Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Digital Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj digital medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 April 2026

External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction

  • Iolanda Ferreira1,2,
  • Joana Simões3,
  • João Correia3 &
  • …
  • Ana Luísa Areia1,2,4 

npj Digital Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 805 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research
  • Risk factors

Abstract

No machine learning (ML) models for predicting delivery mode after labor induction (IOL) have been externally validated. We aimed to develop and validate one using medical records. Portuguese tertiary center data (n = 2434) were used for development and internal validation, and Consortium on Safe Labor data (n = 10,591) for external validation. Outcomes are vaginal delivery (VD) or cesarean section (CS). Internal validation employed different ML approaches, aiming for model simplification. Logistic regression performed best on internal validation: AUROC:0.793; F1-score:0.748; PPV:0.752, with good calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA), being selected for simplification. Simplified top-13 features model was selected for external validation: AUROC:0.808; F1-score:0.781; PPV:0.822, tending for VD (99.6%) while avoiding false-positives (0.5%). Calibration curves underestimated CS risk by 10–75%; DCA showed good net benefit. The model’s good AUROC and DCA suggest clinical utility. Calibration curve underestimation of CS risk may result from outcome imbalance between datasets.

Similar content being viewed by others

Ensemble learning for fetal ultrasound and maternal–fetal data to predict mode of delivery after labor induction

Article Open access 03 July 2024

Machine learning prediction models for mode of delivery in prolonged pregnancies in Sweden

Article Open access 12 September 2025

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for caesarean delivery among multiparous women

Article Open access 13 February 2025

Acknowledgements

The data included in this paper were obtained from the Consortium on Safe Labor, supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, through Contract No. HHSN267200603425C. Institutions involved in the Consortium include, in alphabetical order: Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Burnes Allen Research Center, Los Angeles, CA; Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC; Indiana University Clarian Health, Indianapolis, IN; Intermountain Healthcare and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY; MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.; Summa Health System, Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH; The EMMES Corporation, Rockville MD (Data Coordinating Center); University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of Miami, Miami, FL; and University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this manuscript, which does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the NICHD.We acknowledge NICHD DASH for providing the Consortium on Safe Labor data that was used for this research.This work has received funding from the Research Grant from the Coimbra Hospital and University Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Iolanda Ferreira & Ana Luísa Areia

  2. Faculty of Medicine of University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Iolanda Ferreira & Ana Luísa Areia

  3. Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Joana Simões & João Correia

  4. ICBR Inflammation and Biomarkers Group, Coimbra, Portugal

    Ana Luísa Areia

Authors
  1. Iolanda Ferreira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joana Simões
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. João Correia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Luísa Areia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iolanda Ferreira.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, I., Simões, J., Correia, J. et al. External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction. npj Digit. Med. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02384-0

Download citation

  • Received: 11 October 2025

  • Accepted: 15 January 2026

  • Published: 28 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02384-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Evaluating the Real-World Clinical Performance of AI

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Calls for Papers
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access
  • Early Career Researcher Editorial Fellowship
  • Editorial Team Vacancies
  • News and Views Student Editor
  • Communication Fellowship

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Digital Medicine (npj Digit. Med.)

ISSN 2398-6352 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing