Table 8 Configuration Results for Different Levels of Digital Inclusive Finance.

From: Evaluation and pathways for achieving agricultural resilience under the framework of climate-smart agriculture

 

High level

Moderate level

Low level

 

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

H6

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

L1

L2

L3

Climate Productivity Potential

 

 

 

No-Tillage Technology

 

 

 

Water-Saving Irrigation

  

 

Straw Returning to the Field

 

 

Rural Digitalization

 

 

 

Digital Financial Inclusion Index

  

Agricultural Fiscal Expenditure

  

 

 

Consistency

0.996

0.948

0.919

0.998

0.997

0.997

0.960

0.991

0.989

0.974

0.976

0.994

0.973

0.98

0.978

PRI

0.994

0.895

0.854

0.996

0.993

0.995

0.910

0.975

0.956

0.854

0.928

0.979

0.905

0.916

0.874

Raw coverage

0.342

0.398

0.424

0.346

0.244

0.385

0.413

0.345

0.288

0.216

0.327

0.291

0.356

0.322

0.272

Unique coverage

0.044

0.032

0.024

0.016

0.009

0.012

0.104

0.033

0.021

0.030

0

0

0.077

0.026

0.035

Intergroup consistency adjustment

0.008

0.062

0.066

0.008

0.012

0.008

0.039

0.016

0.02

0.035

0.02

0.012

0.02

0.023

0.027

Intra-group consistency adjusted

0.012

0.086

0.086

0.006

0.006

0.006

0.098

0.046

0.035

0.058

0.069

0.035

0.109

0.104

0.104

Solution PRI

0.913

0.93

0.971

Solution consistency

0.94

0.966

0.914

Solution coverage

0.711

0.626

0.447

  1. ” signifies the existence of a core condition.
  2. “•” signifies the presence of a peripheral condition.
  3. ” signifies the absence of a core condition.
  4. ” signifies the absence of a peripheral condition.
  5. “Blank” signifies that the presence or absence of a condition variable is irrelevant to the outcome.