dimensions.
Hypothesis demonstration
SEM construction
Grounded in the theoretical framework of the hypotheses and the reliability and validity assessments of scale data, AMOS software was employed to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to explore the factors shaping the interaction between TQM and STD (Fig. 8). The values ranged from 0.78 to 0.79 for the SFLs of the five FP indicators, whereas those for WPM fell between 0.74 and 0.80. Similarly, the SFLs for CM were between 0.77 and 0.82, while those for OP spanned from 0.74 to 0.80. For the nine items of STD, the SFLs varied from 0.68 to 0.80, and for TB, they ranged from 0.71 to 0.83. All 39 observed variables achieved SFLs above the threshold of 0.6. Moreover, the SEM model demonstrated robust fit indices, with CFI = 0.98, IFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.98, GFI = 0.93, AGFI = 0.92, X²/df = 1.28 (<3), and RMSEA = 0.02 (below the cutoff of 0.08). These findings confirm that the SEM model adheres to the proposed theoretical structure and achieves excellent fit as validated by the goodness-of-fit metrics.
Hypothesis demonstration of TQM’s influence on STD.
Path analysis
The SEM model’s goodness-of-fit underscores the suitability of its framework. To better understand the intricate dynamics between latent variables and assess their mutual impacts, a path analysis was performed using AMOS. The findings (Fig. 8; Table 6) reveal that all the expected associations in the framework are noteworthy (p < 0.05), except for the non-significant impact of TB on OP (p > 0.05). These results verify the robustness of the research hypotheses. Path analysis indicates that FP, WPM, and CM influence STD directly in a positive direction, with values of 0.19 (p ≤ 0.001), 0.12, and 0.10 (p ≤ 0.05). FP demonstrates the strongest direct influence, emphasizing its pivotal role among the TQM dimensions. Additionally, these independent variables influence STD indirectly through mediating variables, with CM-TB-STD emerging as the most influential pathway, characterized by a mean of 0.31 (p ≤ 0.001). The subsequent pathways are WPM-TB-STD (0.30, p ≤ 0.001) and FP-TB-STD (0.30, p ≤ 0.001). The results suggest that TQM primarily affects STD via indirect mechanisms, particularly by enhancing tourism benefits. In contrast, TQM’s indirect effects on STD through tourism perceptions are relatively moderate, with FP-OP-STD identified as the most impactful path, averaging a coefficient of 0.25 (p ≤ 0.001). Overall, the indirect effect of TQM on STD (0.28) through tourism benefits substantially exceeds its direct impact (0.13).
Discussion and conclusion
Discussion
Scale development validation
Based on bibliometric analysis and expert knowledge, the relationship between three dimensions of TQM and STD was established, successfully developing a TQM-STD scale consisting of five dimensions: FP, WPM, CM, TB, and OP, comprising 30 items. The construction process of the scale for the five dimensions passed a series of rigorous tests including IOC, collinearity, reliability, and validity. The TQM-STD scale can be presented from the perspectives of FP, WPM, CM, TB, and OP, and the correlation coefficients between dimensions (Fig. 9) are all below the standard of 0.75 (Kline 2015), indicating no model collinearity or overlap issues. This suggests that the first-order model (Fig. 8) is appropriate for this study, with no second-order constructs present.
Two-dimensional correlation of the TQM-STD Scale System.
In the TQM-STD scale, the FP mainly revolve around tourists, residents, and scenic area staff, covering stakeholders in tourism (Roxas et al. 2020) and reflecting the concept of full participation. The WPM involve tourism planning, operation, and supervisory management, which align with the PDCA cycle (Carvalho et al. 2023) and are a significant manifestation of the tourist attraction lifecycle management (Ahmed and Nahar 2024). The construct of CM consists of five items, encompassing aspects such as hardware and software, tourism features, innovative concepts, etc., which align with the comprehensive management’s promotion of sustainable tourism development (Li et al. 2024; Ahmad et al. 2022). TB and OP are two intermediate variables influencing TQM-STD. The TB scale includes 9 items involving residents’ income, investment, product sales, and environmental awareness, aligning with the three dimensions of economic, social, and ecological benefits of STD (León-Gómez et al. 2021; Czernek-Marszałek 2020; Khan et al. 2020). Timothy and Said (2023) proposed that residents’ perception of tourism includes positive and negative aspects, with positive perception showing high consistency with the OP item in this study. Additionally, research indicates that in special tourism scenarios, tourists are willing to exchange time costs for better travel experiences (Yin et al. 2024), and tourism attractions often focus on enhancing tourists’ travel experiences for better marketing (Dong and Qu 2023). This underscores the importance of tourism perception for sustainable tourism, which is highly relevant to the content included in the OP item of this study.
The five extracted factors (FP, WPM, CM, TB, and OP) are interrelated to enhance STD through both synergies and potential conflicts. FP and WPM are closely connected, with FP relying on effective WPM for the structured engagement of stakeholders. Strong WPM ensures that the inclusivity of FP is translated into actionable tourism strategies. CM serves as the operational framework that integrates FP and WPM, promoting synergy through coordinated resource management and policy implementation. However, if CM becomes overly rigid or lacks flexibility, it may limit stakeholder participation, potentially leading to conflicts. TB and OP act as mediators: when TB aligns with sustainable goals, it fosters positive OP, reinforcing support for the tourism system. However, disparities in TB can lead to negative OP, undermining the sustainability of the tourism development. Therefore, while these dimensions generally work together to drive STD, balancing their interrelations is crucial to avoid conflicts and enhance the overall effectiveness of the TQM-STD framework.
Hypotheses verification
The structural path analysis sheds light on the ways TQM dimensions (FP, WPM, CM) contribute to STD. FP emerges as the most impactful factor, showing the highest direct effect on STD (coefficient = 0.189, p < 0.001). Additionally, both OP and TB play crucial roles as mediators, amplifying the indirect impact of TQM on sustainable tourism development. To verify the reliability of these findings, a robust bootstrapping method (Edwards and Lambert 2007) was applied, performing 5000 resampling iterations at a 95% confidence interval. This analysis corroborates the findings obtained from the SEM model. The partial mediation role of OP and TB is evident, with VAF (Variance Accounted For) values ranging between 20 and 80%. Notably, TB demonstrates a stronger mediating influence compared to OP, as reflected in the standardized effect values: 0.10 for CM-TB-STD. These patterns indicate that TB serves as a more dominant channel for TQM’s impact on STD. Overall, the cumulative effects of TQM dimensions reveal FP as the leading contributor (total effect = 0.34), followed by WPM (0.28) and CM (0.26). This ranking highlights the pivotal role of FP in driving STD development. The alignment of these results with the path analysis further substantiates the research hypotheses and underscores the layered influence of TQM on STD through both direct and indirect mechanisms.
To substantiate the effect of TQM on sustainable tourism development, our findings were compared with prior studies (Achmad et al. 2022; Fatma et al. 2016; Ho et al. 2023; Jum’a et al. 2023; Khurshid et al. 2022), to ensure methodological precision and consistency. The first dimension, Full Participation (FP), highlights the involvement of all stakeholders such as employees in tourism destinations, local businesses, governing bodies, and residents in tourism initiatives. Our findings underscore the positive direct influence of FP on STD, as evidenced by a path coefficient of 0.34 (p < 0.001). This supports the notion that broader engagement can directly enhance STD, aligning with previous research (Yang et al. 2023; He et al. 2020). STD encapsulates multiple phases, including strategy development, implementation, and evaluation. Whole Process Management (WPM), the second TQM dimension, focuses on orchestrating all stages of tourism activities systematically. Our analysis confirms WPM’s significant effect on sustainable tourism development, having a path coefficient of 0.28 at the significance level of p < 0.001. Literature underscores the importance of WPM in fostering sustainability through streamlined planning and execution, especially under green tourism management frameworks (Waligo et al. 2013). Integrating WPM into TQM practices thus emerges as a well-justified approach for promoting STD (Xiaorong et al. 2013). The third dimension, Comprehensive Management (CM), involves a diverse range of practices, including personnel oversight (Singh et al. 2024), performance tracking (Erden Ayhun et al. 2024), and safety protocols (Efunniyi et al. 2024). Our study establishes that CM contributes to STD through both direct and mediated pathways, with total effects quantified at 0.26 (p < 0.001). TB and OP function as key mediators, amplifying the influence of CM on STD. Ultimately, the empirical results confirm that TQM significantly drives STD both directly and indirectly. The findings provide actionable recommendations for fostering sustainable tourism in the Chengdu-Chongqing region by leveraging TQM’s multidimensional framework.
Limitations
Some valuable findings were obtained during the study. However, the study also has certain limitations due to various reasons. Firstly, the data were derived from questionnaire responses. Although respondents were encouraged to answer truthfully, they may have been influenced by social expectations and inclined to provide responses that aligned with these expectations, leading to inflated item scores. This is a common issue in questionnaire surveys (Fowler 2014). Moreover, we should also clearly recognize that the sample collection was limited to a specific region. Future research can be expanded to different areas or cross-cultural contexts to validate the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, the sample comprised national 5A-level scenic areas, which employ relatively advanced management methods. However, there may be differences in management concepts and methods among scenic areas of different levels (Wang et al. 2024). In the future, it is necessary to conduct uniform sampling across A-5A-level scenic areas to validate the applicability of the scale. While the scale has passed various tests of reliability and validity, further optimization of the scale items for each dimension may be required to adapt to specific survey subjects as the application scenarios change. Furthermore, although the study employed path analysis and bootstrapping methods to validate the hypotheses, the impact of TQM on STD may be influenced by other potential variables not included in the model, such as policy interventions and technological innovations. Future research could enhance the explanatory power of the model by incorporating more advanced causal inference methods.
Conclusion
This study offers substantial insights into the integration of Total Quality Management (TQM) principles with Sustainable Tourism Development (STD). By validating a robust TQM-STD scale, this research introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding how TQM dimensions, including Full Participation (FP), Whole Process Management (WPM), and Comprehensive Management (CM), influence STD both directly and indirectly. The empirical findings demonstrate that FP is the most significant driver of STD. WPM and CM also make substantial contributions, with their effects mediated by factors such as tourism benefits (TB) and overall perceptions (OP).
From a theoretical perspective, this research advances our understanding of the multidimensional relationship between TQM and STD, offering a reliable measurement tool and contributing to the literature on sustainable tourism. The interdisciplinary approach, blending project management and tourism management principles, enriches the conceptualization of tourist attraction management and has the potential to drive future theoretical innovations. From a practical standpoint, the study’s methodology, which employs both online and on-site surveys, provides valuable insights for tourism practitioners. It guides the implementation of TQM strategies to enhance tourism sustainability. The findings also underscore the importance of stakeholder engagement, systematic planning, and comprehensive management in achieving sustainable tourism outcomes.
Overall, this research provides actionable recommendations for tourism destinations, particularly in the Chengdu-Chongqing region, and establishes a framework that can be applied globally to foster sustainable tourism practices. Further research should explore broader contexts and incorporate additional variables to deepen the understanding of how TQM can effectively contribute to sustainable tourism development.
