Table 8 Indirect association of achievement goals in the relationship between coaches’ dedication and adolescent athletes’ sport-cognitive level.
Effect | path | Estimate | 95%CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p | Lower | Upper | |||
Direct effect | DED → MIR | 0.392 | *** | 0.337 | 1.045 |
Indirect effect | DED → TSK → MIR | −0.012 | 0.113 | −0.686 | 0.203 |
Indirect effect | DED → EGO → MIR | 0.008 | * | −0.782 | 0.091 |
Total effect | DED → MIR | 0.389 | 0.277 | −0.141 | 0.470 |
Direct effect | DED → ATT | 0.426 | *** | 0.363 | 1.211 |
Indirect effect | DED → TSK → ATT | −0.024 | 0.085 | −0.693 | 0.200 |
Indirect effect | DED → EGO → ATT | 0.008 | * | −0.719 | 0.075 |
Total effect | DED → ATT | 0.410 | 0.147 | −0.085 | 0.491 |
Direct effect | DED → COG | 0.387 | *** | 0.329 | 1.055 |
Indirect effect | DED → TSK → COG | −0.031 | 0.127 | −0.711 | 0.181 |
Indirect effect | DED → EGO → COG | 0.012 | * | −0.931 | 0.145 |
Total effect | DED → COG | 0.368 | 0.384 | −0.212 | 0.466 |
Direct effect | DED → SPP | 0.408 | *** | 0.348 | 1.200 |
Indirect effect | DED → TSK → SPP | −0.034 | 0.186 | −0.659 | 0.147 |
Indirect effect | DED → EGO → SPP | 0.011 | * | −0.826 | 0.116 |
Total effect | DED → SPP | 0.386 | 0.240 | −0.140 | 0.474 |
