Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
ShinyEvents: harmonizing longitudinal data for real-world survival estimation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 January 2026

ShinyEvents: harmonizing longitudinal data for real-world survival estimation

  • Alyssa Obermayer1,2,
  • Joshua Davis1,
  • Divya Priyanka Talada1,
  • Mingxiang Teng1,
  • Steven Eschrich1,
  • Vivien Yin1,
  • Daniel Spakowicz3,
  • Dipankor Chatterjee3,
  • Robert J. Rounbehler4,
  • Michelle L. Churchman4,
  • Ahmad A. Tarhini1,
  • Xuefeng Wang1,
  • Sumati Gupta5,
  • Joseph Markowitz1,
  • Jeremy Goecks1,
  • Roger Li1,
  • Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa1,
  • Brandon J. Manley1,
  • Aik-Choon Tan5 na1,
  • G. Daniel Grass1 na1,
  • Dung-tsa Chen1 na1 &
  • …
  • Timothy I. Shaw1 na1 

npj Precision Oncology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1145 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Health care
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research

Abstract

Longitudinal data analysis of the patient’s treatment course is critical to uncovering variables that influence outcomes. However, existing tools have significant limitations in integrating multilayered time-series data, particularly in linking treatment events with survival outcomes. Here, we developed ShinyEvents, a web-based framework for complex longitudinal data analysis. ShinyEvents allows users to upload data and generate interactive timelines of clinical events, enabling cohort-level analyses such as treatment clustering and endpoint assignment. It also provides informative cohort visualizations, such as a Sankey diagram of the treatment line and a Swimmer diagram of the clinical course. Finally, our tool can infer real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) based on user-defined endpoints and perform Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. With these features, the tool can then associate treatment lines with clinical outcomes. As a case study, we analyzed Moffitt patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine exhibited more favorable rwPFS and overall survival, which is consistent with prior reports. Altogether, ShinyEvents provides a unified framework for integrating longitudinal real-world data with survival analytics, fostering transparent and reproducible collaboration between clinicians and data scientists. A live demo is available at https://shawlab-moffitt.shinyapps.io/shinyevents/.

Similar content being viewed by others

Identification of a novel lactylation-related gene signature predicts the prognosis of multiple myeloma and experiment verification

Article Open access 02 July 2024

Tislelizumab plus zanubrutinib for Richter transformation: the phase 2 RT1 trial

Article Open access 09 December 2023

Prognostic significance of cachexia index in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy

Article Open access 10 May 2022

Data availability

Software code has been deposited inside the Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16527381.

References

  1. Verkerk, K. & Voest, E. E. Generating and using real-world data: A worthwhile uphill battle. Cell 187, 1636–1650 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, F. & Panagiotakos, D. Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 22, 287 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramsey, S. D., Onar-Thomas, A. & Wheeler, S. B. Real-World Database Studies in Oncology: A Call for Standards. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 977–980 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soupir, A. et al. Genomic, transcriptomic, and immunogenomic landscape of over 1300 sarcomas of diverse histology subtypes. Nat. Commun. 16, 4206 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park, M. A. et al. Molecular Pathway and immune profile analysis of IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313164 (2024).

  6. Wang, X. et al. Multicellular immune ecotypes within solid tumors predict real-world therapeutic benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.19.24310726 (2024).

  7. Eule, C. J. et al. Clinical and genomic features of patients with renal cell carcinoma and advanced chronic kidney disease: analysis of a multi-institutional database. Cancers. 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101920 (2024).

  8. Demetriou, A. N. et al. Profiling the molecular and clinical landscape of glioblastoma utilizing the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network brain cancer database. Neurooncol. Adv. 6, vdae046 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castellanos, E. H., Wittmershaus, B. K. & Chandwani, S. Raising the bar for real-world data in oncology: approaches to quality across multiple dimensions. JCO Clin. Cancer Inf. 8, e2300046 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Consortium, A. P. G. AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine through an International Consortium. Cancer Discov. 7, 818–831 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Bruijn, I. et al. Analysis and visualization of longitudinal genomic and clinical data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative in cBioPortal. Cancer Res. 83, 3861–3867 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harbig, T. A. et al. OncoThreads: visualization of large-scale longitudinal cancer molecular data. Bioinformatics 37, i59–i66 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Del Gaizo, J., Catchpole, K. R. & Alekseyenko, A. V. Research and Exploratory Analysis Driven-Time-data Visualization (read-tv) software. JAMIA Open 4, ooab007 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goedhart, J. PlotTwist: A web app for plotting and annotating continuous data. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000581 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Espinosa-Carrasco, J. et al. Pergola-web: a web server for the visualization and analysis of longitudinal behavioral data using repurposed genomics tools and standards. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W600–W604 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maheux, E. et al. Forecasting individual progression trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 14, 761 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nguena Nguefack, H. L. et al. Trajectory modelling techniques useful to epidemiological research: a comparative narrative review of approaches. Clin. Epidemiol. 12, 1205–1222 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, K. B. et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin. Transl. Sci. 14, 86–93 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Choudhury, N. J. et al. The GENIE BPC NSCLC Cohort: a real-world repository integrating standardized clinical and genomic data for 1846 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 3418–3428 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obermayer, A. N. et al. PATH-SURVEYOR: pathway level survival enquiry for immuno-oncology and drug repurposing. BMC Bioinforma. 24, 266 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Einerhand, S. M. H. et al. Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J. Urol. 40, 2707–2715 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Turchioe, M. R. et al. A systematic review of patient-facing visualizations of personal health data. Appl Clin. Inf. 10, 751–770 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Avila, M. & Meric-Bernstam, F. Next-generation sequencing for the general cancer patient. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol. 17, 447–454 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stahlberg, E. A. et al. Exploring approaches for predictive cancer patient digital twins: Opportunities for collaboration and innovation. Front. Digit. Health 4, 1007784 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Altman, R. B. The interactions between clinical informatics and bioinformatics: a case study. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 7, 439–443 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martin-Sanchez, F. et al. Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care. J. Biomed. Inf. 37, 30–42 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alowais, S. A. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med. Educ. 23, 689 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource at the Moffitt Cancer Center (NCI P30 CA076292), the Moffitt Cancer Center Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Pilot Project (T.I.S.). Funding for this project was provided by the Department of Defense, Grant No. HT94252510691 (T.I.S., B.M.), Florida Department of Health, Grant No. MOAAX (D.C.), and the National Institute of Health, Grant No. R21 CA286417-01 (D.C.), NIH R01CA293755 (T.I.S), and Grant No. T32 CA233399-04 (J.D., X.W., T.I.S.). We thank Drs. Mitchell Hayes, Kendrick Yim, and Dae Won Kim for their valuable suggestions and comments about our tool. The authors thank all the ORIEN AVATAR Collaborative Members, Dale Hedges, Michael Radmacher, and Phaedra Agius from Aster’s Insight for their support on the project. The authors would like to acknowledge the American Association for Cancer Research and its financial and material support in the development of the AACR Project GENIE registry, as well as members of the consortium for their commitment to data sharing. Interpretations are the responsibility of the study authors.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Aik-Choon Tan, G. Daniel Grass, Dung-tsa Chen, Timothy I. Shaw.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

    Alyssa Obermayer, Joshua Davis, Divya Priyanka Talada, Mingxiang Teng, Steven Eschrich, Vivien Yin, Ahmad A. Tarhini, Xuefeng Wang, Joseph Markowitz, Jeremy Goecks, Roger Li, Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa, Brandon J. Manley, G. Daniel Grass, Dung-tsa Chen & Timothy I. Shaw

  2. University of South Florida Genomics & College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Alyssa Obermayer

  3. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA

    Daniel Spakowicz & Dipankor Chatterjee

  4. Aster Insights, Hudson, FL, USA

    Robert J. Rounbehler & Michelle L. Churchman

  5. Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Sumati Gupta & Aik-Choon Tan

Authors
  1. Alyssa Obermayer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua Davis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Divya Priyanka Talada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingxiang Teng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steven Eschrich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vivien Yin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Spakowicz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dipankor Chatterjee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Robert J. Rounbehler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michelle L. Churchman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ahmad A. Tarhini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Xuefeng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sumati Gupta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Joseph Markowitz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jeremy Goecks
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Roger Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Brandon J. Manley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Aik-Choon Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. G. Daniel Grass
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Dung-tsa Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Timothy I. Shaw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Contribution: A.O., T.I.S., led the software development and testing. J.D., D.P.T., M.T., D.S., D.D., S.E., V.Y., X.W., A.T., J.G., D.C., G.D.G., contributed to the software development and testing; B.J.M., A.A.T., S.G., J.M., R.L., R.R.P., and G.D.G., provided guidance on the clinical interpretation; V.Y., D.C., provided guidance on statistical analysis. A.T., R.J.R., M.L.C., R.L., G.D.G. provided patient samples and clinical data. A.O., G.D.G., D.C., and T.I.S. designed the study, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; A.T., G.D.G., D.C., and T.I.S. oversaw the study. All authors assisted in the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alyssa Obermayer or Timothy I. Shaw.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.D.G., T.I.S., and D.C. have a patent pending based on the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obermayer, A., Davis, J., Talada, D.P. et al. ShinyEvents: harmonizing longitudinal data for real-world survival estimation. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01212-0

Download citation

  • Received: 28 July 2025

  • Accepted: 19 November 2025

  • Published: 13 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01212-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics