Table 7 Influence of agro-tourism coupling coordination and key livelihood capitals on the livelihood decision-making of household labor.

From: Agro-tourism integration and key livelihood capitals: multi-scale impacts on rural residents’ strategic choices in Western Sichuan ethnic villages

Variables

Agricultural activities

Employment outside the local area

Local employment

Business activities

Coefficient (B)

Standard error

Exp (B)

Coefficient (B)

Standard error

Exp (B)

Coefficient (B)

Standard error

Exp (B)

Coefficient (B)

Standard error

Exp (B)

Agro-tourism coupling coordination degree

-0.398*

0.362

0.672

-0.548*

0.379

0.578

0.108**

0.409

1.114

-0.467

0.406

0.627

Per capita arable land area

0.001

0.023

1.001

-0.034*

0.031

0.967

-0.015

0.027

0.985

-0.021

0.031

0.979

Per capita grassland area

-0.480**

0.164

0.619

-0.480**

0.164

0.619

-0.400*

0.164

0.670

-0.400*

0.164

0.670

[Gender=1.00]

0.128

0.083

1.136

1.540**

0.355

4.665

0.495

0.375

1.641

0.323

0.370

1.381

[Gender=2.00]

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

[Age=1.00]

0.140

0.141

1.150

0.778**

0.175

2.176

0.337*

0.158

1.401

0.033

0.167

1.034

[Age=2.00]

-0.045

0.101

0.956

0.703**

0.150

2.020

0.271*

0.119

1.311

0.218**

0.112

1.243

[Age=3.00]

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

[Education Level=1.00]

1.024**

0.190

2.784

0.470**

0.139

1.600

0.640**

0.165

1.896

0.669**

0.182

1.952

[Education Level=2.00]

0.277*

0.190

1.319

0.088

0.126

1.092

0.085

0.165

1.088

0.202

0.178

1.224

[Education Level=3.00]

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

0b

.

.

Constant

-0.135

0.262

 

-0.379

0.255

 

-0.577

0.273

 

-0.139

0.268

 

Number of samples: 1381

-2 log likelihood=498.653

Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

  

LR chic(32) = 259.297

Pseudo R2 = 0.342

        
  1. Note: In addition to the above four livelihood strategies, the “other livelihood strategies” are used as the reference group; robust standard errors are in parentheses; * and ** denote statistical significance of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.