Table 7 Analysis of clustering results.

From: Comprehensive evaluation and optimization path of innovation and entrepreneurship environment from the perspective of sustainability—pressure-state-response model

Level

Quantity

Autonomous prefecture

F mean

Level one

7

Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Qiannan Buyi Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Qianxinan Buyi Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture

1.02

Level two

1

Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture

0.27

Level three

17

Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Kizilsu Kyrgyz Autonomous Prefecture, Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Huangnan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Hainan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Bortala Mongol Autonomous Prefecture, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Golog Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture,

0.08

Level four

5

Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture

−1.77

Back to article page