Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Rhizosphere microbial functions drive ecological stoichiometry in soils across an elevational gradient of a temperate mountain ecosystem
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 January 2026

Rhizosphere microbial functions drive ecological stoichiometry in soils across an elevational gradient of a temperate mountain ecosystem

  • Yi Yang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6722-594X1,2,3,4,
  • Kaiyang Qiu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-09681,2,3,4,
  • Yanqing Zhang1,2,3,4,
  • Qianqian Cui5,
  • Wangsuo Liu6,
  • Yanju Guo1,2,3,4,
  • Hongyan Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-44397 &
  • …
  • Yingzhong Xie1,2,3,4 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biodiversity
  • Element cycles
  • Microbial ecology
  • Soil microbiology

Abstract

The soil microbiome plays a vital role in maintaining soil nutrient levels and ecological stoichiometry balance. However, the relationships between rhizosphere microbiomes and soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics, including organic carbon (SC), total nitrogen (SN), total phosphorus (SP), and their ratios, remain poorly understood. Here, we used a temperate mountain ecosystem as a natural laboratory along a ~ 2190 m elevational gradient spanning a desert steppe-alpine meadow transition. We investigated rhizosphere microbiomes from 20 dominant plant populations across 17 sites by integrating environmental factors, microbial community structure, functional genes, microbial biomass, and ectorhizosphere soil stoichiometric characteristics. Ectorhizosphere soil stoichiometric characteristics were significantly associated with microbial biomass stoichiometric characteristics, rhizosphere community composition, and C-, N-, and P-cycling genes, with functional genes emerging as the strongest predictors. Structural equation modeling further identified the composition and diversity of functional genes as key drivers of soil stoichiometric characteristics. Geographic and edaphic factors exerted primarily direct effects, whereas climatic influences were indirect and mediated through the rhizosphere microbiome. These findings highlight the rhizosphere microbiome as a critical biological filter linking climate to soil nutrient stoichiometry at the root-soil interface.

Similar content being viewed by others

Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions

Article Open access 11 February 2022

Drivers of soil microbial and detritivore activity across global grasslands

Article Open access 01 December 2023

Soil microbiomes show consistent and predictable responses to extreme events

Article Open access 27 November 2024

Data availability

The absolute quantitative sequencing and metagenomic sequencing data are publicly available in the Genome Sequence Archive at the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, under accession numbers CRA022703 (bacteria), CRA022707 (fungi), and CRA022858 (metagenome). The datasets supporting the findings of this study, including source data for all figures and tables as well as statistical analysis outputs, are provided in Supplementary Data 1–7.

References

  1. Yang, R. et al. Nitrogen inhibitors improve soil ecosystem multifunctionality by enhancing soil quality and alleviating microbial nitrogen limitation. Sci. Total Environ. 880, 163238 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, P. et al. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1008–1028 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feng, L. et al. Globally increased cropland soil exposure to climate extremes in recent decades. Nat. Commun. 16, 4354 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, S., Zamanian, K., Schleuss, P.-M., Zarebanadkouki, M. & Kuzyakov, Y. Degradation of Tibetan grasslands: consequences for carbon and nutrient cycles. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 252, 93–104 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y. et al. Patterns and driving factors of soil ecological stoichiometry in typical ecologically fragile areas of China. Catena 219, 106628 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiao, S. et al. Core microbiota in agricultural soils and their potential associations with nutrient cycling. mSystems 4, e00313–e00318 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broadbent, A. A. D. et al. Climate change disrupts the seasonal coupling of plant and soil microbial nutrient cycling in an alpine ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17245 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, M. et al. Microbial diversity and keystone species drive soil nutrient cycling and multifunctionality following mangrove restoration. Environ. Res. 251, 118715 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, Z. et al. Microorganisms maintain C:N stoichiometric balance by regulating the priming effect in long-term fertilized soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 167, 104033 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, J., Luo, Y. & Chen, J. Dilemmas in linking microbial carbon use efficiency with soil organic carbon dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70047 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang, S. et al. Microbial community succession in soil is mainly driven by carbon and nitrogen contents rather than phosphorus and sulphur contents. Soil Biol. Biochem. 180, 109019 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, T. et al. Synergy of saprotrophs with mycorrhiza for litter decomposition and hotspot formation depends on nutrient availability in the rhizosphere. Geoderma 410, 115662 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, K. K. et al. Functional regimes define soil microbiome response to environmental change. Nature 644, 1028–1038 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knight, C. G. et al. Soil microbiomes show consistent and predictable responses to extreme events. Nature 636, 690–696 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naylor, D. et al. Soil Microbiomes Under Climate Change and Implications for Carbon Cycling. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 29–59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Canarini, A. et al. Ecological memory of recurrent drought modifies soil processes via changes in soil microbial community. Nat. Commun. 12, 5308 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu, W. et al. Biochar and organic fertilizer applications enhance soil functional microbial abundance and agroecosystem multifunctionality. Biochar 6, 3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, J. & Sinsabaugh, R. L. Linking microbial functional gene abundance and soil extracellular enzyme activity: Implications for soil carbon dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1322–1325 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, L. et al. Reduction of microbial diversity in grassland soil is driven by long-term climate warming. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1054–1062 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, M. et al. Increased plant productivity exacerbates subsoil carbon losses under warming via nitrogen mining. Nat. Geosci. 18, 510–517 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, M. et al. Warming promotes nitrogen and carbon cycles in global grassland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 2505–2518 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. He, X. et al. Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5831–5846 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fan, Y. et al. Responses of soil phosphorus fractions after nitrogen addition in a subtropical forest ecosystem: Insights from decreased Fe and Al oxides and increased plant roots. Geoderma 337, 246–255 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Philippot, L., Chenu, C., Kappler, A., Rillig, M. C. & Fierer, N. The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 226–239 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gao, Y. et al. The dominance of K-strategy microbes enhances the potential of soil carbon decomposition under long-term warming. Appl. Soil Ecol. 206, 105854 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jia, J. et al. Unlocking soil health: are microbial functional genes effective indicators? Soil Biol. Biochem. 204, 109768 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, H. et al. Metagenomic insights into inhibition of soil microbial carbon metabolism by phosphorus limitation during vegetation succession. ISME Commun. 4, ycae128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Louca, S. et al. Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 936–943 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, H., La, S., Zhang, X., Gao, L. & Tian, Y. Salt-induced recruitment of specific root-associated bacterial consortium capable of enhancing plant adaptability to salt stress. ISME J. 15, 2865–2882 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pantigoso, H. A., Ossowicki, A., Stringlis, I. A. & Carrión, V. J. Hub metabolites at the root-microbiome interface: unlocking plant drought resilience. Trends Plant Sci. 30, 1046–1059 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Osburn, E. D., McBride, S. G., Bahram, M. & Strickland, M. S. Global patterns in the growth potential of soil bacterial communities. Nat. Commun. 15, 6881 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, X. et al. A global relationship between genome size and encoded carbon metabolic strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol. Lett. 28, e70064 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, G. et al. Soil and microbial C:N:P stoichiometries play vital roles in regulating P transformation in agricultural ecosystems: a review. Pedosphere 34, 44–51 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hou, E. et al. Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3344–3356 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. He, J. et al. Driving factors for soil C:N ratio in woody plant communities across northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Catena 233, 107504 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, W. et al. Rhizosphere effect and water constraint jointly determined the roles of microorganism in soil phosphorus cycling in arid desert regions. Catena 222, 106809 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, X. et al. Soil metagenomics reveals reduced tillage improves soil functional profiles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in bulk and rhizosphere soils. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 379, 109371 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Luo, C., He, Y. & Chen, Y. Rhizosphere microbiome regulation: unlocking the potential for plant growth. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 8, 100322 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, X., Li, F., Wu, F., Zhang, X. & Ni, X. Top-down gene upregulation and not microbial community diversity in explaining local-scale litter decomposition. Biol. Fertil. Soils 60, 1085–1097 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, Y.-F. et al. Biological interactions mediate soil functions by altering rare microbial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 5866–5877 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, C. et al. Soil microbiota modulates root transcriptome with divergent effect on maize growth under low and high phosphorus inputs. Plant Cell Environ. 48, 2132–2144 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Krause, H.-M. et al. Organic cropping systems alter metabolic potential and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling capacity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 203, 109737 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, X. et al. Microbial carbon and phosphorus metabolism regulated by C:N:P stoichiometry stimulates organic carbon accumulation in agricultural soils. Soil Tillage Res. 242, 106152 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Qin, S., Zhang, D., Wei, B. & Yang, Y. Dual roles of microbes in mediating soil carbon dynamics in response to warming. Nat. Commun. 15, 6439 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, S. et al. Intrinsic microbial temperature sensitivity and soil organic carbon decomposition in response to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17395 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, J. et al. Multiple global change factors alter the scaling of nitrogen to phosphorus in alpine plants. Funct. Ecol. 39, 2044–2055 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bickel, S. & Or, D. Aqueous habitats and carbon inputs shape the microscale geography and interaction ranges of soil bacteria. Commun. Biol. 6, 322 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Huang, H., Calabrese, S. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Variability of ecosystem carbon source from microbial respiration is controlled by rainfall dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2115283118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Oram, N. J. et al. Plant community composition and traits modulate the impacts of drought intensity on soil microbial community composition and function. Soil Biol. Biochem. 200, 109644 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yang, Y., Liu, B.-R. & An, S.-S. Ecological stoichiometry in leaves, roots, litters and soil among different plant communities in a desertified region of Northern China. Catena 166, 328–338 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ma, Y. et al. Soil bacterial diversity drives shifts in dominant plants’ fine root C:N:P stoichiometry across an altitudinal gradient. Appl. Soil Ecol. 215, 106486 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bönisch, E. et al. Mycorrhizal type and tree diversity affect foliar elemental pools and stoichiometry. N. Phytol. 242, 1614–1629 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yang, Y. et al. Geographical, climatic, and soil factors control the altitudinal pattern of rhizosphere microbial diversity and its driving effect on root zone soil multifunctionality in mountain ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 904, 166932 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Guo, L. et al. Correlations and stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, and P contents in Juniperus saltuaria plants, litter, and soil in the Sygera Mountains, southeastern Xizang, China. J. Mt. Sci. 21, 4254–4268 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. & Jenkinson, D. S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 703–707 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G. & Jenkinson, D. S. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 837–842 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brookes, P. C., Powlson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. Phosphorus in the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 169–175 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cleveland, C. C. & Liptzin, D. C. :N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85, 235–252 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Marcos, M. S., Bertiller, M. B. & Olivera, N. L. Microbial community composition and network analyses in arid soils of the Patagonian Monte under grazing disturbance reveal an important response of the community to soil particle size. Appl. Soil Ecol. 138, 223–232 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tourlousse, D. M. et al. Synthetic spike-in standards for high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e23 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, H. et al. Organic substitutions improve soil quality and maize yield through increasing soil microbial diversity. J. Clean. Prod. 347, 131323 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wang, Q. et al. Microbial regulation of net N mineralisation is driven by C, N, P content and stoichiometry. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 73, e13257 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tan, X., Yang, Y.-L., Liu, Y.-W., Li, X. & Zhu, W.-B. Quantitative ecology associations between heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification, nitrogen-metabolism genes, and key bacteria in a tidal flow constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. 337, 125449 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tickle, T. L., Segata, N., Waldron, L., Weingart, U. & Huttenhower, C. Two-stage microbial community experimental design. ISME J. 7, 2330–2339 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Blankenberg, D. et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 89, Unit 19.10.11–Unit 19.1021 (2010).

  66. Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, J. et al. Grazing promotes soil phosphorus cycling by enhancing soil microbial functional genes for phosphorus transformation in plant rhizosphere in a semi-arid natural grassland. Geoderma 430, 116303 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tu, Q. et al. NCycDB: a curated integrative database for fast and accurate metagenomic profiling of nitrogen cycling genes. Bioinformatics 35, 1040–1048 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zeng, J. et al. PCycDB: a comprehensive and accurate database for fast analysis of phosphorus cycling genes. Microbiome 10, 101 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yang, C. et al. Soil salinity regulation of soil microbial carbon metabolic function in the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci. Total Environ. 790, 148258 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Huang, H. LinkET: Everything Is Linkable. R Package Version 03. Vienna (2021).

  72. Wang, K. et al. Biogeographic patterns of soil microbial biomass in alpine ecosystems depend on local rather than regional drivers. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 34, e70095 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lai, J. et al. glmm.hp: an R package for computing individual effect of predictors in generalized linear mixed models. J. Plant Ecol. 15, 1302–1307 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Köninger, J. et al. Ecosystem type drives soil eukaryotic diversity and composition in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 5706–5719 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Liu, X. et al. Long-term soil warming decreases soil microbial necromass carbon by adversely affecting its production and decomposition. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17379 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Lefcheck, J. S. & Freckleton, R. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling inr for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wu, L. et al. Land abandonment transforms soil microbiome stability and functional profiles in apple orchards of the Chinese Losses Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 906, 167556 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42001095); Ningxia Young Top-Notch Talent Cultivation Program (Document No. 236 [2024] of Ningxia Human Resources and Social Security Department); Ningxia Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program (Document No. 2 [2025] of Ningxia Association for Science and Technology); the High-Level Talent Introduction Research Start-up Funding of Hetao College of China (HYRC202401); and the Ecological Environment Innovation Team Building of Hetao College of China (HTKCT-A202408). We are grateful to Prof. Xiaowei Li at Ningxia University for his assistance in site selection and plant recognition. We thank Yeyun Huang, Yayuan Li, Yi He, and Kai Yang for their help with field sampling and laboratory analyses. We also appreciate the support from the Ningxia Helan Mountain National Nature Reserve Administration and the Inner Mongolia Helan Mountain National Nature Reserve Administration. We express our sincere gratitude to the editor and reviewers for their constructive feedback and insightful comments. Yi Yang gratefully acknowledges the support of the Ningxia Agricultural Publicity and Education Exhibition Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forestry and Grassland Science, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

    Yi Yang, Kaiyang Qiu, Yanqing Zhang, Yanju Guo & Yingzhong Xie

  2. Ningxia Grassland and Animal Husbandry Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan, China

    Yi Yang, Kaiyang Qiu, Yanqing Zhang, Yanju Guo & Yingzhong Xie

  3. Breeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Yinchuan, China

    Yi Yang, Kaiyang Qiu, Yanqing Zhang, Yanju Guo & Yingzhong Xie

  4. Northern Yanchi Desert Steppe Observation and Research Station of Ningxia, Wuzhong, China

    Yi Yang, Kaiyang Qiu, Yanqing Zhang, Yanju Guo & Yingzhong Xie

  5. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

    Qianqian Cui

  6. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Hetao College, Bayannur, Inner Mongolia, China

    Wangsuo Liu

  7. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Hongyan Liu

Authors
  1. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaiyang Qiu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanqing Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qianqian Cui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wangsuo Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanju Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongyan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yingzhong Xie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.Y.Q. and H.Y.L. conceived and designed the study. Y.Y., Y.Q.Z., W.S.L., and Y.J.G. conducted field sampling and laboratory experiments. Y.Y. conducted all statistical analyses, generated figures, and drafted the initial manuscript. K.Y.Q., H.Y.L., Q.Q.C., and Y.Z.X. revised it. K.Y.Q., Y.Y., and W.S.L. provided resources and funding. All authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kaiyang Qiu or Hongyan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: David Favero.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Informations

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Qiu, K., Zhang, Y. et al. Rhizosphere microbial functions drive ecological stoichiometry in soils across an elevational gradient of a temperate mountain ecosystem. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09553-7

Download citation

  • Received: 10 March 2025

  • Accepted: 08 January 2026

  • Published: 31 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09553-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing