Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. humanities and social sciences communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Central city construction and urban land green utilization efficiency: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Central city construction and urban land green utilization efficiency: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations

  • Yi Xiao1,2,
  • Qingshen Kong1,
  • Haonan Yang1,
  • Huan Huang1,
  • Liang Chen3 &
  • …
  • Ming Chang2 

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Environmental social sciences
  • Environmental studies

Abstract

Central city construction (CCC) functions as an important policy instrument for facilitating China’s green transformation, while urban agglomerations serve as the primary spatial carriers of this process. In the context of low land utilization efficiency and environmental pressure, this study examines how CCC influences urban land green utilization efficiency (ULGUE) within urban agglomerations (UAs). Using panel data from 2006 to 2021 for 213 cities across 19 Chinese UAs, this study measures ULGUE using the super-efficiency SBM model and investigates the impact of CCC on ULGUE via a difference-in-differences (DID) model. ULGUE is significantly enhanced by CCC, and the effect of CCC on ULGUE varies noticeably. CCC can further optimize land resource allocation and utilization efficiency by enhancing green innovation vitality, promoting industrial upgrading, accelerating internet agglomeration, and improving the urbanization level. CCC is a major national development plan that not only greatly advances new-type urbanization but also promotes the integrated and coordinated growth of UAs. Furthermore, it provides a productive methodology and theoretical reference for urban spatial structure optimization and sustainable land use in other developing countries.

Similar content being viewed by others

Investigating the impacts of urban agglomeration spatial structures on carbon emissions based on spatial networks of cities

Article Open access 27 March 2026

Different pathways, same goal: configuring different types of policy tools to improve the urban land green use efficiency

Article Open access 07 October 2025

Types identification, patterns characterize and pathway optimization of synergistic development between urbanization and pollution control in Chinese urban agglomerations

Article Open access 02 March 2026

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed in the current study, together with the analytical code supporting the results of this study, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Chen K, Wang Y, Li N, Xu Y, Zheng Y, Zhan X, Li Q (2023) The impact of farmland use transition on rural livelihood transformation in China. Habitat Int 135:102784

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chen W, Ning S, Liu E, Zhou X, Wang Y, Zhao M (2019) Exploring the industrial land use efficiency of China’s resource-based cities. Cities 93:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Dai Y, Zhou L, Chen S, Wan S (2026) How regional integration accelerates urban energy transition: a quasi-experimental study from China’s city clusters. Energy 342:139618

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Wang Y, Zheng L, Li J, Xie S (2020) Can industrial agglomeration promote pollution agglomeration? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 246:118960

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei R, Lin Z, Chunga J (2021) How land transfer affects agricultural land use efficiency: Evidence from China’s agricultural sector. Land Use Policy 103:105300

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Yuan H, Liu Y (2023) The energy-saving effect in the new transformation of urbanization. Econ Anal Policy 78:41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Li Y, Nie C (2023) The effect of place-based policy on urban land green use efficiency: evidence from the pilot free-trade zone establishment in China. Land 12:701

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan Y, Qiang Y, Qu Y, Lu W, Xiao Y, Chu C, Xiong S, Shao C (2024) Environmental sustainability and beautiful China: a study of indicator identification and provincial evaluation. Environ Impact Assess Rev 105:107452

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Jin G (2025) Heterogeneity of urban-rural responses to multigoal policy from an efficiency perspective: an empirical study in China. Habitat Int 158:103341

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Zhang Y, Guo D, Lu W, Xu H (2023) How does ecological protection redline policy affect regional land use and ecosystem services? Environ Impact Assess Rev 100:107062

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu R, Xu W, Liu L, Cui Z, Zhao C (2023) The impact of urban agglomerations on carbon emissions in China: spatial scope and mechanism. J Clean Prod 419:138250

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Han W, Zhang Z, Ning S, Zhang X (2024) The decoupling relationship between land use efficiency and carbon emissions in China: an analysis using the socio-ecological systems (SES) framework. Land Use Policy 138:107055

