Table 2 Means, standard deviations and 2×2 ANOVA results of the variables.

From: Why might AI-enabled interviews reduce candidates’ job application intention? The role of procedural justice and organizational attractiveness

Condition

2 × 2 ANOVA

Variables

HT-TV

HT-AI

PU-TV

PU-AI

HT vs. PU

TV vs. AI

Interaction

M(SD)

M(SD)

M(SD)

M(SD)

F

P

η²

F

P

η²

F

P

η²

Intention to apply

6.13(0.57)

5.99(0.63)

6.14(0.47)

5.42(1.59)

4.75

0.03**

0.02

11.08

0.001**

0.05

4.97

0.03**

0.02

Perceived procedural justice

5.86(0.65)

5.37(0.89)

5.73(0.47)

5.04(1.39)

3.28

0.07

0.02

21.54

<0.001***

0.10

0.57

0.45

0.003

Organizational attractiveness

6.26(0.49)

5.96(0.76)

6.09(0.50)

5.35(1.61)

8.63

0.004**

0.04

14.91

<0.001***

0.07

2.73

0.10

0.01

  1. Source: Created by authors. nHT-TV = 49, nHT-AI = 55, nLT-TV = 51, nLT-AI = 48.
  2. HT high-tech industry condition, PU publishing industry condition, TV traditional video interviews condition, AI AI-enabled interviews condition.
  3. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 .