Table 6 Regression results from Models #3-1 and #3-2 (Section “Model #3: Assignee Type and Gender Disparity”) examine how women’s participation in patenting varies across different types of organizations.
Variable | With women (Model #3-1) | With women (Model #3-2) |
|---|---|---|
Regression Model | Logit | Logit |
Assignee type = Government (comparing to Corporation) | 0.3213*** (0.0134) | 0.2175*** (0.0140) |
Assignee type = University (comparing to Corporation) | 0.7529*** (0.0059) | 0.3493*** (0.0064) |
Assignee type = Idividual (comparing to Corporation) | 0.1011 (0.2738) | 0.2498 (0.2770) |
Assignee type = Unassigned (comparing to Corporation) | −0.2746 (0.5223) | −0.3763 (0.5380) |
Controlling for WIPO fields | No | Yes |
Full-digit CPC codes | 0.0017*** (0.0002) | −0.0039*** (0.0002) |
Bwd. citations | −0.0010*** (0.0000) | −0.0009*** (0.0000) |
Filing year | 0.0227*** (0.0001) | 0.0252*** (0.0002) |
Claims | −0.0035*** (0.0001) | −0.0031*** (0.0001) |
Team size | 0.4390*** (0.0009) | 0.4270*** (0.0009) |