Data availability
The original datasets used in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
References
Abu-Rumman A, Mhasnah A, Al-Zyout T (2021) Direct and indirect effects of TQM on the patients’ satisfaction and loyalty in the Jordanian health care sector. Manag Sci Lett 11(2):493–502
Achmad W, Yulianah Y (2022) Corporate social responsibility of the hospitality industry in realizing sustainable tourism development Enrich J Manag 12(2):1610–1616. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v12i2.447
Ahmad N, Youjin L, Hdia M (2022) The role of innovation and tourism in sustainability: why is environment-friendly tourism necessary for entrepreneurship? J Clean Prod 379:134799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134799
Ahmed S, Nahar R (2024) Development of total quality management from conventional and Islamic perspectives. In: Islamic operations management. Routledge, pp 85–95
Akhmatova M-S, Antonina D, Dzhennet-Mari A, Larisa P (2022). Integrating quality management systems (TQM) in the digital age of intelligent transportation systems industry 4.0. Transp Res Procedia, 63:1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.163
Anand PD (2024) Exploring quality management practices in construction projects: Comprehensive literature. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci 2582–5208
Angelevska-Najdeska K, Rakicevik G (2012) Planning of sustainable tourism development. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 44:210–220
Anil AP, Satish KP (2016) Investigating the relationship between TQM practices and firm’s performance: a conceptual framework for Indian organizations. Procedia Technol 24:554–561
Arora M, Sharma RL (2024) Analyzing microfinance as a resilience strategy for poverty alleviation and promoting sustainable tourism: a communicative perspective. In: Dynamics of the tourism industry. Apple Academic Press, pp 125–143
Martínez-Martínez A, Cegarra-Navarro Alexeis Garcia A (2023) Sustainability knowledge management and organisational learning in tourism: current approaches and areas for future development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 31(4):895–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2086560
Baloch QB, Shah SN, Iqbal N, Sheeraz M, Asadullah M, Mahar S, Khan AU (2023) Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(3):5917–5930
Boluk KA, Cavaliere CT, Higgins-Desbiolles F (2019) A critical framework for interrogating the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda in tourism. J Sustain Tour 27:847–864
Bramwell B (2015) Theoretical activity in sustainable tourism research. Ann Tour Res 54:204–218
Carvalho AB, Carvalho M, Mota M, Fonseca S, Martins S (2023) Lean thinking and tourism management—an Airbnb case study in Douro. In: Carvalho JV, Abreu A, Liberato P, Peña A (eds) Advances in tourism, technology and systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 345. Springer, Singapore
Chandralal L, Valenzuela FR (2015) Memorable tourism experiences: Scale Development. Contemp Manag Res 11(3):291–230. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.1382
Cheung KS, Li LH (2019) Understanding visitor–resident relations in overtourism: developing resilience for sustainable tourism. J Sustain Tour 27(8):1197–1216
Chi Y, Liu D (2023) Measuring the island tourism development sustainability at dual spatial scales using a four-dimensional model: a case study of Shengsi archipelago, China. J Clean Prod 388:135775
Czernek-Marszałek K (2020) Social embeddedness and its benefits for cooperation in a tourism destination. J Destin Mark Manag 15:100401
Das A, Paul H, Swierczek FW (2008) Developing and validating total quality management (TQM) constructs in the context of Thailand’s manufacturing industry. Benchmarking Int J 15(1):52–72
Deka A, Banga C, Rukani S (2024) The effects of energy efficiency, renewable energy and tourism development on the environment in Sub-Sahara Africa. Int J Environ Sci Technol 21(4):3649–3660
Dong Y, Qu Y (2023) The impact mechanism and boundary conditions of tourists’ restoration perception on destination attachment: a resource conservation perspective. Tour Manag Perspect 48:101165
Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1