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang T, Quan Y, Li N (2024) Reallocate to the right place: the heterogeneous effect of internet use on factor allocation of rural households in China. Econ Anal Policy 84:1328–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Long H, Ives CD, Deng W, Chen K, Zhang Y (2022) Modes and practices of rural vitalisation promoted by land consolidation in a rapidly urbanising China: a perspective of multifunctionality. Habitat Int 121:102514

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Yang L, Wei X, Zhang X (2024) The impact of government digital transformation on land use efficiency: evidence from China. Land 13:2080

    Google Scholar 

  • Koroso NH, Zevenbergen JA (2024) Urban land management under rapid urbanization: exploring the link between urban land policies and urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia. Cities 153:105269

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Dong K, Dong X (2022) Green energy as a new determinant of green growth in China: the role of green technological innovation. Energy Econ 114:106260

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Huang X, Wu D, Yang H (2023) Construction of ecological security pattern adapting to future land use change in Pearl River Delta, China. Appl Geogr 154:102946

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Liu Y, Ouyang X, Zhou Y, Bi M, Wei G (2024) Sustainable development of urban agglomerations around lakes in China: achieving SDGs by regulating Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand through New-type Urbanization. Habitat Int 153:103206

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Cai Z, Jin L (2024) Urban green land use efficiency of resource-based cities in China: multidimensional measurements, spatial-temporal changes, and driving factors. Sustain Cities Soc 104:105299

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Zhang A (2023) Can government environmental regulation promote low-carbon development in heavy polluting industries? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Environ Impact Assess Rev 99:106991

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Wang Z, Su K, Zhou Y, Li X, Lin A (2024) Understanding the impact of cultivated land-use changes on China’s grain production potential and policy implications: a perspective of non-agriculturalization, non-grainization, and marginalization. J Clean Prod 436:140647

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Ke S (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable urban land use in China from the perspective of sustainable urbanization. Habitat Int 77:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Tao X (2024) Local government environmental attention and urban land green use efficiency in China: the intermediary role of industrial restructuring. Land 13:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Shang Y, Liang Z (2024) National central cities, technological innovation, and economic growth. Financ Res Lett 67:105890

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu W, Luo L, Shi Y, Chai C, Wang H, Tian Q, Jin Y, Kong X, Yu Q, Ren L, Zhang B (2025) Impacts of “One Household One Plot” and “One Village Group One Plot” fragmentation consolidation models on cultivated land use transition from perspective of human-land system. Habitat Int 156:103252

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi R, Yi P, Li W, Wang L (2022) Sustainability self-determination evaluation based on the possibility ranking method: a case study of cities in ethnic minority autonomous areas of China. Sustain Cities Soc 87:104188

    Google Scholar 

  • Song X, Feng Q, Xia F, Li X, Scheffran J (2021) Impacts of changing urban land-use structure on sustainable city growth in China: a population-density dynamics perspective. Habitat Int 107:102296

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yeung G, Zhu D, Xu Y, Zhang L (2022) Efficiency of urban land use in China’s resource-based cities, 2000-2018. Land Use Policy 115:106009

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Hu B, Kuang B, Zhou M (2021) Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China. Land Use Policy 106:105449

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Lin W, Liu B, Wang H, Xu H (2021) Does smart city construction improve the green utilization efficiency of urban land? Land 10:657

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang J, Ai W (2024) Do urbanization, environmental regulation and GDP affect agricultural land use efficiency? Implications for just transition. Environ Impact Assess Rev 105:107421

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Ren J, Su H, Chen Z, Diao M (2026) Unraveling the impacts of free trade zones on urban innovation intensity: evidence from China. Land Use Policy 162:107901

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shi M, Liu J, Zhong M, Ran R (2025) The impact of digital-real integration on energy productivity under a multi-governance framework: the mediating role of AI and embodied technological progress. Energy Econ 142:108167

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Wang Y, Ren Y (2025) Optimizing green space-building landscape characteristics of key urban functional zones for comprehensive thermal environment mitigation. Landsc Urban Plan 257:105314

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu A, Song M, Wu Y, Luo Y, Zhu Y, Qiu K (2024) Effects of new urbanization on China’s carbon emissions: a quasi-natural experiment based on the improved PSM-DID model. Technol Forecast Soc Change 200:123164

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Yang Y, Wang F, Zhou MY, Wang Y (2024). Evaluation and convergence analysis of science and technology innovation efficiency in China’s national central cities based on the super-efficiency SBM-ML model. Techn Anal Strateg Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2408732

  • Yang Y, Ren X, Yan J (2023) Trade-offs or synergies? Identifying dynamic land use functions and their interrelations at the grid scale in urban agglomeration. Cities 140:104384

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Yuan C (2025) The impact of land conservation and intensification policy on green land use efficiency: the role of factor agglomeration. J Clean Prod 501:145297

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wang T, Goh YM, He P, Hua L (2024) The effects of long-term policies on urban resilience: a dynamic assessment framework. Cities 153:105294

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Sun F, Hu Y (2024) Carbon emission efficiency of land use in urban agglomerations of Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: based on three-stage SBM-DEA model. Ecol Indic 160:111922

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wang B, Wang J, Wu Q, Wei YD (2022) How does industrial agglomeration affect urban land use efficiency? A spatial analysis of Chinese cities. Land Use Policy 119:106178

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Li J, Li G, Guo S (2020) Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China. Energy 196:117117

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng R, Wu G, Cheng Y, Liu H, Wang Y, Wang X (2023) How does digitalization drive carbon emissions? The inverted U-shaped effect in China. Environ Impact Assess Rev 102:107203

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Lu Y (2023) Spatiotemporal evolution and determinants of urban land use efficiency under green development orientation: insights from 284 cities and eight economic zones in China, 2005-2019. Appl Geogr 161:103117

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Xia Z, Liang F, Yuan C, Liu L (2025) Non-linear responses and critical thresholds of human well-being to ecosystem services across land-use intensities in urbanizing areas. Environ Impact Assess Rev 114:107921

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Zhang P, Wei Y, Li Y, Zhao H (2019) Measuring the efficiency and driving factors of urban land use based on the DEA method and the PLS-SEM model—a case study of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China. Sustain Cities Soc 50:101646

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo Z, Guo H, Li Y, Cheng J (2022) A two-stage DEA evaluation of Chinese mining industry technological innovation efficiency and eco-efficiency. Environ Impact Assess Rev 94:106762

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Yibin Philosophy and Social Sciences Fund (YB25Z01), the Research Project of Chengdu Water Ecological Civilization Construction Center (SST2025-16), the State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project (SKLGP2024Z023), the Open Foundation of the Research Center for Human Geography of Tibetan Plateau and Its Eastern Slope (Chengdu University of Technology) (RWDL2025-ZC001; RWDL2025-ZC002) and the Chengdu University of Technology Post-graduate Innovative Cultivation Program (2025BJCX-LS028; 2025BJCX-LS029).The authors would like to sincerely acknowledge reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which significantly improved the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China

    Yi Xiao, Qingshen Kong, Haonan Yang & Huan Huang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China

    Yi Xiao & Ming Chang

  3. School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China

    Liang Chen

Authors
  1. Yi Xiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qingshen Kong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haonan Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huan Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liang Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ming Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: YX QK and HH; Software, formal analysis, and Writing—original draft: QK; Validation: HY; Investigation: QK and HY; Resources: YX and MC; Data curation: LC and MC; Writing—review and editing: YX, QK, HY, HH, LC, and MC; Visualization: QK and HY; Supervision: YX and HH; Project administration: YX and HH. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingshen Kong or Huan Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study does not involve human participants or their data, so no informed consent or other forms of ethical approval is needed.

Informed consent

No informed consent was needed for this paper. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, Y., Kong, Q., Yang, H. et al. Central city construction and urban land green utilization efficiency: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07066-6

Download citation

  • Received: 08 July 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07066-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Referee instructions
  • Editor instructions
  • Journal policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Events
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Humanit Soc Sci Commun)

ISSN 2662-9992 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited