Table 6 Impact of agro-tourism coupling coordination and key livelihood capitals on household strategy types.
Variables | Household strategy types | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The specialized type | The dominant type | The balanced type | |||||||
Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | |
Agro-tourism coupling coordination degree | 1.750 | 1.944 | 5.755 | 3.734** | 1.205 | 41.846 | 2.722* | 1.173 | 15.211 |
Per capita arable land area | -1.033* | 0.420 | 0.356 | -2.324 | 1.788 | 0.098 | 0.415** | 0.157 | 1.514 |
Per capita grassland area | -0.467* | 0.198 | 0.627 | -1.899* | 0.775 | 0.150 | -1.635 | 1.176 | 0.195 |
Proportion of family labor | -1.213* | 0.503 | 0.297 | -0.939 | 0.610 | 0.391 | -0.790* | 0.310 | 0.454 |
Average education level of the labor force | -0.451 | 0.490 | 0.637 | 0.567* | 0.270 | 1.763 | 0.483* | 0.207 | 1.621 |
Per capita annual household income | -0.157 | 0.155 | 0.855 | 1.068* | 0.438 | 2.910 | 1.104** | 0.356 | 3.016 |
Family savings | 0.201* | 0.086 | 1.223 | 0.861* | 0.391 | 2.366 | -0.406* | 0.169 | 0.666 |
Constant | 1.651 | 1.144 | 5.214 | -0.978 | 0.684 | 0.376 | -0.518 | 0.345 | 0.596 |
Number of samples = 479 -2 log likelihood = 198.150 Prob > chi2 |  |  | LR chic(21) = 278.950 Pseudo R2 = 0.585 = 0.0000 |  |  |  |  | ||
