Table 4 Effects of concert format manipulations on audience experience.
From: Concert formats influence how audiences experience live classical music
Concert format variants | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent variables | Spatial-architectural environment (Boulez Saal) | Ensemble characteristics (seniors) | Moderation and interviews with musicians | Visual enhancement: movement-specific lighting | Program: interlocking of pieces 2 and 3 | Audience participation | Visual component: screen | Aoucstic enhancement: immersive sound |
Single items from questionnaires | ||||||||
Concert overall | 0.270** | |||||||
Being moved | ||||||||
Interaction musicians – audience | 0.716*** | −0.381* | ||||||
Appreciation and experience dimensions | ||||||||
Immersion | 0.233* | 0.321* | ||||||
Intellectual stimulation | ||||||||
Eval. musicians | ||||||||
Eval. venue | 0.696*** | −0.272* | ||||||
Eval. concert design | 0.321** | |||||||
Social experience factors (SECS) | ||||||||
Satisfaction | ||||||||
Attention | −0.450** | −0.404* | ||||||
Self-definition | 0.285* | −0.333* | ||||||
Solidarity | −0.319 | |||||||
Depth of processing | ||||||||
Aesthetic emotions (AESTHEMOS) | ||||||||
Made me happy | cl: −0.336* cont: −0.552*** | -0.331** | ||||||
Annoyed me | cont: −0.337* | 0.341** | −0.226* | −0.389*** | ||||
Made me melancholic | cl: 0.339* cont: 0.674*** | |||||||
Physiological responses | ||||||||
Skin conductance | 0.247 | 0.427** | ||||||
Heart rate | −0.326* | 0.398* | 0.478** | 0.574*** | ||||
Respiration rate | 0.321 | |||||||
Facial expressions | ||||||||
Emotional valence | cl: −0.385* cont: −0.199* | |||||||
Emotional engagement | ||||||||