Efunniyi CP, Abhulimen AO, Obiki-Osafiele AN, Osundare OS, Agu EE, Adeniran IA (2024) Strengthening corporate governance and financial compliance: enhancing accountability and transparency. Financ Acc Res J 6(8):1597–1616
Erden Ayhun S, Usta Kara I, Cavusgil Kose B (2024) Quality management research in tourism literature: a bibliometric analysis approach. Mark Menedžment Innov 15(2):55–74
Eslami S, Khalifah Z, Mardani A, Streimikiene D, Han H (2019) Community attachment, tourism impacts, quality of life and residents support for sustainable tourism development. J Travel Tour Mark 36(9):1061–1079
Fatma M, Rahman Z, Khan I (2016) Measuring consumer perception of CSR in tourism industry: scale development and validation. J Hosp Tour Manag 27:39–48
Fernandez-Abila CJ, Tan R, Dumpit DZ, Gelvezon RP, Hall RA, Lizada J, Salvador-Amores A (2024) Characterizing the sustainable tourism development of small islands in the Visayas, Philippines. Land Use Policy 137:106996
Filipiak BZ, Dylewski M, Kalinowski M (2023) Economic development trends in the EU tourism industry. Towards the digitalization process and sustainability. Qual Quant 57(Suppl 3):321–346
Fowler Jr FJ (2014) Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Glaveli N, Vouzas F, Roumeliotou M (2022) The soft side of TQM and teachers job satisfaction: an empirical investigation in primary and secondary education. TQM J 34(5):922–938
Hasan AAT (2024) Theory of sustainable consumption behavior (TSCB) to predict renewable energy consumption behavior: a case of eco-tourism visitors of Bangladesh. Manag Environ Qual Int J 35(1):101–118
He L, Zha J, Loo HA (2020) How to improve tourism energy efficiency to achieve sustainable tourism: evidence from China. Curr Issues Tour 23(1):1–16
Ho YS, Cavacece Y, Moretta Tartaglione A, Douglas A (2023) Publication performance and trends in Total Quality Management research: a bibliometric analysis. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 34(1-2):97–130
Iqbal UP, Hamza VK, Nooney LK et al. (2023) Exploring the determinants of destination satisfaction: a multidimensional approach. Futur Bus J 9:59
Jeong E, Shim C, Brown AD, Lee S (2021) Development of a scale to measure intrapersonal psychological empowerment to participate in local tourism development: applying the sociopolitical control scale construct to tourism (SPCS-T). Sustain 13(7):4057
Jum’a L, Alkalha Z, Al Mandil K, Alaraj M (2023) Exploring the influence of lean manufacturing and total quality management practices on environmental sustainability: the moderating role of quality culture. Int J Lean Six Sigma 14(7):1626–1654
Khan A, Bibi S, Lorenzo A, Lyu J, Babar ZU (2020) Tourism and development in developing economies: a policy implication perspective. Sustain 12(4):1618
Khurshid MA, Alhidari AM, Tabassum S (2022) Scale development and validation of total quality and socially responsible management (TQSR-M) framework: dual competitive strategy for management. Soc Responsib J 18(3):573–596
Kim MJ, Hall CM, Chung N, Kim M, Sohn K (2024) What makes tourists use public transport? Value-belief-norm theory, environmental, social, and governance factors, and the sustainable development goals. J Travel Res 63(6):1426–1441
Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications, New York, NY
Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
Lee TH (2013) Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development. Tour Manag 34:37–46
León-Gómez A, Ruiz-Palomo D, Fernández-Gámez MA, García-Revilla MR (2021) Sustainable tourism development and economic growth: bibliometric review and analysis. Sustain 13(4):2270
Li K, Cipolletta G, Andreola C, Eusebi AL, Kulaga B, Cardinali S, Fatone F (2024) Circular economy and sustainability in the tourism industry: critical analysis of integrated solutions and good practices in European and Chinese case studies. Environ Dev Sustain 26(7):16461–16482
Li Y, Liu Y, Solangi YA (2024) Analysis of factors and strategies for the implementation of sustainable tourism in a green economic structure in China J Clean Prod 434:140011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140011
Liu J, Wang C, Fang S, Zhang T (2019) Scale development for tourist trust toward a tourism destination. Tour Manag Perspect 31:383–397
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8(5):336–341
Moore W, Whitehall P (2005) The tourism area lifecycle and regime switching models. Ann Tour Res 32(1):112–126
Mukherjee S, Adhikari A, Datta B (2018) Quality of tourism destination–a scale development. J Indian Bus Res 10(1):70–100
Musenze IA, Thomas MS (2020) Development and validation of a total quality management model for Uganda’s local governments. Cogent Bus Manag 7(1):1767996
Nieuwland S (2024) Urban tourism transitions: doughnut economics applied to sustainable tourism development. Tour Geogr 26(2):255–273
Othman AR, Yusr MM, Mokhtar SSM, Sulaiman Y (2020) Does interaction between TQM practices and knowledge management processes enhance the innovation performance? Int J Qual Reliab Manag 34(7):955–974. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2014-0138
Rahman MH, Tanchangya T, Rahman J, Aktar MA, Majumder SC (2024) Corporate social responsibility and green financing behavior in Bangladesh: towards sustainable tourism. Innov Green Dev 3(3):100133
Rasoolimanesh SM, Chee SY, Salee A (2024) Scale development for measuring sustainability of urban destinations from the perspectives of residents, tourists, businesses and government. J Sustain Tour 33:290–317
Roxas FMY, Rivera JPR, Gutierrez ELM (2020) Mapping stakeholders’ roles in governing sustainable tourism destinations. J Hosp Tour Manag 45:387–398
Ruhanen L (2008) Progressing the sustainability debate: a knowledge management approach to sustainable tourism planning. Curr Issues Tour 11(5):429–455
Sakcharoen T, Niyommaneerat W, Silalertruksa T (2024) Towards low-carbon travel trips through carbon footprint: a case study of marine tourism in Sichang Island, Thailand. Clean Eng Technol 23:100840
Schlesinger W, Cervera-Taulet A, Crespi-Vallbona M (2024) Community factors affecting residents’ support for tourism. J Sustain Tour 32(8):1492–1510
Shrestha N (2020) Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat 8(2):39–42
Singh P, Sharma D, Abdullah H (2024) Sustainable tourism practices: evidence from global perspectives to achieve development through economic and environmental balance. In: Sustainable tourism, part A: balancing conservation and progress in a dynamic industry (pp 169–182). Emerald Publishing Limited
Spenceley A, Rylance A (2019) The contribution of tourism to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In D. A. Fennell, N. K. Prebensen (Eds.), A research agenda for sustainable tourism, pp 107–125. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham, UK
Tabatabaei F, Oshriyeh O, Beldona S (2024) Towards sustainability: exploring community involvement in tourism development. Tour Plan Dev 21(1): 1–31
Timothy VL, Said SK (2023) Perception of residents on the impacts of beach tourism: the case of Nungwi village in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Heliyon 9(11):e21816
Walas B, Szromek AR, Kruczek Z, Rončák M (2024) Minimizing conflicts between residents and local tourism stakeholders as a way to achieve sustainable tourism in Prague, Krakow and Braga. Tour Rev 79(7):1367–1384
Waligo VM, Clarke J, Hawkins R (2013) Implementing sustainable tourism: a multi-stakeholder involvement management framework. Tour Manag 36:342–353
Wang CJ (2023) Do social exchange relationships influence total-quality-management involvement? Evidence from frontline employees of international hotels. Behav Sci 13(12):1013
Wang D, Yang L, Wang S, Wang X, Fang L, Cao N, Ren C (2024) Coordination and transformation of quality management system and standards system. China Stand 1:60–62
Wang X, Zeng Y, Wen H, Gui Z (2024) Ticket pricing and spatial heterogeneity of scenic spots in China: a spatial hedonic pricing approach. J China Tour Res 20:853–877
Woosnam KM (2012) Using emotional solidarity to explain residents’ attitudes about tourism and tourism development. J Travel Res 51(3):315–327
Worthen BR, Borg WR, White KR (2014) Measurement and evaluation in the schools. Pearson. Boston, MA
Xiaorong N, Bojian X, Huili Z (2013) The application of total quality management in rural tourism in the context of new rural construction–the case in China. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 24(9-10):1188–1201
Yang Q, Dan H, Ni T, Zhao P, Wei J, Wang G (2023) Research on the coupling and coordinated development of the tourism industry and regional economy in the economic circle of the Sichuan–Chongqing region in Southwest China. Sustain 15(3):2405
Yin J, Cheng Y, Ni Y (2024) Staging a comeback? The influencing mechanism of tourist crowding perception on adaptive behavior. Tour Manag 100:104827
Yuan S, Zhu J, Ma C, Xie Z (2024) The evolutionary game of national park tourism development and governance: public supervision, government regulation and tourism enterprise. Environ Dev Sustain 27:13335–13370
Yusr MM, Mokhtar SSM, Othman AR, Sulaiman Y (2017) Does interaction between TQM practices and knowledge management processes enhance the innovation performance? Int J Qual Reliab Manag 34(7):955–974
Zaman U (2024) Nexus of tourism affinity, perceived behavioral control and green environmental literacy in support of regenerative tourism. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 18(3):781–810
Zhao X, Elahi E, Wang F, Xing H, Khalid Z (2024) Sustainable tourism development for traditional Chinese drama’s intangible cultural heritage. Heliyon 10:e25483
Zhu H, Liu J, Wei Z, Li W, Wang L (2017) Residents’ attitudes towards sustainable tourism development in a historical-cultural village: Influence of perceived impacts, sense of place and tourism development potential. Sustain 9(1):61
Ziyadin S, Borodin A, Streltsova E, Suieubayeva S, Pshembayeva D (2019) Fuzzy logic approach in the modeling of sustainable tourism development management. Pol J Manag Stud 19(1):492–504
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Opening Fund of the Sichuan Key Provincial Research Base of Intelligent Tourism Project (ZHZR24-03, ZHZR23-01), the Key Project of the Scientific Research Fund of the Sichuan Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism (2024ZD-07), the Rural Community Governance Research Center Project (SQZL2024A01), the Key Laboratory of Digital-Intelligent Management and Ecological Decision Optimization for Liquor in the Upper Yangtze River Region Project (ZDSYS24-05), the Southern Sichuan Development Research Institute of the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle Project (CYQCNY20242), the Social Development and Social Risk Control Research Center Project (SR24A14), the Agricultural Modernization and Rural Revitalization Research Center Project (AMRR2024001), the Western Ecological Civilization Research Center Project (XBST2024-ZC003), the System Science and Enterprise Development Research Center Project (XQ23B03), and the Yangtze River Key Ecological Functional Area Protection Policy Research Center Project (YREPC2024-ZD001).We thank Google Earth Engine for the computing platform and the Earth Science Dataset, the China Resource Satellite Application Center, and the China National Meteorological Science Data Center for providing data support, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and detailed comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XK and HW: wrote the main manuscript text, data collection and analysis. HW, YC, JL and HL: contributed to all aspects of this work, Writing - Review & Editing, Revision, Project administration, Supervision. XT, MP, MD and XL: data collection and analysis, Revision. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant national and institutional ethical guidelines. This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee in School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (Approval No. SUSE20250107-001) on 31 August 2024, ensuring that the research complies with ethical standards for human research. Additional oversight was provided under the National Science and Technology Ethics Committee of China, ensuring compliance with all national regulations for social science research.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants between 1 September 2024 and 15 October 2024, prior to the commencement of any study procedures. Participants were informed that (i) their participation was voluntary, (ii) they could withdraw at any time without penalty, and (iii) all data would be handled confidentially and reported only in aggregate form.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kong, X., Wang, H., Chen, Y. et al. Innovative application of total quality management in sustainable tourism development: framework development and empirical analysis. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1055 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05139-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05139-6











