Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Precision Oncology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj precision oncology
  3. articles
  4. article
BET inhibition disrupts the FOXM1-MYC axis to induce BRCAness and enhance PARP inhibitor response
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 March 2026

BET inhibition disrupts the FOXM1-MYC axis to induce BRCAness and enhance PARP inhibitor response

  • Pingping Fang1,
  • Anais Saunders2,
  • Kay Minn3,
  • Katherine Jane Chua4,
  • Rebecca A. Brooks4,
  • Danika Bakke5,
  • Gary S. Leiserowitz4,
  • Neil Johnson6,
  • Shaomeng Wang7 &
  • …
  • Jeremy Chien2,4 

npj Precision Oncology (2026) Cite this article

  • 2071 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Cell biology
  • Molecular biology
  • Oncology

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) proficiency underlies intrinsic and acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). We identify a BRD4-dependent FOXM1-MYC transcriptional axis that sustains HR gene expression and limits PARPi response. ENCODE analyses revealed extensive co-occupancy of FOXM1 and MYC at regulatory regions of DNA repair genes, including BRCA1/2 and RAD51 paralogs, suggesting a shared HR program. Functionally, transient knockdown of FOXM1 or MYC reduced BRCA1/RAD51 transcripts, whereas sustained FOXM1 silencing triggered adaptive MYC upregulation that preserved HR output, indicating compensatory control. BET inhibition with (+)-JQ1 diminished FOXM1/MYC promoter occupancy at BRCA1 and RAD51, downregulated HR genes, and synergized with PARPi in viability and clonogenic assays. A BRD4 degrader (ZBC260) achieved potent BRD4 depletion at low nanomolar doses, suppressed FOXM1/MYC and HR gene expression, enhanced PARP1 trapping, and produced strong synergy with olaparib, including in patient-derived cancer cells. Clinically, BRD4 is highly expressed in ovarian cancer and independently predicts poor survival, outperforming FOXM1 and MYC. These data establish BRD4-directed disruption of the FOXM1–MYC axis as a strategy to induce “BRCAness” and broaden PARPi efficacy.

Similar content being viewed by others

BRCA2 prevents PARPi-mediated PARP1 retention to protect RAD51 filaments

Article 26 March 2025

The mitochondrial translocation of phosphorylated EZH2 promotes PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer

Article Open access 12 March 2026

Repression of EGFR by new biguanide 4C potentiated ovarian cancer to PARP inhibitors through down-regulation of BRCA2 and Rad51

Article Open access 18 March 2026

Data availability

The Cancer Genome Atlas data were accessed via cbioportal. Caris Genomics data were accessed through the Caris Precision Oncology Alliance.

Code availability

R script used in the data analysis was provided in the Supplementary Information. TCGA data analysis used the cbioportal built-in tools for group comparison. Caris data analysis used built-in tools available from the Caris CODEai portal.

References

  1. Bryant, H. E. et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434, 913–917 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farmer, H. et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drew, Y. et al. Therapeutic potential of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor AG014699 in human cancers with mutated or methylated BRCA1 or BRCA2. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103, 334–346 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCabe, N. et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res. 66, 8109–8115 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mendes-Pereira, A. M. et al. Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors. EMBO Mol. Med. 1, 315–322 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474, 609–615 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veeck, J. et al. BRCA1 CpG island hypermethylation predicts sensitivity to poly(adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, e563–e564 (2010). author reply e5-6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes-Davies, L. et al. EMSY links the BRCA2 pathway to sporadic breast and ovarian cancer. Cell 115, 523–535 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Audeh, M. W. et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376, 245–251 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fong, P. C. et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 123–134 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tutt, A. et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376, 235–244 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ledermann, J. et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1382–1392 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ledermann, J. et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 852–861 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livraghi, L. & Garber, J. E. PARP inhibitors in the management of breast cancer: current data and future prospects. BMC Med. 13, 188 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramakrishnan Geethakumari, P., Schiewer, M. J., Knudsen, K. E. & Kelly, W. K. PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 18, 37 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhalla, A. & Saif, M. W. PARP-inhibitors in BRCA-associated pancreatic cancer. JOP 15, 340–343 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levra, M. G., Olaussen, K. A., Novello, S. & Soria, J. C. PARP inhibitors: an interesting pathway also for non-small cell lung cancer? Curr. Pharm. Des. 20, 3875–3882 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Plummer, R. et al. A phase II study of the potent PARP inhibitor, Rucaparib (PF-01367338, AG014699), with temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma demonstrating evidence of chemopotentiation. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 71, 1191–1199 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robson, M. et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 523–533 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mirza, M. R. et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2154–2164 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fojo, T. & Bates, S. Mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors-three and counting. Cancer Discov. 3, 20–23 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lord, C. J. & Ashworth, A. Mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting BRCA-mutant cancers. Nat. Med. 19, 1381–1388 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benafif, S. & Hall, M. An update on PARP inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 8, 519–528 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miura, K. et al. The combination of olaparib and camptothecin for effective radiosensitization. Radiat. Oncol. 7, 62 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Ejeh, F. et al. Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer using anti-EGFR-directed radioimmunotherapy combined with radiosensitizing chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor. J. Nucl. Med. 54, 913–921 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Evers, B. et al. Selective inhibition of BRCA2-deficient mammary tumor cell growth by AZD2281 and cisplatin. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 3916–3925 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Norris, R. E., Adamson, P. C., Nguyen, V. T. & Fox, E. Preclinical evaluation of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in pediatric solid tumors. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 61, 145–150 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zander, S. A. et al. Sensitivity and acquired resistance of BRCA1;p53-deficient mouse mammary tumors to the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. Cancer Res. 70, 1700–1710 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, J. F. et al. Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1207–1214 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, D. et al. Combined inhibition of PI3K and PARP is effective in the treatment of ovarian cancer cells with wild-type PIK3CA genes. Gynecol. Oncol. 142, 548–556 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, D. et al. Effective use of PI3K inhibitor BKM120 and PARP inhibitor Olaparib to treat PIK3CA mutant ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 7, 13153–13166 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, L. et al. TGFbeta induces “BRCAness” and sensitivity to PARP inhibition in breast cancer by regulating DNA-repair genes. Mol. Cancer Res. 12, 1597–1609 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gadducci, A. & Guerrieri, M. E. PARP inhibitors alone and in combination with other biological agents in homologous recombination deficient epithelial ovarian cancer: from the basic research to the clinic. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 114, 153–165 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samol, J. et al. Safety and tolerability of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib (AZD2281) in combination with topotecan for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I study. Investig. New Drugs 30, 1493–1500 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fang, P. et al. Olaparib-induced adaptive response is disrupted by FOXM1 targeting that enhances sensitivity to PARP Inhibition. Mol. Cancer Res. 16, 961–973 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, M. & Gartel, A. L. Micelle-encapsulated thiostrepton as an effective nanomedicine for inhibiting tumor growth and for suppressing FOXM1 in human xenografts. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 2287–2297 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buchner, M. et al. Identification of FOXM1 as a therapeutic target in B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat. Commun. 6, 6471 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang, L. et al. Targeting FoxM1 by thiostrepton inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 141, 971–981 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, X. et al. Targeting of mutant p53-induced FoxM1 with thiostrepton induces cytotoxicity and enhances carboplatin sensitivity in cancer cells. Oncotarget 5, 11365–11380 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gartel, A. L. Thiostrepton, proteasome inhibitors and FOXM1. Cell cycle 10, 4341–4342 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aminake, M. N. et al. Thiostrepton and derivatives exhibit antimalarial and gametocytocidal activity by dually targeting parasite proteasome and apicoplast. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 1338–1348 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature 468, 1067–1073 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nicodeme, E. et al. Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic. Nature 468, 1119–1123 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Loven, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shi, J. & Vakoc, C. R. The mechanisms behind the therapeutic activity of BET bromodomain inhibition. Mol. Cell 54, 728–736 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, G. Q. et al. Suppression of BRD4 inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing MYC and enhancing BIM expression. Oncotarget 7, 2462–2474 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. McCleland, M. L. et al. CCAT1 is an enhancer-templated RNA that predicts BET sensitivity in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 126, 639–652 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shu, S. et al. Response and resistance to BET bromodomain inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer. Nature 529, 413–417 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. French, C. A. et al. BRD-NUT oncoproteins: a family of closely related nuclear proteins that block epithelial differentiation and maintain the growth of carcinoma cells. Oncogene 27, 2237–2242 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Da Costa, D. et al. BET inhibition as a single or combined therapeutic approach in primary paediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Blood Cancer J. 3, e126 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Delmore, J. E. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 146, 904–917 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sun, L. & Gao, P. Small molecules remain on target for c-Myc. Elife 6, e22915 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Koh, C. M., Sabo, A. & Guccione, E. Targeting MYC in cancer therapy: RNA processing offers new opportunities. Bioessays 38, 266–275 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Knoechel, B. et al. An epigenetic mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 46, 364–370 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Korkut, A. et al. Perturbation biology nominates upstream-downstream drug combinations in RAF inhibitor resistant melanoma cells. Elife 4, e04640 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Z. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in ovarian cancer by downregulating FoxM1. Theranostics 6, 219–230 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Raychaudhuri, P. & Park, H. J. FoxM1: a master regulator of tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 71, 4329–4333 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kwok, J. M. et al. FOXM1 confers acquired cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 8, 24–34 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Monteiro, L. J. et al. The Forkhead Box M1 protein regulates BRIP1 expression and DNA damage repair in epirubicin treatment. Oncogene 32, 4634–4645 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Itzen, F., Greifenberg, A. K., Bosken, C. A. & Geyer, M. Brd4 activates P-TEFb for RNA polymerase II CTD phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7577–7590 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kumar, S. et al. Coiled-coil and C2 domain-containing protein 1A (CC2D1A) promotes chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 986 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hu, W. et al. Notch3 pathway alterations in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 74, 3282–3293 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Garnier, J. M., Sharp, P. P. & Burns, C. J. BET bromodomain inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 24, 185–199 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mio, C. et al. BET proteins regulate homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair: BRCAness and implications for cancer therapy. Int. J. Cancer 144, 755–766 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, N. et al. FoxM1 inhibition sensitizes resistant glioblastoma cells to temozolomide by downregulating the expression of DNA-repair gene Rad51. Clin. Cancer Res.18, 5961–5971 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tan, Y., Raychaudhuri, P. & Costa, R. H. Chk2 mediates stabilization of the FoxM1 transcription factor to stimulate expression of DNA repair genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1007–1016 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ihnen, M. et al. Therapeutic potential of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib for the treatment of sporadic human ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 1002–1015 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Johnson, N. et al. Stabilization of mutant BRCA1 protein confers PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17041–17046 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhou, B. et al. Discovery of a small-molecule degrader of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins with picomolar cellular potencies and capable of achieving tumor regression. J. Med. Chem. 61, 462–481 (2018).

  70. Michelena, J. et al. Analysis of PARP inhibitor toxicity by multidimensional fluorescence microscopy reveals mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance. Nat. Commun. 9, 2678 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Karakashev, S. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition synergizes with PARP inhibitor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cell Rep. 21, 3398–3405 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sun, C. et al. BRD4 Inhibition Is Synthetic Lethal with PARP Inhibitors through the Induction of Homologous Recombination Deficiency. Cancer Cell 33, 401–16.e8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Yang, L. et al. Repression of BET activity sensitizes homologous recombination-proficient cancers to PARP inhibition. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal1645 (2017).

  74. Xu, W. et al. NFATC1 promotes cell growth and tumorigenesis in ovarian cancer up-regulating c-Myc through ERK1/2/p38 MAPK signal pathway. Tumour Biol. 37, 4493–4500 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Domcke, S., Sinha, R., Levine, D. A., Sander, C. & Schultz, N. Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat. Commun. 4, 2126 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Garcia, P. L. et al. The BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 suppresses growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patient-derived xenograft models. Oncogene 35, 833–845 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stordal, B. et al. BRCA1/2 mutation analysis in 41 ovarian cell lines reveals only one functionally deleterious BRCA1 mutation. Mol. Oncol. 7, 567–579 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Elstrodt, F. et al. BRCA1 mutation analysis of 41 human breast cancer cell lines reveals three new deleterious mutants. Cancer Res. 66, 41–45 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Vichai, V. & Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1112–1116 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bastola, P., Neums, L., Schoenen, F. J. & Chien, J. VCP inhibitors induce endoplasmic reticulum stress, cause cell cycle arrest, trigger caspase-mediated cell death and synergistically kill ovarian cancer cells in combination with Salubrinal. Mol. Oncol. 10, 1559–1574 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bastola, P., Neums, L., Schoenen, F.J., Chien, J. VCP inhibitors induce endoplasmic reticulum stress, cause cell cycle arrest, trigger caspase-mediated cell death and synergistically kill ovarian cancer cells in combination with Salubrinal. Mol. Oncol. 10, 1559–1574 (2016).

  83. Di Veroli, G. Y. et al. Combenefit: an interactive platform for the analysis and visualization of drug combinations. Bioinformatics 32, 2866–2868 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).

  85. Andrews, G. et al. Mammalian evolution of human cis-regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites. Science 380, eabn7930 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially funded by the University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant (JC) and T32 Training Grant, T32GM144303 (AS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

    Pingping Fang

  2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Anais Saunders & Jeremy Chien

  3. Novogene, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Kay Minn

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Katherine Jane Chua, Rebecca A. Brooks, Gary S. Leiserowitz & Jeremy Chien

  5. Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Danika Bakke

  6. Nuclear Dynamics and Cancer Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Neil Johnson

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, Pharmacology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Shaomeng Wang

Authors
  1. Pingping Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anais Saunders
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kay Minn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katherine Jane Chua
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rebecca A. Brooks
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danika Bakke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gary S. Leiserowitz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Neil Johnson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shaomeng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jeremy Chien
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.F. and J.C. wrote the initial draft. P.F., J.C., A.S., K.M., K.J.C., and D.B. performed experimental studies and data analyses. N.J., S.W., R.A.B., and G.S.L. contributed to critical reagents and resources, reviewed the final draft, and provided their expertise in DNA repair, BRD4 targeting, and oncology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Chien.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, P., Saunders, A., Minn, K. et al. BET inhibition disrupts the FOXM1-MYC axis to induce BRCAness and enhance PARP inhibitor response. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01360-x

Download citation

  • Received: 15 July 2025

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 12 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01360-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Onc.)

ISSN 2397-768X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer