Table 7 Influence of agro-tourism coupling coordination and key livelihood capitals on the livelihood decision-making of household labor.
Variables | Agricultural activities | Employment outside the local area | Local employment | Business activities | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | Coefficient (B) | Standard error | Exp (B) | |
Agro-tourism coupling coordination degree | -0.398* | 0.362 | 0.672 | -0.548* | 0.379 | 0.578 | 0.108** | 0.409 | 1.114 | -0.467 | 0.406 | 0.627 |
Per capita arable land area | 0.001 | 0.023 | 1.001 | -0.034* | 0.031 | 0.967 | -0.015 | 0.027 | 0.985 | -0.021 | 0.031 | 0.979 |
Per capita grassland area | -0.480** | 0.164 | 0.619 | -0.480** | 0.164 | 0.619 | -0.400* | 0.164 | 0.670 | -0.400* | 0.164 | 0.670 |
[Gender=1.00] | 0.128 | 0.083 | 1.136 | 1.540** | 0.355 | 4.665 | 0.495 | 0.375 | 1.641 | 0.323 | 0.370 | 1.381 |
[Gender=2.00] | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . |
[Age=1.00] | 0.140 | 0.141 | 1.150 | 0.778** | 0.175 | 2.176 | 0.337* | 0.158 | 1.401 | 0.033 | 0.167 | 1.034 |
[Age=2.00] | -0.045 | 0.101 | 0.956 | 0.703** | 0.150 | 2.020 | 0.271* | 0.119 | 1.311 | 0.218** | 0.112 | 1.243 |
[Age=3.00] | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . |
[Education Level=1.00] | 1.024** | 0.190 | 2.784 | 0.470** | 0.139 | 1.600 | 0.640** | 0.165 | 1.896 | 0.669** | 0.182 | 1.952 |
[Education Level=2.00] | 0.277* | 0.190 | 1.319 | 0.088 | 0.126 | 1.092 | 0.085 | 0.165 | 1.088 | 0.202 | 0.178 | 1.224 |
[Education Level=3.00] | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . | 0b | . | . |
Constant | -0.135 | 0.262 | Â | -0.379 | 0.255 | Â | -0.577 | 0.273 | Â | -0.139 | 0.268 | Â |
Number of samples: 1381 -2 log likelihood=498.653 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 |  |  | LR chic(32) = 259.297 Pseudo R2 = 0.342 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |